From nobody Sun Mar 1 06:07:43 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F3911AC3B8 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 06:07:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J67VZgBDp3qh for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 06:07:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94C851A92AF for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 06:07:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43898 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YS4Wy-0003J7-Cr; Sun, 01 Mar 2015 06:07:40 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 14:07:40 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: /ticket/277#comment:2 Message-ID: <075.72518ce75567a625dc8de9cdc151b3f2@tools.ietf.org> References: <060.78290404827ff2ad2556eaea16493c1b@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 277 In-Reply-To: <060.78290404827ff2ad2556eaea16493c1b@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #277 (Version 2 cli): An empty column breaks xml2rfc (throws unhandled exception) X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 14:07:42 -0000 #277: An empty column breaks xml2rfc (throws unhandled exception) Comment (by henrik@levkowetz.com): From [1804]: Better resolusion of the zero-width table column issue. Related to issue #277. -- ----------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: cabo@tzi.org | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: fixed | Keywords: ----------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Sun Mar 1 10:00:47 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31231A1A6D for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 10:00:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id awBFwHC5qRcO for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 10:00:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 233E51A0263 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 10:00:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58948 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YS8AU-0005rq-WA; Sun, 01 Mar 2015 10:00:42 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:00:42 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: /ticket/275#comment:1 Message-ID: <075.ac6e35f10d90976d2286cec75b2c7281@tools.ietf.org> References: <060.caa5eca00e4ab6c7ae16de26caf53a69@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 275 In-Reply-To: <060.caa5eca00e4ab6c7ae16de26caf53a69@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #275 (Version 2 cli): remote references make xml2rfc slow X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:00:44 -0000 #275: remote references make xml2rfc slow Changes (by henrik@levkowetz.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Fixed in [1806]: Added a switch --no-network to turn off all attempts to use the network to resolve references. When using this, processing will fail if the references required by the source file aren't available in the file cache. Also added code to refresh cached content if it's older than 14 days. Modified some tests to suit. This closes issues #275 and #284. -- ----------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: miek@miek.nl | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: fixed | Keywords: ----------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Sun Mar 1 10:00:48 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4851A0263 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 10:00:45 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0azo4mxYG5P9 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 10:00:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB131A1A60 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 10:00:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:58949 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YS8AV-0005rz-1D; Sun, 01 Mar 2015 10:00:43 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:00:43 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: /ticket/284#comment:1 Message-ID: <083.7f2e46264a6c6a6b07ab80beb08b8901@tools.ietf.org> References: <068.0fcb736a82cf43c2815c5ccccc0c98fd@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 284 In-Reply-To: <068.0fcb736a82cf43c2815c5ccccc0c98fd@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #284 (Version 2 cli): Add a switch to skip network access X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:00:45 -0000 #284: Add a switch to skip network access Changes (by henrik@levkowetz.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Fixed in [1806]: Added a switch --no-network to turn off all attempts to use the network to resolve references. When using this, processing will fail if the references required by the source file aren't available in the file cache. Also added code to refresh cached content if it's older than 14 days. Modified some tests to suit. This closes issues #275 and #284. -- -----------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: henrik@levkowetz.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: fixed | Keywords: -----------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Sun Mar 1 10:55:16 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647861A1BCC for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 10:55:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mElC5ks9nv3e for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 10:55:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 552DC1A1B83 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 10:55:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:33599 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YS91G-0001DE-6U; Sun, 01 Mar 2015 10:55:14 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:55:14 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: /ticket/274#comment:1 Message-ID: <075.c4057ac5f942e698bc23b4cc65f6fa3e@tools.ietf.org> References: <060.d2dfde71e12d9dd7a939b387691b186f@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 274 In-Reply-To: <060.d2dfde71e12d9dd7a939b387691b186f@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #274 (Version 2 cli): handling of
title attribute is inconsistent X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:55:15 -0000 #274: handling of
title attribute is inconsistent Changes (by henrik@levkowetz.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Fixed in [1809]: Fixed a bug where leading whitespace in title attributes weren't handled properly. Fixes issue #274. -- ----------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: tony@att.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: closed Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: fixed | Keywords: ----------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Sun Mar 1 11:36:45 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 629161A1DE2 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 11:36:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -100.5 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TEpJUZowfCW1 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 11:36:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B605C1A1B25 for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2015 11:36:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:35901 helo=vigonier.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YS9eI-00016h-KM; Sun, 01 Mar 2015 11:35:34 -0800 Message-ID: <54F36A02.4020300@levkowetz.com> Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 20:35:30 +0100 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: XML2RFC Interest Group , Ray Pelletier , Russ Housley , Alice Russo , Tony Hansen , Julian Reschke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik-sent@levkowetz.com, ietf@augustcellars.com, julian.reschke@gmx.de, tony@att.com, arusso@amsl.com, housley@vigilsec.com, rpelletier@isoc.org, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] New xml2rfc release: 2.4.9 X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 19:36:44 -0000 This announces the release of xml2rfc version 2.4.9, available for download from: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/xml2rfc This release addresses a number of issues which has been marked as major by the RFC Editor, some other smaller fixes, and also includes a patch from Martin Thompson to render the ToC with sublevel indentation instead of as a flat list for html output. For full details on all tickets, there's always the issue tracker: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/report/. An excerpt from the changelog is available below. Best regards, Henrik -------- Release notes: xml2rfc (2.4.9) ietf; urgency=medium * Applied a patch from Martin Thompson to render the ToC with sublevel indentation, instead of as a flat list, for html output, and updated the html regression test masters to match. * Added a --no-headers switch, valid only for paginated text. Specifying this omits the output of headers and footers, but retains form feed and top-of-page line padding. * Consistently use utf-8 as output encoding. As long as all content is forced to be ascii, this doesn't change anything; if we permit non-ascii content, this ensures it's utf-8 encoded. * Issue a warning for input containing tab characters, and expand to 8, not 4 characters. Fixes issue #276. * Added 'i.e.' as a non-sentence-ending string. Added a test for some abbreviations, including 'i.e.'. Fixes issue #115 * Changed the handling of rfcedstyle so as to include the Authors' Addresses section in the TOC. Fixes issue #273. * Added the ability to create unnumbered sections by using the attribute numbered="no" on the section element, with the constraints specified in draft-hoffman-xml2rfc-15. Fixes issue #105. * In the front page top right-hand matter, don't keep the blank line between authors and date that would otherwise be used for authors without affiliation. Fixes issue #272. * Rewrote the network access code to use the requests package instead of urllib. Added cache cleaning to the tox test actions. -- Henrik Levkowetz 28 Feb 2015 10:27:05 -0100 From nobody Mon Mar 2 03:26:46 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3441A8714 for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 03:26:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.31 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, J_CHICKENPOX_44=0.6, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RCHG4d5yMz9U for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 03:26:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 582151A870D for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 03:26:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:45580 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YSOUk-0007E4-BQ; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 03:26:42 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:26:42 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/285 Message-ID: <068.77deca59c19edc354c0b61f915d6b362@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 285 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, ben@nostrum.com, srdonovan@usdonovans.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: ben@nostrum.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org, srdonovan@usdonovans.com Subject: [xml2rfc] #285 (Version 2 cli): Exception on out-of-date X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 11:26:44 -0000 #285: Exception on out-of-date {{{ WARNING: Incomplete and out-of date element: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/xml2rfc", line 4, in __import__('pkg_resources').run_script('xml2rfc==2.4.9dev0', 'xml2rfc') File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 517, in run_script self.require(requires)[0].run_script(script_name, ns) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/pkg_resources.py", line 1436, in run_script exec(code, namespace, namespace) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist- packages/xml2rfc-2.4.9dev0-py2.7.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/xml2rfc", line 239, in main() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist- packages/xml2rfc-2.4.9dev0-py2.7.egg/EGG-INFO/scripts/xml2rfc", line 224, in main pagedwriter.write(filename) File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist- packages/xml2rfc-2.4.9dev0-py2.7.egg/xml2rfc/writers/base.py", line 1182, in write self._format_date() File "/usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist- packages/xml2rfc-2.4.9dev0-py2.7.egg/xml2rfc/writers/base.py", line 484, in _format_date datetime.datetime.strptime(date.attrib.get('year')+date.attrib.get('month'), '%Y%B') TypeError: cannot concatenate 'str' and 'NoneType' objects }}} -- ----------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: henrik@levkowetz.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Keywords: | ----------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Mon Mar 2 06:58:58 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22DD91A885D for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 06:58:58 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ajX4ULPBhu3o for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 06:58:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1669F1A885B for ; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 06:58:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:60987 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YSRo8-0004pA-LC; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 06:58:56 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, srdonovan@usdonovans.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:58:56 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/286 Message-ID: <072.be46a24e0383fc68c33e172448ceb85b@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 286 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, srdonovan@usdonovans.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: [xml2rfc] #286 (Version 2 cli): No output with missing month in date X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2015 14:58:58 -0000 #286: No output with missing month in date When date does not contain a month parameter the xml2rfc tool does the following: When using frames the following is output: The file is not there -- check for error messages or you may have clicked reload When using windows nothing is output. When writing to a file and empty file is created. -- --------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: srdonovan@usdonovans.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Keywords: | --------------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Wed Mar 4 21:16:01 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7791A8FD4 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:15:59 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -114.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S2H_YWwwWarH for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:15:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 156EE1A037A for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:15:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1500; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1425532558; x=1426742158; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=CpZAwVsa491a253+obAHgVZQ5/feQhf3HZRYj+OAn54=; b=ILKxAjAUx5YI76+e98+eWMlWyvEZzNGfbN9EuR6Ic9y94A4RcKXffyXz ksI5IV/eJDv2hYpShXIRaNT+0sMUu9OM2/hpB31SuCTHc9iHMQNL1xciq OXbGCyCUcQU20qe5B+ncbp66WxX3dY9GNSK0+0e43Vxql9kQA6JdxQTLt k=; X-Files: signature.asc : 487 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AZBgB05fdU/5JdJa1agwKBLASDB8QGAoEmTQEBAQEBAXyEDwEBAQMBI1YFCwIBCA4KKgICIRElAgQOBQ6IDQMJCL0NlQINhTsBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXixKCRIFoQgeCaC+BFAWQA4FkgS6Ec4FIgRqJeoF7TIYPI4Nub4EEQH8BAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,345,1422921600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="401034288" Received: from rcdn-core-10.cisco.com ([173.37.93.146]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2015 05:15:57 +0000 Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t255FviY009568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 05:15:57 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.149]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 23:15:56 -0600 From: "Fred Baker (fred)" To: Mahesh Jethanandani Thread-Topic: Issue in upgrading to XMLMind v 6_1_0 Thread-Index: AQHQVwN1siXdEjfELUyv8yLdUixjvQ== Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 05:15:55 +0000 Message-ID: <57B4269B-D1C6-433C-B16C-61C680971BFA@cisco.com> References: <53D2DD33-8773-4826-91E8-66B0B3B1F775@cisco.com> <39d3dbdc-b318-43b9-9d3d-cbc640917a3b@googlegroups.com> <1ACB875A-0E0F-469D-97D1-63CD55189346@cisco.com> <0C1AC8A8-CA2C-4529-8DDC-92F44FE59404@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <0C1AC8A8-CA2C-4529-8DDC-92F44FE59404@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.116] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_42C92318-4423-4D0A-9F92-B7B80C78F552"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: Bill Fenner , "xml2rfc@ietf.org" , "xml2rfc-xxe-users@googlegroups.com" , Warren Kumari Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Issue in upgrading to XMLMind v 6_1_0 X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 05:15:59 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_42C92318-4423-4D0A-9F92-B7B80C78F552 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Mar 4, 2015, at 8:56 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani = wrote: >=20 > I find myself in the same position as Fred. I installed the 6.2 = version of the software, but the xml2rfc.xxe_addon does not work in that = release. I am going to drop to 5.9 version of the software. Before you do, Warren=E2=80=99s update in fact worked. The effect on the = UI was different, which had me tricked. When you open an xml2rfc XML = file, it shows up correctly, but doesn=E2=80=99t show up until you do = so. --Apple-Mail=_42C92318-4423-4D0A-9F92-B7B80C78F552 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEVAwUBVPfmiZ9ieig10VPpAQJ1zQgAprEQVH67LrQludNE56KbTtO0/15npTY4 XxTrcOwPgxU+L+RIFGhnNKKrG0nkb3x3gzYMFLfy4tndZcKJHyxHRnhLFR5CUKaA qdrngS2D5qPh/HBx9Eqqq4aQgymDVIIhBY20rMMzBs4NLqm0TOGbup6a0fVjl70V 4fvOxoEN0plz4fosvq5r2fbQgmMBRBp1TLIkFy6nZdvIJT1LnZxnrb2fvqxl5B4R 8XRkMZaa+vplWw/db1DoWOIIzWEolYBdmEpNq9sk3HW/YwpHAL0uvChMk1Zun+k7 EiBap8i2sjc+G4lvJWgpv5AzlQ8vOK2n6Sfw9J6q1bIFVvYJtjodRQ== =LbiH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_42C92318-4423-4D0A-9F92-B7B80C78F552-- From nobody Thu Mar 5 08:54:05 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2921AD218 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 20:56:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id joAv4JNllDHW for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 20:56:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qc0-x235.google.com (mail-qc0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2CCBC1AD28D for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 20:56:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by qcxn11 with SMTP id n11so13202413qcx.11 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 20:56:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=/O7OVm7PifsGs1qNO4b7Hq3XNm+hMAoBRLxabOYK+Gk=; b=FXCv8Ph1/bew1Ww0hEgqKvjt25YUL5tEw6b8bnUj8zEW9GutCODL4X50lJmVwKaNsl dCGNWvxAUkHkH6V44/pXfJY2WFHZ4ClEgR2qeuivbRlqFmhmen06ZR2AOWlFomiJNCVJ ZIeiGFJY47dKCzSRiFGuk6Z5/ZNhcHOaV6+t5qvi/ovXxTRWKJRT9uF7G9ydynh1KkdH b9ChkvzT3l9spIeooXU7mmScuL0cPvhv7jnkpndSPYBz49tHL+PGxI6+b4bN6ZAZxsTe gFmMCyR8gvcwjQESp6pKI5VP0xeCuTojII6qFIJJTk1NY+73bxMj1CxeB5GUh8a5io6W WGyw== X-Received: by 10.140.81.242 with SMTP id f105mr10020002qgd.33.1425531407482; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 20:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.133] (108-247-127-76.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.247.127.76]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l78sm3359665qhl.34.2015.03.04.20.56.45 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 20:56:46 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4BE54D5C-B1F9-40D4-B754-D4259ACCB4DA" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) From: Mahesh Jethanandani In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 20:56:44 -0800 Message-Id: <0C1AC8A8-CA2C-4529-8DDC-92F44FE59404@gmail.com> References: <53D2DD33-8773-4826-91E8-66B0B3B1F775@cisco.com> <39d3dbdc-b318-43b9-9d3d-cbc640917a3b@googlegroups.com> <1ACB875A-0E0F-469D-97D1-63CD55189346@cisco.com> To: "Fred Baker (fred)" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 08:54:03 -0800 Cc: Bill Fenner , "xml2rfc@ietf.org" , "xml2rfc-xxe-users@googlegroups.com" , Warren Kumari Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Issue in upgrading to XMLMind v 6_1_0 X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 04:56:56 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_4BE54D5C-B1F9-40D4-B754-D4259ACCB4DA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I find myself in the same position as Fred. I installed the 6.2 version = of the software, but the xml2rfc.xxe_addon does not work in that = release. I am going to drop to 5.9 version of the software. > On Dec 16, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: >=20 >=20 >> On Dec 16, 2014, at 1:11 PM, Warren Kumari > wrote: >>=20 >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Fred Baker (fred) > wrote: >>> Reviving a thread from August. >>>=20 >>> I have updated to MacOSX Yosemite, and find myself Really Really = wanting to use XMLMind 6. There was, last I tried it, an issue with the = xml2rfc plugin, and I note that = https://code.google.com/p/xml2rfc-xxe/w/list = only has an update to = XmlMind 5. >>>=20 >>> Has someone generated the update for XMLMind 6? If so, could they = post it and point the rest of us to it? >>=20 >> AFAIK, no-one has gotten to this yet. >> Can you remember what the issue was? >=20 > The problem I had going from 5_9_0 to 6_0_0 was that it required a = file called rfc2629-xhtml.ent to open an XML file. I didn=E2=80=99t get = that message with 6_1_0. >=20 > I=E2=80=99m following = https://code.google.com/p/xml2rfc-xxe/wiki/Installation = . It says to = copy http://xml2rfc-xxe.googlecode.com/svn/release/xml2rfc.xxe_addon = into = =E2=80=9Cinstall addons=E2=80=9D. >=20 > I just installed version 6_1_0. It asked me whether there were any add = ons I thought might need to be checked, and I told it to check them. It = said It didn=E2=80=99t find any it could update. >=20 > Added the above to the add ons list. >=20 > Then I opened a file, and saw the attached result. >=20 > What=E2=80=99s pretty clear is that it=E2=80=99s not doing what we = expect. I don=E2=80=99t have the debug environment or information to say = why. My first guess is that it=E2=80=99s missing some variable setting. >=20 > >=20 > --=20 > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google = Groups "xml2rfc-xxe users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send = an email to xml2rfc-xxe-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com = . > To post to this group, send email to = xml2rfc-xxe-users@googlegroups.com = . > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/xml2rfc-xxe-users = . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout = . Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanandani@gmail.com --Apple-Mail=_4BE54D5C-B1F9-40D4-B754-D4259ACCB4DA Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 I find myself in the same position as Fred. I installed the = 6.2 version of the software, but the xml2rfc.xxe_addon does not work in = that release. I am going to drop to 5.9 version of the software.

On Dec 16, 2014, at 1:43 PM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> = wrote:


On Dec 16, 2014, at 1:11 PM, Warren = Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:

On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> = wrote:
Reviving a thread from August.

I have updated to MacOSX Yosemite, and find myself Really Really wanting = to use XMLMind 6. There was, last I tried it, an issue with the = xml2rfc plugin, and I note that https://code.google.com/p/xml2rfc-xxe/w/list only has an = update to XmlMind 5.

Has someone generated the update for XMLMind 6? If so, could they post = it and point the rest of us to it?

AFAIK, no-one has gotten to this yet.
Can you remember what the issue was?

The problem I had going from 5_9_0 to 6_0_0 was that it = required a file called rfc2629-xhtml.ent to open an XML file. I didn=E2=80= =99t get that message with 6_1_0.

I=E2=80=99m following https://code.google.com/p/xml2rfc-xxe/wiki/Installation. = It says to copy http://xml2rfc-xxe.googlecode.com/svn/release/xml2rfc.xxe_addon= into =E2=80=9Cinstall addons=E2=80=9D.

I just installed version 6_1_0. It asked me whether = there were any add ons I thought might need to be checked, and I told it = to check them. It said It didn=E2=80=99t find any it could update.

Added the above to the add ons list.

Then I opened a file, and saw the attached result.

What=E2=80=99s pretty clear is that it=E2=80=99s not = doing what we expect. I don=E2=80=99t have the debug environment or = information to say why. My first guess is that it=E2=80=99s missing some = variable setting.

<XLMMind = 6_1_0 Result.png>

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google = Groups "xml2rfc-xxe users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send = an email to xml2rfc-xxe-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to xml2rfc-xxe-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/xml2rfc-xxe-users.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com





= --Apple-Mail=_4BE54D5C-B1F9-40D4-B754-D4259ACCB4DA-- From nobody Thu Mar 5 08:54:07 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F571AD357 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:24:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UQXnMhQp9tHq for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:24:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qa0-x22a.google.com (mail-qa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 610041AD34E for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:24:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id w8so37388859qac.1 for ; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 21:24:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=6xJ7wEHtjOqTleOF/bJ55ABADBqOqm128opO84x6KUc=; b=zNZnoVLlKBWGRrWVfdyiBHC8MOIqxfh/dlSUw6VJIlGd6oCXdPDX3PA8AI+ZLlKoMX UUr1B9j68YHh49tslnjDLX7Za0P7maNGuxlGifWTXaEE8qB2ST1r7r8d3TcN9grQxFlM phLV1uUeNNstdBy6JTkrZVtpMcQydIkO7QuybgaiEWYIhZyxlSH5uOQU/0p8V/OYZQyK bjkBJIxG+lXw0rMrU9FPnFc9x7zHbSmwxCa3h6IL9sC1gzcqhVUor5qE0puHCH319AWj BVwEYtpppGMZUcadMnQJ098LqgOuwGOW7dt0UQM/tcBQl1bxIPUzVLqd6SCGHwYYUj3K 5DiA== X-Received: by 10.55.41.38 with SMTP id p38mr14558461qkh.9.1425533050661; Wed, 04 Mar 2015 21:24:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.133] (108-247-127-76.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [108.247.127.76]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h35sm3378640qgd.26.2015.03.04.21.24.08 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Mar 2015 21:24:09 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A1E56A9F-1A5C-4A3A-AC0F-9B5542F930F3" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) From: Mahesh Jethanandani In-Reply-To: <57B4269B-D1C6-433C-B16C-61C680971BFA@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 21:21:57 -0800 Message-Id: References: <53D2DD33-8773-4826-91E8-66B0B3B1F775@cisco.com> <39d3dbdc-b318-43b9-9d3d-cbc640917a3b@googlegroups.com> <1ACB875A-0E0F-469D-97D1-63CD55189346@cisco.com> <0C1AC8A8-CA2C-4529-8DDC-92F44FE59404@gmail.com> <57B4269B-D1C6-433C-B16C-61C680971BFA@cisco.com> To: "Fred Baker (fred)" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Archived-At: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 08:54:03 -0800 Cc: Bill Fenner , "xml2rfc@ietf.org" , "xml2rfc-xxe-users@googlegroups.com" , Warren Kumari Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Issue in upgrading to XMLMind v 6_1_0 X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 05:24:13 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_A1E56A9F-1A5C-4A3A-AC0F-9B5542F930F3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Fred, Did Warren share the update on the e-mail? I cannot seem to locate a = response from him. > On Mar 4, 2015, at 9:15 PM, Fred Baker (fred) wrote: >=20 >=20 >> On Mar 4, 2015, at 8:56 PM, Mahesh Jethanandani = wrote: >>=20 >> I find myself in the same position as Fred. I installed the 6.2 = version of the software, but the xml2rfc.xxe_addon does not work in that = release. I am going to drop to 5.9 version of the software. >=20 > Before you do, Warren=E2=80=99s update in fact worked. The effect on = the UI was different, which had me tricked. When you open an xml2rfc XML = file, it shows up correctly, but doesn=E2=80=99t show up until you do = so. Mahesh Jethanandani mjethanandani@gmail.com --Apple-Mail=_A1E56A9F-1A5C-4A3A-AC0F-9B5542F930F3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Fred,

Did = Warren share the update on the e-mail? I cannot seem to locate a = response from him.

On Mar 4, 2015, at 9:15 PM, = Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:


On Mar 4, 2015, at 8:56 = PM, Mahesh Jethanandani <mjethanandani@gmail.com> wrote:

I find myself in the same position as Fred. I installed the = 6.2 version of the software, but the xml2rfc.xxe_addon does not work in = that release. I am going to drop to 5.9 version of the software.

Before you do, Warren=E2=80=99s = update in fact worked. The effect on the UI was different, which had me = tricked. When you open an xml2rfc XML file, it shows up correctly, but = doesn=E2=80=99t show up until you do so.

Mahesh Jethanandani
mjethanandani@gmail.com





= --Apple-Mail=_A1E56A9F-1A5C-4A3A-AC0F-9B5542F930F3-- From nobody Sun Mar 8 10:44:48 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 063961A005B for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:44:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.79 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.79 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YLo8VjiAv9RZ for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:44:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FAD21A0060 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:44:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44481 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YUfFt-0001DE-6C; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 10:44:45 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 17:44:45 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: /ticket/283#comment:3 Message-ID: <078.ea5279192ee83ad3dc19fc61df2d6ef8@tools.ietf.org> References: <063.abc9ca080ea97358d711647710003b40@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 283 In-Reply-To: <063.abc9ca080ea97358d711647710003b40@tools.ietf.org> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, sginoza@amsl.com, rse@rfc-editor.org, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org, sginoza@amsl.com Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] #283 (Version 2 cli): ability to suppress quotation marks around ref title X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 17:44:47 -0000 #283: ability to suppress quotation marks around ref title Changes (by henrik@levkowetz.com): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Fixed in [1819]: Added the attribute quote-title (default: true) to schema and writers, and updated the tests accordingly. Fixes issue #283. -- ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: arusso@amsl.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: enhancement | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Resolution: fixed | Keywords: ------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Sun Mar 8 14:20:32 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B4A01A0154 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 14:20:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ED9PfZ9SXWIe for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 14:20:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5361A0137 for ; Sun, 8 Mar 2015 14:20:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55908 helo=vigonier.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YUibW-0008SL-8C; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 14:19:18 -0700 Message-ID: <54FCBCD2.7050103@levkowetz.com> Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 22:19:14 +0100 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: XML2RFC Interest Group , Ray Pelletier , Russ Housley , Alice Russo , Tony Hansen , Julian Reschke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik-sent@levkowetz.com, ietf@augustcellars.com, julian.reschke@gmx.de, tony@att.com, arusso@amsl.com, housley@vigilsec.com, rpelletier@isoc.org, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] New xml2rfc release: 2.4.10 X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Mar 2015 21:20:30 -0000 This announces the release of xml2rfc version 2.4.10, available for download from: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/xml2rfc This release addresses a couple of issues which has been marked as major by the RFC Editor, and some other smaller fixes. Release notes: xml2rfc (2.4.10) ietf; urgency=medium * Catch bad arguments to the 'needlines' processing instruction. Fixes issue #282. * Make sure we don't ask textwrap to wrap text with within a width of zero. Fixes issue #277. * Reorganized the presentation of options, and corrected some of the help strings. Marked the -f, --filename options in use for output filename as deprecated. * Added a switch --no-network to turn off all attempts to use the network to resolve references. When using this, processing will fail if the references required by the source file aren't available in the file cache. Also added code to refresh cached content if it's older than 14 days. Modified some tests to suit. This closes issues #275 and #284. * Fixed a bug where leading whitespace in title attributes weren't handled properly. Fixes issue #274. * Added the attribute quote-title (default: true) to schema and writers, and updated the tests accordingly. Fixes issue #283. For full details on all tickets, there's always the issue tracker: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/report/. Best regards, Henrik From nobody Mon Mar 9 09:41:53 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470731A8852 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 09:41:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XcZqO17R5lNJ for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC6B91A1BDD for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (76-218-8-156.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t29GfeUk022185 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 09:41:48 -0700 Message-ID: <54FDCD41.3080908@dcrocker.net> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 09:41:37 -0700 From: Dave Crocker Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: XML2RFC Interest Group References: <54FCBCD2.7050103@levkowetz.com> In-Reply-To: <54FCBCD2.7050103@levkowetz.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Mon, 09 Mar 2015 09:41:49 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] Citing a URL reference X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 16:41:52 -0000 G'day. I'm clearly using the wrong convention, for citing a URL in a section. At some point, I thought I saw guidance that said I should do something like: Working Groups But the results are awful. What is the preferred (required?) template? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net From nobody Mon Mar 9 10:25:33 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028181A9024 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:25:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.347 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bmL7T0RudUjj for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:25:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16ECF1A90DE for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:25:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-99-2.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t29HP3US075817 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:25:04 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-99-2.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.2] claimed to be [10.20.30.101] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) From: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: <54FDCD41.3080908@dcrocker.net> Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:25:03 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <54FCBCD2.7050103@levkowetz.com> <54FDCD41.3080908@dcrocker.net> To: Dave Crocker X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Archived-At: Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Citing a URL reference X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 17:25:23 -0000 On Mar 9, 2015, at 9:41 AM, Dave Crocker wrote: > > > Working Groups > > > > > > > But the results are awful. > > What is the preferred (required?) template? It seems people like: Working Groups --Paul Hoffman From nobody Mon Mar 9 10:30:06 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3D61A8F45 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:30:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -14.51 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9smkkRbPeHLy for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 639401A8BBD for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 10:29:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=4510; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1425922198; x=1427131798; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=7CxaGlF2hjZSF3CAsynCJPvnmIiVbwRF+0C8X6P8R2Q=; b=FP9ag4CVJ+6G2zVLppGQMcnifSV+lpLEMU1NK4vDcSsBh0lE/vUu2dQH tYm3aVjGlB+YlDRTHlPaX87ukXfYIKq9MDIz1dj1E/H0n9MSKTNJaIFXj Q1e5tPhW6dN2RTt/mmlxgD8vYhHarh84s+9mCXHfMDgplVGxk5/pR61a7 g=; X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,368,1422921600"; d="scan'208,217";a="372638364" Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2015 17:29:57 +0000 Received: from [10.55.98.185] (ams-stbryant-8818.cisco.com [10.55.98.185]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t29HTuKa016259; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 17:29:56 GMT Message-ID: <54FDD894.6040005@cisco.com> Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 17:29:56 +0000 From: Stewart Bryant User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dcrocker@bbiw.net, XML2RFC Interest Group References: <54FCBCD2.7050103@levkowetz.com> <54FDCD41.3080908@dcrocker.net> In-Reply-To: <54FDCD41.3080908@dcrocker.net> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000309060807030900090907" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Citing a URL reference X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 17:30:04 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000309060807030900090907 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 09/03/2015 16:41, Dave Crocker wrote: > G'day. > > > I'm clearly using the wrong convention, for citing a URL in a > section. > > At some point, I thought I saw guidance that said I should do something > like: > > > > > Working Groups > > > > > > > But the results are awful. > > What is the preferred (required?) template? > > d/ > This text: [PALS] The IETF, "The PALS Working Group, https:// datatracker.ietf.org/wg/pals/documents/ ", 2015. was generated by The PALS Working Group, https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/pals/documents/ The IETF - Stewart --------------000309060807030900090907 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 09/03/2015 16:41, Dave Crocker wrote:
G'day.


I'm clearly using the wrong convention, for citing a URL in a
<references> section.

At some point, I thought I saw guidance that said I should do something
like:


         <reference anchor="WG">
            <front>
               <title>Working Groups</title>
               <author />
               <date />
            </front>
            <seriesInfo name="WEB" value="http://www.ietf.org/wg/" />
         </reference>

But the results are awful.

What is the preferred (required?) <reference> template?

d/

This text:

   [PALS]     The IETF, "The PALS Working Group, https://
              datatracker.ietf.org/wg/pals/documents/ ", 2015.

was generated by

      <reference anchor="PALS">
        <front>
          <title>The PALS Working Group, https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/pals/documents/
          </title>

          <author>
            <organization>The IETF</organization>
          </author>

          <date year="2015" />
        </front>
      </reference>

- Stewart
--------------000309060807030900090907-- From nobody Thu Mar 12 03:21:58 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC0F1A90DD for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:21:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hcgoK4h6kpHP for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [198.180.150.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AA031A90E8 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:21:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YW0FW-00078G-Hf for xml2rfc@ietf.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:21:54 +0000 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 19:21:52 +0900 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: XML2RFC Interest Group User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] listless in tokyo X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:21:57 -0000 macosx 10.10.2 xml2rfc 2.4.10 ok, i have stared and twiddled for over an hour. can not see my own error. time to beg.
As a formal business relationship between all parties to a transfer provides a level of trust which allows simple transactions, we first consider the simple case where the seller and the buyer are both directly known to the swing point, see Figure 1. The transfer is done in the following steps (see Figure 2): The seller creates a certificate describing the subset of the seller=E2=80=99s resources which are to be transferred. The seller tells the swing point that it wishes to transfer the resources described by the certificate to the buyer. The swing point issues a new expanded certificate to the buyer describing the buyer=E2=80=99s old holdings plus the new resources.= When the seller and the buyer are comfortable that both the techni= cal aspects (customers swung, routing done, etc.) and the business aspects of the transfer have been accomplished, they inform the swing point which then shrinks the seller=E2=80=99s resource certificate, removing the transferred resources.
gives ERROR: Unable to validate the XML document: draft-ymbk-rpki-transfer.xml draft-ymbk-rpki-transfer.xml: Line 152: Element section content does not f= ollow the DTD, expecting ((t | figure | texttable | iref)* , section*), got= (t t list) 152 is the X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0971A90ED for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:23:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.922 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MANGLED_LOOK=2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I2S4B5_BSPa5 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ob0-x22c.google.com (mail-ob0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B2321A90DD for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:23:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obcuy5 with SMTP id uy5so14095837obc.11 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:23:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vqZSiuDlyOGYpAZWtELVXJrG5/eK80feGHvFZ/JEz3c=; b=CzU6pMxbY9tGBjOm/5rkswZPL26kq/4+P4k+cPi3yxynwB3Wl+QCze0STieNEDgLIp 4ZfBEIkQEGk8BDIa2IHYQ8O3x3jTC6xQQbI5mzBH2+ByaLwEGYHLgwaBVcoaZ0YE6yWs yDY2d2QwIWoLqPkUAoB5M703hrmft0dbAVjyw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vqZSiuDlyOGYpAZWtELVXJrG5/eK80feGHvFZ/JEz3c=; b=ENCYaKr8AsQxuy+F44icvDDCIfdkcGqaEjwZiO3NhXR+GPSwRvC7tzWYux0P2nwNJy Aq0FydYcZ1rRXsmlnGLRVwwKsrURDkSnd2oU9e7X4zhPOpwZ/LD36EVi7fEyKE8j1Lpy Vs19itdTp4YbSF+ImWasqQ/z4Bt9u71pK3QMfE7h7GFHoK/AsBOfxPUHJjEPJy5e1EdK DJ9d028e3dQD36Lw8Lnghk8QkzaZojykKLVYMoFGWMCGKVbHDPcUXbaL1H+gro9eXLpj kE6sY2G5y2/8TgQSRgcEvcJzCb+XOGZuLO71rgahakNCGrXgcNLQfjNP3LujHAImfrqK Bqeg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkSIpMEo7ZSc+eiCL/W42mL3zWJkaA7zdZSF5mbFUlSNtvjQ15C5Y2x866yKu7nfzX6hZ/P MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.88.136 with SMTP id bg8mr18371493obb.86.1426155791738; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:23:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.17.138 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 03:23:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:23:11 +0000 Message-ID: From: Dave Cridland To: Randy Bush Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0111bd765c7fe4051114c598 Archived-At: Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] listless in tokyo X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 10:23:18 -0000 --089e0111bd765c7fe4051114c598 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable needs to be within a . On 12 March 2015 at 10:21, Randy Bush wrote: > macosx 10.10.2 > xml2rfc 2.4.10 > > ok, i have stared and twiddled for over an hour. can not see my own > error. time to beg. > >
> As a formal business relationship between all parties to a > transfer provides a level of trust which allows simple > transactions, we first consider the simple case where the seller > and the buyer are both directly known to the swing point, see > Figure 1. > The transfer is done in the following steps (see Figure 2): > > The seller creates a certificate describing the subset of the > seller=E2=80=99s resources which are to be transferred. > The seller tells the swing point that it wishes to transfer the > resources described by the certificate to the buyer. > The swing point issues a new expanded certificate to the buyer > describing the buyer=E2=80=99s old holdings plus the new resource= s. > When the seller and the buyer are comfortable that both the > technical > aspects (customers swung, routing done, etc.) and the business > aspects of the transfer have been accomplished, they inform the > swing point which then shrinks the seller=E2=80=99s resource > certificate, removing the transferred resources. > >
> > gives > > ERROR: Unable to validate the XML document: draft-ymbk-rpki-transfer.xml > draft-ymbk-rpki-transfer.xml: Line 152: Element section content does not > follow the DTD, expecting ((t | figure | texttable | iref)* , section*), > got (t t list) > > 152 is the > if i remove the numbered list, or just the list bracketing, all is happy > > i am gonna go make dinner (crabcakes and snow peas) and hope for a > miracle. > > randy > > _______________________________________________ > xml2rfc mailing list > xml2rfc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc > --089e0111bd765c7fe4051114c598 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<list/> needs to be within a <t/>.

On 12 March 2015 at 10:= 21, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
macosx 10.10.2
xml2rfc 2.4.10

ok, i have stared and twiddled for over an hour.=C2=A0 can not see my own error.=C2=A0 time to beg.

=C2=A0 <section anchor=3D"steps" title=3D"Steps in Simple= Case">
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 <t>As a formal business relationship between all partie= s to a
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 transfer provides a level of trust which allows simple=
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 transactions, we first consider the simple case where = the seller
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 and the buyer are both directly known to the swing poi= nt, see
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 Figure 1.</t>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 <t>The transfer is done in the following steps (see Fig= ure 2):</t>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 <list style=3D"numbers">
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <t>The seller creates a certificate describing t= he subset of the
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 seller=E2=80=99s resources which are to be tran= sferred.</t>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <t>The seller tells the swing point that it wish= es to transfer the
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 resources described by the certificate to the b= uyer.</t>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <t>The swing point issues a new expanded certifi= cate to the buyer
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 describing the buyer=E2=80=99s old holdings plu= s the new resources.</t>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 <t>When the seller and the buyer are comfortable= that both the technical
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 aspects (customers swung, routing done, etc.) a= nd the business
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 aspects of the transfer have been accomplished,= they inform the
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 swing point which then shrinks the seller=E2=80= =99s resource
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 certificate, removing the transferred resources= .</t>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 </list>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 </section>

gives

ERROR: Unable to validate the XML document: draft-ymbk-rpki-transfer.xml =C2=A0draft-ymbk-rpki-transfer.xml: Line 152: Element section content does = not follow the DTD, expecting ((t | figure | texttable | iref)* , section*)= , got (t t list)

152 is the <section... line

if i remove the numbered list, or just the list bracketing, all is happy
i am gonna go make dinner (crabcakes and snow peas) and hope for a
miracle.

randy

_______________________________________________
xml2rfc mailing list
xml2rfc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc

--089e0111bd765c7fe4051114c598-- From nobody Thu Mar 12 06:28:58 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5014D1A010E for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:28:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -6.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Y-wr3feLUUt for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [198.180.150.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C14D51A00F4 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ryuu.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1YW3AR-00089Y-Tb; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:28:52 +0000 Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 22:28:50 +0900 Message-ID: From: Randy Bush To: Dave Cridland In-Reply-To: References: User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Archived-At: Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] listless in tokyo X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:28:55 -0000 > needs to be within a . thank you. randy From nobody Thu Mar 12 06:48:17 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271E51A01CB for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:48:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.378 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CVKm4vGEwqqq for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com (mail-oi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 980BF1A01C6 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by oigi138 with SMTP id i138so13669386oig.6 for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:48:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cridland.net; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dY0MtR7B2wJbRonOXmRJ+lkNLWmnNXbdjU3UZ/ohBOk=; b=iB20TRRcs6x+eY+zlXpAOkvcyaBK6n0w0avUs2vnYdhRmpT/YCg+7xbe2dan7VCqKS H1q3jnM0izAP8e8F06I50qZ7Gj8OG25KObDOww4GggJZPuXmNTZcnY/tkjDK5ccfZu2L P/NOlNpkKRGLMVM6dcNIgPDqRQyvU9sXb4sjA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dY0MtR7B2wJbRonOXmRJ+lkNLWmnNXbdjU3UZ/ohBOk=; b=U8C1FsdYWUlrOdPWVHHxcOpEwn6s0kqLW+tn0W/G/xH8EYTrGAew+Opk7ywocFJIXb qHWLmxTYXqHHrepKwiUziRVnYBM+YpqKJwON/MeRTVGJxy+Be2CoR6J5GcLj+4pHlLIp 9YlVWoMKF6ZGyZXkkoHoxxf0Wmov0NgIWa9N3Yeu2TzWGzH76CiGibFLDWTNEdcBHzjP +JEZO6YdM5p9wvf9gZCqgtAUDteLdBtYxVI+Th4R8r+7c7fm5H7h6Ju1ECJYv+WifVpz QvDrJ5QDLFhtyp6w52M27vYv0gKH008Sj9LFiPEDMT8SVFskyGZkd7eJJ6BFUudL79T7 sLcg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnnlWSh8yuhI3fxiEKEgXqDJVf866/C/LOJsLECexpiwb6WIjAc+3/NFdDRkHSURkwgF3Q1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.66.136 with SMTP id p130mr32340115oia.110.1426168092120; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:48:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.17.138 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Mar 2015 06:48:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:48:12 +0000 Message-ID: From: Dave Cridland To: Randy Bush Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d65d2856eff051117a234 Archived-At: Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] listless in tokyo X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2015 13:48:15 -0000 --001a113d65d2856eff051117a234 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On 12 March 2015 at 13:28, Randy Bush wrote: > > needs to be within a . > > thank you. > You mean . This XML, it's harder than it looks. --001a113d65d2856eff051117a234 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 1= 2 March 2015 at 13:28, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote:
> <list/> needs to be = within a <t/>.

<doh>=C2=A0 thank you.

You= mean <doh/>.

This XML, it's harder than= it looks.=C2=A0
--001a113d65d2856eff051117a234-- From nobody Fri Mar 13 07:19:22 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A82841A8902 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:19:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id flWYx0t-XzGB for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:19:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CEF31A88DB for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:19:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (unknown [49.149.165.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 47DB418013C8 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:19:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5502F1E0.8060105@pi.nu> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:19:12 +0800 From: Loa Andersson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: XML2RFC Interest Group Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] two or more paragraphs in the same list bullet? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:19:21 -0000 Folks, I have xml that looks like this The nodes in the data plane only know the forwrding semantics, to the extent there is further semantics related to the label this is only known by the applications, i.e. the full semantics only need to be known by the applications. FEC, Forwarding Equivalence Class is a simple and powerful concept. A set of packets, sent from one node to the same destination, and is treated the same way in all other respects, can be assigned a singel label. Note that the TC field is not part of the FEC definition. I want it to come out like this: o The nodes in the data plane only know the forwrding semantics, to the extent there is further semantics related to the label this is only known by the applications, i.e. the full semantics only need to be known by the applications. o FEC, Forwarding Equivalence Class is a simple and powerful concept. A set of packets, sent from one node to the same destination, and is treated the same way in all other respects, can be assigned a singel label. Note that TC field is not part of the FEC definition. o LSP, Label Switched Path The not is part of the FEC bullet. I know how to do it with vspace, but how will I do after vspace has been deprecated? /Loa Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 From nobody Fri Mar 13 07:28:39 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289761A01D6 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:28:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.21 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IhSV8OMcqQtU for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:28:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com [209.65.160.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0AC51A0195 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [144.160.229.23] (EHLO alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.4-5) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 414f2055.0.3092003.00-2339.8658228.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:28:36 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 5502f41452df798c-5d132c7b8a6ae958e4ac2dacb712522af949c5af Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2DESZi5016026 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:28:35 -0400 Received: from alpi132.aldc.att.com (alpi132.aldc.att.com [130.8.217.2]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2DESPNe015935 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:28:29 -0400 Received: from alpi153.aldc.att.com (alpi153.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by alpi132.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:28:17 GMT Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2DESH6K022722 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:28:17 -0400 Received: from dns.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2DESBjT022429 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:28:11 -0400 Received: from gacdtl02jl1668.itservices.sbc.com (unknown[135.110.241.187](untrusted sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20150313142810gw1000cekpe>; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:28:11 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [135.110.241.187] Message-ID: <5502F3FA.8000504@att.com> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:28:10 -0400 From: Tony Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Loa Andersson , XML2RFC Interest Group References: <5502F1E0.8060105@pi.nu> In-Reply-To: <5502F1E0.8060105@pi.nu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=K8qV6VqI c=1 sm=1 a=VXHOiMMwGAwA+y4G3/O+aw==:17 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=CA33sFktnKwA:10 a=Udl9GXcCSv4A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=N65] X-AnalysisOut: [9UExz7-8A:10 a=zQP7CpKOAAAA:8 a=emO1SXQWCLwA:10 a=wTy0O_3M] X-AnalysisOut: [6Xt5ygwN1D0A:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10] X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.23] Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] two or more paragraphs in the same list bullet? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:28:38 -0000 On 3/13/15 10:19 AM, Loa Andersson wrote: > Folks, > > I have xml that looks like this > > > > > The nodes in the data plane only know the forwrding semantics, to the > extent there is further semantics related to the label this is only > known > by the applications, i.e. the full semantics only need to be known by > the applications. > > > > FEC, Forwarding Equivalence Class is a simple and powerful concept. > A set of packets, sent from one node to the same destination, and is > treated > the same way in all other respects, can be assigned a singel label. > > Note that the TC field is not part of the FEC definition. > > > > > I want it to come out like this: > > o The nodes in the data plane only know the forwrding semantics, to > the extent there is further semantics related to the label this is > only known by the applications, i.e. the full semantics only need > to be known by the applications. > > > o FEC, Forwarding Equivalence Class is a simple and powerful > concept. A set of packets, sent from one node to the same > destination, and is treated the same way in all other respects, > can be assigned a singel label. > > Note that TC field is not part of the FEC definition. > > > o LSP, Label Switched Path > > The not is part of the FEC bullet. I know how to do it with vspace, but > how will I do after vspace has been deprecated? Excellent question. The turns into
    The 's turn into
  • 's. An
  • can have one or more paragraphs within it. When an
  • has multiple paragraphs, each paragraph is delimited with . When an
  • has only one paragraph, the delimiters can be eliminated. So you wind up with this:
    • The nodes in the data plane only know the forwrding semantics, to the extent there is further semantics related to the label this is only known by the applications, i.e. the full semantics only need to be known by the applications.
    • FEC, Forwarding Equivalence Class is a simple and powerful concept. A set of packets, sent from one node to the same destination, and is treated the same way in all other respects, can be assigned a singel label. Note that the TC field is not part of the FEC definition.
    Hope this helps. Tony Hansen From nobody Fri Mar 13 07:37:03 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964FB1A8993 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:37:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rybCepX_45_v for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:37:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pipi.pi.nu (pipi.pi.nu [83.168.239.141]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FC711A898F for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 07:37:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (unknown [49.149.165.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: loa@pi.nu) by pipi.pi.nu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D455A18013C8; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:36:58 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5502F605.2060808@pi.nu> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 22:36:53 +0800 From: Loa Andersson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tony Hansen , XML2RFC Interest Group References: <5502F1E0.8060105@pi.nu> <5502F3FA.8000504@att.com> In-Reply-To: <5502F3FA.8000504@att.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] two or more paragraphs in the same list bullet? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:37:02 -0000 On 2015-03-13 22:28, Tony Hansen wrote: > On 3/13/15 10:19 AM, Loa Andersson wrote: >> Folks, >> >> I have xml that looks like this >> >> >> >> >> The nodes in the data plane only know the forwrding semantics, to the >> extent there is further semantics related to the label this is only >> known >> by the applications, i.e. the full semantics only need to be known by >> the applications. >> >> >> >> FEC, Forwarding Equivalence Class is a simple and powerful concept. >> A set of packets, sent from one node to the same destination, and is >> treated >> the same way in all other respects, can be assigned a singel label. >> >> Note that the TC field is not part of the FEC definition. >> >> >> >> >> I want it to come out like this: >> >> o The nodes in the data plane only know the forwrding semantics, to >> the extent there is further semantics related to the label this is >> only known by the applications, i.e. the full semantics only need >> to be known by the applications. >> >> >> o FEC, Forwarding Equivalence Class is a simple and powerful >> concept. A set of packets, sent from one node to the same >> destination, and is treated the same way in all other respects, >> can be assigned a singel label. >> >> Note that TC field is not part of the FEC definition. >> >> >> o LSP, Label Switched Path >> >> The not is part of the FEC bullet. I know how to do it with vspace, but >> how will I do after vspace has been deprecated? > > Excellent question. > > The turns into
      > The 's turn into
    • 's. > An
    • can have one or more paragraphs within it. > When an
    • has multiple paragraphs, each paragraph is delimited with > . > When an
    • has only one paragraph, the delimiters can be > eliminated. > > So you wind up with this: > >
        >
      • > The nodes in the data plane only know the forwrding semantics, to the > extent there is further semantics related to the label this is only > known > by the applications, i.e. the full semantics only need to be known by > the applications. >
        • >
      • > > FEC, Forwarding Equivalence Class is a simple and powerful concept. > A set of packets, sent from one node to the same destination, and is > treated > the same way in all other respects, can be assigned a singel label. > > > Note that the TC field is not part of the FEC definition. > >
        • >
      > Yes - very helpful! The
    • gives a bullet, while the doesn't :) /Loa > > Hope this helps. > > Tony Hansen -- Loa Andersson email: loa@mail01.huawei.com Senior MPLS Expert loa@pi.nu Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64 From nobody Fri Mar 13 09:19:40 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3091A904C for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:19:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.8 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dUILQw6kHjiV for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9574D1A9038 for ; Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.87] (76-218-8-156.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.8.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t2DGJ8Je027906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:19:12 -0700 Message-ID: <55030DFA.9000005@dcrocker.net> Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:19:06 -0700 From: Dave Crocker Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Hoffman References: <54FCBCD2.7050103@levkowetz.com> <54FDCD41.3080908@dcrocker.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Citing a URL reference X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 16:19:36 -0000 On 3/9/2015 10:25 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > It seems people like: > > > > Working Groups > > > > Yeah, that produces good results, while keeping the pieces of information in the reference separate. This is worth noting in xml2rfc docs. tnx. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net From nobody Sat Mar 14 16:40:33 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679831A03AA for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 16:40:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.347 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.347 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VaVpIapG7qIT for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 16:40:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from proper.com (Opus1.Proper.COM [207.182.41.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24EFA1A03A5 for ; Sat, 14 Mar 2015 16:40:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.20.30.101] (50-1-99-2.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by proper.com (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t2ENeKES023843 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Mar 2015 16:40:21 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: proper.com: Host 50-1-99-2.dsl.dynamic.fusionbroadband.com [50.1.99.2] claimed to be [10.20.30.101] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) From: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: <55030DFA.9000005@dcrocker.net> Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 16:40:20 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8C46269A-66A6-459A-975C-B743A5328EDA@vpnc.org> References: <54FCBCD2.7050103@levkowetz.com> <54FDCD41.3080908@dcrocker.net> <55030DFA.9000005@dcrocker.net> To: Dave Crocker X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Archived-At: Cc: Julian Reschke , XML2RFC Interest Group Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Citing a URL reference X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:40:31 -0000 On Mar 13, 2015, at 9:19 AM, Dave Crocker wrote: > On 3/9/2015 10:25 AM, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> It seems people like: >>=20 >> >> >> Working Groups >> >> >> >> >=20 >=20 > Yeah, that produces good results, while keeping the pieces of > information in the reference separate. >=20 > This is worth noting in xml2rfc docs. For v2, Julian can add a note to this effect to his document. For v3, is now deprecated for references, so the target is = the only logical place to put the URL. If you have specific wording that = I can add to make that clearer to draft-hoffman-xml2rfc, that would be = grand. --Paul Hoffman= From nobody Tue Mar 17 02:07:48 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C231A017A for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 02:07:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.802 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.802 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_FAIL=0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UxbnPjTEerro for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 02:07:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyclone.public.resource.org (cyclone.public.resource.org [192.101.98.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92E9D1A0155 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 02:07:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) by cyclone.public.resource.org (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t2H97Vse034307 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 02:07:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian.reschke@gmx.de) Received: from [192.168.2.177] ([84.187.35.147]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MIyCj-1YZiLF0wo5-002Xgk; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:07:00 +0100 Message-ID: <5507EEB3.4050603@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 10:06:59 +0100 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xml2rfc , Paul Hoffman , Henrik Levkowetz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:w/kR01/fPohPp1XBUdf4yW98VFC1sAv5egrsFDLSk758va74WBn xUdkDPSKmryxK8zZIWrNsz5qt8S0Aenz+Erm9MQVPkuLCjMykS6dtBv/AQ7FufZUBswW63I ZXPw6ojFiheaMqR75Qx3gsKqBJzYStkzXnAyJbhZk+3rH4ss37vcc/Kqrd7reY/r2BN94V1 hCUPcavzCZDkLeEwvKyXQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] quote-title attribute X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 09:07:42 -0000 Shouldn't that be "quoteTitle" for consistency with other attributes? Best regards, Julian From nobody Tue Mar 17 05:50:03 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C7071A0396 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:50:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -99.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6D1TuyX8DfM1 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:49:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cyclone.public.resource.org (cyclone.public.resource.org [192.101.98.135]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF1E51A0395 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:49:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (Debian-exim@zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [64.170.98.42]) by cyclone.public.resource.org (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t2HCnqVd039102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:49:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from henrik@levkowetz.com) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50380 helo=tannat.netnod.se) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YXqwP-0005q6-La; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 05:49:50 -0700 Message-ID: <550822EC.7060401@levkowetz.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 13:49:48 +0100 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Reschke , xml2rfc , Paul Hoffman References: <5507EEB3.4050603@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <5507EEB3.4050603@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik-sent@levkowetz.com, paul.hoffman@vpnc.org, xml2rfc@lists.xml.resource.org, julian.reschke@gmx.de X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] quote-title attribute X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 12:50:01 -0000 On 2015-03-17 10:06, Julian Reschke wrote: > Shouldn't that be "quoteTitle" for consistency with other attributes? WFM Henrik From nobody Thu Mar 19 15:21:13 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70C61B2B03 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:21:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -114.211 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7NzxS1w5WKMV for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:21:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F4391B2AF8 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 15:21:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2168; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1426803670; x=1428013270; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=AYTaMpE4UGCJwu2dcxr3DhWLNXZakdwvLXOuUEtsACw=; b=gky6U7/kADSN1UNTJeZ/OrTpaHtzremNBgiFn6QbnOf9RBm665n/G9d4 qH9Pq9peA2od+xkGD8aOeb55nQoyQ/nI2EavOWx1FpgZ+Nh+kNYWJlPxH J6mAZbEqWiHXu3oWVicvxgbp6AxZUkLepeF3jkO0JC075s3TESLHuv0Rl 0=; X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ARBQAoSwtV/40NJK1cDoJ4UloEgwnDGQyFKkkCHIEtTAEBAQEBAX2EDwEBAQMBAQEBIBE6CwULAgEIGAICJgICAiULFRACBA4FiCcIDbIcnAUBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXgSGJdoRWGweCaC+BFgWQTINuhX+BVZJTIoICHIETPW+BRH8BAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,432,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="401982761" Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Mar 2015 22:21:09 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com [173.36.12.88]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2JML9Xw019469 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 19 Mar 2015 22:21:09 GMT Received: from xmb-aln-x02.cisco.com ([169.254.5.127]) by xhc-aln-x14.cisco.com ([173.36.12.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:21:09 -0500 From: "Cullen Jennings (fluffy)" To: =?utf-8?B?TWFydGluIEouIETDvHJzdA==?= Thread-Topic: [xml2rfc] [rfc-i] Current Cacheing behavior for current XML2RFC Thread-Index: AQHQYpL/yOddJwlbhkaVC/y5f6U9vw== Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 22:21:08 +0000 Message-ID: References: <064801cf0c13$6a5326e0$3ef974a0$@augustcellars.com> <52CD3416.9070007@gmx.de> <52CE2091.2070406@it.aoyama.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <52CE2091.2070406@it.aoyama.ac.jp> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.20.249.164] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: Julian Reschke , "xml2rfc@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] [rfc-i] Current Cacheing behavior for current XML2RFC X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 22:21:12 -0000 DQpZZXAsIEknbSB0aGF0IG1pbm9yaXR5IHRvby4gSSd2ZSBiZWVuIHVzaW5nIGtyYW1kb3duLXJm YzI2MjkgbGF0ZWx5IGFuZCBpdCB1c2VzIDwhRU5USVRZID4gaW5jbHVkZXMgYW5kIEkganVzdCBn b3QgYml0dGVuIGJ5IHRoaXMuIA0KDQoNCj4gT24gSmFuIDgsIDIwMTQsIGF0IDk6MDcgUE0sIE1h cnRpbiBKLiBEw7xyc3QgPGR1ZXJzdEBpdC5hb3lhbWEuYWMuanA+IHdyb3RlOg0KPiANCj4gSSBz dHJvbmdseSBhZ3JlZSB3aXRoIEp1bGlhbi4gRXZlbiBpZiB3ZSBoYXBwZW4gdG8gYmUgaW4gYSBt aW5vcml0eSwgSSdkIG5vdGUgdGhhdCBhZGRpbmcgdG9vbCBzdXBwb3J0IGlzIGEgdm9sdW50ZWVy IGVmZm9ydCwgc28gYW55Ym9keSAoZXZlbiBhIG1pbm9yaXR5KSBjYW4gY29udHJpYnV0ZS4NCj4g DQo+IFJlZ2FyZHMsICAgTWFydGluLg0KPiANCj4gW1VuZm9ydHVuYXRlbHksIEkgZG9uJ3QgaGF2 ZSB0aGUgdGltZSB0byB2b2x1bnRlZXIgbXlzZWxmLCBhbmQgb24gdG9wIG9mIHRoYXQgZmFjZSB0 aGUgaGFuZGljYXAgdG8gcHJlZmVyIFJ1Ynkgb3ZlciBQeXRob24gOi0oLl0NCj4gDQo+IE9uIDIw MTQvMDEvMDggMjA6MTgsIEp1bGlhbiBSZXNjaGtlIHdyb3RlOg0KPj4gT24gMjAxNC0wMS0wOCAw Mjo0NiwgSmltIFNjaGFhZCB3cm90ZToNCj4+PiAuLi4NCj4+IA0KPj4gSSBjb250aW51ZSB0byBi ZWxpZXZlIGlzIHRoYXQgdXNpbmcgb3V0LW9mLWRvY3VtZW50IHJlZmVyZW5jZXMgc2ltcGx5IGlz DQo+PiBhIGJhZCBpZGVhOyBpdCBjYXVzZXMgYWxsIGtpbmRzIG9mIHRyb3VibGUsIHN1Y2ggYXMg ZmFpbHVyZXMgaW4gYWJzZW5jZQ0KPj4gb2YgYSBuZXR3b3JrIGNvbm5lY3Rpb24sIG9yIHNpbGVu dCBjaGFuZ2VzIHRoYXQgZG9uJ3QgZ2V0IGNoZWNrZWQgcHJvcGVybHkuDQo+PiANCj4+IFdoYXQg d291bGQgYmUgbXVjaCBtb3JlIHVzZWZ1bCBpcyB0byBoYXZlIGFuIGF1dG9tYXRlZCB3YXkgdG8g Y2hlY2sNCj4+IGluLWxpbmVkIHJlZmVyZW5jZXMsIHN1Y2ggYXMgd2l0aA0KPj4gPGh0dHA6Ly9n cmVlbmJ5dGVzLmRlL3RlY2gvd2ViZGF2L3JmYzI2Mjl4c2x0L3JmYzI2Mjl4c2x0Lmh0bWwjY2hl Y2tpbmctcmVmZXJlbmNlcz4NCj4+IG9yIGFuIHhtbDJyZmMtYXdhcmUgdmFyaWFudCBvZiBpZC1u aXRzLg0KPj4gDQo+PiBUaGF0IGJlaW5nIHNhaWQsIEkgcmVhbGl6ZSB0aGlzIGlzIGEgbWlub3Jp dHkgb3BpbmlvbiA6LSkNCj4+IA0KPj4gQmVzdCByZWdhcmRzLCBKdWxpYW4NCj4+IA0KPj4gDQo+ PiANCj4+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fDQo+ PiByZmMtaW50ZXJlc3QgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0DQo+PiByZmMtaW50ZXJlc3RAcmZjLWVkaXRvci5v cmcNCj4+IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJmYy1lZGl0b3Iub3JnL21haWxtYW4vbGlzdGluZm8vcmZjLWlu dGVyZXN0DQo+PiANCj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX18NCj4geG1sMnJmYyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QNCj4geG1sMnJmY0BpZXRmLm9yZw0KPiBodHRw czovL3d3dy5pZXRmLm9yZy9tYWlsbWFuL2xpc3RpbmZvL3htbDJyZmMNCg0K From nobody Thu Mar 19 17:51:52 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2A91A86E6 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:51:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.038 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.038 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZeqAVw5q6Khr for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from oj.bangj.com (amt0.gin.ntt.net [129.250.11.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED77E1A86EC for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 17:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.16.21.162] (unknown [104.138.81.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by oj.bangj.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F42526F5 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:47:31 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom Pusateri X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9C989830-C0A7-432F-9EB3-51A0B48E8ADE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 20:51:47 -0400 Message-Id: To: xml2rfc@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] PDF generation on datatracker X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 00:51:52 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_9C989830-C0A7-432F-9EB3-51A0B48E8ADE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I'm curious how PDF's are generated on the datatracker website. For instance: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dprive-problem-statement/ What is the command used to translate from XML to PDF? Thanks, Tom --Apple-Mail=_9C989830-C0A7-432F-9EB3-51A0B48E8ADE Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVC28kAAoJEPk0GMVmUuYMossIALv9/cN2Ga1rZ7BtRQ9EUyfZ /b9v5prDlXhwqOdLwACeSqdJUGnN7w78rkBTi1oJqlVSo/t+0Ph+jvy5BmSiHsN7 G8+seRo8NHrSQYBpdiClLFwEvqpRNC9y5CsVB71c5SUynYYTPUTC+X1irSJRS5Nm 3Y/ENSiIZdrki5FC30tXXSZn7Nu+fy+JN4vvkREPIrSGMJzRdgd+CaTM/2TG8Qpz DGuGqVEpkfLc7KXvouhcXb55gQU4UMfSuGY+XUx2ebak0CmZ01+4OVb9v0IT4rWY H8DPqEbt6c3p0j9OXGYKX7tYHY5HejYCv9HKUVCZ3Pg04HeZxsl8DDkesCMOCt8= =MeCG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_9C989830-C0A7-432F-9EB3-51A0B48E8ADE-- From nobody Mon Mar 23 09:38:20 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 218261ACD4F for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:38:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.288 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id j8AsVdMWML1C for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ig0-x22d.google.com (mail-ig0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E7A31ACD4D for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by ignm3 with SMTP id m3so36010555ign.0 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:38:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=bWgWsKgiFgNzNBn/+52lqKAd9B1dSAsTH87Wa0HMxdo=; b=fp26dkSyh8KTGnqQ00l0aj9P2VooZFlzqb/SSZqGfpSKxQDltTyMMVZrkXPna1jrWB RyXiidThWl98F8R3gPTeACEugUwihEiRXBDvdfCKnXkcOjvv0e09KzY4X4VaSlrwDDco iUoJoH4jfkC8mE4tUuKYWBmiLbf08onJamB9EFcSgpzj3U1yveneGXgDuQa99oD3M8bF HL5JYEnXoKp2aWqK8NiCTfBe3apEerIBnKRbj9GX0rx8xvK/RIDPf6PiC6rjQ4VMUXvm ULFsTs85QeijbpgNdovigHSpe4X27uxplD+ZBpf+0nfXeollz4SxUk8IfQD7oDyuPG1U 4PPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from :to:content-type; bh=bWgWsKgiFgNzNBn/+52lqKAd9B1dSAsTH87Wa0HMxdo=; b=QEsyuGiuzZaSXO+8yKahegbtQHdVLKjfaLleJYCwQWi1POP4dihc7nL2OuIlp9Vo5n DdxPxW+/5kNCA05TKPn7iglOto2DLIq66qxj4mPkFXDqDeNdRQXHZIlxeqAHcQQyIdXR EW6wYhdRlzDKXin/rHGttq+n+ZRlqTTb7Ul8kGMXwnM5p54TpKkVsRr3p5YSaE3eC4aR vKuiXQdXc+SacJSRjx5NxuHkaW0BCKhaUGjbvoow74mxb1C88fabLLEpXKZuecC0i2/1 RXYndaqGd2EcAqpNPFHYVMnVfE1ndV94QpUsKFlGtply3NGAL7zgvhOCOhKKZ3xBI4d+ 5cSw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnkBfsw4zCg5D+Fq3gn8CRpddaiGSHQSkT/QHkoHgngA5u7wo/AcTLeHbg0nuarpFd6I8mn MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.107.7 with SMTP id gy7mr15711552igb.49.1427128697669; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:38:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: hlundin@google.com Received: by 10.64.149.7 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 09:38:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:38:17 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: erKIag3Pl0Myd0JTsI4V8SWugb4 Message-ID: From: Henrik Lundin To: xml2rfc@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8ffbae4112e8c10511f74b9f Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc down? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:38:19 -0000 --e89a8ffbae4112e8c10511f74b9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi all, I cannot convert my XML file using the otherwise excellent web tool. Is it experiencing some turbulence at the moment? (I even tried with an older version of my draft that I know worked 3 weeks ago.) Thanks! /Henrik --e89a8ffbae4112e8c10511f74b9f Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
      Hi all,

      I cannot convert my XML file us= ing the otherwise excellent web tool. Is it experiencing some turbulence at= the moment? (I even tried with an older version of my draft that I know wo= rked 3 weeks ago.)

      Thanks!
      /Henrik
      =

      --e89a8ffbae4112e8c10511f74b9f-- From nobody Mon Mar 23 10:24:57 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F851ACE82 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:24:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RSBPZYO2-kdO for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BFC11ACE7F for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59164 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1Ya65n-0006lV-0F; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 10:24:47 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:24:46 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/287 Message-ID: <063.422c5296b437088c88ee77b835c1616f@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 287 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, arusso@amsl.com, sginoza@amsl.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org, sginoza@amsl.com Subject: [xml2rfc] #287 (Version 2 cli): missing line breaks in list in NROFF output X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:24:56 -0000 #287: missing line breaks in list in NROFF output When using a list style="empty" with PI subcompact="yes", the NROFF output is missing line breaks between the items. Example below is also in the attached file. (The other list styles seem to work fine - there is .ti 3 above each list item in the NROFF.) XML input {{{ Here is a list: apples bananas cherries dates }}} NROFF output {{{ Here is a list: .in 6 apples bananas cherries dates }}} TXT generated from the NROFF output {{{ Here is a list: apples bananas cherries dates }}} Desired output (which matches the xml2rfc TXT output) {{{ Here is a list: apples bananas cherries dates }}} -- -----------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: arusso@amsl.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli | Version: 2.4.x Keywords: | -----------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Mon Mar 23 13:21:10 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CD01B29E6 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:21:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.288 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.288 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xbyTW-hNXYFf for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ig0-x235.google.com (mail-ig0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03EDE1B29E0 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:21:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by igcau2 with SMTP id au2so53487179igc.0 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:21:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Rd5oAPAV84MP8Bmf3106T0UJnhsNoQ6e8uC8NRrRG7M=; b=nUlJN6sp3f9zcATgkDe72XT1jUK1Yp3Hs7LV/4HQQHihFOoBaaiRekSVeeiy0BSQ2D HGSWUa99MSAjvCwJyY8fTfPj8SkoC+zvMG09OFFOc4PXW14eFOLZ+kz3iVz6plCmx4AC axoB+PFQ88kr3p+fKdDRgSzrkWYwidW63OUJf87T8SEkDSIBW29OPsmzApo/TZM1KKLp cmQj2RILAvC4kM8QE9TBNqRCTZZORfpZWEIWmOu4ZtDVeAfyE0CzFpC21empfgmXFKHI FC0m4B66noat4GzjAqfUlUpeZEUnKmn8sL6QDcSq+KwcpOnUflA7tAxsZtSvEJYTXkvP n4DQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Rd5oAPAV84MP8Bmf3106T0UJnhsNoQ6e8uC8NRrRG7M=; b=jp1Gvk+wyBmsi2hJ0WoF25c9Li5FChzOyQGyZS41+OmKLQH2NDfKch57C8fIDaQG2M RI9Xnf8JG4LcQX7uPn11U08GSY9wj9s6b/ijurGq8OJxPXBXEopRQjpK3jN9x9o6mvxS cHLLJsncguhlmtXlmy/gi559FunQ9n+YQYytJssKsGQ1iklgIQcdnt0X0CLCB4zmnfyj B324yKjDrA4FFMezqBchdFzDE32aLEw2g5LU3OFyTOejLUVaylzX26H1XORC96skU/V0 9sPOrJqBhPOKfMKClclGFV/WVEcGT9PlaW/6Oc76KWoo63OIfUux2I7R5PeOWKGoSkvm 3VHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnGh31UjYpnQAB8FKX44Kmg3mRlusx27o0qEc282aalk6cGJZE7jljJU+cmE+OqxNm4FQEi MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.16.158 with SMTP id 30mr1610377ioq.2.1427142063462; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:21:03 -0700 (PDT) Sender: hlundin@google.com Received: by 10.64.149.7 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:21:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:21:03 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: asS4eDpL33H8H8jMh_kXV-8a7R0 Message-ID: From: Henrik Lundin To: xml2rfc@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ed8d8bcbb290511fa679c Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc down? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:21:08 -0000 --001a113ed8d8bcbb290511fa679c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Now it works again. On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Henrik Lundin wrote: > Hi all, > > I cannot convert my XML file using the otherwise excellent web tool. Is it > experiencing some turbulence at the moment? (I even tried with an older > version of my draft that I know worked 3 weeks ago.) > > Thanks! > /Henrik > > --001a113ed8d8bcbb290511fa679c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
      Now it works again.


      On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:38 PM, He= nrik Lundin <henrik.lundin@webrtc.org> wrote:
      Hi all,

      I ca= nnot convert my XML file using the otherwise excellent web tool. Is it expe= riencing some turbulence at the moment? (I even tried with an older version= of my draft that I know worked 3 weeks ago.)

      Than= ks!
      /Henrik
      <= div>


      --001a113ed8d8bcbb290511fa679c-- From nobody Mon Mar 23 13:50:56 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895AC1B2A43 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:50:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.209 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.209 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jnu0vyvX078t for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:50:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com [209.65.160.92]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 281561B2A45 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from unknown [144.160.229.23] (EHLO alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.4-5) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id 5ac70155.0.4808356.00-1972.13493022.nbfkord-smmo05.seg.att.com (envelope-from ); Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:50:47 +0000 (UTC) X-MXL-Hash: 55107ca73e16a430-6c0aa85c6c8c5ab8642c090e229c1bcbb017f6da Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2NKoj4j006213 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:50:45 -0400 Received: from alpi131.aldc.att.com (alpi131.aldc.att.com [130.8.218.69]) by alpi154.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2NKocBw006131 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:50:39 -0400 Received: from alpi153.aldc.att.com (alpi153.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by alpi131.aldc.att.com (RSA Interceptor) for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:50:19 GMT Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2NKoJ0s001247 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:50:19 -0400 Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpi153.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2NKoD4I000831 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:50:14 -0400 Received: from tonys-macbook-pro.local (unknown[135.110.240.91](untrusted sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20150323205013gw1000cenje>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:50:13 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [135.110.240.91] Message-ID: <55107C85.1050409@att.com> Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:50:13 -0400 From: Tony Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Henrik Lundin , xml2rfc@ietf.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060004040504000006040209" X-RSA-Inspected: yes X-RSA-Classifications: public X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=XPqHv3dE c=1 sm=1 a=VXHOiMMwGAwA+y4G3/O+aw==:17 a] X-AnalysisOut: [=CA33sFktnKwA:10 a=3Um5EMvj-usA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP] X-AnalysisOut: [7CpKOAAAA:8 a=emO1SXQWCLwA:10 a=gzrAAwQbAAAA:8 a=Chy-Oxfk5] X-AnalysisOut: [VbXrXd4kOYA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=w6cnBAV] X-AnalysisOut: [_PqonPRXPaJYA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10] X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2014051901)] X-MAIL-FROM: X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.23] Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc down? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 20:50:51 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------060004040504000006040209 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit A new version of the command line tool got pushed out to the web server (not by me) and something got broken in the process. As you say, it works again. Tony On 3/23/15 4:21 PM, Henrik Lundin wrote: > Now it works again. > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Henrik Lundin > > wrote: > > I cannot convert my XML file using the otherwise excellent web > tool. Is it experiencing some turbulence at the moment? (I even > tried with an older version of my draft that I know worked 3 weeks > ago.) > --------------060004040504000006040209 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit A new version of the command line tool got pushed out to the web server (not by me) and something got broken in the process.

      As you say, it works again.

          Tony

      On 3/23/15 4:21 PM, Henrik Lundin wrote:
      Now it works again.


      On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Henrik Lundin <henrik.lundin@webrtc.org> wrote:
      I cannot convert my XML file using the otherwise excellent web tool. Is it experiencing some turbulence at the moment? (I even tried with an older version of my draft that I know worked 3 weeks ago.)

      --------------060004040504000006040209-- From nobody Mon Mar 23 14:31:18 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20CCD1B2A80 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:31:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.902 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ytYwG0spB1m3 for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0096.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E72D1B2A7D for ; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 14:31:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from DM2PR02MB1322.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.161.142.21) by DM2PR02MB1324.namprd02.prod.outlook.com (25.161.142.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.118.21; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:31:12 +0000 Received: from DM2PR02MB1322.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([25.161.142.21]) by DM2PR02MB1322.namprd02.prod.outlook.com ([25.161.142.21]) with mapi id 15.01.0118.021; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:31:12 +0000 From: Larry Masinter To: "xml2rfc@ietf.org" , "rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org" Thread-Topic: informal review of draft-hansen-rfc-use-of-pdf tomorrow Tuesday 4:30-5:30 PM Thread-Index: AQHQZbCunAncQSRJbEee+TPAyAtQpQ== Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:31:11 +0000 Message-ID: <8CA3958A-C1A3-4ED1-99CE-CCE27AEDD33B@adobe.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/15.8.0.150303 x-originating-ip: [31.133.142.1] authentication-results: ietf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DM2PR02MB1324; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-forefront-antispam-report: BMV:1; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(23433003)(33656002)(87936001)(106116001)(40100003)(50986999)(54356999)(2656002)(107886001)(82746002)(99286002)(83506001)(230783001)(83716003)(86362001)(19580395003)(36756003)(229853001)(92566002)(77156002)(2900100001)(46102003)(62966003)(2501003)(15975445007)(66066001)(102836002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR02MB1324; H:DM2PR02MB1322.namprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en; x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(5002010); SRVR:DM2PR02MB1324; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR02MB1324; x-forefront-prvs: 05245CA661 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: adobe.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 23 Mar 2015 21:31:11.9390 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: fa7b1b5a-7b34-4387-94ae-d2c178decee1 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR02MB1324 Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] informal review of draft-hansen-rfc-use-of-pdf tomorrow Tuesday 4:30-5:30 PM X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 21:31:17 -0000 SSB3YW50ZWQgdG8gZ28gdGhyb3VnaA0KaHR0cHM6Ly90b29scy5pZXRmLm9yZy9odG1sL2RyYWZ0 LWhhbnNlbi1yZmMtdXNlLW9mLXBkZg0KDQphbmQgc2VlIGlmIHRoZXJlIGFyZSBxdWVzdGlvbnMg b3IgaXNzdWVzIHRvIHJhaXNlDQpXZSBoYXZlIHRoZSBTdGF0ZSByb29tLCA0OjMwLTU6MzAgdG9t b3Jyb3cgYWZ0ZXJub29uLCBUdWVzZGF5Lg0KDQoNClNlZSBhbHNvIGh0dHBzOi8vZ2l0aHViLmNv bS9tYXNpbnRlci9wZGZyZmMgDQoNCg0KSWYgdGhlcmXigJlzIHRpbWUgd2UgbWlnaHQgbG9vayBh dA0KDQpodHRwczovL2lhb2MuaWV0Zi5vcmcvZG9jdW1lbnRzL1B1YmxpY2F0aW9uLUZvcm1hdHRl ci1TT1ctMDQucGRmDQoNCg0KdG9vDQoNCg0KTGFycnkNCuKAlA0KaHR0cDovL2xhcnJ5Lm1hc2lu dGVyLm5ldA0KDQo= From nobody Tue Mar 24 15:18:51 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895001AC426 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:18:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LBCuInsxtxfk for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:18:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC8221AC422 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([::1]:55706 helo=zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82_1-5b7a7c0-XX) (envelope-from ) id 1YaX9s-0004N9-HG; Tue, 24 Mar 2015 15:18:48 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "xml2rfc issue tracker" X-Trac-Version: 0.12.3 Precedence: bulk Auto-Submitted: auto-generated X-Mailer: Trac 0.12.3, by Edgewall Software To: henrik@levkowetz.com, tony@att.com X-Trac-Project: xml2rfc Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:18:48 -0000 X-URL: http://tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/ X-Trac-Ticket-URL: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/xml2rfc/trac/ticket/288 Message-ID: <060.f0ba9470f1c2fa7e7bbc591bb0d10ce8@tools.ietf.org> X-Trac-Ticket-ID: 288 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: ::1 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: henrik@levkowetz.com, tony@att.com, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: trac@tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org Subject: [xml2rfc] #288 (Version 2 cli txt): PDF/A is split apart on / X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 22:18:50 -0000 #288: PDF/A is split apart on / see draft-hansen-rfc-use-of-pdf-06 section 2.1.7 paragraph 2. {{{ In addition, the PDF/A standards mandate the embedding of fonts. Preferably, the software generating the files would produce PDF/ A-conforming files directly, thus ensuring that all glyphs include Unicode mappings and embedded fonts from the outset. }}} The "PDF/A-conforming" should not be split on the "/" -- -------------------------------+---------------------------------- Reporter: tony@att.com | Owner: henrik@levkowetz.com Type: defect | Status: new Priority: medium | Milestone: Component: Version 2 cli txt | Version: 2.4.x Keywords: | -------------------------------+---------------------------------- Ticket URL: xml2rfc From nobody Wed Mar 25 15:26:16 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3271B2A23 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:26:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pLeI_1XDh7Vs for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:26:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A2AB1A1A1D for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:26:12 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=OKuoa5zY2uK44E/Fj4zAXByxYLbgCATh7lruiKkfMc2fWoZcy1DJt8uGAVA+LbUU; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [31.133.141.118] by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1YatkZ-0002zX-Qk for xml2rfc@ietf.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2015 18:26:11 -0400 Message-ID: <55133601.9090302@earthlink.net> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:26:09 -0700 From: Charlie Perkins User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: xml2rfc@ietf.org References: <55107C85.1050409@att.com> In-Reply-To: <55107C85.1050409@att.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: 137d7d78656ed6919973fd6a8f21c4f2d780f4a490ca6956527bd5036cbc8ac7f666f5d4ae9379057e95134944be51a6350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 31.133.141.118 Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] "see Sections NN and MM" versus "see Section NN and Section MM" X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 22:26:14 -0000 Hello folks, Is it possible to convince to emit the first formulation? To my mind it reads a lot better, but so far I have to be content with the second formulation. Regards, Charlie P. From nobody Thu Mar 26 06:14:51 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BB941B2CE9 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 06:14:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bt9Gx5YvXRPp for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 06:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F1581B2D10 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 06:14:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.197] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MOfQw-1YWBPO0Luo-0063hf; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:14:44 +0100 Message-ID: <5514063D.9030204@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 14:14:37 +0100 From: Julian Reschke User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Charlie Perkins , xml2rfc@ietf.org References: <55107C85.1050409@att.com> <55133601.9090302@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <55133601.9090302@earthlink.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:mhn23iq/ubYBeFzOp96IUSDwJFJWgsaPi/RJ6yqtspM9YeH5LJb GmBlmNBxc+BumqEnrp5nGd7xTdXCV0t3B5yV/EyL14Y8t/Ztx36Eyy4tVwSUALsAH4c4syL ydOcZXrkamsN2eoANMSmFkg93WNi7owKC7D4uPXpDlgEmZsi1CTf7bAUl9Jm9Elc1c0Y8Wk kZpvD7hX9Cs/7QpgvRQ6A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1; Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] "see Sections NN and MM" versus "see Section NN and Section MM" X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 13:14:49 -0000 On 2015-03-25 23:26, Charlie Perkins wrote: > > Hello folks, > > Is it possible to convince to emit the first formulation? To > my mind it reads a lot better, but so far I have to be content with the > second formulation. > > Regards, > Charlie P. See ; format="counter" is what you need. Best regards, Julian