From nico@cryptonector.com Thu May 3 13:33:36 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB5521F867F for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 13:33:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.797 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.234, BAYES_40=-0.185, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gRDckT-+Vom8 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 13:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaib.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE34221F867E for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 13:33:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB7C76806A for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 13:33:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s= cryptonector.com; b=jJQ1+kaX5RA1bzRfdDI+wTJDimBhcb6vIXBV4fqdlP+0 64RL+jZKAobjtP1fHzoc/xRLIF8TP2AepuPKPmdUO8sFT9w03R9Rk370tJ5kt1ql mn6KBQb4rcYbrVGElCkXe4o2hwfUM+x6VUCChahrzulfcWQ8pvqIbsWp39sNYmM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s= cryptonector.com; bh=eCVHO2KdUAxGojMDv4pP5/nO9h8=; b=v5daelZW1gG fTWbrVk83h9qSbprU21cccVHFHU2ShqB62An/ifoFDlsyI4sD4IVlDJJwP7Dh1cH ZsEgv19+KGeauIVYUJ4g1HI4sYoJoDlX/CI83VXxbz2fxHFr+emhoKu4j1uy2R1c Vg+ExQiETId8pAUd1Tf5N7LspSOkbjEQ= Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7A905768057 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 13:33:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so3008988pbc.31 for ; Thu, 03 May 2012 13:33:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.221.10 with SMTP id qa10mr11066733pbc.139.1336077213998; Thu, 03 May 2012 13:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.28.6 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2012 13:33:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 15:33:33 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: xml2rfc@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [xml2rfc] Alternate XML schemas, or XSLTs? Latexml -> xml2rfc conversion? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 20:33:36 -0000 Has anyone written an XSLT to convert from latexml's schema to xml2rfc schema? The latexml schema is here: http://dlmf.nist.gov/LaTeXML/manual/schema/ . The reason I ask is that I'm wondering if LyX could be made to output Internet-Drafts by way of exporting to tex, then applying latexml, then postprocess with an XSLT stylesheet to convert to xml2rfc schema, finally typeset with xml2rfc. Then we'd have a WYSYWIG Internet-Draft editing tool. Nico -- From miekg@atoom.net Thu May 3 14:10:45 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB24721F86B6 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:10:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LIFtUPm09EW6 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:10:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elektron.atoom.net (elektron.atoom.net [85.223.71.124]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C8921F86AB for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:10:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by elektron.atoom.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C76C53FF4D; Thu, 3 May 2012 23:10:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 23:10:40 +0200 From: Miek Gieben To: xml2rfc@ietf.org Message-ID: <20120503211040.GA14414@miek.nl> Mail-Followup-To: xml2rfc@ietf.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux X-Home: http://www.miek.nl Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Alternate XML schemas, or XSLTs? Latexml -> xml2rfc conversion? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 21:10:45 -0000 --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [ Quoting in "[xml2rfc] Alternate XML schemas, or..= =2E" ] > Has anyone written an XSLT to convert from latexml's schema to xml2rfc sc= hema? >=20 > The latexml schema is here: http://dlmf.nist.gov/LaTeXML/manual/schema/ . >=20 > The reason I ask is that I'm wondering if LyX could be made to output > Internet-Drafts by way of exporting to tex, then applying latexml, > then postprocess with an XSLT stylesheet to convert to xml2rfc schema, > finally typeset with xml2rfc. Then we'd have a WYSYWIG Internet-Draft > editing tool. Seems like a simular route I took in pandoc2rfc (https://github.com/miekg/pandoc2rfc). The style sheet translates from DocBook XML to xml2rfc. Maybe you can use that as a starting point? gtrz Miek --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+i9FAACgkQJYuFzziA0PYkFQCeL2U3dvkREN/4ae3zCTdrdpku gCUAnR0tmY5bPe5g1/zClt2Roc21CgKC =qAFg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7-- From nico@cryptonector.com Thu May 3 14:19:13 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E9B21F86C6 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:19:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.676 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.299, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Sl9-d4k0NeDH for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a87.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaid.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FAD21F84AA for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a87.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a87.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4929726C073 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:19:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: content-type; q=dns; s=cryptonector.com; b=XKXs6cZPCSRmeBTMuE9NZ 8BLL9YtfXEQzTJhrx7YWamDVkm/eQFWtq8oajo2RVlwI7dDBnPraiojcjFDQhQzL QW4cEdVb7Cu5Yax5f3//MMV0qW2L2SK0m5tKUw8EDwpKK31yIBwJoK/lrC5LcjUn zJNTgJIExjcgWub8V7eunw= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=EXUTIN/yu8j0T3WHMhkH2AJ OE5M=; b=u8czPtvmlbOk/qJohBMHhBEi8Ut3gKbHFHRjYsYzMcVuStVOgTvbm+K DJ0eyI9dBi1TQsXRYzNi8SKt8iqpbwQslnA9TpGNhWvB1RGLI3ip+vpHraDC2EgU 2mPNFE6Gmae864gs5Howc58ZjkSii6CWwiOOg0C9G3JjCvhn4aNA= Received: from mail-pz0-f52.google.com (mail-pz0-f52.google.com [209.85.210.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a87.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 291A826C063 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by dadz9 with SMTP id z9so3000913dad.39 for ; Thu, 03 May 2012 14:19:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.237.33 with SMTP id uz1mr11626637pbc.55.1336079951835; Thu, 03 May 2012 14:19:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.28.6 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:19:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120503211040.GA14414@miek.nl> References: <20120503211040.GA14414@miek.nl> Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 16:19:11 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: xml2rfc@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Alternate XML schemas, or XSLTs? Latexml -> xml2rfc conversion? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 21:19:13 -0000 On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Miek Gieben wrote: > [ Quoting in "[xml2rfc] Alternate XML schemas, or..." ] > Seems like a simular route I took in pandoc2rfc > (https://github.com/miekg/pandoc2rfc). The style sheet translates from > DocBook XML to xml2rfc. Maybe you can use that as a starting point? Oh, I'll take a look, thanks! There's a LaTeX to DocBook XML conversion tool, TeX4ht, that I might be able to use to convert to docbook, then I might be able to use your pandoc2rfc tool. I've been using VIM for years to edit xml2rfc XML, but I'm getting bored of that :) Nico -- From miekg@atoom.net Thu May 3 14:21:34 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D86421F86D8 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:21:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3lhfszC4-CqG for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elektron.atoom.net (cl-201.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:c8::2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A3F21F86D7 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:21:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by elektron.atoom.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 667A73FF4D; Thu, 3 May 2012 23:21:32 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 23:21:32 +0200 From: Miek Gieben To: xml2rfc@ietf.org Message-ID: <20120503212132.GA28555@miek.nl> Mail-Followup-To: xml2rfc@ietf.org References: <20120503211040.GA14414@miek.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Vim/Mutt/Linux X-Home: http://www.miek.nl Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Alternate XML schemas, or XSLTs? Latexml -> xml2rfc conversion? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 21:21:34 -0000 --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [ Quoting in "Re: [xml2rfc] Alternate XML schemas..= =2E" ] > > [ Quoting in "[xml2rfc] Alternate XML schemas, = or..." ] > > Seems like a simular route I took in pandoc2rfc > > (https://github.com/miekg/pandoc2rfc). The style sheet translates from > > DocBook XML to xml2rfc. Maybe you can use that as a starting point? >=20 > Oh, I'll take a look, thanks! >=20 > There's a LaTeX to DocBook XML conversion tool, TeX4ht, that I might > be able to use to convert to docbook, then I might be able to use your > pandoc2rfc tool. >=20 > I've been using VIM for years to edit xml2rfc XML, but I'm getting > bored of that :) I did that too, right now I only edit Pandoc sources (http://johnmacfarlane.net/pandoc/), which is such a bless :) See https://github.com/miekg/nsec4 for a real life example. Regards, --=20 Miek Gieben --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk+i9twACgkQJYuFzziA0PaOIwCg3aPKPt84zt/2hmDfhsfl5Mhr k4UAoNcgMGetqSvmSDepXVZYEhKBVAi1 =xolA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf-- From nico@cryptonector.com Thu May 3 14:42:13 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327A421F86DD for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:42:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.369 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.592, BAYES_50=0.001, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_57=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j86v6uj0y9+7 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaid.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA1E21F86D8 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718801005D for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:42:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= cryptonector.com; b=RK+6ESpe6YBa7rfGSO7K192iQOIrt/vQr7wM+1THJ1zT B2VxJy3E3eTQQF7otTlvSpAZKCLwBuZuZlIyweXHnSYQlThVinafN0McYPdBjidz q0IZGrgx/OKfmSUcPoO5TDHlIN6hCdPC3kfR3tHHV4rkMizDszwf5VkH54UNHSI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=cryptonector.com; bh=8cWd0pPfMkr3WRJAGbKr2zXGzu4=; b=HZpExNWFAtsYury5waOyQ+ogqoIf rb+NkHThXHXBmtO79x6gBuEviMSRMYhflfncfkRkD5MSdVo4vibIUd1MaKSvDRCA oTyZQ2GZvdDWmQcvytC1xlH3Tv8A1EBtZVoDrFcvAS7HmOrXBLkhr7Wlq1+wuNLc 2gud5KHvZHezHTc= Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 260EF10041 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:42:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so3068553pbc.31 for ; Thu, 03 May 2012 14:42:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.221.10 with SMTP id qa10mr11524272pbc.139.1336081331273; Thu, 03 May 2012 14:42:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.28.6 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:42:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120503212132.GA28555@miek.nl> References: <20120503211040.GA14414@miek.nl> <20120503212132.GA28555@miek.nl> Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 16:42:11 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: xml2rfc@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Alternate XML schemas, or XSLTs? Latexml -> xml2rfc conversion? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 21:42:13 -0000 So I've got a simple test-i-d.lyx file, dead simple: it has a title, an author, an abstract, a section and a subsection. I export it as LaTeX, then I run htlatex test\-i\-d.tex xhtml,docbook " -cunihtf" -cdocbk then I tried to apply your transform: xsltproc --nonet ../../ws/pandoc2rfc/transform.xsl test\-i\-d.xml but this only produces plain text output on stdout that looks like this: draft-williams-httpbis-auth-classi=EF=AC=81cation Nicolas Williams May 3, 2012 Abstract This document proposes a classi=EF=AC=81cation scheme for HTTPbis authentication proposals, to help with analysis and selection. 0.1Introduction 0.1.1Conventions used in this document The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119. What am I doing wrong? Nico -- From nico@cryptonector.com Thu May 3 14:43:35 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F3D21F86DB for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:43:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.035 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.858, BAYES_50=0.001, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, J_CHICKENPOX_32=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_57=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8nQiPaU+kQDY for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:43:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbhh.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF1D21F86D8 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:43:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DFCA10062 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:43:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: content-type; q=dns; s=cryptonector.com; b=yJYiLecI1f0+39Q5sIEwh qxX2scAmdpc9ZHFh+wr+gTahZvNzgDzMY0o/aR5UtejWgCVN7AxUx6VUOgyAry7t Wfx4+spDKfBpgO/PrPznB4I3+G6PzUd8S1Yi94H3ewdOaGyu9n7o1LGkiqOlBfb+ kunqHlhpc0m8ES5JaVSRCI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=80pRRqSfv/2Ks54b0VALAwj L12E=; b=MYmYiCqJbk0krMb6LLsok2kEPF++uolmUpMa+rsteJ+r5OxAs4ygnMF 93SyTW48ooeZSTBm2FlGPnRTTJhTLzbLqqPHyWndNWw6O6pR0jP6cM6oiCsajbvI jYJ3u490uKTkDoVesKMzBIvStr6PZVgfadUzMWka0xGzfsHnM21c= Received: from mail-pz0-f52.google.com (mail-pz0-f52.google.com [209.85.210.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a34.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 333FF10060 for ; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:43:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by dadz9 with SMTP id z9so3041152dad.39 for ; Thu, 03 May 2012 14:43:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.135.40 with SMTP id pp8mr11720826pbb.13.1336081413878; Thu, 03 May 2012 14:43:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.28.6 with HTTP; Thu, 3 May 2012 14:43:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20120503211040.GA14414@miek.nl> <20120503212132.GA28555@miek.nl> Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 16:43:33 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: xml2rfc@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Alternate XML schemas, or XSLTs? Latexml -> xml2rfc conversion? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 21:43:35 -0000 The .xml output by htlatex looks like this (I had to change the URL for docbook.dtd):
draft-williams-httpbis-auth-classification Nicolas Williams May 3, 2012 Abstract This document proposes a classification scheme for HTTPbis authentication proposals, to help with analysis and selection. ... From nico@cryptonector.com Thu May 10 21:53:11 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F85E21F850C for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 21:53:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.677 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.677 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.114, BAYES_40=-0.185, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A9pdqqeDO7UC for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 21:53:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdccac.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.202]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0455C21F8507 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 21:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7AF11B4061 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 21:53:03 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: content-type; q=dns; s=cryptonector.com; b=Tzd/aMK/XnPnf1IdmMWyH 64nS1usZruTV9CgEbXW/vgK3PjCsknOQsyT1lknYQmT2qbu8EQrUpVINdg3XmhHc RAsPZQC6X6GRwMGJHJV6GiJWIztulx0AI/a6hol996tJcghhqLKhbm9bPzKXF6j8 M32lWx58U497lhr0ovP+Bg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=mp3EWRGOzFBJHqg22rF3zdm 0d6k=; b=et7tbfWc+SVJbSR0CZTJYkdyfcyYyBYVbeWiYjfT4jEa32FyAc1/TfA NpA6nigNv/N+X8slgkBuD8Sw0eyzFjc42Nj9NLYqN06aTeQcHrR5e8TKYzuaLopZ TQKnbyI+HLZBuh6L1Gz0hY83x71R7c/ltLk9B5JUrgaC5a5A5PxA= Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E36A1B405F for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 21:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by dacx6 with SMTP id x6so2716524dac.31 for ; Thu, 10 May 2012 21:53:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.204.2 with SMTP id ku2mr27490936pbc.55.1336711983262; Thu, 10 May 2012 21:53:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.5.99 with HTTP; Thu, 10 May 2012 21:53:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 23:53:03 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: xml2rfc@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Alternate XML schemas, or XSLTs? Latexml -> xml2rfc conversion? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 04:53:11 -0000 I'm actually making good progress now on an XSTL (2.0, sadly) stylesheet to convert LyX XHTML output (which is less lossy than the other LyX->XML and LyX->TeX->XML conversions I've tried) into xml2rfc output. I've to work out some issues with tables and references, and I have to add support for more author meta-data (which I now know how to do). Once I have this working it'd also be nice to develop a LyX layout and class for properly displaying and printing, respectively, Internet-Drafts/RFCs written in Lyx -- not really necessary, I know, given xml2rfc, but for RFCs with complex math formulas and such it might be a good idea. LyX is a WYSIWYM -- what you see is what you mean -- editor. It's only missing a vi mode and it'd be my ideal editor for complex documents. Being able to author Internet-Drafts in LyX might make editing I-Ds easier and more accessible for many people. Nico -- From nico@cryptonector.com Fri May 11 00:51:26 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E95521F85F9 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:51:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.563 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.186, BAYES_50=0.001, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YsgPdn0v+fx7 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a16.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaid.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D8921F85B7 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a16.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a16.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE4650806E for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:51:25 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to: content-type; q=dns; s=cryptonector.com; b=F6ELTlyYwZy++X+2F39Op cFbY352w+NFSwEe+LUL7USMT4S3/Bb+IqHMwz48RAulCjK/ysrHPfUjvcMrbqsw3 7htRHtfmQ6XNpGibGUlPE4rLrABD4iy2g+nBRK/FOACyu7xZEpFkCGvr6pjQUF7/ p77TqlIR5CVfluDdekX2wU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=w0IhJ5aI6eH4K0KPPVgFhfe N55Q=; b=SX4fXwmtas9fivcyzosqxtgDT6oKcCpSeVqP3Bfn7+9oxm/mpIN7qVq EsVrOfBEjt8Vr/pKBjuSntjrh7EvozA1BvP45YTyuGqSGGSkwNtIBjOkfmEurgyo xMZ6dgTHKwfjsemntNNKqjX8jaUszse8kGrLUWzb9AAp43jrGI+8= Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a16.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 09DE6508064 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:51:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so3085652pbc.31 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:51:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.135.40 with SMTP id pp8mr28786148pbb.13.1336722684726; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:51:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.5.99 with HTTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 00:51:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 02:51:24 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: xml2rfc@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Alternate XML schemas, or XSLTs? Latexml -> xml2rfc conversion? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 07:51:26 -0000 Making a lot more progress. Thanks a lot for your help! From nico@cryptonector.com Fri May 11 18:08:17 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7256B21F8483 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:08:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.542 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.542 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.165, BAYES_50=0.001, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r5soDcjhbhgm for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:08:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbbj.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.119]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F38DE21F85BD for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ADC1584058 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:08:16 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s= cryptonector.com; b=oZEEclrV+oR1TqUbwfOckSS0imJn6Drndmsq4FSDjUbT JYcq7seKWrapBQsIITu7NHCRvAxV1yQBTsstRTyBo5OKvG60RKEagp0rPpZ6V0Sc lgw/MCF8XSY5eVTAWOnmoFvqz0T4mn78wWyI+BYWhagIGhkwyW+agHAhiVc6BJc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s= cryptonector.com; bh=edJiR1szgSVGcV2QN6iUXhbf9oI=; b=VCrkbgPNB82 SZZNU14/flo7bra26iILHvLwVtqQtXq1ADukF+mM4nWerEjeq6CY/MzE9KNRT5KP XFu6CYYrPdfK0MzkDlQ4TfNN7EBd9txBwP1KbG6cCW8E5YZp+0ZHeB/+DMW02uRG Jkdl0XUqsinwuE3NpiUz0b6WClONBkBk= Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5AA05584057 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:08:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so4082970pbc.31 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:08:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.132.201 with SMTP id ow9mr332886pbb.160.1336784895824; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.5.99 with HTTP; Fri, 11 May 2012 18:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 20:08:15 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: XML2RFC Interest Group Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [xml2rfc] Odd error: xml2rfc: error: list doesn't contain element 4 around input line 168 X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 01:08:17 -0000 xml2rfc: error: list doesn't contain element 4 around input line 168 Even if I remove all elements I still get this. What's it mean? Nico -- From tony@att.com Fri May 11 19:33:10 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CFD21F84AF for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 19:33:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -104.375 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.375 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.365, BAYES_20=-0.74, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tOPv6RMWnXq1 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 19:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com [209.65.160.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14CCE21F846D for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 19:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [144.160.20.146] (EHLO mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-6.11.0-8) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 4ebcdaf4.0.1583190.00-367.4365317.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Sat, 12 May 2012 02:33:09 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 4fadcbe55a1760fa-f5ddb1efdf210b22350547a39335aac54c4fcfe6 Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4C2X6CQ012527 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:33:08 -0400 Received: from sflint04.pst.cso.att.com (sflint04.pst.cso.att.com [144.154.234.231]) by mlpd194.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4C2X3bh012523 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:33:04 -0400 Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by sflint04.pst.cso.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:32:37 -0400 Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4C2WbC0022071 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:32:37 -0400 Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4C2WWhJ021973 for ; Fri, 11 May 2012 22:32:33 -0400 Received: from [135.70.160.144] (vpn-135-70-160-144.vpn.mwst.att.com[135.70.160.144]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20120512022907gw10060l2ue> (Authid: tony); Sat, 12 May 2012 02:29:08 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [135.70.160.144] Message-ID: <4FADCBBF.40507@att.com> Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 22:32:31 -0400 From: Tony Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nico Williams References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-RSA-Action: allow X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.20.146] X-AnalysisOut: [v=1.0 c=1 a=j8aDBR96Q90A:10 a=4JAii899aesA:10 a=dsaiZPhBQ7] X-AnalysisOut: [gA:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:1] X-AnalysisOut: [0 a=Qs8R1XBwmid1qBFB/a8mmA==:17 a=lcXNqnGv9wVTk8cLEGcA:9 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10] Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Odd error: xml2rfc: error: list doesn't contain element 4 around input line 168 X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 02:33:10 -0000 What's the new version of xml2rfc say? Tony Hansen On 5/11/2012 9:08 PM, Nico Williams wrote: > xml2rfc: error: list doesn't contain element 4 around input line 168 > > Even if I remove all elements I still get this. What's it mean? > > Nico From nico@cryptonector.com Sat May 12 01:22:14 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8379621F8631 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:22:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.077 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.077 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.589, BAYES_05=-1.11, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IgeVaJzAZLnP for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:22:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hapkido.dreamhost.com (hapkido.dreamhost.com [66.33.216.122]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFCE21F85F9 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:22:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcahe.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.74]) by hapkido.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971711DAE8D for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34ACD1DE060 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc: content-type; q=dns; s=cryptonector.com; b=YraTClOGdRtL/hx/e6VEZ PSk8dPeq8q9nejSihynBv5Yiijt21qinM7ilxKJUpANTVCKpcM6lEnssxzhz4Vox mgnDT7OZ9DiSWGKjshqetDFZrL5S6WQm3cnDxSmB997hFPPgFwRmNgjPKyLR5j7q cDMBuME9H2+tnopF+pQjnI= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=mlmXseEp3m8cxLLLuQyZ OCaktEg=; b=RrBFfUcJma4TTY/eDXsqIo1AbsXO3e+eemvfXkOn40wa2okPzb3u thAhquJn0ERpIR2+8rEmBWmmlnlxwlpdeZnYGfuCaXkHdVBl4778oBFpdKSj+Jw9 TtJcvPdu1U/g8Neiw+xOoI1BvQxClNtUaRuQNyVlUpUGtya9FuJwmws= Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2490C1DE05D for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:21:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so4344276pbc.31 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:21:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.135.40 with SMTP id pp8mr3194706pbb.13.1336810880682; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:21:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.5.99 with HTTP; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:21:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FADCBBF.40507@att.com> References: <4FADCBBF.40507@att.com> Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 03:21:20 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: Tony Hansen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Odd error: xml2rfc: error: list doesn't contain element 4 around input line 168 X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 08:22:15 -0000 I solved the problem. I now have a LyX XHTML->xml2rfc XSLT that works, albeit with lots of warnings. I do need to move to the newer xml2rfc, fix the warnings, ... I'll do that tomorrow. Thanks for reminding me to move to the new xml2rfc version. Nico -- From julian.reschke@gmx.de Sat May 12 01:23:47 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E2721F8618 for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:23:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.524 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aM6RrCEEbUKA for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E803B21F862F for ; Sat, 12 May 2012 01:23:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 12 May 2012 08:23:44 -0000 Received: from p54BB3021.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [84.187.48.33] by mail.gmx.net (mp031) with SMTP; 12 May 2012 10:23:44 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18D8bkqLykDiWtaY2u1tmHI3ZufqLTX1EetUEUktC Is5jKrWiZKov30 Message-ID: <4FAE1E0D.5070305@gmx.de> Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 10:23:41 +0200 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nico Williams References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Odd error: xml2rfc: error: list doesn't contain element 4 around input line 168 X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 08:23:47 -0000 On 2012-05-12 03:08, Nico Williams wrote: > xml2rfc: error: list doesn't contain element 4 around input line 168 > ... Source file? Best regards, Julian From nico@cryptonector.com Thu May 17 10:20:44 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0683E21F86F1 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:20:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.92 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.802, BAYES_20=-0.74, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 178i1OSfuTcc for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:20:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcbef.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 030A621F86F0 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C031DE071 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:20:42 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; q=dns; s= cryptonector.com; b=De2sZl/YERPrqsumbbhvlwNokfQhG3FNXuZosWMDj1Hi QFTaNN/ftZe3NGPHAYcDYyNqLgQ843UY/+LeO8q8aDgJu5TPETG2OVMu7XhpB48+ cAm9PXEdR3NtMPk43S2RFa+H13nwo6BcK81TZT/bQggeDN4++vTVC9XpBXPgdi8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; s= cryptonector.com; bh=93oDSRWHdUsK23VMeHQ4YbR574I=; b=AjptLZIaEDT OrKwe28wqHqO9nY9iz8y1HUyi7GMCdd0PnhFJ5vNkGRtE8+YOCrLchHO/lOGU+LC fGxbKFWawbZIJsAOmZbY8UewkdItoli6gSbTS55BPK6I/RMCvp15Dsr+3PLuZf7T 3N5wJ7YX62hMevPc2lCkCWqayKCGuwSo= Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6603F1DE060 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so2883969pbc.31 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:20:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.132.166 with SMTP id ov6mr16280776pbb.24.1337275241942; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.5.99 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:20:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:20:41 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: XML2RFC Interest Group Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: [xml2rfc] LyX -> RFC online, work in progress X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 17:20:44 -0000 https://github.com/nicowilliams/lyx2rfc It works well enough that I can actually write a lengthy I-D (in progress) that xml2rfc (old version) formats with minimal complaints: xml2rfc: warning: element is deprecated, use
instead around input line 422 xml2rfc: warning: now defaults to "yes" around input line 436 Also, I need to add various metadata to cover PIs like whether to generate toc and so on, but it's really quite functional now. I suppose I should include a screenshot, but, there's plenty at lyx.org to get started with. Note that normally I'm very much a VIM in a screen(1) kind of a person. I just got tired of , what can I say. LyX doesn't have VI keybindings, which sucks for me, but I still want to try this out for a while. Nico -- From julian.reschke@gmx.de Thu May 17 10:29:27 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F0321F86FA for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:29:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.562 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.562 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iRaGsGRY-U9W for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:29:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DEA7221F86F6 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:29:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 May 2012 17:29:22 -0000 Received: from p54BB26EE.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [84.187.38.238] by mail.gmx.net (mp004) with SMTP; 17 May 2012 19:29:22 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18M5sVpeakMLtl+O65pMWc0fCvcXVNTfgu/tHajcx GVKltCsHX5ijKR Message-ID: <4FB53550.7000906@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:28:48 +0200 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nico Williams References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] LyX -> RFC online, work in progress X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 17:29:28 -0000 On 2012-05-17 19:20, Nico Williams wrote: > https://github.com/nicowilliams/lyx2rfc > > It works well enough that I can actually write a lengthy I-D (in > progress) that xml2rfc (old version) formats with minimal complaints: > > xml2rfc: warning: element is deprecated, use
> instead around input line 422 Indeed. Don't use . > xml2rfc: warning: now defaults to "yes" around input line 436 Do you have the PI set at all? > ... Best regards, Julian From nico@cryptonector.com Thu May 17 10:41:35 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E646821F86FF for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:41:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.838 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.838 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.139, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fq-Szwimyggt for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaid.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5422E21F869F for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998EB768070 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:41:34 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= cryptonector.com; b=I6sUCSLw58Aj7PFTngHHn0+ExmI/Kg19WEmb8YiT5gni sv9VwwyV4OVMqpkUM+ZIK6DgoPLAQJoGdPZnZTTqJVBsWF/lw6PF47HR8QIRsCiY JU8iuOmfWGhsPgiH+/ReZtr0kD2E2JRvML0JyjRxVngTFwFwXf0ikGb6/saTzg8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=enNlxpSh0sYKtVam5JfXumFTC2M=; b=kksmN3rks73 DpxNsHxkKYZMKxvXIu5QD3by2IqY0lBbQS/gy8DhsE/cCIDzDqqjwITKQD2zVyem n/rYGKFFArKSRUEdJyhz9mHbO+hyHHOwTH7tvFPe8f94T830kIlkEFuiJHsfSxOh nfwEDqslSQx3AJ0E4iaO8WzdeHMCmRuI= Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E19F76806B for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so2907793pbc.31 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:41:34 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.132.232 with SMTP id ox8mr1897289pbb.145.1337276494168; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:41:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.5.99 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:41:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FB53550.7000906@gmx.de> References: <4FB53550.7000906@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 12:41:34 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: Julian Reschke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] LyX -> RFC online, work in progress X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 17:41:36 -0000 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Julian Reschke wr= ote: > On 2012-05-17 19:20, Nico Williams wrote: >> https://github.com/nicowilliams/lyx2rfc I added screenshots just now. >> It works well enough that I can actually write a lengthy I-D (in >> progress) that xml2rfc (old version) formats with minimal complaints: >> >> xml2rfc: warning: =C2=A0element is deprecated, use
>> instead around input line 422 > > Indeed. Don't use . I know :) I'll get to that... since it's only a warning and renders fine... I had many more warnings earlier, not to mention errors. BTW, you seem to know a lot about XSLT... I had to resort to XSLT 2.0 and some ugly twists to handle conversion of h2, h3, and h4 elements into section elements. Any ideas for how to do that in XSLT 1.0? I couldn't find any recipes general enough (i.e., covering nested sections). >> xml2rfc: warning: =C2=A0now defaults to "yes" around i= nput line >> 436 > > Do you have the PI set at all? No, I have to add that too. Nico -- From julian.reschke@gmx.de Thu May 17 10:48:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC9021F8630 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:48:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.569 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.569 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.030, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ysSF6NcMgsDb for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:48:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DA5C021F841A for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 10:48:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 May 2012 17:48:54 -0000 Received: from p54BB26EE.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [84.187.38.238] by mail.gmx.net (mp072) with SMTP; 17 May 2012 19:48:54 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+wkbdnHZawbZHpusWDGe5jyALRfaVpndyN/hgnTM n8fNDuZT5aTZIL Message-ID: <4FB539E7.50302@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:48:23 +0200 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nico Williams References: <4FB53550.7000906@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] LyX -> RFC online, work in progress X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 17:48:57 -0000 On 2012-05-17 19:41, Nico Williams wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:28 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: >> On 2012-05-17 19:20, Nico Williams wrote: >>> https://github.com/nicowilliams/lyx2rfc > > I added screenshots just now. > >>> It works well enough that I can actually write a lengthy I-D (in >>> progress) that xml2rfc (old version) formats with minimal complaints: >>> >>> xml2rfc: warning: element is deprecated, use
>>> instead around input line 422 >> >> Indeed. Don't use. > > I know :) I'll get to that... since it's only a warning and renders > fine... I had many more warnings earlier, not to mention errors. > > BTW, you seem to know a lot about XSLT... I had to resort to XSLT 2.0 > and some ugly twists to handle conversion of h2, h3, and h4 elements > into section elements. Any ideas for how to do that in XSLT 1.0? I > couldn't find any recipes general enough (i.e., covering nested > sections). If you have a minimized example, I can try. In general, everything is possible in XSLT 1.0, it just can get very painful. Grouping is a weakness. >>> xml2rfc: warning: now defaults to "yes" around input line >>> 436 >> >> Do you have the PI set at all? > > No, I have to add that too. xml2rfc was supposed to warn about the absence of the PI just for a transition period; I guess this should be fixed in the TCL code. Best regards, Julian From nico@cryptonector.com Thu May 17 11:07:13 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323FB21F86FE for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:07:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.84 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.84 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.137, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BAu7F9eA9q86 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a98.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdccac.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.202]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9366E21F86E8 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a98.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a98.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7072C207D for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:07:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s= cryptonector.com; b=way6pzziprck0NzcQoZ0/H0zv/oXdNaETnUYL2lTkhUG ZLe0CRlkYpVlqd2fALSHJY1NuIzoyRnp7d0F2jla+iGfI8hAQGzCpoNbVDOeJXzQ QXziTc4diiFmGCUvFbqDK2N1iy6EhW1X3qJ1lh1z8ptu+R6KdueTJ9ByXo8FG9w= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= cryptonector.com; bh=2yFQT9esgdZ5NLkqte/2ovVez+c=; b=ebo5mCADL9P waI+zJMK36F4F2JSU8fSGwitZGZUB+KYiE2e3o4siKZqPErWs0t6U6YdxJKrNGPX PEoUoaCE7qoO6LQgK730I5dZA1vHU2hW64SKo9f8zWbnYwRNwH9qwA1QM0aJrHRV mlviKGUjC0MH76eUYpRhObl2cu3txaMY= Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a98.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF04E2C2057 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so2937264pbc.31 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:07:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.192.74 with SMTP id he10mr29091677pbc.69.1337278031226; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:07:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.5.99 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 11:07:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FB539E7.50302@gmx.de> References: <4FB53550.7000906@gmx.de> <4FB539E7.50302@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 13:07:11 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: Julian Reschke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] LyX -> RFC online, work in progress X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 18:07:13 -0000 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Julian Reschke wr= ote: > On 2012-05-17 19:41, Nico Williams wrote: >> BTW, you seem to know a lot about XSLT... =C2=A0I had to resort to XSLT = 2.0 >> and some ugly twists to handle conversion of h2, h3, and h4 elements >> into section elements. =C2=A0Any ideas for how to do that in XSLT 1.0? = =C2=A0I >> couldn't find any recipes general enough (i.e., covering nested >> sections). > > If you have a minimized example, I can try. I've added a sample .xhtml file to my repo. You can see sequences of elements like:

2 Details

Some text. Here's a protected space, and here's a bunch of them:      , see?

2.1 A sub-section

and

2.1.1 A sub-sub-section

cool.
To simplify:

section title

...paragraphs...

subsection title

... There's no closing of sections. > In general, everything is possible in XSLT 1.0, it just can get very > painful. Grouping is a weakness. I looked and looked. I couldn't find a recipe that supports nesting of sections. I ended up relying on the XPath 2.0 << operator, and even so it feels very hackish. But surely this must be a common problem!! (The O'Reilly XSLT Cookbook covers this, but not with support for nesting, so I know it has come up before.) Nico -- From nico@cryptonector.com Thu May 17 12:58:33 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3782B21F87C8 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:58:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.610, BAYES_05=-1.11, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vCDRW+riELA0 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (mailbigip.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7208321F87CF for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6B7768059 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:58:32 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc: content-type; q=dns; s=cryptonector.com; b=uZ2oJntbnacTGnNpBXu3c +M4u9SlTGbI05uGJnXqEpiRH73CT0h6rGjXjK1BsDefuwQZprIeKDx8IwU9Yt0jj HbjQKxDSebi5U/2Ryq1EhbelwEt5FuMv2caxfjdLgsSNVSdMtryXw/mpcKJaCAul Hp29qztz3tU9rRk9VKvFdM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=E/Yses+apl539NP9K8MH PFqDlGk=; b=QcYA8MwBArwO2KFNTDJ7t1eurYnwOk+RNHQkfVSeoPN2DAzPOTi5 hDuVcFopUYiHJfXv5wVrNR6DwP7DDLdp0IDj93kIBpBW0NemTqAIC6Fa5ziNrxB7 2LjM7rGkw7jor+RcWlOY0yGHuKqsImf+YWXPPGFKAJxTnQY+hq6YuVs= Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a70.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0AA4F76801C for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:58:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by dacx6 with SMTP id x6so2919029dac.31 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:58:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.216.33 with SMTP id on1mr30393424pbc.105.1337284711489; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.5.99 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 12:58:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FB53550.7000906@gmx.de> References: <4FB53550.7000906@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 14:58:31 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: Julian Reschke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] LyX -> RFC online, work in progress X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 19:58:33 -0000 Actually, I can't find docs saying what should be used to produce an appendix other than the appendix element. E.g, http://xml.resource.org/authoring/draft-mrose-writing-rfcs.html doesn't say. The page for the dev version of xml2rfc also doesn't say. Where should I be looking? Nico -- From nico@cryptonector.com Thu May 17 13:03:11 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FCB421F8764 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:03:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.627 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.627 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.064, BAYES_40=-0.185, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NiZIxgb26Lc4 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcahe.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF00921F8630 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC28584064 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:03:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc: content-type; q=dns; s=cryptonector.com; b=uzOATj97Yd8lnKqXzE1Hv J998EzFm1Y3cDFCjTGYBd3eTGkwzfs/D9wL63jyz3hhghlRdJyv1LH6Rui3NfAaY 9f0oxvhRMQWTgF0/bi8JdeBAbJlruXBmDbmFvVCNgR/I81FgO3BHT2DCxrgB7M6w M/IRaYBL8+5LmI+DzGT4rA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=jT32Ys2asXNg9zO6L5E5 fxr23Tw=; b=NLTpYc1bTbcPAw4D5Vuql4J64+uFQ8qhkQtTxDBloamS565QueKR +EZuh5FLfXRVIQNPkmZ9XrX5yvHDFPyQNyGcKMsNzU7pJscDG6aoAGO7HJh7ED7m DgR02lgCoxvy0UmKCshCL1LZGzpRoO0j1slv9qYDxi/rFdrjaVUHd+w= Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a32.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B62F584059 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so3058159pbc.31 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:03:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.192.5 with SMTP id hc5mr7203158pbc.49.1337284990106; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.5.99 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:03:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FB53550.7000906@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:03:09 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: Julian Reschke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] LyX -> RFC online, work in progress X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:03:11 -0000 Never mind: it's section elements in the back element, following references. From julian.reschke@gmx.de Thu May 17 13:06:57 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BEC321F876A for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:06:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.576 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.576 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vc2PT2tUdK4C for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4EF7221F8766 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 17 May 2012 20:06:52 -0000 Received: from p54BB26EE.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.178.36]) [84.187.38.238] by mail.gmx.net (mp069) with SMTP; 17 May 2012 22:06:52 +0200 X-Authenticated: #1915285 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+ER38O65qETweNN+TJ9DksW0v5QLusHchnhzBap0 PmSA+BXnsA5FDE Message-ID: <4FB55A3D.6030802@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 22:06:21 +0200 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nico Williams References: <4FB53550.7000906@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] LyX -> RFC online, work in progress X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:06:57 -0000 On 2012-05-17 21:58, Nico Williams wrote: > Actually, I can't find docs saying what should be used to produce an > appendix other than the appendix element. E.g, Just put a
into . > http://xml.resource.org/authoring/draft-mrose-writing-rfcs.html > doesn't say. The page for the dev version of xml2rfc also doesn't > say. Where should I be looking? > > Nico > -- I think you're looking in the right place, it's just not there. Best regards, Julian From nico@cryptonector.com Thu May 17 13:18:14 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C6E21F87A2 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:18:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.077 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.077 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.589, BAYES_05=-1.11, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gSwDlR370xSZ for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcagg.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A94D21F879F for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29F5678062 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:18:13 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc: content-type; q=dns; s=cryptonector.com; b=Hj/57z+qX42fRRdjLHgHS iSVsJcHfGuDQPIroodVHXeUWM+5Ss9C/mQvNtCtfytvMhvbt7U54xsm+w+mvo2ZQ rUt9kIDkQOAULXVyASKYcKFo4lKDwpbE58x4UFP2NpvAe85PgtWdcExeA5hMd1o+ 50M+3vkgdCreDZmvhUGpgs= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=abSvXYVnnJDbFT54TOrV HtIfCZQ=; b=u4/8MHclBnWt5B8Y3ldMLCQIM9QMJAI6oYUUs888WDKZttxeq17d WMqDRqZmEcEBFkVBHJkhayEPkVmwh8IpDjdr6f02ahlmNJvofSJo3NyQq/Lo6FpG P6cxET8P9CjVwlgEfVP4NtdHkl1ntKXh981YI6z5zQwQzFe4pbcvTAo= Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B39C3678058 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by dacx6 with SMTP id x6so2939414dac.31 for ; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:18:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.218.72 with SMTP id pe8mr30855103pbc.45.1337285893335; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:18:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.5.99 with HTTP; Thu, 17 May 2012 13:18:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FB55A3D.6030802@gmx.de> References: <4FB53550.7000906@gmx.de> <4FB55A3D.6030802@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:18:13 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: Julian Reschke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] LyX -> RFC online, work in progress X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 20:18:14 -0000 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Julian Reschke wrote: > On 2012-05-17 21:58, Nico Williams wrote: > I think you're looking in the right place, it's just not there. Yeah. Somehow it became obvious after posting. Using
in actually simplified the XSLT stylesheet significantly. I've added PI support, and now I just need to figure the namespace issues so I can fully script this, deal with whatever minor issues as I go. Thanks! Do you think the IETF tools team would like to incorporate this tool? I'd be happy to contribute it. I'd think that a WYISWYM tool for I-D authoring would be somewhat desirable... Nico -- From brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com Fri May 25 00:12:33 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A7D21F8435 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:12:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.676 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.676 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.015, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M-bpS7M3qXkD for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:12:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D606F21F842E for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by eekd4 with SMTP id d4so134266eek.31 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:12:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=RAgA5fdmef6aqHoKsmidtg58YtsOzfCDI4pmwi1qbxg=; b=pen45uE/85uxAfQzzkkZNlzjh+hOHAP38igE7jMLsv2Seex80Nb4oCfv8dcqMdf56M /aiPEPHZ78LnpMs2knkHNVJywNQ5OtbtD/ghyFYu8RWgq4jhI515YkFbcTVyUsom73gc Tdn1lpM4I75uZdTA3YVgUrPrcAzbjvMgMJJI82v3p4wsHx0AEzoaLJ3inSzkwEoZ8X8e wLZK5vXgw42KezViqYSi1ZjkqbvAaYopMeMky0nMoEVk4dgVZ6Mppia6FE3fb6jVNYQf 1id9XjGJ6rb+2Rm9lIsjVdDR6xH4VboZdFtqccbjWoUhPgefeehbEcgmVNFCpJHr5GyZ MUAA== Received: by 10.14.37.199 with SMTP id y47mr424875eea.111.1337929951956; Fri, 25 May 2012 00:12:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (host-2-102-217-25.as13285.net. [2.102.217.25]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f16sm3852426eec.2.2012.05.25.00.12.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 25 May 2012 00:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4FBF30D4.9080207@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 08:12:20 +0100 From: Brian E Carpenter Organization: University of Auckland User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xml2rfc References: <0D89463D-A2E9-420F-8E25-D08DBCB1066B@vpnc.org> <5165953E-F423-4707-A754-996BF882FC50@vpnc.org> <4FBE7FF5.4010706@gmail.com> <4FBE9FAC.8000602@isi.edu> In-Reply-To: <4FBE9FAC.8000602@isi.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [xml2rfc] Using a "modern" word processor X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 07:12:33 -0000 >From the thread [rfc-i] Proposed new RFC submission requirements... On 2012-05-24 21:53, Joe Touch wrote: ... > The requirement for text allows multiple author formats. Allowing the > current XML markup is an option because it allows xml2rfc-tools. > > Forcing a particular markup has implications upstream for author tools. > The markup chosen should be as agnostic to those tools as possible, and > minimal to only those aspects the RFC Editor actually cares about. > > I haven't seen a specific proposal for such a markup. I'll be glad to > see if there's a way to support it in a modern word processor (e.g., MS > Word) once there is. I tried to edit an XML2RFC file using a reasonably modern version of MS-Word and it half-worked by default, showing me the document structure nicely, but it didn't show all the content (for example, not the content of elements. When I tried to feed it with rfc2629.xslt it complained about this and that (security, basically, screen shots available). Does anybody know how to make that work [on Windows]? Brian From nico@cryptonector.com Fri May 25 09:18:00 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF20F21F8710 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:18:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.977 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D8WJkSTjqrxK for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (caiajhbdcaid.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.83]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539ED21F870F for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:18:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED281B4058 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:17:59 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cryptonector.com; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc: content-type; q=dns; s=cryptonector.com; b=tqMaJbhXl640HAJAWl5Ej uxDT1KKVvQqSymb5b1ou5QNBu6z31e1uhDyzjQ1cApT3t9jWveYT6Zoykeu72P20 uFlPFI8YudiR+Zf6uMDPNppuRGGC5QtP9DPeGPpGEd3EyG34eHKOHU7Ih1W6xETX SIvcnw39RJWTZu5RaYnK0Y= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h= mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from :to:cc:content-type; s=cryptonector.com; bh=MMZ2mmydr4hS6MDV2hmj l2Fi2ts=; b=SXN6c5TMuWK1HSiWuVr2JSbcO36QR8YoSLXlS08RSAjK2RqQWo1C hCwsX3+tRw5eBa/fhNpB3/+aCIlYpXIAx+vxCi7uLDMXiSUmMMunu61YlASaM9mo lW5COGHRZD5dcYDQoMbvj8O3bxOihfvNzRCNMaePgApv0sTbuhmGgwc= Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by homiemail-a28.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACD4B1B4057 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:17:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by dacx6 with SMTP id x6so1475884dac.31 for ; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:17:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.202.130 with SMTP id ki2mr33261476pbc.52.1337962678618; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:17:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.15.134 with HTTP; Fri, 25 May 2012 09:17:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4FBF30D4.9080207@gmail.com> References: <0D89463D-A2E9-420F-8E25-D08DBCB1066B@vpnc.org> <5165953E-F423-4707-A754-996BF882FC50@vpnc.org> <4FBE7FF5.4010706@gmail.com> <4FBE9FAC.8000602@isi.edu> <4FBF30D4.9080207@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 11:17:58 -0500 Message-ID: From: Nico Williams To: Brian E Carpenter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: xml2rfc Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Using a "modern" word processor X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 16:18:00 -0000 I'm using LyX, a WYSIWYM GUI editor based on TeX. I've written a lyx2rfc tool that uses XSLT 2.0 (specifically the Saxon XSLT 2.0 processor) to convert LyX XHTML output to xml2rfc schema, then xml2rfc to format the I-D. You can find lyx2rfc here: git@github.com:nicowilliams/lyx2rfc (https://github.com/nicowilliams/lyx2rfc). Included are screenshots and a sample I-D. Most of the xml2rfc functionality is supported; a handful of features are missing: - table column width specifications (but I think I'll add that eventually) - cref - iref xrefs are supported, and actually easy to use. Nico --