From nobody Fri Jul 1 09:08:36 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294A212D74F for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 09:08:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.601 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fDXk-xYX8XIJ for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 09:08:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD3D312D754 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 09:08:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pa0-x236.google.com with SMTP id hl6so40030086pac.2 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 09:08:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bCJTMicR4IWAO44ZGIJRMcxiRfNtZMJVgpw945mlTGw=; b=0hbmgVcqrNGZuNPuSEALhkvkHpJjCKcO31KV9XHY5ZrjbB4dTMp+e46NuXUxb0Xp5w 49IIe5zuAT5/F2+Ky8JPPLeCgdXG0q7dL33dn1Yiu5Q4gEdPjVUBNbGqoCoVvwXvi0YZ KtwOjgkC4Td5d2FkD1ryOyAHGIp5neau1fTJ/ACA2rYV/fP21W7Kpjnmvhr+WgJCdagq RksV3lbzUW4nOrz6aj0pQUzk/ZrzkoMOPNc4DsuipnLEdzUb4/ZIXRp5GhA1NNPYga7W U0mCU+zIH2SrhQv5ygr3tV43b8RVfJ1Ta6A6LnZUBVHtSO7M1o1vcjZUHjFsG3RpJ7eK HYEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bCJTMicR4IWAO44ZGIJRMcxiRfNtZMJVgpw945mlTGw=; b=Xr8EdWYXQLmklCwyEI6BolWXT+6lo/4ltlx/UnQtmx99mNgpcCob/70SAWhT91Mr56 IMVhNBjuC2u3iKS6h9lZt2BYjzFZjxa8eQHWvUzh4afIfQzhhJKvrhaV6S80KqWu1DO0 ofbVZJetApp6YW3MalyTq4MIeMAwvN/7fegr1dZ9Rr3hrQkDBRy+rKmkPZFDbjp4Dkz8 lz54kco61LACgMpkNNh0uNhaN8uAdTtmgZR75qk7axz1aQPbA7QeVJ/I9stEeNLHrfR0 vmEmoBp+V0dPxvS2q8I9tLHHqfHFHL3PTTsLICVO2VcvjhgX73THEZwc3LyLELT/1zMj CC/A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLbiCaut501apl67Q4JE5ip7Z+jOkq1FbdMwSEnwfbd7e6xA1Nk747Ep/J+zpLjOXJL X-Received: by 10.66.236.69 with SMTP id us5mr32709189pac.69.1467389305202; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 09:08:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:101:80fc:224:fc9a:7708:25af:1dee? ([2620:101:80fc:224:fc9a:7708:25af:1dee]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z29sm6813561pff.0.2016.07.01.09.08.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Jul 2016 09:08:24 -0700 (PDT) To: Martin Thomson , "webpush@ietf.org" , JR Conlin References: From: jr conlin Message-ID: Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 09:08:23 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/49.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Webpush] vapid issue 24: supplementary data in tokens X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 16:08:34 -0000 I think it's absolutely fine to point out the additional claims. It may also be a good idea to provide some guidance about what name prefix to use to avoid potential conflicts should this header be compounded like the Crypto-Key header. (e.g. """ Subscription providers may wish to include additional information using prefixed keys such as { "vap_servid": "ami-123", "vap_custid": "abc012", ...} to assist in quickly isolating and resolving issues with a given feed. """ It may also be worth noting that some servers (like apache) limit the maximum acceptable size of headers to 8K, so it's best not to go too nuts with the amount of extra data you're storing. On 6/30/2016 7:02 PM, Martin Thomson wrote: > JR requests that we allow the inclusion of extra stuff in a vapid token: > > https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-vapid/issues/24 > As noted in the arguments of #23, there is a need for an "extra data" > field which would be used by the parties using the VAPID claims. This > data would contain information useful to the publisher of the claim > (e.g. the originating server ID, transaction ID, or other possibly > VAPID consumer opaque data). > > This extra data ("vapid-ext" ?) field would allow consistent, > predictable definition rather than a set of 'one-offs' that may be > difficult to find or ignored by operators. > <<< > > I think that the general idea is fine. Better this than trying to > pack the "sub" field with extra stuff. > > JR, would it suffice to point out that the > [private](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7519#section-4.3) (or even > [public](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7519#section-4.2)) claims can > be added to the token? Allowing multiple fields gives the application > server a fair bit more flexibility. > > If that's OK, we should point out that this is possible so that push > services don't lose the extra data because they aren't aware that it > might exist. From nobody Fri Jul 1 11:19:49 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB43C12D75A for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:19:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3r6HqnnqTzZW for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:19:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E434512D0F5 for ; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:19:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id f30so107032839ioj.2 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 11:19:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E2t9ByWXKHtEH8meSYJHJgNG27ZDG3qFD0fo25hN7iE=; b=1ZQ6O4Ttsy4p/B8x+BSFxhAuITBZx26z+jNKkmHCOCcfvr8G073fkVaTZyFATwCRCp 2ty07ef1sAciY7uxtbYnnwNvqHeCEmid87o5/vnn4aYG28XOMf9mZivNITfZaneL12Yw jrUb7L2ugnN0VNjEpkFXxPosiyv6taN6E1cL4uVuGffmjjlnqxZ0W6xN5/nP8Y2cA06Y 3dzVn6TGF2ODQPo3W+P6YjIfx3v1ddlysbzP2uoQc/Kcn/MrWZWZ1BUBMv+wr78XMJ1n xcwGJ7u+ZnunXdceYr60RCxYm66cm6w9hUfFokotGiz8ZzOqZEPKpg434D6XLkjpLo31 MvwA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E2t9ByWXKHtEH8meSYJHJgNG27ZDG3qFD0fo25hN7iE=; b=CzSeuuYOIZ+z8RQu96vA5p8eevsvp9krrau8rclfiBkg/XgTPwApba6ESFA7+MVeZw BYvc/hNjHjqsx17jO+qmgD+5ycSo6z7qHo71rPT2OKEc2RbpHa4M9MnHafJ8hPa9EIpc mvwfK1EDrYYl4YLHPHZig+GNdnQHmQ3q7LmaZ0yiE9C6i8IXASzChBlEdlWP1QaW3F45 zhsiKUsY90FprVs54kaAbJkPDOpDBwgD/oQrWNdgI1qm6EOAIw1aMZ5hns2htKnr/qVj 5haGGHg6q33p1MZEGsWy17s5PaYNMmuROKgciZSgCF+AHzScBToa1e8GtzyJFlGlLafI 1P7g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI1BuyqH02FxX2KWITCcENlUoK/U+bvi/mUNWBLJTCBrj1LFXrDSkiUf6eWeLA6ugtMbVxLq6tfNc2Sed3+ X-Received: by 10.107.132.28 with SMTP id g28mr23847294iod.34.1467397184213; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 11:19:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.70.71 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:19:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <786718A2-C28D-436C-B91D-B3217F459F2E@mozilla.com> References: <786718A2-C28D-436C-B91D-B3217F459F2E@mozilla.com> From: Benjamin Bangert Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2016 11:19:43 -0700 Message-ID: To: Kit Cambridge Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f377ae8f84d05369707a9 Archived-At: Cc: jr conlin , "webpush@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again) X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 18:19:48 -0000 --001a113f377ae8f84d05369707a9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'm happy with the draft as-is. Thanks to the editors and chairs. Cheers, Ben On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Kit Cambridge wrote: > I support the draft, with gratitude to the editors and chairs for their > hard work. > > Cheers, > - kit > > > On Jun 23, 2016, at 5:23 PM, jr conlin wrote: > > I have no additional concerns or requests for this protocol, and support > this draft. > > Huge thanks to the editors and contributors for their patience and > understanding. > > On 6/23/2016 12:58 AM, Shida Schubert wrote: > > All; > > As I noted on the e-mail I sent out on June 7th after the initial WGLC for > webpush protocol draft, we are commencing another WGLC as there are no > remaining issues on github AND the authors have produced the 06 version of > the draft reflecting all resolutions. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-06 > > If you have any issues or questions regarding the draft please submit it > to the list, when raising issues please provide constructive resolution > whenever possible. > > PLEASE acknowledge on the list when you are content/happy with the status > of the draft and you see no issue passing it forward to IESG for > publication. > > The WGLC will conclude at the end of the day on July 8th PST. > > Shida > As co-chair > > > _______________________________________________ > Webpush mailing listWebpush@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush > > > _______________________________________________ > Webpush mailing list > Webpush@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush > > > > _______________________________________________ > Webpush mailing list > Webpush@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush > > --001a113f377ae8f84d05369707a9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm happy with the draft as-is. Thanks to th= e editors and chairs.

Cheers,
Ben

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:0= 6 AM, Kit Cambridge <kcambridge@mozilla.com> wrote:
=
I suppor= t the draft, with gratitude to the editors and chairs for their hard work.<= div>
Cheers,
- kit

<= br>
On Jun 23, 2016, at 5:23 PM, jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com> wrote:
=20 =20 =20
I have no additional concerns or requests for this protocol, and support this draft.

Huge thanks to the editors and contributors for their patience and understanding.

On 6/23/2016 12:58 AM, Shida Schubert wrote:
=20
All;

As I noted on the e-mail I sent out on June 7th after the initial WGLC for webpush protocol draft, we are commencing another WGLC as there are no remaining issues on github AND the authors have produced the 06 version of the draft reflecting all resolutions.


If you have any issues or questions regarding the draft please submit it to the list, when raising issues please provide constructive resolution whenever possible.

PLEASE acknowledge on the list when you are content/happy with the status of the draft and you see no issue passing it forward to IESG for publication.=C2=A0

The WGLC will conclude at the end of the day on July 8th PST.

Shida
As co-chair


_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush


_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
= Webpush@ietf.org<= br>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush


____________________________________= ___________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush


--001a113f377ae8f84d05369707a9-- From nobody Sun Jul 3 08:13:19 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1FC12D093 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 08:13:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DS5IuTFnbS8w for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 08:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5FA412B031 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2016 08:13:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f6so103683073lfg.0 for ; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 08:13:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6FS0/Zn544fjM1McgHZreF4lGY229fIqaNcA9qA1uiM=; b=XBba9Xi2Pk33d/Zv6qDDqC1rICx5cpZ2M/lxyajbVeeR/Eyav+3sZ6ZGsvoU1dQA/K cQzXQB+I5WW2jzL0akOKqF6cw5Lp6xZBttktNob/tK6k6XHTAI+MQYJDjvCLUbNRkn0+ Df8ZWEZCD+Asg4uemC87OtoccFKZTKAILp0yHPABxqNl0by0fiIeMWFf1Ap3c2y8Ir/J lo/tjvYGoQ+T6ZY9ha5IXP7rKW0VcIoZDARFAtjFgJbkgtfyJuEKbcCZLRSXHuTto9gE vLYAHhMVdKAX4o7dOMB0E0eH1PqY3O3GXM4OmVsJ5fzzIdF6Jod+z6CoBiTF7EQ8GToP O0RA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6FS0/Zn544fjM1McgHZreF4lGY229fIqaNcA9qA1uiM=; b=API1LFSFmN8gHspPz1+mjX4p03MGSndMajGE5oUAGo/HOmja2igEwGdM69xnzLYGy5 KlJPjVfZ0JLSm6LzA5geUaF1SWDPcRgb7qXeL6dSQR79PZvLman6Y8Dyn6ctvXcwagl2 znbkyQxU/BRkLHvnlSLPTFCfqqzY1JgygFAUmOtq4fWNzk12PQZlWkzXzQh+BH+jGhe4 JvSKjJifckJ61llGe45OKvvFaaZ7fwPTqTfRg7O5xrGQKYO/iREpcrwksEHubTVuuSb3 ij678oaplw6RbYqGc3GyjwulzyGuZiJTyyvZfzcj/qaQLsdkHiixBpmlfCENGEVoC0Wq kj0w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIeTcSLntAa61fcW7kH06Lq8Pn+BrARcQnRjn//zIGJwRmJ1sTRT0Pl88hu3Rr54MGhDyEBWDRX+DmlYw== X-Received: by 10.25.31.77 with SMTP id f74mr1923861lff.215.1467558793564; Sun, 03 Jul 2016 08:13:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <786718A2-C28D-436C-B91D-B3217F459F2E@mozilla.com> In-Reply-To: From: Costin Manolache Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 15:13:03 +0000 Message-ID: To: Benjamin Bangert , Kit Cambridge Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140246093d8920536bca8b9 Archived-At: Cc: jr conlin , "webpush@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again) X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2016 15:13:18 -0000 --001a1140246093d8920536bca8b9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 +1 Costin On Fri, Jul 1, 2016, 9:19 PM Benjamin Bangert wrote: > I'm happy with the draft as-is. Thanks to the editors and chairs. > > Cheers, > Ben > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Kit Cambridge > wrote: > >> I support the draft, with gratitude to the editors and chairs for their >> hard work. >> >> Cheers, >> - kit >> >> >> On Jun 23, 2016, at 5:23 PM, jr conlin wrote: >> >> I have no additional concerns or requests for this protocol, and support >> this draft. >> >> Huge thanks to the editors and contributors for their patience and >> understanding. >> >> On 6/23/2016 12:58 AM, Shida Schubert wrote: >> >> All; >> >> As I noted on the e-mail I sent out on June 7th after the initial WGLC >> for webpush protocol draft, we are commencing another WGLC as there are no >> remaining issues on github AND the authors have produced the 06 version of >> the draft reflecting all resolutions. >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-06 >> >> If you have any issues or questions regarding the draft please submit it >> to the list, when raising issues please provide constructive resolution >> whenever possible. >> >> PLEASE acknowledge on the list when you are content/happy with the status >> of the draft and you see no issue passing it forward to IESG for >> publication. >> >> The WGLC will conclude at the end of the day on July 8th PST. >> >> Shida >> As co-chair >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Webpush mailing listWebpush@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Webpush mailing list >> Webpush@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Webpush mailing list >> Webpush@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush >> >> > _______________________________________________ > Webpush mailing list > Webpush@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush > --001a1140246093d8920536bca8b9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

+1

Costin


On Fri, Jul 1, 2016, 9:19 P= M Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@moz= illa.com> wrote:
I'm happy with the draft as-is. Thanks to the editors a= nd chairs.

Cheers,
Ben

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Kit C= ambridge <kcambridge@mozilla.com> wrote:
I support the draft= , with gratitude to the editors and chairs for their hard work.

Cheers,
- kit


On Jun 23, = 2016, at 5:23 PM, jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com> wrote:

=20 =20 =20
I have no additional concerns or requests for this protocol, and support this draft.

Huge thanks to the editors and contributors for their patience and understanding.

On 6/23/2016 12:58 AM, Shida Schubert wrote:
=20
All;

As I noted on the e-mail I sent out on June 7th after the initial WGLC for webpush protocol draft, we are commencing another WGLC as there are no remaining issues on github AND the authors have produced the 06 version of the draft reflecting all resolutions.


If you have any issues or questions regarding the draft please submit it to the list, when raising issues please provide constructive resolution whenever possible.

PLEASE acknowledge on the list when you are content/happy with the status of the draft and you see no issue passing it forward to IESG for publication.=C2=A0

The WGLC will conclude at the end of the day on July 8th PST.

Shida
As co-chair


_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush


_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
= Webpush@ietf.org<= br>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush


____________________________________= ___________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org<= br> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush


_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org<= br> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
--001a1140246093d8920536bca8b9-- From nobody Tue Jul 5 11:39:00 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD4B12D685 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:38:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.012 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.012 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2N1z7DVoQpqY for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:38:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM03-DM3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm3nam03on0107.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.41.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1294912D5F6 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 11:38:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Bu/6PDUjISBPn5bsgPrSFV86Bq17g4CL3lmRBC+Cmd4=; b=dBumtYJDFrtd5Ohw6vomxVcU81dCMhj/sERsGVpjdPvST2e9A7mWddvrTZSJ3nzp69M882Jv99wFM7lJW5tnUiXhyf3Vy801fw210m5YOLzFeRZDv3YIyEko4LcAJwX0skD+qDMC0uUisYpMGAkHypZ6m86ugA8qFZlV2wuWi3M= Received: from BN1PR0301MB0626.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.171.11) by BN1PR0301MB0628.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.160.171.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.528.16; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:38:45 +0000 Received: from BN1PR0301MB0626.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.171.11]) by BN1PR0301MB0626.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.171.11]) with mapi id 15.01.0534.015; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:38:45 +0000 From: Elio Damaggio To: Costin Manolache , Benjamin Bangert , Kit Cambridge Thread-Topic: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again) Thread-Index: AQHRzSUfxKm/y7lLd0moC8xCAnwldJ/3PMYAgAShggCACBG0gIAC8IOAgANeEfA= Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 18:38:44 +0000 Message-ID: References: <786718A2-C28D-436C-B91D-B3217F459F2E@mozilla.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=elioda@microsoft.com; x-originating-ip: [131.107.160.231] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 0579a3b9-ff0c-4a0a-1b84-08d3a50398bc x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BN1PR0301MB0628; 6:bm4IWehPdYcdjqx/Nik3NLMeiq1IT1J7cRIdDpA9wpUF3CNvD32p46cayC9R1JvJYC0E4CxcKM3c1VZmrndR1Fl+G8cBzUT82E6IdJq5FHSUHzifWwaf38tGNBjG55AmG3p3k+lpqt0f9ZoRrkqWYsD8NYMKd7G8HBiWTLt/EyLpLe6ILrpmuTS/CXoGl4OV4OcI2hy5wD4s9D0E7lSfK6+aH3iDGUy6AmkdR+0lpWyc4/LbYggvbyr8McN3DvSbC2AlLAHaNR9NxQrM2dQft1Ij0dhbH4j0/1TJ1ItvfL5cWmqbSTsV/NZ+K/wcNrt/BR2YefIq0NFxDvM9oOQbkw==; 5:OkGF05mHPkJ1cX9GGnwP0YGOruDJcqWI9NI2te8QVzgPZ3LAbKdVoZ54sWtLRYpfkQexvQ3GaXbitC2uiVRxPJa7AgI3QK2iLdBc2duPNaB7A52rFpqI8YCIStCbio96hKFcCVjn034bJ+B/tXWiLQ==; 24:+J3TMYRhOAW48k2YNX01Vo6UGK2NBVrQHKWFg2zb9p7E+Ls6nSyYrxM+qIpvqvR1KtXc51iVX+7h/c8UriKmPY8BQFD4DhUVATCgUKCjRWU=; 7:22BaUEUq5RNOXjmFbaroU/clHPw7cSlnnIVQe/6W040zL2uy8SzSaTIAX31erpe0g3REX5Ya+/gVyreIKBiJ5mcg+BZDydfscJHFPGuXlsrLNSQRdIKjLMd1Cbfwo9x4GHZ6gbc2f0kNS1bn/Y5B8rlgxQObMtfisKQwGAnvogJ8WVCTNihKM2om3t+rpdZsQQ1hiTIlDE2rC2K94IbfQgn69ZRyy2w3r9iLZdq8HjziTilcxRA3e1VN6Kco7xA2 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BN1PR0301MB0628; x-o365eop-header: O365_EOP: Allow for Unauthenticated Relay x-o365ent-eop-header: Message processed by - O365_ENT: Allow from ranges (Engineering ONLY) x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(189930954265078)(219752817060721)(21748063052155); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:BN1PR0301MB0628; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BN1PR0301MB0628; x-forefront-prvs: 0994F5E0C5 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(7916002)(199003)(24454002)(377454003)(189002)(19617315012)(86362001)(92566002)(99286002)(122556002)(50986999)(68736007)(3660700001)(3280700002)(15975445007)(19300405004)(76176999)(10090500001)(19625215002)(76576001)(54356999)(9686002)(93886004)(230783001)(5005710100001)(10290500002)(10400500002)(8936002)(86612001)(19609705001)(101416001)(77096005)(19580405001)(8990500004)(19580395003)(81156014)(7906003)(7846002)(106116001)(81166006)(7736002)(586003)(74316002)(8676002)(2906002)(16236675004)(33656002)(105586002)(5003600100003)(7696003)(66066001)(106356001)(790700001)(6116002)(5002640100001)(97736004)(2900100001)(102836003)(5001770100001)(11100500001)(4326007)(3846002)(87936001)(2950100001)(189998001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN1PR0301MB0628; H:BN1PR0301MB0626.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BN1PR0301MB0626DD9C035F2C7B908C1A7ECB390BN1PR0301MB0626_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Jul 2016 18:38:45.0847 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN1PR0301MB0628 Archived-At: Cc: jr conlin , "webpush@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again) X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 18:38:50 -0000 --_000_BN1PR0301MB0626DD9C035F2C7B908C1A7ECB390BN1PR0301MB0626_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 KzENCg0KRWxpbw0KDQpGcm9tOiBXZWJwdXNoIFttYWlsdG86d2VicHVzaC1ib3VuY2VzQGlldGYu b3JnXSBPbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgQ29zdGluIE1hbm9sYWNoZQ0KU2VudDogU3VuZGF5LCBKdWx5IDMs IDIwMTYgODoxMyBBTQ0KVG86IEJlbmphbWluIEJhbmdlcnQgPGJiYW5nZXJ0QG1vemlsbGEuY29t PjsgS2l0IENhbWJyaWRnZSA8a2NhbWJyaWRnZUBtb3ppbGxhLmNvbT4NCkNjOiBqciBjb25saW4g PGpjb25saW5AbW96aWxsYS5jb20+OyB3ZWJwdXNoQGlldGYub3JnDQpTdWJqZWN0OiBSZTogW1dl YnB1c2hdIFdHTEMgZm9yIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtd2VicHVzaC1wcm90b2NvbCAoYWdhaW4pDQoNCg0K KzENCg0KQ29zdGluDQoNCk9uIEZyaSwgSnVsIDEsIDIwMTYsIDk6MTkgUE0gQmVuamFtaW4gQmFu Z2VydCA8YmJhbmdlcnRAbW96aWxsYS5jb208bWFpbHRvOmJiYW5nZXJ0QG1vemlsbGEuY29tPj4g d3JvdGU6DQpJJ20gaGFwcHkgd2l0aCB0aGUgZHJhZnQgYXMtaXMuIFRoYW5rcyB0byB0aGUgZWRp dG9ycyBhbmQgY2hhaXJzLg0KQ2hlZXJzLA0KQmVuDQoNCk9uIFN1biwgSnVuIDI2LCAyMDE2IGF0 IDg6MDYgQU0sIEtpdCBDYW1icmlkZ2UgPGtjYW1icmlkZ2VAbW96aWxsYS5jb208bWFpbHRvOmtj YW1icmlkZ2VAbW96aWxsYS5jb20+PiB3cm90ZToNCkkgc3VwcG9ydCB0aGUgZHJhZnQsIHdpdGgg Z3JhdGl0dWRlIHRvIHRoZSBlZGl0b3JzIGFuZCBjaGFpcnMgZm9yIHRoZWlyIGhhcmQgd29yay4N Cg0KQ2hlZXJzLA0KLSBraXQNCg0KDQpPbiBKdW4gMjMsIDIwMTYsIGF0IDU6MjMgUE0sIGpyIGNv bmxpbiA8amNvbmxpbkBtb3ppbGxhLmNvbTxtYWlsdG86amNvbmxpbkBtb3ppbGxhLmNvbT4+IHdy b3RlOg0KDQoNCkkgaGF2ZSBubyBhZGRpdGlvbmFsIGNvbmNlcm5zIG9yIHJlcXVlc3RzIGZvciB0 aGlzIHByb3RvY29sLCBhbmQgc3VwcG9ydCB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0Lg0KDQpIdWdlIHRoYW5rcyB0byB0 aGUgZWRpdG9ycyBhbmQgY29udHJpYnV0b3JzIGZvciB0aGVpciBwYXRpZW5jZSBhbmQgdW5kZXJz dGFuZGluZy4NCg0KT24gNi8yMy8yMDE2IDEyOjU4IEFNLCBTaGlkYSBTY2h1YmVydCB3cm90ZToN CkFsbDsNCg0KQXMgSSBub3RlZCBvbiB0aGUgZS1tYWlsIEkgc2VudCBvdXQgb24gSnVuZSA3dGgg YWZ0ZXIgdGhlIGluaXRpYWwgV0dMQyBmb3Igd2VicHVzaCBwcm90b2NvbCBkcmFmdCwgd2UgYXJl IGNvbW1lbmNpbmcgYW5vdGhlciBXR0xDIGFzIHRoZXJlIGFyZSBubyByZW1haW5pbmcgaXNzdWVz IG9uIGdpdGh1YiBBTkQgdGhlIGF1dGhvcnMgaGF2ZSBwcm9kdWNlZCB0aGUgMDYgdmVyc2lvbiBv ZiB0aGUgZHJhZnQgcmVmbGVjdGluZyBhbGwgcmVzb2x1dGlvbnMuDQoNCmh0dHBzOi8vdG9vbHMu aWV0Zi5vcmcvaHRtbC9kcmFmdC1pZXRmLXdlYnB1c2gtcHJvdG9jb2wtMDY8aHR0cHM6Ly9uYTAx LnNhZmVsaW5rcy5wcm90ZWN0aW9uLm91dGxvb2suY29tLz91cmw9aHR0cHMlM2ElMmYlMmZ0b29s cy5pZXRmLm9yZyUyZmh0bWwlMmZkcmFmdC1pZXRmLXdlYnB1c2gtcHJvdG9jb2wtMDYmZGF0YT0w MSU3YzAxJTdjZWxpb2RhJTQwbWljcm9zb2Z0LmNvbSU3YzA5Y2M4NzEwNWNkYTRkMzgxNjczMDhk M2EzNTQ5MjY5JTdjNzJmOTg4YmY4NmYxNDFhZjkxYWIyZDdjZDAxMWRiNDclN2MxJnNkYXRhPWpv UUFmM2RXUE85cEdTSWJEUlVoTVhuVFBkS3o5WGpZSWVCZCUyZnBxWkFlSSUzZD4NCg0KSWYgeW91 IGhhdmUgYW55IGlzc3VlcyBvciBxdWVzdGlvbnMgcmVnYXJkaW5nIHRoZSBkcmFmdCBwbGVhc2Ug c3VibWl0IGl0IHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0LCB3aGVuIHJhaXNpbmcgaXNzdWVzIHBsZWFzZSBwcm92aWRl IGNvbnN0cnVjdGl2ZSByZXNvbHV0aW9uIHdoZW5ldmVyIHBvc3NpYmxlLg0KDQpQTEVBU0UgYWNr bm93bGVkZ2Ugb24gdGhlIGxpc3Qgd2hlbiB5b3UgYXJlIGNvbnRlbnQvaGFwcHkgd2l0aCB0aGUg c3RhdHVzIG9mIHRoZSBkcmFmdCBhbmQgeW91IHNlZSBubyBpc3N1ZSBwYXNzaW5nIGl0IGZvcndh cmQgdG8gSUVTRyBmb3IgcHVibGljYXRpb24uDQoNClRoZSBXR0xDIHdpbGwgY29uY2x1ZGUgYXQg dGhlIGVuZCBvZiB0aGUgZGF5IG9uIEp1bHkgOHRoIFBTVC4NCg0KU2hpZGENCkFzIGNvLWNoYWly DQoNCg0KX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18NCg0K V2VicHVzaCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCg0KV2VicHVzaEBpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86V2VicHVzaEBp ZXRmLm9yZz4NCg0KaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby93ZWJwdXNo PGh0dHBzOi8vbmEwMS5zYWZlbGlua3MucHJvdGVjdGlvbi5vdXRsb29rLmNvbS8/dXJsPWh0dHBz JTNhJTJmJTJmd3d3LmlldGYub3JnJTJmbWFpbG1hbiUyZmxpc3RpbmZvJTJmd2VicHVzaCZkYXRh PTAxJTdjMDElN2NlbGlvZGElNDBtaWNyb3NvZnQuY29tJTdjMDljYzg3MTA1Y2RhNGQzODE2NzMw OGQzYTM1NDkyNjklN2M3MmY5ODhiZjg2ZjE0MWFmOTFhYjJkN2NkMDExZGI0NyU3YzEmc2RhdGE9 RHhJU1lGdWliWVltM0YlMmZ5dWljemVjaHBHMnlGaElkNjF4Q2lDJTJmNFMlMmY2ayUzZD4NCg0K DQpfX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXw0KV2VicHVz aCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCldlYnB1c2hAaWV0Zi5vcmc8bWFpbHRvOldlYnB1c2hAaWV0Zi5vcmc+ DQpodHRwczovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3dlYnB1c2g8aHR0cHM6Ly9u YTAxLnNhZmVsaW5rcy5wcm90ZWN0aW9uLm91dGxvb2suY29tLz91cmw9aHR0cHMlM2ElMmYlMmZ3 d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmclMmZtYWlsbWFuJTJmbGlzdGluZm8lMmZ3ZWJwdXNoJmRhdGE9MDElN2MwMSU3 Y2VsaW9kYSU0MG1pY3Jvc29mdC5jb20lN2MwOWNjODcxMDVjZGE0ZDM4MTY3MzA4ZDNhMzU0OTI2 OSU3YzcyZjk4OGJmODZmMTQxYWY5MWFiMmQ3Y2QwMTFkYjQ3JTdjMSZzZGF0YT1EeElTWUZ1aWJZ WW0zRiUyZnl1aWN6ZWNocEcyeUZoSWQ2MXhDaUMlMmY0UyUyZjZrJTNkPg0KDQoNCl9fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpXZWJwdXNoIG1haWxpbmcg bGlzdA0KV2VicHVzaEBpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86V2VicHVzaEBpZXRmLm9yZz4NCmh0dHBzOi8v d3d3LmlldGYub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vd2VicHVzaDxodHRwczovL25hMDEuc2FmZWxp bmtzLnByb3RlY3Rpb24ub3V0bG9vay5jb20vP3VybD1odHRwcyUzYSUyZiUyZnd3dy5pZXRmLm9y ZyUyZm1haWxtYW4lMmZsaXN0aW5mbyUyZndlYnB1c2gmZGF0YT0wMSU3YzAxJTdjZWxpb2RhJTQw bWljcm9zb2Z0LmNvbSU3YzA5Y2M4NzEwNWNkYTRkMzgxNjczMDhkM2EzNTQ5MjY5JTdjNzJmOTg4 YmY4NmYxNDFhZjkxYWIyZDdjZDAxMWRiNDclN2MxJnNkYXRhPUR4SVNZRnVpYllZbTNGJTJmeXVp Y3plY2hwRzJ5RmhJZDYxeENpQyUyZjRTJTJmNmslM2Q+DQoNCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQpXZWJwdXNoIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdA0KV2VicHVz aEBpZXRmLm9yZzxtYWlsdG86V2VicHVzaEBpZXRmLm9yZz4NCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmlldGYub3Jn L21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vd2VicHVzaDxodHRwczovL25hMDEuc2FmZWxpbmtzLnByb3RlY3Rp b24ub3V0bG9vay5jb20vP3VybD1odHRwcyUzYSUyZiUyZnd3dy5pZXRmLm9yZyUyZm1haWxtYW4l MmZsaXN0aW5mbyUyZndlYnB1c2gmZGF0YT0wMSU3YzAxJTdjZWxpb2RhJTQwbWljcm9zb2Z0LmNv bSU3YzA5Y2M4NzEwNWNkYTRkMzgxNjczMDhkM2EzNTQ5MjY5JTdjNzJmOTg4YmY4NmYxNDFhZjkx YWIyZDdjZDAxMWRiNDclN2MxJnNkYXRhPUR4SVNZRnVpYllZbTNGJTJmeXVpY3plY2hwRzJ5RmhJ ZDYxeENpQyUyZjRTJTJmNmslM2Q+DQo= --_000_BN1PR0301MB0626DD9C035F2C7B908C1A7ECB390BN1PR0301MB0626_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 PGh0bWwgeG1sbnM6dj0idXJuOnNjaGVtYXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTp2bWwiIHhtbG5zOm89InVy bjpzY2hlbWFzLW1pY3Jvc29mdC1jb206b2ZmaWNlOm9mZmljZSIgeG1sbnM6dz0idXJuOnNjaGVt YXMtbWljcm9zb2Z0LWNvbTpvZmZpY2U6d29yZCIgeG1sbnM6bT0iaHR0cDovL3NjaGVtYXMubWlj cm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9vZmZpY2UvMjAwNC8xMi9vbW1sIiB4bWxucz0iaHR0cDovL3d3dy53My5vcmcv VFIvUkVDLWh0bWw0MCI+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxtZXRhIGh0dHAtZXF1aXY9IkNvbnRlbnQtVHlwZSIg Y29udGVudD0idGV4dC9odG1sOyBjaGFyc2V0PXV0Zi04Ij4NCjxtZXRhIG5hbWU9IkdlbmVyYXRv ciIgY29udGVudD0iTWljcm9zb2Z0IFdvcmQgMTUgKGZpbHRlcmVkIG1lZGl1bSkiPg0KPHN0eWxl PjwhLS0NCi8qIEZvbnQgRGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgKi8NCkBmb250LWZhY2UNCgl7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 IkNhbWJyaWEgTWF0aCI7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiA0IDUgMyA1IDQgNiAzIDIgNDt9DQpAZm9udC1m YWNlDQoJe2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OkNhbGlicmk7DQoJcGFub3NlLTE6MiAxNSA1IDIgMiAyIDQgMyAy IDQ7fQ0KQGZvbnQtZmFjZQ0KCXtmb250LWZhbWlseTpDb25zb2xhczsNCglwYW5vc2UtMToyIDEx IDYgOSAyIDIgNCAzIDIgNDt9DQovKiBTdHlsZSBEZWZpbml0aW9ucyAqLw0KcC5Nc29Ob3JtYWws IGxpLk1zb05vcm1hbCwgZGl2Lk1zb05vcm1hbA0KCXttYXJnaW46MGluOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0 b206LjAwMDFwdDsNCglmb250LXNpemU6MTIuMHB0Ow0KCWZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiJUaW1lcyBOZXcg Um9tYW4iLHNlcmlmO30NCmE6bGluaywgc3Bhbi5Nc29IeXBlcmxpbmsNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXBy aW9yaXR5Ojk5Ow0KCWNvbG9yOmJsdWU7DQoJdGV4dC1kZWNvcmF0aW9uOnVuZGVybGluZTt9DQph OnZpc2l0ZWQsIHNwYW4uTXNvSHlwZXJsaW5rRm9sbG93ZWQNCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5 Ojk5Ow0KCWNvbG9yOnB1cnBsZTsNCgl0ZXh0LWRlY29yYXRpb246dW5kZXJsaW5lO30NCnANCgl7 bXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5Ojk5Ow0KCW1zby1tYXJnaW4tdG9wLWFsdDphdXRvOw0KCW1hcmdp bi1yaWdodDowaW47DQoJbXNvLW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b20tYWx0OmF1dG87DQoJbWFyZ2luLWxlZnQ6 MGluOw0KCWZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMi4wcHQ7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IlRpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbiIs c2VyaWY7fQ0KcHJlDQoJe21zby1zdHlsZS1wcmlvcml0eTo5OTsNCgltc28tc3R5bGUtbGluazoi SFRNTCBQcmVmb3JtYXR0ZWQgQ2hhciI7DQoJbWFyZ2luOjBpbjsNCgltYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOi4w MDAxcHQ7DQoJZm9udC1zaXplOjEwLjBwdDsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ291cmllciBOZXciO30N CnAubXNvbm9ybWFsMCwgbGkubXNvbm9ybWFsMCwgZGl2Lm1zb25vcm1hbDANCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxl LW5hbWU6bXNvbm9ybWFsOw0KCW1zby1tYXJnaW4tdG9wLWFsdDphdXRvOw0KCW1hcmdpbi1yaWdo dDowaW47DQoJbXNvLW1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b20tYWx0OmF1dG87DQoJbWFyZ2luLWxlZnQ6MGluOw0K CWZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMi4wcHQ7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6IlRpbWVzIE5ldyBSb21hbiIsc2VyaWY7 fQ0Kc3Bhbi5IVE1MUHJlZm9ybWF0dGVkQ2hhcg0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtbmFtZToiSFRNTCBQcmVm b3JtYXR0ZWQgQ2hhciI7DQoJbXNvLXN0eWxlLXByaW9yaXR5Ojk5Ow0KCW1zby1zdHlsZS1saW5r OiJIVE1MIFByZWZvcm1hdHRlZCI7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6Q29uc29sYXM7fQ0Kc3Bhbi5FbWFp bFN0eWxlMjENCgl7bXNvLXN0eWxlLXR5cGU6cGVyc29uYWwtcmVwbHk7DQoJZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6 IkNhbGlicmkiLHNhbnMtc2VyaWY7DQoJY29sb3I6d2luZG93dGV4dDt9DQouTXNvQ2hwRGVmYXVs dA0KCXttc28tc3R5bGUtdHlwZTpleHBvcnQtb25seTsNCglmb250LWZhbWlseToiQ2FsaWJyaSIs c2Fucy1zZXJpZjt9DQpAcGFnZSBXb3JkU2VjdGlvbjENCgl7c2l6ZTo4LjVpbiAxMS4waW47DQoJ bWFyZ2luOjEuMGluIDEuMGluIDEuMGluIDEuMGluO30NCmRpdi5Xb3JkU2VjdGlvbjENCgl7cGFn ZTpXb3JkU2VjdGlvbjE7fQ0KLS0+PC9zdHlsZT48IS0tW2lmIGd0ZSBtc28gOV0+PHhtbD4NCjxv OnNoYXBlZGVmYXVsdHMgdjpleHQ9ImVkaXQiIHNwaWRtYXg9IjEwMjYiIC8+DQo8L3htbD48IVtl bmRpZl0tLT48IS0tW2lmIGd0ZSBtc28gOV0+PHhtbD4NCjxvOnNoYXBlbGF5b3V0IHY6ZXh0PSJl ZGl0Ij4NCjxvOmlkbWFwIHY6ZXh0PSJlZGl0IiBkYXRhPSIxIiAvPg0KPC9vOnNoYXBlbGF5b3V0 PjwveG1sPjwhW2VuZGlmXS0tPg0KPC9oZWFkPg0KPGJvZHkgbGFuZz0iRU4tVVMiIGxpbms9ImJs dWUiIHZsaW5rPSJwdXJwbGUiPg0KPGRpdiBjbGFzcz0iV29yZFNlY3Rpb24xIj4NCjxwIGNsYXNz PSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZx dW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+JiM0MzsxPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9w Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxMS4wcHQ7Zm9u dC1mYW1pbHk6JnF1b3Q7Q2FsaWJyaSZxdW90OyxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpw Pjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXpl OjExLjBwdDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomcXVvdDtDYWxpYnJpJnF1b3Q7LHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPkVsaW88 bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48YSBuYW1lPSJfTWFp bEVuZENvbXBvc2UiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZx dW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9h PjwvcD4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxiPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEu MHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0NhbGlicmkmcXVvdDssc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+RnJvbTo8L3Nw YW4+PC9iPjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTEuMHB0O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiZxdW90O0Nh bGlicmkmcXVvdDssc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+IFdlYnB1c2ggW21haWx0bzp3ZWJwdXNoLWJvdW5jZXNA aWV0Zi5vcmddDQo8Yj5PbiBCZWhhbGYgT2YgPC9iPkNvc3RpbiBNYW5vbGFjaGU8YnI+DQo8Yj5T ZW50OjwvYj4gU3VuZGF5LCBKdWx5IDMsIDIwMTYgODoxMyBBTTxicj4NCjxiPlRvOjwvYj4gQmVu amFtaW4gQmFuZ2VydCAmbHQ7YmJhbmdlcnRAbW96aWxsYS5jb20mZ3Q7OyBLaXQgQ2FtYnJpZGdl ICZsdDtrY2FtYnJpZGdlQG1vemlsbGEuY29tJmd0Ozxicj4NCjxiPkNjOjwvYj4ganIgY29ubGlu ICZsdDtqY29ubGluQG1vemlsbGEuY29tJmd0Ozsgd2VicHVzaEBpZXRmLm9yZzxicj4NCjxiPlN1 YmplY3Q6PC9iPiBSZTogW1dlYnB1c2hdIFdHTEMgZm9yIGRyYWZ0LWlldGYtd2VicHVzaC1wcm90 b2NvbCAoYWdhaW4pPG86cD48L286cD48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+ PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8cD4mIzQzOzE8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxwPkNvc3Rp bjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48 L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPk9uIEZyaSwgSnVsIDEsIDIw MTYsIDk6MTkgUE0gQmVuamFtaW4gQmFuZ2VydCAmbHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmJiYW5nZXJ0 QG1vemlsbGEuY29tIj5iYmFuZ2VydEBtb3ppbGxhLmNvbTwvYT4mZ3Q7IHdyb3RlOjxvOnA+PC9v OnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8YmxvY2txdW90ZSBzdHlsZT0iYm9yZGVyOm5vbmU7Ym9yZGVyLWxl ZnQ6c29saWQgI0NDQ0NDQyAxLjBwdDtwYWRkaW5nOjBpbiAwaW4gMGluIDYuMHB0O21hcmdpbi1s ZWZ0OjQuOHB0O21hcmdpbi1yaWdodDowaW4iPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xh c3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCIgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MTIuMHB0Ij5JJ20gaGFwcHkgd2l0 aCB0aGUgZHJhZnQgYXMtaXMuIFRoYW5rcyB0byB0aGUgZWRpdG9ycyBhbmQgY2hhaXJzLjxvOnA+ PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5DaGVlcnMsPG86cD48L286 cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPkJlbjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0K PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+ DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+T24gU3VuLCBKdW4gMjYsIDIwMTYgYXQgODow NiBBTSwgS2l0IENhbWJyaWRnZSAmbHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmtjYW1icmlkZ2VAbW96aWxs YS5jb20iIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5rY2FtYnJpZGdlQG1vemlsbGEuY29tPC9hPiZndDsgd3Jv dGU6PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8YmxvY2txdW90ZSBzdHlsZT0iYm9yZGVyOm5vbmU7Ym9yZGVy LWxlZnQ6c29saWQgI0NDQ0NDQyAxLjBwdDtwYWRkaW5nOjBpbiAwaW4gMGluIDYuMHB0O21hcmdp bi1sZWZ0OjQuOHB0O21hcmdpbi1yaWdodDowaW4iPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3Jt YWwiPkkgc3VwcG9ydCB0aGUgZHJhZnQsIHdpdGggZ3JhdGl0dWRlIHRvIHRoZSBlZGl0b3JzIGFu ZCBjaGFpcnMgZm9yIHRoZWlyIGhhcmQgd29yay48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBj bGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxw IGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPkNoZWVycyw8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4N CjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPi0ga2l0PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4N CjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNs YXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBj bGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5PbiBKdW4gMjMsIDIwMTYsIGF0IDU6MjMgUE0sIGpyIGNvbmxpbiAm bHQ7PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOmpjb25saW5AbW96aWxsYS5jb20iIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5q Y29ubGluQG1vemlsbGEuY29tPC9hPiZndDsgd3JvdGU6PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4N CjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxicj4NCjxicj4NCjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPGJsb2Nr cXVvdGUgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi10b3A6NS4wcHQ7bWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTo1LjBwdCI+DQo8ZGl2 Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPkkgaGF2ZSBubyBhZGRpdGlvbmFsIGNvbmNl cm5zIG9yIHJlcXVlc3RzIGZvciB0aGlzIHByb3RvY29sLCBhbmQgc3VwcG9ydCB0aGlzIGRyYWZ0 Ljxicj4NCjxicj4NCkh1Z2UgdGhhbmtzIHRvIHRoZSBlZGl0b3JzIGFuZCBjb250cmlidXRvcnMg Zm9yIHRoZWlyIHBhdGllbmNlIGFuZCB1bmRlcnN0YW5kaW5nLjxicj4NCjxicj4NCk9uIDYvMjMv MjAxNiAxMjo1OCBBTSwgU2hpZGEgU2NodWJlcnQgd3JvdGU6PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rp dj4NCjxibG9ja3F1b3RlIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tdG9wOjUuMHB0O21hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206NS4w cHQiPg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPkFsbDs8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwv ZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0K PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+QXMgSSBub3RlZCBvbiB0aGUgZS1t YWlsIEkgc2VudCBvdXQgb24gSnVuZSA3dGggYWZ0ZXIgdGhlIGluaXRpYWwgV0dMQyBmb3Igd2Vi cHVzaCBwcm90b2NvbCBkcmFmdCwgd2UgYXJlIGNvbW1lbmNpbmcgYW5vdGhlciBXR0xDIGFzIHRo ZXJlIGFyZSBubyByZW1haW5pbmcgaXNzdWVzIG9uIGdpdGh1YiBBTkQgdGhlIGF1dGhvcnMgaGF2 ZSBwcm9kdWNlZCB0aGUgMDYgdmVyc2lvbiBvZiB0aGUgZHJhZnQgcmVmbGVjdGluZw0KIGFsbCBy ZXNvbHV0aW9ucy48bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29O b3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1z b05vcm1hbCI+PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cHM6Ly9uYTAxLnNhZmVsaW5rcy5wcm90ZWN0aW9uLm91dGxv b2suY29tLz91cmw9aHR0cHMlM2ElMmYlMmZ0b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZyUyZmh0bWwlMmZkcmFmdC1p ZXRmLXdlYnB1c2gtcHJvdG9jb2wtMDYmYW1wO2RhdGE9MDElN2MwMSU3Y2VsaW9kYSU0MG1pY3Jv c29mdC5jb20lN2MwOWNjODcxMDVjZGE0ZDM4MTY3MzA4ZDNhMzU0OTI2OSU3YzcyZjk4OGJmODZm MTQxYWY5MWFiMmQ3Y2QwMTFkYjQ3JTdjMSZhbXA7c2RhdGE9am9RQWYzZFdQTzlwR1NJYkRSVWhN WG5UUGRLejlYallJZUJkJTJmcHFaQWVJJTNkIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+aHR0cHM6Ly90b29s cy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0LWlldGYtd2VicHVzaC1wcm90b2NvbC0wNjwvYT48bzpwPjwv bzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7 PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+SWYgeW91IGhh dmUgYW55IGlzc3VlcyBvciBxdWVzdGlvbnMgcmVnYXJkaW5nIHRoZSBkcmFmdCBwbGVhc2Ugc3Vi bWl0IGl0IHRvIHRoZSBsaXN0LCB3aGVuIHJhaXNpbmcgaXNzdWVzIHBsZWFzZSBwcm92aWRlIGNv bnN0cnVjdGl2ZSByZXNvbHV0aW9uIHdoZW5ldmVyIHBvc3NpYmxlLjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0K PC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+ DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5QTEVBU0UgYWNrbm93bGVkZ2Ug b24gdGhlIGxpc3Qgd2hlbiB5b3UgYXJlIGNvbnRlbnQvaGFwcHkgd2l0aCB0aGUgc3RhdHVzIG9m IHRoZSBkcmFmdCBhbmQgeW91IHNlZSBubyBpc3N1ZSBwYXNzaW5nIGl0IGZvcndhcmQgdG8gSUVT RyBmb3IgcHVibGljYXRpb24uJm5ic3A7PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxkaXY+DQo8 cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4N CjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5UaGUgV0dMQyB3aWxsIGNvbmNsdWRlIGF0IHRo ZSBlbmQgb2YgdGhlIGRheSBvbiBKdWx5IDh0aCBQU1QuPG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4N CjxkaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2 Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8ZGl2Pg0KPHAgY2xhc3M9Ik1zb05vcm1hbCI+U2hpZGE8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwv cD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPGRpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPkFzIGNvLWNoYWlyPG86cD48 L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiIHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90 dG9tOjEyLjBwdCI+PG86cD4mbmJzcDs8L286cD48L3A+DQo8cHJlPl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fPG86cD48L286cD48L3ByZT4NCjxwcmU+V2Vi cHVzaCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3Q8bzpwPjwvbzpwPjwvcHJlPg0KPHByZT48YSBocmVmPSJtYWlsdG86 V2VicHVzaEBpZXRmLm9yZyIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPldlYnB1c2hAaWV0Zi5vcmc8L2E+PG86 cD48L286cD48L3ByZT4NCjxwcmU+PGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cHM6Ly9uYTAxLnNhZmVsaW5rcy5wcm90 ZWN0aW9uLm91dGxvb2suY29tLz91cmw9aHR0cHMlM2ElMmYlMmZ3d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmclMmZtYWls bWFuJTJmbGlzdGluZm8lMmZ3ZWJwdXNoJmFtcDtkYXRhPTAxJTdjMDElN2NlbGlvZGElNDBtaWNy b3NvZnQuY29tJTdjMDljYzg3MTA1Y2RhNGQzODE2NzMwOGQzYTM1NDkyNjklN2M3MmY5ODhiZjg2 ZjE0MWFmOTFhYjJkN2NkMDExZGI0NyU3YzEmYW1wO3NkYXRhPUR4SVNZRnVpYllZbTNGJTJmeXVp Y3plY2hwRzJ5RmhJZDYxeENpQyUyZjRTJTJmNmslM2QiIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5odHRwczov L3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3dlYnB1c2g8L2E+PG86cD48L286cD48L3By ZT4NCjwvYmxvY2txdW90ZT4NCjxwPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8cCBj bGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fXzxicj4NCldlYnB1c2ggbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0PGJyPg0KPGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOldl YnB1c2hAaWV0Zi5vcmciIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5XZWJwdXNoQGlldGYub3JnPC9hPjxicj4N CjxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHBzOi8vbmEwMS5zYWZlbGlua3MucHJvdGVjdGlvbi5vdXRsb29rLmNvbS8/ dXJsPWh0dHBzJTNhJTJmJTJmd3d3LmlldGYub3JnJTJmbWFpbG1hbiUyZmxpc3RpbmZvJTJmd2Vi cHVzaCZhbXA7ZGF0YT0wMSU3YzAxJTdjZWxpb2RhJTQwbWljcm9zb2Z0LmNvbSU3YzA5Y2M4NzEw NWNkYTRkMzgxNjczMDhkM2EzNTQ5MjY5JTdjNzJmOTg4YmY4NmYxNDFhZjkxYWIyZDdjZDAxMWRi NDclN2MxJmFtcDtzZGF0YT1EeElTWUZ1aWJZWW0zRiUyZnl1aWN6ZWNocEcyeUZoSWQ2MXhDaUMl MmY0UyUyZjZrJTNkIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1h bi9saXN0aW5mby93ZWJwdXNoPC9hPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0KPC9ibG9ja3F1b3RlPg0KPC9k aXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj48bzpwPiZuYnNwOzwvbzpwPjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0K PC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvZGl2Pg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIiBzdHls ZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbToxMi4wcHQiPjxicj4NCl9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fPGJyPg0KV2VicHVzaCBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3Q8YnI+DQo8YSBo cmVmPSJtYWlsdG86V2VicHVzaEBpZXRmLm9yZyIgdGFyZ2V0PSJfYmxhbmsiPldlYnB1c2hAaWV0 Zi5vcmc8L2E+PGJyPg0KPGEgaHJlZj0iaHR0cHM6Ly9uYTAxLnNhZmVsaW5rcy5wcm90ZWN0aW9u Lm91dGxvb2suY29tLz91cmw9aHR0cHMlM2ElMmYlMmZ3d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmclMmZtYWlsbWFuJTJm bGlzdGluZm8lMmZ3ZWJwdXNoJmFtcDtkYXRhPTAxJTdjMDElN2NlbGlvZGElNDBtaWNyb3NvZnQu Y29tJTdjMDljYzg3MTA1Y2RhNGQzODE2NzMwOGQzYTM1NDkyNjklN2M3MmY5ODhiZjg2ZjE0MWFm OTFhYjJkN2NkMDExZGI0NyU3YzEmYW1wO3NkYXRhPUR4SVNZRnVpYllZbTNGJTJmeXVpY3plY2hw RzJ5RmhJZDYxeENpQyUyZjRTJTJmNmslM2QiIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5odHRwczovL3d3dy5p ZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3dlYnB1c2g8L2E+PG86cD48L286cD48L3A+DQo8L2Js b2NrcXVvdGU+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjxwIGNsYXNzPSJNc29Ob3JtYWwiPjxvOnA+Jm5ic3A7PC9vOnA+ PC9wPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8cCBjbGFzcz0iTXNvTm9ybWFsIj5fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fXzxicj4NCldlYnB1c2ggbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0PGJyPg0K PGEgaHJlZj0ibWFpbHRvOldlYnB1c2hAaWV0Zi5vcmciIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj5XZWJwdXNo QGlldGYub3JnPC9hPjxicj4NCjxhIGhyZWY9Imh0dHBzOi8vbmEwMS5zYWZlbGlua3MucHJvdGVj dGlvbi5vdXRsb29rLmNvbS8/dXJsPWh0dHBzJTNhJTJmJTJmd3d3LmlldGYub3JnJTJmbWFpbG1h biUyZmxpc3RpbmZvJTJmd2VicHVzaCZhbXA7ZGF0YT0wMSU3YzAxJTdjZWxpb2RhJTQwbWljcm9z b2Z0LmNvbSU3YzA5Y2M4NzEwNWNkYTRkMzgxNjczMDhkM2EzNTQ5MjY5JTdjNzJmOTg4YmY4NmYx NDFhZjkxYWIyZDdjZDAxMWRiNDclN2MxJmFtcDtzZGF0YT1EeElTWUZ1aWJZWW0zRiUyZnl1aWN6 ZWNocEcyeUZoSWQ2MXhDaUMlMmY0UyUyZjZrJTNkIiB0YXJnZXQ9Il9ibGFuayI+aHR0cHM6Ly93 d3cuaWV0Zi5vcmcvbWFpbG1hbi9saXN0aW5mby93ZWJwdXNoPC9hPjxvOnA+PC9vOnA+PC9wPg0K PC9ibG9ja3F1b3RlPg0KPC9kaXY+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCjwvYm9keT4NCjwvaHRtbD4NCg== --_000_BN1PR0301MB0626DD9C035F2C7B908C1A7ECB390BN1PR0301MB0626_-- From nobody Tue Jul 5 15:00:35 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1646012D0F7 for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:00:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MUfbd6UlLIqU for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-it0-x22a.google.com (mail-it0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6261C12B05B for ; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 15:00:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-it0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id h190so94683525ith.1 for ; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:00:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/UcLkbfoZ4MndSPZUIJsANSuBAfUaDBQOLmn4HvgKXc=; b=rCJAKFUpkABcfpTHWvzAXmtIie6B47W1QvOXrmmQgrKQ2tviBd9Q7dT9AzD86NXf0L I1x3zkaRyopFlfueXt6tnzweMt5edBO/5Idy5M1DAIHff0+Y+N/eeyhnX9qqr/AVvfwW S45utmiu0ywPy2aYXm0qaWAhyX1kqCcB0HClJy8rBFjzNfFnhDEWakjwl9BxbMh8J2mX RVla9KVrPnoHuez33+CmjRCvcUXMAe06ORiiKyeF2IEvjyqnKTV394EmhHgLQGta64Ci DfJLJyLGBmrcBnWRT+/uHKN0+86eOYCsYneZlxA1jYK9sduH4ctnaRXNsf51C3789zVy 7FoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=/UcLkbfoZ4MndSPZUIJsANSuBAfUaDBQOLmn4HvgKXc=; b=dnLOXNPe6tk4Kd7/SgY3ysdc56hjpnJ2ypeZGU+JS83RGDK/TLM03c3bOzzTyCPxDF CyCo79/NBypbPY7ziis7c7GGlFmYL+37kfb81Or6AoiqdRUriK7JHQHRfo+GPM4Jzabo gquy6306TQQl6w/H6nGIJ8/fTehRY+mz0IjdkpZ1oISPOy9M2cgbZYp8LsT2BrmG/Gm7 pFNAyUqOspeHkWBi5kOZBHyTax5tcCR0UzUamkkewXw/bgFic73MgrVfsOXDej+PRRMx qDZhixwUtI6D/1/wusfO8ksN7TJDu7SwDDmtw2YjNaeIBpIxL8KkoBzViixiFjUOB0Bd j4+A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKC2azS/osuqwanpWAESKXZlvWkRzjUI9Kk5S9it7ZXGKhMMY8sEmI2AaZGWclKeFj8MW8w0KFv1rw2WA== X-Received: by 10.36.103.10 with SMTP id u10mr16854738itc.45.1467756030448; Tue, 05 Jul 2016 15:00:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.36.40.84 with HTTP; Tue, 5 Jul 2016 14:59:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <786718A2-C28D-436C-B91D-B3217F459F2E@mozilla.com> From: Idel Pivnitskiy Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 00:59:51 +0300 Message-ID: To: "webpush@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114a9d68cfdc260536ea945e Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again) X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 22:00:34 -0000 --001a114a9d68cfdc260536ea945e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I support the draft. Just a little reminder of my non-blocker proposal, which was left without an answer or comments [1]. All of you worked hard! Highly appreciate quick answers and informative discussions in the mailing list and on GitHub. Thanks for all! [1] Define a list of headers, which must be transmitted to the UA: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/webpush/current/msg00578.html Best regards, Idel Pivnitskiy -- Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy GitHub: @idelpivnitskiy On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: > +1 > > Costin > > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016, 9:19 PM Benjamin Bangert > wrote: > >> I'm happy with the draft as-is. Thanks to the editors and chairs. >> >> Cheers, >> Ben >> >> On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Kit Cambridge >> wrote: >> >>> I support the draft, with gratitude to the editors and chairs for their >>> hard work. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> - kit >>> >>> >>> On Jun 23, 2016, at 5:23 PM, jr conlin wrote: >>> >>> I have no additional concerns or requests for this protocol, and support >>> this draft. >>> >>> Huge thanks to the editors and contributors for their patience and >>> understanding. >>> >>> On 6/23/2016 12:58 AM, Shida Schubert wrote: >>> >>> All; >>> >>> As I noted on the e-mail I sent out on June 7th after the initial WGLC >>> for webpush protocol draft, we are commencing another WGLC as there are no >>> remaining issues on github AND the authors have produced the 06 version of >>> the draft reflecting all resolutions. >>> >>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-06 >>> >>> If you have any issues or questions regarding the draft please submit it >>> to the list, when raising issues please provide constructive resolution >>> whenever possible. >>> >>> PLEASE acknowledge on the list when you are content/happy with the >>> status of the draft and you see no issue passing it forward to IESG for >>> publication. >>> >>> The WGLC will conclude at the end of the day on July 8th PST. >>> >>> Shida >>> As co-chair >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Webpush mailing listWebpush@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Webpush mailing list >>> Webpush@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Webpush mailing list >>> Webpush@ietf.org >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush >>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Webpush mailing list >> Webpush@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush >> > > _______________________________________________ > Webpush mailing list > Webpush@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush > > --001a114a9d68cfdc260536ea945e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I support the draft. Just a little reminder of my non-bloc= ker proposal, which was left without an answer or comments [1].

All of you worked hard! Highly appreciate quick answers and informa= tive discussions in the mailing list and on GitHub. Thanks for all!

[1] Define a list of headers, which must be transmitted to = the UA:=C2=A0https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/w= ebpush/current/msg00578.html

Best rega= rds,
Idel Pivnitskiy
--
Twitter: @idelpivnitskiy
GitHub:=C2=A0@idelpivnitskiy
=

On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Costin Manol= ache <costin@gmail.com> wrote:

+1

Costin


On Fri, Jul 1, 2016, 9:19 P= M Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com> wrote:
I'm happy with the draft as-is. Thanks to the edito= rs and chairs.

Cheers,
Ben

On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:06 AM, K= it Cambridge <kcambridge@mozilla.com> wrote:
I support the draft, with gra= titude to the editors and chairs for their hard work.

Ch= eers,
- kit


On Jun 23, 2016, at 5= :23 PM, jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com> wrote:

=20 =20 =20
I have no additional concerns or requests for this protocol, and support this draft.

Huge thanks to the editors and contributors for their patience and understanding.

On 6/23/2016 12:58 AM, Shida Schubert wrote:
=20
All;

As I noted on the e-mail I sent out on June 7th after the initial WGLC for webpush protocol draft, we are commencing another WGLC as there are no remaining issues on github AND the authors have produced the 06 version of the draft reflecting all resolutions.


If you have any issues or questions regarding the draft please submit it to the list, when raising issues please provide constructive resolution whenever possible.

PLEASE acknowledge on the list when you are content/happy with the status of the draft and you see no issue passing it forward to IESG for publication.=C2=A0

The WGLC will conclude at the end of the day on July 8th PST.

Shida
As co-chair


_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush


_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
= Webpush@ietf.org<= br>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush


____________________________________= ___________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org<= br> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush


_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org<= br> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org<= br> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush


--001a114a9d68cfdc260536ea945e-- From nobody Fri Jul 8 13:52:28 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietf.org Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF45A12B004; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:52:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.25.1 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160708205224.32168.88247.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 13:52:24 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: webpush@ietf.org Subject: [Webpush] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-07.txt X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 20:52:25 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web-Based Push Notifications of the IETF. Title : Generic Event Delivery Using HTTP Push Authors : Martin Thomson Elio Damaggio Brian Raymor Filename : draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-07.txt Pages : 31 Date : 2016-07-08 Abstract: A simple protocol for the delivery of real-time events to user agents is described. This scheme uses HTTP/2 server push. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-07 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-07 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Jul 8 13:57:31 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294B312D09B for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:57:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.022 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.022 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MEqYADwXyFlt for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:57:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0099.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B450212B034 for ; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:57:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=67e+vQr7gduqkHiJGQjblvLieOJ0UVMvgrqlURi0p6k=; b=g/3qUl1yby5BGTtJkYU+6Ny3WokPLtNWAEf6ZSFDPOwIHger+vSzQgfBlzCw50Oky67vj4IhCFIt0YAVMekI0ZqsKP2pSeX1qjQtfG7x4FwqHcwB6NUouWimm68PMBnGAJTLDJzEHpG4ZjfZWewZfkWlDOajzwsIxntP/JkXcxg= Received: from CY1PR0301MB1562.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.166.12) by CY1PR0301MB1563.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.166.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.534.14; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 20:57:26 +0000 Received: from CY1PR0301MB1562.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.166.12]) by CY1PR0301MB1562.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.166.12]) with mapi id 15.01.0528.024; Fri, 8 Jul 2016 20:57:26 +0000 From: Brian Raymor To: "webpush@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Webpush] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-07.txt Thread-Index: AQHR2VqsWIXireIi1UaKJnOS1DmqvqAPArbg Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2016 20:57:26 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20160708205224.32168.88247.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20160708205224.32168.88247.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com; x-originating-ip: [24.16.23.27] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b1b0b324-d55e-40bb-687d-08d3a77277ca x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0301MB1563; 6:Z56iRPTbgWy7s8DsdUpqNbz2pZbGqSPKrKbmY6YXKU7tx74R5tSOL726DDLwKycmx7tDjVW5u17ZCqU+cJLaPhKmz1lpA0nLefLme4mh4wxg1PXlMC6BG4vjg5jny00rML6OAs7LfH5HM7vB8cdJrNKBTRFCmuY6npXT1Ao5PtWxOLXcxMjgVK2Z9ClWQOVEUpKedeurTwJ1FlcfRTpRsUXJDaf99ZCZw0mssr6+LttGp+NxrGo51INhHINlM5RZDMUcQd8uLERgQBL9jDtLz9IHAFSzK5+xI4XOyMffe+hcm/Z+u9BRmfxswveDdNWGSwjFR9LVu1vExWg8Sqsorg==; 5:klpjDJmn/vNV56oU4yErG4nN4ky6b+I6s3EhqReJVOsFxeUkzesbUArfdpnPF7EngmtESOdq8RHN22hNq8VElXNCRa6qrr7w21M4R7V1Wtpayv9Q288u/PS0axH73D7OLz4iFqbHR7zcsnrBi2ekqw==; 24:6q3L520pHSu+AkfaBAm8L+20jAHRKjTxjlwW21JBs/KjvP72BKVhiz+eqVoFzUquBp/ff1Ws+9POVDh/ri0Rqh/63f+B1cp8FLiG+xlT+1U=; 7:HI7L4GHvSm8GQ60jCFJaxoNNLbd09iKvksc4PAhBAPP76GHQFP26OfV0azPhOfyb19nHhLyEIMFD9PdRuXTh3LwLGSF3/gPliOYieARSEBHOSjXkzrLcRlbplVTaL0f8MCl4+9I6c68m6m+A6hsWe8ic9SAWlqwU8H5C8Rdl3lDVS4o9MgGu4OQc9SdcoGyFvA2XJRhQ+MO2Nk3KA/ogPmsHwrnzq5GL2zQ0jgeCQuGOjhcgazqsX0lxZxYxYjFa x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0301MB1563; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863)(120809045254105); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:CY1PR0301MB1563; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB1563; x-forefront-prvs: 0997523C40 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(189002)(199003)(377424004)(377454003)(13464003)(5003600100003)(7846002)(450100001)(7696003)(305945005)(66066001)(7736002)(122556002)(10290500002)(8676002)(10400500002)(5002640100001)(2906002)(5005710100001)(5640700001)(102836003)(107886002)(15975445007)(3846002)(99286002)(106356001)(11100500001)(92566002)(74316002)(105586002)(77096005)(2501003)(106116001)(19580405001)(76576001)(87936001)(189998001)(68736007)(110136002)(101416001)(6116002)(9686002)(54356999)(8936002)(3660700001)(1730700003)(76176999)(50986999)(81156014)(81166006)(2900100001)(3280700002)(10090500001)(230783001)(19580395003)(2351001)(8990500004)(33656002)(86612001)(86362001)(2950100001)(586003)(97736004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB1563; H:CY1PR0301MB1562.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Jul 2016 20:57:26.5624 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0301MB1563 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Webpush] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-07.txt X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 20:57:30 -0000 After reviewing with the chairs, I decided to publish webpush-07 in time fo= r IETF 96 to reflect changes in informative references that are works in pr= ogress and were recently updated: * vapid * message encryption * w3c push api Thanks to Idel for a couple of spelling corrections too. There are no changes that impact the WGLC that concludes today. -----Original Message----- From: Webpush [mailto:webpush-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-draft= s@ietf.org Sent: Friday, July 8, 2016 1:52 PM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: webpush@ietf.org Subject: [Webpush] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-07.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Web-Based Push Notifications of the IETF. Title : Generic Event Delivery Using HTTP Push Authors : Martin Thomson Elio Damaggio Brian Raymor Filename : draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-07.txt Pages : 31 Date : 2016-07-08 Abstract: A simple protocol for the delivery of real-time events to user agents is described. This scheme uses HTTP/2 server push. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-07 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-webpush-protocol-07 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ Webpush mailing list Webpush@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush From nobody Sun Jul 10 12:48:31 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 202FC12D0F1 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 12:48:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4vy71uTB2goi for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 12:48:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gateway31.websitewelcome.com (gateway31.websitewelcome.com [192.185.144.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 968EA12D0B1 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 12:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cm2.websitewelcome.com (cm2.websitewelcome.com [192.185.178.13]) by gateway31.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DA09FF9DBB for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:48:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from gator4135.hostgator.com ([192.185.4.147]) by cm2.websitewelcome.com with id H7oR1t0073AKFgo017oSAM; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:48:27 -0500 Received: from c-98-248-153-86.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([98.248.153.86]:36809 helo=[10.0.96.7]) by gator4135.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1bMKiG-000B2N-Pr; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 14:48:24 -0500 From: Shida Schubert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 12:48:23 -0700 Message-Id: <3AF29401-CED5-4B45-ABB4-DE1FE9A14386@ntt-at.com> To: webpush@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator4135.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ntt-at.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 98.248.153.86 X-Exim-ID: 1bMKiG-000B2N-Pr X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: c-98-248-153-86.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([10.0.96.7]) [98.248.153.86]:36809 X-Source-Auth: shida@agnada.com X-Email-Count: 2 X-Source-Cap: c3NoaWRhO3NzaGlkYTtnYXRvcjQxMzUuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== Archived-At: Cc: webpush-chairs@tools.ietf.org Subject: [Webpush] IETF96 WEBPUSH call for Agenda items X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 19:48:30 -0000 All,=20 I know this is so last minute, but please let the chairs know if you = would like to request time to present at Berlin in Webpush mtg.=20 If you are interested, please send the topic/draft and time needed to = the chairs.=20 Thanks!=20 Shida as co-chair= From nobody Sun Jul 10 15:45:00 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29B312B01E for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 15:44:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.07 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.07 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N-rgIczMjZ7m for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 15:44:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gateway30.websitewelcome.com (gateway30.websitewelcome.com [192.185.150.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC46812B008 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 15:44:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cm6.websitewelcome.com (cm6.websitewelcome.com [108.167.139.19]) by gateway30.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C71592259ED for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:44:56 -0500 (CDT) Received: from gator4135.hostgator.com ([192.185.4.147]) by cm6.websitewelcome.com with id HAku1t00h3AKFgo01Akvb6; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:44:56 -0500 Received: from c-98-248-153-86.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([98.248.153.86]:47244 helo=[10.0.96.7]) by gator4135.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1bMNT4-0004oc-I3 for webpush@ietf.org; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:44:54 -0500 From: Shida Schubert Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_69C246D1-A415-41CF-B9B4-CE8E4483D2EE" Message-Id: <61506325-7705-4D1F-B991-322140FD904F@ntt-at.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 15:44:53 -0700 References: <786718A2-C28D-436C-B91D-B3217F459F2E@mozilla.com> To: "webpush@ietf.org" In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator4135.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ntt-at.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 98.248.153.86 X-Exim-ID: 1bMNT4-0004oc-I3 X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: c-98-248-153-86.hsd1.ca.comcast.net ([10.0.96.7]) [98.248.153.86]:47244 X-Source-Auth: shida@agnada.com X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: c3NoaWRhO3NzaGlkYTtnYXRvcjQxMzUuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again) X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 22:44:59 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_69C246D1-A415-41CF-B9B4-CE8E4483D2EE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 All; The 2nd WGLC for webpush-protocol draft concluded on Friday.=20 As there were unanimous support for the draft, chairs will start working = on porto-writeup to submit the draft to IESG. Thanks again for your time and effort. Shida > On Jul 5, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Elio Damaggio = wrote: >=20 > +1 > =20 > Elio > =C2=A0 <> > From: Webpush [mailto:webpush-bounces@ietf.org = ] On Behalf Of Costin Manolache > Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 8:13 AM > To: Benjamin Bangert >; Kit Cambridge > > Cc: jr conlin >; = webpush@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again) > =20 > +1 >=20 > Costin >=20 > =20 > On Fri, Jul 1, 2016, 9:19 PM Benjamin Bangert > wrote: > I'm happy with the draft as-is. Thanks to the editors and chairs. >=20 > Cheers, > Ben > =20 > On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Kit Cambridge > wrote: > I support the draft, with gratitude to the editors and chairs for = their hard work. > =20 > Cheers, > - kit > =20 > =20 > On Jun 23, 2016, at 5:23 PM, jr conlin > wrote: >=20 >=20 > I have no additional concerns or requests for this protocol, and = support this draft. >=20 > Huge thanks to the editors and contributors for their patience and = understanding. >=20 > On 6/23/2016 12:58 AM, Shida Schubert wrote: > All; > =20 > As I noted on the e-mail I sent out on June 7th after the initial WGLC = for webpush protocol draft, we are commencing another WGLC as there are = no remaining issues on github AND the authors have produced the 06 = version of the draft reflecting all resolutions. > =20 > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-06 = > =20 > If you have any issues or questions regarding the draft please submit = it to the list, when raising issues please provide constructive = resolution whenever possible. > =20 > PLEASE acknowledge on the list when you are content/happy with the = status of the draft and you see no issue passing it forward to IESG for = publication.=20 > =20 > The WGLC will conclude at the end of the day on July 8th PST. > =20 > Shida > As co-chair > =20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Webpush mailing list > Webpush@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush = > =20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Webpush mailing list > Webpush@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush = > =20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Webpush mailing list > Webpush@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush = > =20 > _______________________________________________ > Webpush mailing list > Webpush@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush = _________= ______________________________________ > Webpush mailing list > Webpush@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush = --Apple-Mail=_69C246D1-A415-41CF-B9B4-CE8E4483D2EE Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

All;

The 2nd WGLC for webpush-protocol draft concluded on = Friday. 

As= there were unanimous support for the draft, chairs will start working = on porto-writeup to submit the draft to IESG.

Thanks again for your time and = effort.
Shida

On = Jul 5, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Elio Damaggio <elioda@microsoft.com> wrote:

+1
 
Elio
 
From: Webpush [mailto:webpush-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf = Of Costin = Manolache
Sent: Sunday, July 3, 2016 8:13 = AM
To: Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com>; = Kit Cambridge <kcambridge@mozilla.com>
Cc: jr = conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com>; webpush@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Webpush] WGLC for = draft-ietf-webpush-protocol (again)
 

+1

Costin

 
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016, = 9:19 PM Benjamin Bangert <bbangert@mozilla.com> wrote:

I'm happy with = the draft as-is. Thanks to the editors and chairs.

Cheers,
Ben
 
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 8:06 AM, Kit Cambridge <kcambridge@mozilla.com> wrote:
I = support the draft, with gratitude to the editors and chairs for their = hard work.
 
Cheers,
- kit
 
 
On Jun 23, 2016, at 5:23 PM, jr conlin = <jconlin@mozilla.com> wrote:


I = have no additional concerns or requests for this protocol, and support = this draft.

Huge thanks to the editors and = contributors for their patience and understanding.

On 6/23/2016 12:58 AM, Shida Schubert wrote:
All;
 
As I noted on the e-mail I sent out on June 7th after = the initial WGLC for webpush protocol draft, we are commencing another = WGLC as there are no remaining issues on github AND the authors have = produced the 06 version of the draft reflecting all resolutions.
 
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-06<= o:p class=3D"">
 
If you have any = issues or questions regarding the draft please submit it to the list, = when raising issues please provide constructive resolution whenever = possible.
 
PLEASE acknowledge on the list when you are = content/happy with the status of the draft and you see no issue passing = it forward to IESG for publication. 
 
The WGLC will = conclude at the end of the day on July 8th PST.
 
Shida
As co-chair

 

_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing =
list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

 

_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
 


_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

 
_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush
_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing = list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

= --Apple-Mail=_69C246D1-A415-41CF-B9B4-CE8E4483D2EE-- From nobody Sun Jul 10 16:06:16 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B5C12D0BD for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 16:06:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tPf88H3oyHD7 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 16:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AB24128E19 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 16:06:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id o67so13738842qke.1 for ; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 16:06:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zy5z7w46GgNLzTs1eWyWD43nBzXIaLkruQhVp7wcA5k=; b=BmS8fftsDfmFKnqEZxUNZjz58N4sdI4bLVoTxtf0NklhyeK3Qkf3RUJkfz0ia0Kp/B xPii0Bcz7/DKsXoECEA4P3vs+abyPY1+iBBbU7v2mfXeP8PPhxSo3ZhJoExxMkXfaB/r RYP4CEzfL+CErOVoPwmUyyGBfFZJ8r/eQodBazVYDXFHSjDg89mKPEdbh2jIeJB2JDnL JSaORbny21i22gpTRSUvxpBB5Uzu9IZhu1DC92XSg1ttTq3WBNwJGhLhRcdiFrwofLIi OGnWbiN6/bczDKodUASXQ9EBH6Ev7BxB1AsSwaf68hoXb1Y/WWDjiNU4xJ11v165qzmN 0onQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zy5z7w46GgNLzTs1eWyWD43nBzXIaLkruQhVp7wcA5k=; b=lSkLfsTyBMO8s0kvPyJJnUgwlG8w/oeDjYNsMiXiSOhV87SUzaNFxL06nNuCHz35iY H6sVWJ/OdbxUW+rUT6MMQF3u9sjwAfyWGAX+kkmAwsu/8jytc0+9N1ienufxf2xrdNvE DT3Q1gz/+FcxyPjBB8YAUkP8Y9Z2OWOVcXOPtCIJbHY5BxpKEsjftPDEt9VswdskaL08 i5VynXwtnnes7Aon58v33W9FfxreqQgE14HM3Ykjy/5c9Ubr7ow+GhDO+s2qFO5vQAjh 9QQee2vvgLbImBLF/5jMPYT31CnoGzWZXUtUySRZDQBwBD0yABHzBanuWCTwl6kQgb9F a7bQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLyE4bktqaBb5PlQGQi1T9V/3yLVjxFpPKMou7uALd7n2Z4KslP6mvG9I9yDXpAn/NqkheIeRaslgMASw== X-Received: by 10.55.152.135 with SMTP id a129mr21129521qke.199.1468191973274; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 16:06:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.22.38 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Jul 2016 16:06:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Martin Thomson Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:06:12 +1000 Message-ID: To: jr conlin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Archived-At: Cc: JR Conlin , "webpush@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [Webpush] vapid issue 24: supplementary data in tokens X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 23:06:15 -0000 PR up: https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-vapid/pull/25 On 2 July 2016 at 02:08, jr conlin wrote: > I think it's absolutely fine to point out the additional claims. It may > also be a good idea to provide some guidance about what name prefix to > use to avoid potential conflicts should this header be compounded like > the Crypto-Key header. (e.g. The advice in RFC 6648 is probably good here. JWT has a registry if people want to coordinate things. > It may also be worth noting that some servers (like apache) limit the > maximum acceptable size of headers to 8K, so it's best not to go too > nuts with the amount of extra data you're storing. Yes, good advice. From nobody Sun Jul 17 15:16:20 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F05712B02C for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 15:16:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.92 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ni9Y9ltxD2uw for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 15:16:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gateway31.websitewelcome.com (gateway31.websitewelcome.com [192.185.143.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C42E12B00D for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 15:16:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cm6.websitewelcome.com (cm6.websitewelcome.com [108.167.139.19]) by gateway31.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04BEB1777B01C for ; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 17:16:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from gator4135.hostgator.com ([192.185.4.147]) by cm6.websitewelcome.com with id KyGE1t00N3AKFgo01yGF4r; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 17:16:16 -0500 Received: from [46.189.45.139] (port=25335 helo=[10.5.8.90]) by gator4135.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1bOuMA-000WFn-5F; Sun, 17 Jul 2016 17:16:14 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) From: Shida Schubert In-Reply-To: <3AF29401-CED5-4B45-ABB4-DE1FE9A14386@ntt-at.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 00:16:17 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20B1D571-7912-4602-B8A3-BC5BAB82C02A@ntt-at.com> References: <3AF29401-CED5-4B45-ABB4-DE1FE9A14386@ntt-at.com> To: Shida Schubert , webpush@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator4135.hostgator.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ntt-at.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 46.189.45.139 X-Exim-ID: 1bOuMA-000WFn-5F X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: ([10.5.8.90]) [46.189.45.139]:25335 X-Source-Auth: shida@agnada.com X-Email-Count: 1 X-Source-Cap: c3NoaWRhO3NzaGlkYTtnYXRvcjQxMzUuaG9zdGdhdG9yLmNvbQ== Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Webpush] IETF96 WEBPUSH call for Agenda items X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 22:16:19 -0000 All; As there were no requests for agenda items, we have withdrawn our = session.=20 Thanks! Shida as co-chair > On Jul 10, 2016, at 9:48 PM, Shida Schubert wrote: >=20 >=20 > All,=20 >=20 > I know this is so last minute, but please let the chairs know if you = would like to request time to present at Berlin in Webpush mtg.=20 >=20 > If you are interested, please send the topic/draft and time needed to = the chairs.=20 >=20 > Thanks!=20 >=20 > Shida as co-chair > _______________________________________________ > Webpush mailing list > Webpush@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush From nobody Mon Jul 18 11:20:34 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDCD12B036 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:20:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3jA7jFqZJUQ2 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B87412D0FF for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:20:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id i5so128684510wmg.0 for ; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:20:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-transfer-encoding:subject:message-id:date:to :mime-version; bh=nHuvb28uRKg63pf65krFJzBpW3g3ql29nc8E9RzcEhA=; b=xePWAYhwvtsskIV037uQQ5+U6QS5GTLUyfkwlEW8eE7gPoTdS37FE0i12aBM1rKhdo 2RrboLWqkp9FqJ6Fk2Byo6s53PswcQ40fxoFBANidsvxPlq52rmrhDuAlWPlOtryRMzN e51/4Wp7ckCP7z223BOYPbIkTdMxqNfEC/Sqdul6fLNgS6NMvKEsZcC2qBcLNPCJmDa2 jpWsuhu1vGKTh2/jl4Fur4rirlKdjJQ1Nj2iAQ2vxikm5quqL1QcWKAycvdp8n655FGV 6AyhK5VSZLUjcqx7JyWxRCKuO+HSN8Gn5YWt6asxaP+lV0nTg0uDr9orM20ia5Ymc558 h3iw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:content-transfer-encoding:subject :message-id:date:to:mime-version; bh=nHuvb28uRKg63pf65krFJzBpW3g3ql29nc8E9RzcEhA=; b=Gtqj+gefo/u51+87tSbGcsCrbi9dvMvlX3DvGXzD1ltU+sY8RTNwCLbUsBO1QGpInP soYKzC7MjodVhFtqgJl3fSxfSA0ukxLj4V6JUFe5Txor/nd0apTSV80Tl/j8bI98DR6h 5RSt1RTFvyoIfyknpVKogi5qHMQe+Bs6skWnzyYBusG9PIg+HKbfz4JraCFhfFU820IG HtPBBGf3N3+DHsfeuQ2278nf/35EXtQsItvA0Vm9ZVoyUSlX91EhpWorBC+jdv1um2+L HKKmdJsxO9Q2BVPo444WKEJ290KRNGP6FE60+FTWIprWA94BTOcY5nkA24QBDA5DTn66 Y9Zw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLsLm9xJW0ktyCS7pNuqiEwciRF95Obvv1Z+C2hpBfs/kfHLDfzz/mh1CGQ+5dmQQ== X-Received: by 10.194.158.226 with SMTP id wx2mr2745140wjb.160.1468866028590; Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:20:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-9b5e.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9b5e.meeting.ietf.org. [31.133.155.94]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r16sm17930746wme.16.2016.07.18.11.20.27 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Jul 2016 11:20:28 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?Lucas_Jen=C3=9F?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:20:27 +0200 To: webpush@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Archived-At: Subject: [Webpush] Review based on first read-through X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 18:20:33 -0000 Hello all, I=E2=80=99ve met Martin at the IETF 96 newcomer meet and greet, and he = suggested that having another review for webpush-protocol couldn=E2=80=99t= hurt, so here I am. This is my first draft review, so apologies if = I=E2=80=99ve done something fundamentally wrong.=20 First off, let me say that the draft was quite enjoyable to read. I have = no relevant prior knowledge regarding protocol design docs, and most of = the document was very straight forward to read and understand. There = were two things, however, which caused some confusion while reading. 1. Until reaching Section 6, the concept of =E2=80=98monitoring for push = messages=E2=80=99 actually works was unclear to me, but the term itself = was used multiple times, beginning in Section 2. It was especially = confusing in Section 5.3, where it says "A user agent MAY include the = Urgency header field when monitoring for push messages [=E2=80=A6]=E2=80=9D= . Reading this, I got the feeling that I had missed some crucial aspect = in the previous sections, since, for me, it reads like the reader should = know how =E2=80=9Cmonitoring for push messages=E2=80=9D works. This = problem was made somewhat worse by the fact that, when the process of = monitoring for push messages is explained in Section 6, the word = =E2=80=9Cmonitoring=E2=80=9D is never used, which makes it impossible to = find by simply searching the document. 2. In Section 6, for me as a person who has no relevant experience with = webpush or HTTP/2, it is not easily possible to understand which = messages are sent to whom, both in the descriptions that begin with = "Each push message is pushed as the response to a synthesized GET = [=E2=80=A6]=E2=80=9D as well as in the example requests. While I think I = was able to infer from the context who the originators and recipients = are in each case, I personally think it should be made clear who the = sender of each message is. Since I=E2=80=99m not sure if I fully and = correctly understand the mechanism yet, I unfortunately don=E2=80=99t = have a good proposal on how to fix this. Based on Martin=E2=80=99s suggestion I=E2=80=99ve also created a pull = request on GitHub [1] with some minor quibbles and a couple of change = proposals. Given that this is based on my first read-through of the = draft, I expect some of them to be nonsense, so don=E2=80=99t be mad :) Cheers and have a good evening, Lucas [1]: https://github.com/webpush-wg/webpush-protocol/pull/124 From nobody Thu Jul 21 08:09:03 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2BB612D640 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:09:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mwJkrTUtijPx for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:08:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7754712D645 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:08:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id f65so25282890wmi.0 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:08:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:subject:message-id:date:to:mime-version; bh=w1dPrqikzxjndvLRWUPRkfa8SwRdixKeaoDpHWB98u0=; b=JQs+ewNJZqlh7LnAd7BWOYF/qDy96LAVQyQZt6Ua7kRZZi9GCqAf2VjtRtqKiw5iPA g2hK2QimsIAQJ8iA8lzwZ9oN8Ui4f+KCIeTbOX0dwOYH/TosnJo4rF028Pim3X4cV7n8 Y8lGr4liWg58dtJhgog5PKfko7hUBCmTGY3vySX8rt88NaZ25py0pUdclTT0+NltkVkw NhSwI7IPiMgVD38dw0g4PGAptC+Wkv2Dm0FG0gj+8/6q5tghHPj8TbamM9ng9cjLRrJ2 1S6X7PbaYHErlsCDjIlxrN2nlkh09xPeKRbTBqdSa4hxBMnHB05Il4+8I35c76BIOZbH 9JEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:message-id:date:to:mime-version; bh=w1dPrqikzxjndvLRWUPRkfa8SwRdixKeaoDpHWB98u0=; b=Esytq292xoOBeOEEDgEBjVaIus1I5ytPt7+rb+f7XSy7ZOxNyA+VYq4F/3qKs607lB kWyqrFXHdNvvzY450E/LrH+d/tyH0PMtIckp+hlRORsZWOM3wvKktvjleP3ZMR++lw9u 4CdBZWnLZK/8O504pp+OM0dEIjHUykxHCS0Ucxi1d3LbnJZVDalGS1Zuy13IU4zzjchN yhyhWe20XVjWf26i3Q3CqwiFoNXx0/62UglmfNK6zFofWuADw4JMExfsyQNE6f1GE0bn 3YFDHAVUKftF9jdJYRd6tOkdPpWUoMW5UFtyiP8WjkWItRnLUbepUEtNNmPScF6mZG1F bOUg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLfyjBdltv+lBU99pHSGakioHZfYDKgz/hbfOx4HimBIEhAG1G/Nc54DpAMs3M4cA== X-Received: by 10.28.18.11 with SMTP id 11mr17811647wms.11.1469113737830; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:08:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:ec0d:ef58:58fb:2f11? ([2001:67c:370:176:ec0d:ef58:58fb:2f11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n131sm1724454wmd.3.2016.07.21.08.08.57 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:08:57 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?Lucas_Jen=C3=9F?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_937D3BCF-075C-4769-8C79-368BA2F1DCF0" Message-Id: <595F7E66-C533-4878-9687-A14EC49F6513@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 17:08:56 +0200 To: webpush@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Archived-At: Subject: [Webpush] Existing implementations of the push service X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:09:01 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_937D3BCF-075C-4769-8C79-368BA2F1DCF0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Hello everyone, I=E2=80=99ve been looking for existing (possibly partial?) = implementations of the push service, but was unable to find anything. = I=E2=80=99m aware of the following list: https://github.com/web-push-libs = (node.js, Java, Python, PHP) https://github.com/GoogleChrome/web-push-encryption = (node.js) https://github.com/Martijnc/gowebpush = (Go) https://github.com/zaru/webpush (Ruby) https://github.com/beverloo/webcrypto-push-encryption = (JS, Web Crypto) = https://github.com/gauntface/simple-push-demo/tree/master/src/scripts/encr= yption = (JS, Web Crypto) But these all seem to be applications/libraries either receiving or = sending push notifications, often interacting with GCM. I=E2=80=99m = probably missing something or searching for the wrong thing, I suppose. = Would somebody be so kind as to point me into the right direction? Best regards, Lucas= --Apple-Mail=_937D3BCF-075C-4769-8C79-368BA2F1DCF0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Hello everyone,

I=E2=80=99ve been looking for existing (possibly partial?) = implementations of the push service, but was unable to find anything. = I=E2=80=99m aware of the following list:

https://github.com/web-push-libs (node.js, Java, = Python, PHP)
https://github.com/GoogleChrome/web-push-encryption (n= ode.js)
https://github.com/Martijnc/gowebpush (Go)
https://github.com/zaru/webpush (Ruby)
https://github.com/beverloo/webcrypto-push-encryption = (JS, Web Crypto)
https://github.com/gauntface/simple-push-demo/tree/master/src/s= cripts/encryption (JS, Web Crypto)
But these all seem to be = applications/libraries either receiving or sending push notifications, = often interacting with GCM. I=E2=80=99m probably missing something or = searching for the wrong thing, I suppose. Would somebody be so kind as = to point me into the right direction?

Best regards,
Lucas
= --Apple-Mail=_937D3BCF-075C-4769-8C79-368BA2F1DCF0-- From nobody Thu Jul 21 08:23:52 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8127712D742 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:23:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.34 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.34 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zN9iepYFAVFL for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-pf0-x233.google.com (mail-pf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A860012D69A for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:23:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id y134so31431268pfg.0 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:23:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mozilla-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=Sa8jZ89/lDCSfLh4oaiJemMALQTKSJQK/XkRSsLNgr0=; b=jeVi+hBBE/bpLesQO7ms1oKvY4quBHiQ0rplhBJG+Ocnkx12dBq2edGTfyEoxqU1t8 TGuzkGHopUnQANIc8o8IPkhAHa/5PG+AVnUOXp6dXhnxtDTXShHVFK13pwaN1FfWikD5 mhl6gcv/c0S2j0XgO9iDZ0yuIGcrF9m/s3bImFMfpaXnbTBSEavT9WtnpB6OexvEUjBu b2soQ83xa0g78NpsPp1p5NBiK5AB3yzVIslWSw81JI/WCJ+JoSNBvKs8AbPW/SlPfSqZ GGoOamm5KN2MJG7gBsiIWQXHCu6bV7EamNF96l1JBAhQPHXCoPMDe4x9l5E2cscvljEl tytQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=Sa8jZ89/lDCSfLh4oaiJemMALQTKSJQK/XkRSsLNgr0=; b=m8XpDEAtLjc54qxJDkVrFZo7b1UwFkUmosrmYczEuAqUVcHfO7b3+eS6p16PsFALtN /kyujFxypwo13z2Xne/N6UsCN2ElH9VfAd2ouViZsN9WvkQbsD6ZzVcFIAeJ0+f7xtbe ilS+uciC2S0AYIj6ekrVY/WQyPx9NJ/dYXBHJzBZsgVKXY6GQeSZA72UdiSH+S+tAyil N05YIrSiSK2g0ssRayZH1FnWHTNDXAzjzNlXfY6QV6R5iRCl2xw63GoB5lkqMmfifBsl 5UdDEJ3EmYDwfqrrrC0pbdpSDmULmPW5+lKLW17iSqE8t+YHlPCA8VJeSuUdUT/7uTU+ cdrA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIHEym66jgKw0ZIEZTiouDl+ZmLLytPa0LHR7/ByMImnnYuE4LR8cTpThAPw/XZmzYe X-Received: by 10.98.79.140 with SMTP id f12mr66891473pfj.161.1469114618747; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:23:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2620:101:80fc:224:7da6:b096:b734:caaf? ([2620:101:80fc:224:7da6:b096:b734:caaf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g21sm418171pfj.88.2016.07.21.08.23.38 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:23:38 -0700 (PDT) To: webpush@ietf.org References: <595F7E66-C533-4878-9687-A14EC49F6513@gmail.com> From: jr conlin Message-ID: Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:23:38 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/49.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <595F7E66-C533-4878-9687-A14EC49F6513@gmail.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------591A6C5F97AA49918162AF6B" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Webpush] Existing implementations of the push service X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:23:48 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------591A6C5F97AA49918162AF6B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit I'm not quite sure I follow what you're looking for. If you're interested in running your own Push Service, our code is available at: https://github.com/mozilla-services/autopush This is the full server we use, but please understand that we do rely on AWS services for a fair bit of our processing. If you want to set up a personal server, it's reasonably straight forward to do. Likewise, it should be possible to factor in more "stand-alone" elements like the database, but you'll want to fork it for that. If you are looking to use WebPush to send subscriptions, the libraries below will help. They don't do things like handle subscription management or scaling up large distributions, but each of those tend to have problems and concerns that are unique to each provider. Is that what you're looking for? On 7/21/2016 8:08 AM, Lucas Jenß wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I’ve been looking for existing (possibly partial?) implementations of > the push service, but was unable to find anything. I’m aware of the > following list: > > https://github.com/web-push-libs (node.js, Java, Python, PHP) > https://github.com/GoogleChrome/web-push-encryption (node.js) > https://github.com/Martijnc/gowebpush (Go) > https://github.com/zaru/webpush (Ruby) > https://github.com/beverloo/webcrypto-push-encryption (JS, Web Crypto) > https://github.com/gauntface/simple-push-demo/tree/master/src/scripts/encryption (JS, > Web Crypto) > > But these all seem to be applications/libraries either receiving or > sending push notifications, often interacting with GCM. I’m probably > missing something or searching for the wrong thing, I suppose. Would > somebody be so kind as to point me into the right direction? > > Best regards, > Lucas > > > _______________________________________________ > Webpush mailing list > Webpush@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush --------------591A6C5F97AA49918162AF6B Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
I'm not quite sure I follow what you're looking for.

If you're interested in running your own Push Service, our code is available at:
https://github.com/mozilla-services/autopush
This is the full server we use, but please understand that we do rely on AWS services for a fair bit of our processing. If you want to set up a personal server, it's reasonably straight forward to do. Likewise, it should be possible to factor in more "stand-alone" elements like the database, but you'll want to fork it for that.

If you are looking to use WebPush to send subscriptions, the libraries below will help. They don't do things like handle subscription management or scaling up large distributions, but each of those tend to have problems and concerns that are unique to each provider.

Is that what you're looking for?

On 7/21/2016 8:08
 AM, Lucas Jenß wrote:
Hello everyone,

I’ve been looking for existing (possibly partial?) implementations of the push service, but was unable to find anything. I’m aware of the following list:


But these all seem to be applications/libraries either receiving or sending push notifications, often interacting with GCM. I’m probably missing something or searching for the wrong thing, I suppose. Would somebody be so kind as to point me into the right direction?

Best regards,
Lucas


_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush


--------------591A6C5F97AA49918162AF6B-- From nobody Thu Jul 21 08:48:27 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FD912D0B4 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:48:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hl_DV0x2Vkjk for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:48:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7A5E12B031 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:48:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id i5so30587067wmg.0 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:48:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:references:to:in-reply-to; bh=dm0SOSQF5YydH6biHpFU+UUOW5k0BcgzQc7tRu/FBm0=; b=iAd/Ma98ei8ThpvdmCODjPflCTUBRh3pP+cdSk4DUleJKIduuDRzcWW1MU350Aa2nT lZIXGTkNljrcle8QRJ3nx9j3MK2Rnms/OrsL5nU/PrEsoipIePwuDsBAANJUq/C/WXJe 56aeENwGiJ1b10UaLSsCojdBfyeEqkDkeFtyzxEjjlqW8TekGcpsYUA+F12sJtoseQ2/ huBb7O3tDsWjkaBTpHSSWQ0e97levMfczf4JXV+ScKYzhvg4FpoZB8zOFLI6/1Es1p2C a1W4ZL2B/dFvma6cVxrB0hVyD2OklS9ldCKmbWb7UF7lmxL2sRFUFOhTWvuWO+DUKT82 LMbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :references:to:in-reply-to; bh=dm0SOSQF5YydH6biHpFU+UUOW5k0BcgzQc7tRu/FBm0=; b=Uin22DzlbNbilkGK7ws7F6N2eC3gL7F/bFqZFAXMA+HAMyu8mj3FHjh1//aYg6i6A4 19uc68qIGFNAUZrjTLCeeIijJQiVCFpVAE67m5fMo9HR1HqNvSfR7joR4LU4o39BaanV L/JHtYva0PlPW6yXDsvuVwLHaVKUnxLSyRCd+uJThYJ2aA6I2mMqwVxnjORdEpwMFXX+ htzEK1Bd+CnDc2BDszkWgCI5DJn84axab6k6EOxfcyCFHMctxKq+cQpg2Tz2ebCVfLsI A5rk/6PNaXbs3LHUF6eV6lTRKqzX61tv5KwbyGYay7HOf2NMUBSynVwBLWDtr8k2ajlj Rg+A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJSbOfAXcsCUYFbltAg3Lyl/mWf8JZxjhPRIjzqokhirgyiVMyDhMTp+IbTEuLD2Q== X-Received: by 10.28.92.80 with SMTP id q77mr19466280wmb.66.1469116100078; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:ec0d:ef58:58fb:2f11? ([2001:67c:370:176:ec0d:ef58:58fb:2f11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c131sm2910655wmh.1.2016.07.21.08.48.19 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jul 2016 08:48:19 -0700 (PDT) From: =?utf-8?Q?Lucas_Jen=C3=9F?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_45D6B164-DBDA-4E00-AF8F-C4CC5DF635E2" Message-Id: <6BBEA934-7975-4679-844C-B0409260668C@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 17:48:18 +0200 References: <595F7E66-C533-4878-9687-A14EC49F6513@gmail.com> To: webpush@ietf.org In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Webpush] Existing implementations of the push service X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:48:24 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_45D6B164-DBDA-4E00-AF8F-C4CC5DF635E2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Something like autopush was indeed what I was looking for, thanks. Cheers, Lucas > On 21 Jul 2016, at 17:23, jr conlin wrote: >=20 > I'm not quite sure I follow what you're looking for. >=20 > If you're interested in running your own Push Service, our code is = available at: > https://github.com/mozilla-services/autopush = > This is the full server we use, but please understand that we do rely = on AWS services for a fair bit of our processing. If you want to set up = a personal server, it's reasonably straight forward to do. Likewise, it = should be possible to factor in more "stand-alone" elements like the = database, but you'll want to fork it for that.=20 >=20 > If you are looking to use WebPush to send subscriptions, the libraries = below will help. They don't do things like handle subscription = management or scaling up large distributions, but each of those tend to = have problems and concerns that are unique to each provider. >=20 > Is that what you're looking for? >=20 > On 7/21/2016 8:08 > AM, Lucas Jen=DF wrote: >> Hello everyone, >>=20 >> I=92ve been looking for existing (possibly partial?) implementations = of the push service, but was unable to find anything. I=92m aware of the = following list: >>=20 >> https://github.com/web-push-libs = (node.js, Java, Python, PHP) >> https://github.com/GoogleChrome/web-push-encryption = (node.js) >> https://github.com/Martijnc/gowebpush = (Go) >> https://github.com/zaru/webpush = (Ruby) >> https://github.com/beverloo/webcrypto-push-encryption = (JS, Web Crypto) >> = https://github.com/gauntface/simple-push-demo/tree/master/src/scripts/encr= yption = (JS, Web Crypto) >>=20 >> But these all seem to be applications/libraries either receiving or = sending push notifications, often interacting with GCM. I=92m probably = missing something or searching for the wrong thing, I suppose. Would = somebody be so kind as to point me into the right direction? >>=20 >> Best regards, >> Lucas >>=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Webpush mailing list >> Webpush@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush = >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Webpush mailing list > Webpush@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush --Apple-Mail=_45D6B164-DBDA-4E00-AF8F-C4CC5DF635E2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Something like autopush was indeed what I was = looking for, thanks.

Cheers,
Lucas

On = 21 Jul 2016, at 17:23, jr conlin <jconlin@mozilla.com>= wrote:

=20 =20
I'm not quite sure I follow what = you're looking for.

If you're interested in running your own Push Service, our code is available at:
https://github.com/m= ozilla-services/autopush
This is the full server we use, but please understand that we do rely on AWS services for a fair bit of our processing. If you want to set up a personal server, it's reasonably straight forward to do. Likewise, it should be possible to factor in more "stand-alone" elements like the database, but you'll want to fork it for that.

If you are looking to use WebPush to send subscriptions, the libraries below will help. They don't do things like handle subscription management or scaling up large distributions, but each of those tend to have problems and concerns that are unique to each provider.

Is that what you're looking for?

On 7/21/2016 8:08
 AM, Lucas Jen=DF wrote:
Hello everyone,

I=92ve been looking for existing (possibly = partial?) implementations of the push service, but was unable to find anything. I=92m aware of the following list:

https://github.com/web-push-libs (node.j= s, Java, Python, PHP)
https://github.com/GoogleChrome/web-push-encrypti= on (node.js)
https://github.com/Martijnc/gowebpush (G= o)
https://github.com/zaru/webpush (Ruby)
https://github.com/beverloo/webcrypto-push-encryp= tion (JS, Web Crypto)
https://github.com/gauntface/simple-push-demo/tre= e/master/src/scripts/encryption (JS, Web Crypto)

But these all seem to be applications/libraries either receiving or sending push notifications, often interacting with GCM. I=92m probably missing something or searching for the wrong thing, I suppose. Would somebody be so kind as to point me into the right direction?

Best regards,
Lucas


_______________________________________________
Webpush mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.or=
g/mailman/listinfo/webpush


_______________________________________________
Webpush = mailing list
Webpush@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush

= --Apple-Mail=_45D6B164-DBDA-4E00-AF8F-C4CC5DF635E2-- From nobody Fri Jul 22 11:46:13 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietf.org Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 372A612D5FF; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:46:09 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.29.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <20160722184609.12224.9292.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:46:09 -0700 Archived-At: Cc: webpush@ietf.org Subject: [Webpush] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-08.txt X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 18:46:09 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Web-Based Push Notifications of the IETF. Title : Generic Event Delivery Using HTTP Push Authors : Martin Thomson Elio Damaggio Brian Raymor Filename : draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-08.txt Pages : 31 Date : 2016-07-22 Abstract: A simple protocol for the delivery of real-time events to user agents is described. This scheme uses HTTP/2 server push. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-08 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-08 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From nobody Fri Jul 22 11:49:57 2016 Return-Path: X-Original-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: webpush@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF58D12E094 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:49:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.022 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.022 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PwSg7IjXd4f8 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from NAM01-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam01on0116.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.34.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EA8012E0A0 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 11:49:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=CPDRa1aaswMm02tljjW/QJjBxf02sy7vIuQUUbm29zg=; b=O6H4+C+F2AfN2UUEJCIrKFf6rjGK4OzvBg8ST7gKmE4aghgYxT/yq2+RLMo72tBbOqUCNUlXqj16rOhtrxYvTwjytyrt74iqeCctqddvVq02z50hdLOGACnLmUwOLKaYuKEutmUtNkiCFKfV6+mpGrzadRBVHeeXHhHcjqhIVs0= Received: from CY1PR0301MB1562.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.166.12) by CY1PR0301MB1563.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.166.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.544.10; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 18:49:48 +0000 Received: from CY1PR0301MB1562.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.166.12]) by CY1PR0301MB1562.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.166.12]) with mapi id 15.01.0539.021; Fri, 22 Jul 2016 18:49:48 +0000 From: Brian Raymor To: "webpush@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Webpush] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-08.txt Thread-Index: AQHR5EldYcRfoO+IE0uhL5IMb7YImaAkyljA Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 18:49:48 +0000 Message-ID: References: <20160722184609.12224.9292.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20160722184609.12224.9292.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Brian.Raymor@microsoft.com; x-originating-ip: [46.189.28.47] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d4b43da4-1558-483c-c0eb-08d3b260f4ec x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; CY1PR0301MB1563; 6:qa47JXvlCeTxEmM5Y6buSbYKSOv3PjRNwNQmXTnZyRSZqi4tyNOsJaPj9sdwZkpxzUSIkd53kmxL+wCe6wolDmAyWbWque1s1dBqD0HnSaubUtDeGY297jQBl/LyPVR7VFwmbwj9vsnykRlN/1mSSDlfstPPmwtHbut1N0awOxqpnzhKABTwYpZhpyB5bJh3rhzGbt+BTAJB12BVraSc+Jakzb3GBg/eL8xkRSpJj/ZtiQatSTpQZ/EDYhtV5x4hQDlhPTWdb8iW84CcAugu5ZigcQVqrHeySGhjnwVPYCg/52u7F/RhQnu2lS1+N1c7+iHUV085w8PJMsr9qsSHTA==; 5:KOlPiBMHWVDLDrzu0cLyHXP9YfLBd46k6huLEloShGkPZQ3LxvTbBlT1QBandxuozdlTA4csKeX/5Daq7sG9I8ADT7ne2Lg0Czo0uTkSX9Rtwk+VZMHHpaOw1L43PTenfkPyVrczRwd0e3aO1mlWbQ==; 24:WAVEMmPO/gN+cFh/4CkVSbsw2z+xtN1ZWMl/umogrnee/UKzrmGkkIU5lOiNPlNcjzvMpfBNhABw2aAC38bOnMVbVK80EEXio6axiiY16e0=; 7:Ey+eD8YDdl5gSLN8E0+KD6RL8yzi3Gmszir/PI01aQN50Od/lRVO+mtEaiKt2C794A25phwoA4BhLzPxKMn4I3DdIfnFBYGduelxu4TQ9KE1o/C/izyrWYAPpqXBqQ9eKGXEXBp3k+8jO0DiAA5a1LQt/oeCBwbbxnBsW8B4coJfWN9R+982J79RNwS6fKsAdRG6A153bsnzQf9DlhKR0O0Ah7KZDxX9p0h5v3bR8IKRu0EbUW2eR8w2roARugyP x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR0301MB1563; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863)(120809045254105); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(61425038)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6055026)(61426038)(61427038); SRVR:CY1PR0301MB1563; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB1563; x-forefront-prvs: 0011612A55 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(377424004)(13464003)(199003)(189002)(377454003)(586003)(92566002)(3846002)(6116002)(102836003)(10290500002)(8990500004)(99286002)(106356001)(5005710100001)(10400500002)(66066001)(5002640100001)(105586002)(10090500001)(15975445007)(77096005)(8936002)(11100500001)(86362001)(450100001)(110136002)(107886002)(97736004)(9686002)(189998001)(87936001)(2906002)(5640700001)(3280700002)(86612001)(19580395003)(1730700003)(8676002)(19580405001)(305945005)(81166006)(5003600100003)(7736002)(101416001)(7846002)(122556002)(76576001)(68736007)(7696003)(76176999)(2351001)(50986999)(106116001)(81156014)(2900100001)(2950100001)(2501003)(33656002)(74316002)(54356999)(3660700001)(230783001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:CY1PR0301MB1563; H:CY1PR0301MB1562.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Jul 2016 18:49:48.3451 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR0301MB1563 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Webpush] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-08.txt X-BeenThere: webpush@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of potential IETF work on a web push protocol List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 18:49:57 -0000 This is minor editorial cleanup based on the feedback from Lucas.=20 -----Original Message----- From: Webpush [mailto:webpush-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-draft= s@ietf.org Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 11:46 AM To: i-d-announce@ietf.org Cc: webpush@ietf.org Subject: [Webpush] I-D Action: draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-08.txt A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Web-Based Push Notifications of the IETF. Title : Generic Event Delivery Using HTTP Push Authors : Martin Thomson Elio Damaggio Brian Raymor Filename : draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-08.txt Pages : 31 Date : 2016-07-22 Abstract: A simple protocol for the delivery of real-time events to user agents is described. This scheme uses HTTP/2 server push. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol/ There's also a htmlized version available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-webpush-protocol-08 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-webpush-protocol-08 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ Webpush mailing list Webpush@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/webpush