From nobody Sun Nov 1 01:01:40 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73743A0BFF for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 01:01:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.898 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H-lkNoHJyCWm for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 01:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 781433A0BF7 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 01:01:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc60.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CP7mB3sGwzyXP; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 09:01:30 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: <686bd621-4492-9b39-373e-883070d45a94@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 09:01:30 +0100 Cc: Robert Moskowitz , "xml2rfc@ietf.org" X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 625910490.132812-61bb40e220cc3b821319f244c5b249a6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <417443D0-47E5-48F2-B717-F77F98EE5CAD@tzi.org> References: <6fd06a21-4835-eec0-8204-85a1c266cda9@htt-consult.com> <686bd621-4492-9b39-373e-883070d45a94@gmail.com> To: Brian E Carpenter X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Dealing with IPv6 reverse DNS entries X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 08:01:36 -0000 On 2020-11-01, at 04:28, Brian E Carpenter = wrote: >=20 > >=20 > > IPv6 PTR Records are too long for ASCII art. > ]]> I know you were just being silly, but for the benefit of onlookers let = me opine that this would be abuse of the artset feature and = should never be accepted by the RFC editor. (The artset feature of beta RFCXMLv3 was never subject to community = review, so I think we never had this discussion.) The only RFC with artset I can find is RFC 8899, which essentially sent = their ASCII art through the =E2=80=9Cgoat=E2=80=9D tool to generate the = HTML/PDF rendering (a feat that is also now directly supported by = kramdown-rfc). That is a sensible (if somewhat gratuitous) use of = artset; the main problem for a proofreader is to check that the = =E2=80=9CASCII=E2=80=9D art and the SVG mean the same thing. Let=E2=80=99s see ~~~ goat IN PTR = e.9.6.a.0.d.a.0.2.5.9.1.d.a.3.a.4.1.0.0.8.2.0.0.4.1.0.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. ~~~ sure works, but doesn't help with ** There is 1 instance of too long lines in the document, the longest = one being 8 characters in excess of 72. and the SVG is not scalable. What was the trick you used to make that scalable? Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Sun Nov 1 01:52:48 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCB23A0FC2 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 01:52:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.097 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dLRPy6B5hjVp for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 01:52:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-lf1-x12a.google.com (mail-lf1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A55623A047D for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 01:52:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id a9so13439711lfc.7 for ; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 01:52:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LlSVQKv9RlbI9chQlGDnn1pjKVPyqCsfZA1t4JGDF+g=; b=kETAX4mNwDNZLzIGUngSxeWWIjZS7NhURddnsjJTudASvBMEjB3xA6iazGL2sWCXyj P7/G/GGyoOq62UzlpvcCawB/57hcUDfN8bjyREKX3GyGfmIpi+qu/yfpvvq20CIIin1n D/oga/HxlVpEyjZdCHC0PqcBr2BAJysKd/WBBzMm2AQNPMjQs7xwlG7ETinpAWcMf9IV K3eHDW9uHghrr63C23JO6kItE3Ap2J2ptNfidr2oK+xgZukrUISrVQZyvGDxMxTGO5Q1 IR3SM81pCgCukn1Adk6yKejEf7i+FPYhmZVSyndbcSjG/i4cqpY+8Uu8iRwQSRj9OKG5 EO9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LlSVQKv9RlbI9chQlGDnn1pjKVPyqCsfZA1t4JGDF+g=; b=eKncpfnA7E6/i2hQISvs66cB81fGNrDBPhZkgm29hT6XidhHRiPncuG3W8YQYSBNik d4gXwi6fOnE0EDXtBUge5sw5eZ1gdHcPu5zxBrngbFrl1/Aw4XVtNEO/1M0Th8L7NamB t/qZaRYqf74+xGwIb1tfz5LcAZBR/LYs96VH49kf9KaVX8ODmrYvwjtSkWHb87oNIGCz SmvnFVq4F38/fg2S2Ov6yHdRFshUhUryqm4DHry34por1V9kX5XFJCbX/E3MB0sa0zn/ 7ZxTLaTpMyy2/JbJ3ogbsi62zY0GrEqXSOu6Rc3JCr4ztaOD81dz5SvCjpHZU6zV7h4N Q/UA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531xa1pRxnoJwSVUUsjxzMcUM7oz81/62I/WMkzMyn3MAw5p4SDO AAv5d4k2flple+ImYX2bWcSrYPuNFP8nwEWHsamnu/nmmXA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz48RSCfYWtTDViI4eQ7Duxp7uP8f6VNVhtxCfdMf71mK8qenPREtwy85cpi5cTW0GcG+cCI1/Gjbz/PIdyHGw= X-Received: by 2002:a19:8c2:: with SMTP id 185mr3424881lfi.49.1604220762769; Sun, 01 Nov 2020 01:52:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <6fd06a21-4835-eec0-8204-85a1c266cda9@htt-consult.com> <686bd621-4492-9b39-373e-883070d45a94@gmail.com> <417443D0-47E5-48F2-B717-F77F98EE5CAD@tzi.org> In-Reply-To: <417443D0-47E5-48F2-B717-F77F98EE5CAD@tzi.org> From: Brian Carpenter Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 21:52:30 +1300 Message-ID: To: Carsten Bormann Cc: Robert Moskowitz , xml2rfc Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b4cdcf05b307c01d" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Dealing with IPv6 reverse DNS entries X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 08:52:47 -0000 --000000000000b4cdcf05b307c01d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Clearly it was partly a joke but there's a genuine problem when "plain" text works in reasonable way in flowed html but incorrectly in txt. My experience is that SVG scales correctly in the v3 html rendering iff there is a viewbox element but no width & height elements. I assume there is some CSS magic involved. As for artset, what will we do about figures that simply cannot be expressed in ascii art? Regards Brian (via tiny screen & keyboard) On Sun, 1 Nov 2020, 21:01 Carsten Bormann, wrote: > On 2020-11-01, at 04:28, Brian E Carpenter > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > IPv6 PTR Records are too long for ASCII art. > > ]]> > > I know you were just being silly, but for the benefit of onlookers let me > opine that this would be abuse of the artset feature and should never be > accepted by the RFC editor. > > (The artset feature of beta RFCXMLv3 was never subject to community > review, so I think we never had this discussion.) > > The only RFC with artset I can find is RFC 8899, which essentially sent > their ASCII art through the =E2=80=9Cgoat=E2=80=9D tool to generate the H= TML/PDF rendering > (a feat that is also now directly supported by kramdown-rfc). That is a > sensible (if somewhat gratuitous) use of artset; the main problem for a > proofreader is to check that the =E2=80=9CASCII=E2=80=9D art and the SVG = mean the same > thing. > > Let=E2=80=99s see > > ~~~ goat > IN PTR > e.9.6.a.0.d.a.0.2.5.9.1.d.a.3.a.4.1.0.0.8.2.0.0.4.1.0.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa. > ~~~ > > sure works, but doesn't help with > > ** There is 1 instance of too long lines in the document, the longest o= ne > being 8 characters in excess of 72. > > and the SVG is not scalable. > > What was the trick you used to make that scalable? > > Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten > > --000000000000b4cdcf05b307c01d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Clearly it was partly a joke but there's a genuine pr= oblem when "plain" text works in reasonable way in flowed html bu= t incorrectly in txt.
My experience is that SVG scales cor= rectly in the v3 html rendering iff there is a viewbox element but no width= & height elements. I assume there is some CSS magic involved.
As for artset, what will we do about figures that simply can= not be expressed in ascii art?

Regards
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Brian
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 (= via tiny screen & keyboard)

On Sun, 1 Nov 2020, 21:01 Carste= n Bormann, <cabo@tzi.org> wrote:<= br>
On 2020-11-01, at 04:28, Brian E Ca= rpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> <artset>
>
> <artwork align=3D"left" type=3D"ascii-art"><= br> > <![CDATA[
> IPv6 PTR Records are too long for ASCII art.
> ]]></artwork>

I know you were just being silly, but for the benefit of onlookers let me o= pine that this would be abuse of the artset feature and should never be acc= epted by the RFC editor.

(The artset feature of beta RFCXMLv3 was never subject to community review,= so I think we never had this discussion.)

The only RFC with artset I can find is RFC 8899, which essentially sent the= ir ASCII art through the =E2=80=9Cgoat=E2=80=9D tool to generate the HTML/P= DF rendering (a feat that is also now directly supported by kramdown-rfc).= =C2=A0 That is a sensible (if somewhat gratuitous) use of artset; the main = problem for a proofreader is to check that the =E2=80=9CASCII=E2=80=9D art = and the SVG mean the same thing.

Let=E2=80=99s see

~~~ goat
IN PTR e.9.6.a.0.d.a.0.2.5.9.1.d.a.3.a.4.1.0.0.8.2.0.0.4.1.0.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.= arpa.
~~~

sure works, but doesn't help with

=C2=A0 ** There is 1 instance of too long lines in the document, the longes= t one
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0being 8 characters in excess of 72.

and the SVG is not scalable.

What was the trick you used to make that scalable?

Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten

--000000000000b4cdcf05b307c01d-- From nobody Sun Nov 1 02:09:12 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 394DA3A101C for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 02:09:10 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.898 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SaWpkQSHQdVk for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 02:09:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8BBC3A0957 for ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 02:09:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc60.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CPBbN6b13zykZ; Sun, 1 Nov 2020 11:09:04 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2020 11:09:04 +0100 Cc: Robert Moskowitz , xml2rfc X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 625918144.4577579-d7e367e5433b814d694a36b969c1ecfa Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <6fd06a21-4835-eec0-8204-85a1c266cda9@htt-consult.com> <686bd621-4492-9b39-373e-883070d45a94@gmail.com> <417443D0-47E5-48F2-B717-F77F98EE5CAD@tzi.org> To: Brian Carpenter X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] Dealing with IPv6 reverse DNS entries X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2020 10:09:10 -0000 On 2020-11-01, at 09:52, Brian Carpenter = wrote: >=20 > Clearly it was partly a joke but there's a genuine problem when = "plain" text works in reasonable way in flowed html but incorrectly in = txt. Right. At the moment, the =E2=80=9Cswitch=E2=80=9D between different = inputs is based on formats, so we=E2=80=99ll need to invent another = format (plain text, but doesn=E2=80=99t render in txt) to make this = work. > My experience is that SVG scales correctly in the v3 html rendering = iff there is a viewbox element but no width & height elements. I assume = there is some CSS magic involved. Good to know. So I could put in an option scale=3D=E2=80=9Ctrue=E2=80=9D to delete = width/height from the tool outputs. > As for artset, what will we do about figures that simply cannot be = expressed in ascii art? Well, if they *cannot* be expressed, the RFC 1305 (1119/1129) exception = applies. I was talking about the case where that exception does not apply, but a = malicious author doesn=E2=80=99t want to expend the effort (or, worse, = wants to make a point by making the document unusable in .TXT). (And, as usual on this list, this entire discussion belongs over at = rfc-interest.) Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Tue Nov 3 22:39:41 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F66E3A09CF for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 22:39:39 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ycZedMqDnKzs for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 22:39:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB4463A09BD for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 22:39:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id c17so1431536wrc.11 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 22:39:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cABVQAWhw10Tck/xjaWwjEDoZ+557MSwE/u8XlGzNbs=; b=Id0LQlXfv89J7MMxVTy1n/oMIC3y7XXs4Njy48mHvcinrkD/19wJQ5F8yRkt069Orl VHEg9Zrjh43fzQIq+esAd1M+xb6xkxCkHeajEIAh6/Z+FCAzSQF4mNozdXPoDzNIR+QV BGYEZ/sFxvIzKxQ6uXsSC8smcMi2ErqWaIcYA3GtYG7mUvCQSVZolDBS2ukBWEkYSRi/ I2lYEXiUowQfuPdUujTGxAM4Rz31DaHeqVucmYimCwCqoV/JHpV3nXzLtBJOWIrOlEoH UrkXOna5eSB4nJVu8/fB6E0VdBFDxOzUTOcofLhXQfm3zETl39BjC+URbaofiHSTwxel G23g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cABVQAWhw10Tck/xjaWwjEDoZ+557MSwE/u8XlGzNbs=; b=A3twiuz39Lp8kbeajCPCciH/7I1IxBrvLb00UOAbGIG3gv+YWnnyfJDCr79FVGmhOz qCJcDjoBF84pk/Jr/S5oayD6i0dtux7/i/vQ8/J9Cnso5pTrAIN38uvcRmElk+m1h/em wIcTDc9MmB8ojR3YQIbA5rhwEIVyk3GUJ6kQMyCNoyY0DQxWu7ajsTOKl+m3kg0PCV8O lY+xtGHbLD1zzBVK26uAo2GJVOld5zFOqQCr8JBYNQZfD6zMx6bHWDGkj3JphRpa+Myb e/6F16tvU6c//8kv+tIS+KXKZEtpSxyd96RN6sdGASoAFMX5j7LVU/uUJh5IXZ15yEco tdLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532S83MQzjPJS0oSXBZRe+vO3YnEiv59/efiy2Kq8vqtS21iQCYX n3K0g05p0X1I4z95IU9zrdqpI/YXH68wpg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwoeGiCcNA/Sc+M+ipMObyVqvGQmG3Hr9Y6q99F29cDAaTLJ763PB7xPy+VlQAg0jdJDmRZ2A== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f20e:: with SMTP id p14mr29245695wro.376.1604471975657; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 22:39:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.79] (25.131.146.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.146.131.25]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id j71sm1092359wmj.10.2020.11.03.22.39.34 for (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Nov 2020 22:39:34 -0800 (PST) To: XML2RFC Interest Group References: <72B5135E-64DB-413D-B4A6-A83CA9FDFBC9@orandom.net> <59ece5f4-d44c-e67a-fb39-c66da9406b90@gmx.de> From: Anders Rundgren Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 07:39:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc/Web - rfcMarkup's reference links do not work anymore X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 06:39:39 -0000 Reference links are now generated like this: http://tools.ietf.org/html//rfc2119 To be sure that I had not screwed up I downloaded https://tools.ietf.org/tools/templates/draft-davies-template-bare-07.xml and got the same result when using the XML2RFC Web tool. Thanx, Anders From nobody Wed Nov 4 00:51:32 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951463A0DC0 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 00:51:30 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.146 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.146 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=gmx.net Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U-OeMyJihKcx for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 00:51:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02A333A0DBF for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 00:51:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1604479885; bh=nCj5vXUrZQByDmjLXrkp1wv6UKcBU+PZ8CauLycr5v4=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=TC6aJA4NNa54k4DXzim5fXnwN1UE988oZPf7OmNlvmS/VnUECY17GDyhYp5fXP2No wbsowGSilCc2vbftewmgkePz3kAsyrj3ca7Plx8PK2g7+vpZCMsMFRJvJQh0P7nOX3 pHkuFcBYyYv9HZLNuKyfc2OlA6wuDWeeP1ultJPk= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Received: from [192.168.178.20] ([84.171.145.1]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx004 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MHG8g-1kVog12HjM-00DFuV for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 09:51:25 +0100 To: xml2rfc@ietf.org References: <72B5135E-64DB-413D-B4A6-A83CA9FDFBC9@orandom.net> <59ece5f4-d44c-e67a-fb39-c66da9406b90@gmx.de> From: Julian Reschke Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 09:51:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:/lkAu8qT/VSZsIXSrDc8pB689fFshVTj8BfN3thcXaoOTovqvp2 QU1LPm97yJxYIc7+zBltktHnxTVhURqWklflJal7iUoEUU2sc6GlWTjIDtp2/81X03PAhmi 6MEzUSQwMIWQPhrlxH2YH+3VJGxsItQ7MHAqeqC6atcDpOaGmzJ4jkZomuSRTrU9lmQLDM2 U/cQNyset643QtgEBb6Jg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:GVE10YS5qRY=:aExkiKby1xI+Wqiien8NGR yMqyK8pehMf5pbud8xXK5T2eN8v+SmyceP64ZVFhmnH969UnZCLhRLFpTzF/MhrXCXxtEqEjS /g7mAX8IbAvElPUODuovWkfan99j7t8X5PNVaJK1VYKTf35U+Kzh1fybJCY0Bi1a17rQqAtHQ GTJf21V0OcEeSwyTLtSgIyw2JZShqm80z8G90GhS51uh15X0qm8LweXc2QBpHq32aOgIlpDzE bXwzdWl2OvnTx2QrtD6CeSdbDihN6SmoUXH066smCd70LLMxHWg+6gkyJyfusIBm4HUZIMj0E vhgmPjwIyqPmhpwLOPTccGoF5MTNC/ghXo1leWJ0clbcrUXMBJOCP3UkBWAz9ktcPXK7XFAER 2J5A4plDChGLIAOrQpKCh6uu63aYvxJ0kFz19A4SDRjjDNiez/oD54KU6fAgfcg6Rp/yqD5eI zETopqBOy6eiHUmOQ0lqulnJ/uljAwHwVxcs6zOS/6x5OVbyhoWsct9o+vRKevrXUHEIm7l6r pmL/OeKIQwSG0R/MiE/Tuns/1J8CPfe/g1YpsyT2EwbyaBAqT+VrGbvCg21CM2iP7dQUeG257 rE4M1KJ+xoRtUiJla8Ui5e7hX5PQ2R7C9mRc5K8lnZ5yDVGkzahrlht4ta17sXxqvA8KUBjCI 4UZejeT71tS+hG/WskSzp4Gj4/bfGLGms9GYO7Mf6SLdPBfRfaQ4NwRFf1vzlw9Iffwv6lHvr zdMWz75JYoBj1tH1Z0gTXTB7h/bH5+UXdTHGD/ZTw5K9ebaBpaVLicGyC5dqBP65hH3aUQ83l 9z78axO9AH/0Qqp6ch4Gez1NChXHWaLoMvh5x9EaBYoyhdZp8A3jlVwshGynFaRbuRz7Fd+L5 Xzcdx0O+6rUy+FXfSxxiN09vRpPwITKvAAKB5Wtr0= Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc/Web - rfcMarkup's reference links do not work anymore X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 08:51:31 -0000 Am 04.11.2020 um 07:39 schrieb Anders Rundgren: > Reference links are now generated like this: > http://tools.ietf.org/html//rfc2119 > > To be sure that I had not screwed up I downloaded > https://tools.ietf.org/tools/templates/draft-davies-template-bare-07.xml > and got the same result when using the XML2RFC Web tool. > > Thanx, > Anders 1) What do you have in the source code? 2) How do you generate the output? (xml2rfv version? offline/online?) 3) What exactly is in the output? Best regards, Julian From nobody Wed Nov 4 01:02:45 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10B6A3A0DCA for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 01:02:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJ_BRKN_WORDNUMS=1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ej48ZBe1cfSG for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 01:02:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 919B83A0DC9 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 01:02:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcc60.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.204.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CR0zM6VZnzyYS; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:02:39 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:02:39 +0100 Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 626173359.410287-18ef214d77a3d8bbc091bd2e8cd8c880 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <72B5135E-64DB-413D-B4A6-A83CA9FDFBC9@orandom.net> <59ece5f4-d44c-e67a-fb39-c66da9406b90@gmx.de> To: Anders Rundgren X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc/Web - rfcMarkup's reference links do not work anymore X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 09:02:44 -0000 On 2020-11-04, at 07:39, Anders Rundgren = wrote: >=20 > Reference links are now generated like this: = http://tools.ietf.org/html//rfc2119 That (double slash) is a bug in rfcmarkup, but why does the subject say = =E2=80=9Cdo not work any more=E2=80=9D? Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Wed Nov 4 01:55:52 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B12003A0E3D for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 01:55:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.345 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.345 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7vsP_zuSSeYv for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 01:55:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A5093A0E3B for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 01:55:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id h62so1725384wme.3 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 01:55:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2CNfsW7QSrcGrMe8RK44Sq6O98hJ94Sb2AcTvLEFLag=; b=tKloH2yY22VZAM/gs0NKh/Ij4uKbsQc4LMqWCFcoBL4vtQwd8u6lM3SULDdTDEI6ro ADkdmWTVCfIwjzn7Eq6+E7O6Cqg5j/bP9/kMEaFHenAjsIs1JjKKZAYxXZmz5Lawj3bZ 1AqSzNu5W+jmx1sTH11Jm4/oHQ9MD2MQVPqjmyoQByo3+lVaXNFnlbhypPUjMZyI3J5I PJ1x1yeAOlJ/953WXVT0AqHBbsxif3xz8aDPpDb0rDJWNVG5gJy+90A7nxAqgoD8hC+/ iIeJagNYF15biAlCyYuxQc4r4Te0Cj9KMaPvwraTzZAlTjVgw5elLXPr4PW/dQiit73C 5drg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=2CNfsW7QSrcGrMe8RK44Sq6O98hJ94Sb2AcTvLEFLag=; b=OYrwvBhEGrnsMIJ3Ds5RrMx4RdUX9Cegm6X7ygSV2KOkG7Qxbof55OzchX1Q42S4sV 0R3rlSyRuGnGKbMVwEWlB64p9KDKHDRW6ImACezmBNqXDhvftFTjjpVQq3J0E/Y7/T6i HvKWhiXA5NTwW47LGLqP/R6m0v7XgYjgbZF0YmvRwQDrd2DpgDJWC1albebb2NZxkVru 3vJ8uPbgkRb0QmCfgLNjecreqO2Q0w+o6gjALv6vxWv0lMXLDLXmPxXz8Va+80FajFtY LMc/clTxbfbi7G7aEiedHV0dnxXNQv2m3vqxqNGavXWOVmmyhN6Hu2TuHXqpdGFftekO DKEQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533qHdJoG0GZaz5Qx3U32vSN5J/xirWkTLyssUnETvLFOsKyNA2+ gWR5V6QwAiYJJKZ6XZ23GjPhpt1GtJwF+w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwvkGZrVaS0l13+ZMS2AgtZc4cCxpnSFFdASTqqwzOKrM1m+Km+l09cRjjeejYJA24+wsdzQg== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:c4c3:: with SMTP id g3mr3470952wmk.127.1604483747074; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 01:55:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.79] (25.131.146.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.146.131.25]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f2sm1895035wre.63.2020.11.04.01.55.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Nov 2020 01:55:45 -0800 (PST) To: Julian Reschke , xml2rfc@ietf.org References: <72B5135E-64DB-413D-B4A6-A83CA9FDFBC9@orandom.net> <59ece5f4-d44c-e67a-fb39-c66da9406b90@gmx.de> From: Anders Rundgren Message-ID: <19820882-0eb8-06bf-7693-1bf8ec098197@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 10:55:43 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc/Web - rfcMarkup's reference links do not work anymore X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 09:55:51 -0000 On 2020-11-04 09:51, Julian Reschke wrote: > Am 04.11.2020 um 07:39 schrieb Anders Rundgren: >> Reference links are now generated like this: >> http://tools.ietf.org/html//rfc2119 >> >> To be sure that I had not screwed up I downloaded >> https://tools.ietf.org/tools/templates/draft-davies-template-bare-07.xml >> and got the same result when using the XML2RFC Web tool. >> >> Thanx, >> Anders > > 1) What do you have in the source code? > 2) How do you generate the output? (xml2rfv version? offline/online?) > 3) What exactly is in the output? Hi Julian, I used (downloaded) the most recent (valid?) IETF template https://tools.ietf.org/tools/templates/draft-davies-template-bare-07.xml "as is" although I had to update the year to make it pass through https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/ The template contains a line RFC 2629 which in the RfcMarkup version doesn't work as expected: the link is dead because it is incorrectly formatted. BTW, in RfcMarkup version there is a direct link to the RFC (in RfcMarkup) in the reference section while in the HTML version it is just a name. Best regards, Anders > > Best regards, Julian > > _______________________________________________ > xml2rfc mailing list > xml2rfc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc > From nobody Wed Nov 4 02:11:24 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25F173A0E67 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 02:11:23 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.345 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.345 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XU_vigInRjOg for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 02:11:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wr1-x436.google.com (mail-wr1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B7703A0E62 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 02:11:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x436.google.com with SMTP id s9so21376483wro.8 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 02:11:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tLbucW6jaJbbhoSl6r4jw8DWWumIXO73+cpGkd6xW0A=; b=YaboAcds9kHkbnyK+VjLOY0R3BV9RXQJ5KeRVbyGmvPGMrN875TKu8d/NYHIbHeQ5G ObGCF0+TqjthFINDks4sfhp6bZICBViJDHEPDJPolmCcT/t+Z673RUS90h/nnOBJ5Jyl Vlr/EOxSHOphPi074onToT05sRJGLNCqs2Unj+nrybYqo9OgpXGQvJEjsvbRtHJPLSqU 4MKZ+jfWJdrw0Q7WlGhbTJRZQKyQwTqmtroOZ11mE5KnSBIUu8sUEk6Xgmw6d/VTf2KA DgIyPesRI9Ni3xltJfduI41kMYGOyuX8BtrBV5gySFEL+1qU4VkF1eanko3IvRpLh+s6 9y2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tLbucW6jaJbbhoSl6r4jw8DWWumIXO73+cpGkd6xW0A=; b=CzSAzVe9fQQZDvsIO2TTwcSef1jeB3H51K4h9CoOP4dfpCizn+YmURQ6Z6qyuz6T/w OJklHbA4Cv5yHtkBnlnSVQcejV3RLArrvxQoJr3udT6GOa99TcnAbZFSmE3piOZvmQs6 zT3nCtIr6O55O1ZBE9pEYWY9qCryvBxB6XYsuDnMRaeHFlIymMU4Tegshs6CsaxFCBGT p7zEzpqNbfuMmgcL7s4Wt2HKXORbsTq/IFCzm42cma/o1epyqJ5C1oQSnG+IqD909owW c12sLLOlcjtGx2RXNe9Yl67ijU3Xovwa7XGfdliAPFfOTOYeGldIKoCGKd82jf04t6Cu HOOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531CGJg7lKzf+telJ6MK07Vx8E+rOi76oIwL/iyAJD4ymwXs6kyR G1s063CPg0RNRXMtXpFNU+gFarXZREl88g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx4C2CZMN4W71x2mqLKCLec59HSDcPLgFy2yUr69gVmRA8PrC8Bz1oE7MBA0S6toTCCPbO3mA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ef0d:: with SMTP id e13mr30980033wro.24.1604484679357; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 02:11:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.79] (25.131.146.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.146.131.25]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g17sm1834573wrw.37.2020.11.04.02.11.17 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Nov 2020 02:11:18 -0800 (PST) To: Carsten Bormann Cc: XML2RFC Interest Group References: <72B5135E-64DB-413D-B4A6-A83CA9FDFBC9@orandom.net> <59ece5f4-d44c-e67a-fb39-c66da9406b90@gmx.de> From: Anders Rundgren Message-ID: <0384355e-7560-311b-3b21-ab5070a88939@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 11:11:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc/Web - rfcMarkup's reference links do not work anymore X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 10:11:23 -0000 On 2020-11-04 10:02, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On 2020-11-04, at 07:39, Anders Rundgren wrote: >> >> Reference links are now generated like this: http://tools.ietf.org/html//rfc2119 > > That (double slash) is a bug in rfcmarkup, but why does the subject say “do not work any more”? Well, the hyper-linked references are dead when you click on them in a browser. This appears to be a regression bug. Regards, Anders > > Grüße, Carsten > From nobody Wed Nov 4 04:47:07 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496073A1098 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 04:47:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fsm2B4inzR9N for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 04:47:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wr1-x42c.google.com (mail-wr1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E4D33A1094 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 04:47:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wr1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id n15so21955413wrq.2 for ; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 04:47:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:from:to:references:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NLM19dYxypsJQsEcwDT6ZtBWRE9/d9NhKb2H2NTxQ34=; b=TgWBLtJVj5Cfq3Ev/eUQuasPzON3hDsvwalsVDFp7QS2zKKnnOVF5sOVetnXf95D0H A9CRjwPCe1+yZXmCQFb2tAOOOgMf6M9ieKiP1gPYW1aELcBtVcdkfLqMc78/Wa3gPrCG Wj4kzRZa5waQt6cN8yXPCRKAY/6JShCGOP8xEJfbzG08IboIAtaX71+aDxMVkCaypxrW pgv3WEJrUAjqnd0U1mPEAIBO4wXAB/WRzEq6lycjtg6fqjOWJZZ8PVnV7wuu7ekonQA/ HVVD8wC4egIk9ou8PoIHy5En+/zBYw92KWMwsnAFoNcHI8rO2KAgoJKoMcuS6ZupMUOJ cwpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:references:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NLM19dYxypsJQsEcwDT6ZtBWRE9/d9NhKb2H2NTxQ34=; b=Q79CRdni4DcVCon3E94qxaPSpKR17U12d2rtha/5fo0qSE9tBryBcMEIXrChatf0T+ QPYkxBjeJasl2wsSyxqXsbmBfR7nkbnQYWW4e4gsXCTVopPs4yL7LVE1ahv9s9ombZAG e1z8wJS9w4kBatjRbQ8qhWHnz0T+YjqyP8SJogbkIGkXOPP7lto06TvR68Cz8QIF2pBp YEI0JXJP0b4rGBR0LWftzRU57j88aWnZsy0xxuXdFfi2uFIMs7P0XvWD5bMPP4uueq58 6b2yw9mLTgSJSBJvDi4ZR/Eb07IlF5PWQJ9dRA7Atkw0Z/cJeLdfwI8KHnzcEVj29YNl P3YA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533NflW6KtOualS6ahbDT0s9SUQPfSVfQqGDYmmQ3KO2S9ClffWR KFmUq7Y2a0o358nSm/Mv6EenMsJJcEzxGQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx+f8pnwcYBx51LF2s2CjM08CxlN3bpX4AbiUd9MTMeT7aPB/he2Zw2IPd6gF7GZRZaWus2oQ== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e8cf:: with SMTP id k15mr31849118wrn.262.1604494021355; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 04:47:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.79] (25.131.146.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.146.131.25]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id f3sm2613089wrw.81.2020.11.04.04.47.00 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Nov 2020 04:47:00 -0800 (PST) From: Anders Rundgren To: Julian Reschke , xml2rfc@ietf.org References: <72B5135E-64DB-413D-B4A6-A83CA9FDFBC9@orandom.net> <59ece5f4-d44c-e67a-fb39-c66da9406b90@gmx.de> <19820882-0eb8-06bf-7693-1bf8ec098197@gmail.com> Message-ID: <1592f04c-00cd-1ca0-fe90-a13ff992646c@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 13:46:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <19820882-0eb8-06bf-7693-1bf8ec098197@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] Correction: Re: xml2rfc/Web - rfcMarkup's reference links do not work anymore X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 12:47:05 -0000 Pardon me, the problem only occurs in the "Debug" mode using the Web tool. Apparently the malformed links work anyway. Thanx again, Anders On 2020-11-04 10:55, Anders Rundgren wrote: > On 2020-11-04 09:51, Julian Reschke wrote: >> Am 04.11.2020 um 07:39 schrieb Anders Rundgren: >>> Reference links are now generated like this: >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html//rfc2119 >>> >>> To be sure that I had not screwed up I downloaded >>> https://tools.ietf.org/tools/templates/draft-davies-template-bare-07.xml >>> and got the same result when using the XML2RFC Web tool. >>> >>> Thanx, >>> Anders >> >> 1) What do you have in the source code? >> 2) How do you generate the output? (xml2rfv version? offline/online?) >> 3) What exactly is in the output? > > Hi Julian, > > I used (downloaded) the most recent (valid?) IETF template https://tools.ietf.org/tools/templates/draft-davies-template-bare-07.xml "as is" although I had to update the year to make it pass through https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/ > > The template contains a line RFC 2629 which in the RfcMarkup version doesn't work as expected: the link is dead because it is incorrectly formatted. > > BTW, in RfcMarkup version there is a direct link to the RFC (in RfcMarkup) in the reference section while in the HTML version it is just a name. > > Best regards, > Anders > >> >> Best regards, Julian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> xml2rfc mailing list >> xml2rfc@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc >> > From nobody Wed Nov 4 05:29:48 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25C293A1236 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 05:29:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.146 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.146 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.247, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, SUBJ_BRKN_WORDNUMS=1, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GYjCGW3dy7Gc for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 05:29:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from zinfandel.tools.ietf.org (zinfandel.tools.ietf.org [64.170.98.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 743353A1233 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2020 05:29:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from h-202-242.a357.priv.bahnhof.se ([158.174.202.242]:52976 helo=tannat.localdomain) by zinfandel.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1kaIr9-0002ZK-Gr; Wed, 04 Nov 2020 05:29:43 -0800 To: Anders Rundgren , XML2RFC Interest Group References: <72B5135E-64DB-413D-B4A6-A83CA9FDFBC9@orandom.net> <59ece5f4-d44c-e67a-fb39-c66da9406b90@gmx.de> From: Henrik Levkowetz Message-ID: <792e72f7-77ad-581a-5022-b342e548efb9@levkowetz.com> Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 14:29:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sPlGRKtG3hEteBLS48XNI4cIbb2Q5jaFj" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 158.174.202.242 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: xml2rfc@ietf.org, anders.rundgren.net@gmail.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on zinfandel.tools.ietf.org) X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc/Web - rfcMarkup's reference links do not work anymore X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2020 13:29:47 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --sPlGRKtG3hEteBLS48XNI4cIbb2Q5jaFj Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="s5E7FbV2IMAehqqlWB5r16imnMeCjft10"; protected-headers="v1" From: Henrik Levkowetz To: Anders Rundgren , XML2RFC Interest Group Message-ID: <792e72f7-77ad-581a-5022-b342e548efb9@levkowetz.com> Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] xml2rfc/Web - rfcMarkup's reference links do not work anymore References: <72B5135E-64DB-413D-B4A6-A83CA9FDFBC9@orandom.net> <59ece5f4-d44c-e67a-fb39-c66da9406b90@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: --s5E7FbV2IMAehqqlWB5r16imnMeCjft10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Anders, Way too little information. And it's not the first time I have to ask yo= u for more info from you. Please indicate exactly where you observed this, an exact URL if applicab= le, or if running rfcmarkup on the command-line, indicate which switches you used. Henrik On 2020-11-04 07:39, Anders Rundgren wrote: > Reference links are now generated like this: http://tools.ietf.org/html= //rfc2119 >=20 > To be sure that I had not screwed up I downloaded https://tools.ietf.or= g/tools/templates/draft-davies-template-bare-07.xml and got the same resu= lt when using the XML2RFC Web tool. >=20 > Thanx, > Anders >=20 > _______________________________________________ > xml2rfc mailing list > xml2rfc@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xml2rfc >=20 --s5E7FbV2IMAehqqlWB5r16imnMeCjft10-- --sPlGRKtG3hEteBLS48XNI4cIbb2Q5jaFj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEifjc5+rnL1MJBcZSTptXS4+7FxoFAl+irMAACgkQTptXS4+7 FxoVcQ/9EEaxZR/i3xdwQyMATFbYcnOJxnnpToX26Vk5iUef8KgsgiX27uNr/UiU cND3bzt6agPIn7/7NnmY9GIl/TqW6zcRFaNRbvl8mKD+zgfaIqaw9f4p9Dww23Dx k/dOxY/FXF5y8YYrYR8WffBc4SSpZ7WNyZUSNEMMlGjEwRxAs9xI1ckDHMQZz/NO BVu3xbPVu4nfPJxMCqZQ2k5VnAnbTOMEUYpcr4JewfASpPiqsY9o6WJwKh3AboMi PZkUoZ+no0FPfEdvlgpfawDBUdbjx8tXFziAAz57C6hFErDriaVY+MDHoWSgFeyy qkbNwvNJmmpMmGDyszy3iqs0TA/DbDwcMmTnPSXKXdWfTWAFaHhXKAFtuo7IDhNv MPsI48gMxXnlJOhyp+rivHsGBVQDCTxEZ4nMIXZqXPAM2EyVQJznfJU/LyTJ8S1M uViZyTXMZkh5QODunxxr52hRq0PY47viGAnzGCaKcjkv4RAULRX8FuiNFhC06xUL Dq4rf0SxaNTwxai325fS6I9Q9FpNE+TIuWJOgF47gPgHz5JnTMx12voJtNzO6DNp 20LGPSb/PY7bGxCzYrB8xp1oCCbSdc/K8/+pzF/TCc2L/lI+ByIJ3SbAArZ0+i8Q YeyL/thEcsaWfDgUMRNaCIxTWtGvxDbwSlOoMTnYf95DheydTA8= =efZa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sPlGRKtG3hEteBLS48XNI4cIbb2Q5jaFj-- From nobody Fri Nov 6 04:56:12 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FC83A1157; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 04:56:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.899 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F77R1GfYgdFV; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 04:55:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from durif.tools.ietf.org (durif.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2001:1900:3001:11::3d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B3BF3A1153; Fri, 6 Nov 2020 04:55:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from henrik by durif.tools.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1kb1Hb-0000BO-01; Fri, 06 Nov 2020 04:55:59 -0800 To: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org, xml2rfc@ietf.org Cc: rfc-markdown@ietf.org Message-Id: From: Henrik Levkowetz Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 04:55:58 -0800 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rfc-markdown@ietf.org, xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on durif.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] New xml2rfc release: v3.4.0 X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2020 12:56:02 -0000 Hi, This is an automatic notification about a new xml2rfc release, v3.4.0, generated when running the mkrelease script. Release notes: xml2rfc (3.4.0) ietf; urgency=medium * Added handling for 'indent' attributes that have been set to the empty string. Fixes issue #564. * Added some new unlisted switches to make some test cases easier to maintain. * Changed the default handling for draft reference XIncludes to use revision-agnostic bibxml URLs in v2-to-v3 conversions, and added a switch to use explicit revisions instead if desired. * Tweaked doc.py and doc.xml to suppress mention of switches with argparse.SUPPRESS help settings, for consistency between --help and --doc output. * Changed the text output for on request from the RPC. Fixes issue #563. -- Henrik Levkowetz 05 Nov 2020 14:13:34 +0000 The preferred way to install xml2rfc is by doing 'pip install xml2rfc', and 'pip install --upgrade xml2rfc' to upgrade. If there are system- installed python modules which pip will not upgrade, you may have to use 'pip install --upgrade --no-deps xml2rfc' and install dependencies manually. The new version is also available through SVN checkout, with 'svn checkout http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/xml2rfc/tags/cli/3.4.0' Documentation for this release is built-in, and also available at: https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/xml2rfc-doc-3.4.0.html Regards, Henrik (via the mkrelease script) From nobody Wed Nov 18 02:25:00 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F763A1766; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 02:24:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.233 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.233 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7IbJ24Zvs2DH; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 02:24:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org (dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org [217.69.81.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DA233A1764; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 02:24:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from henrik by dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kfKdk-00034A-RS; Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:24:40 +0100 To: xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org, xml2rfc@ietf.org Cc: rfc-markdown@ietf.org Message-Id: From: Henrik Levkowetz Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 11:24:40 +0100 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rfc-markdown@ietf.org, xml2rfc-dev@ietf.org, xml2rfc@ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on dunkelfelder.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] New xml2rfc release: v3.5.0 X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 10:24:45 -0000 Hi, This is an automatic notification about a new xml2rfc release, v3.5.0, generated when running the mkrelease script. Release notes: xml2rfc (3.5.0) ietf; urgency=medium * Added some missing test cache entries. * Added missing line joiner settings for , and within
. Fixes issue #569 * Fixed a diff exclusion regex in the Makefile, and added a Makefile target to update manpage and docfiles, and a mkrelease step to update those files with the new release version as part of the release actions. * Changed the output text for with text content equal to the reference tag to output both, rather than suppressing one. Fixes issue #571. -- Henrik Levkowetz 18 Nov 2020 11:15:50 +0100 The preferred way to install xml2rfc is by doing 'pip install xml2rfc', and 'pip install --upgrade xml2rfc' to upgrade. If there are system- installed python modules which pip will not upgrade, you may have to use 'pip install --upgrade --no-deps xml2rfc' and install dependencies manually. The new version is also available through SVN checkout, with 'svn checkout http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/xml2rfc/tags/cli/3.5.0' Documentation for this release is built-in, and also available at: https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/xml2rfc-doc-3.5.0.html Regards, Henrik (via the mkrelease script) From nobody Sat Nov 21 06:57:52 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2693A0D47 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 06:57:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FLZvFOQhpF7S for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 06:57:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-io1-xd33.google.com (mail-io1-xd33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 928E43A0D45 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 06:57:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-xd33.google.com with SMTP id m9so13052597iox.10 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 06:57:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=KB7b4qFFzATBC5TVVCmtVsh+mMqdOOctPuivxAY8MtI=; b=TVk2az6voYf/KQ5DZyCgz4mqpkHBO6/WDh22HDHgfVrERwNiJjHPNOKLYRiCLisPSG tFj/C4kqBhba0Yy/pBPx5oloImRi9ZzVqfvRxndUVMVINvyq1z0XbX5Y4AVeUkVvCESW l0CEI4JEgCtKm8tSW5zzsi6twgnYwX1mcMEDlaCss/l5taW0vVIOz3vT+JZd6KWK6K2E VBi2BXjNDUQDeXyR6t8PJvN+UDdk0ZeVBw0goP0ahiFlRpMLa/If7W7HvPjrqa1MYO6M p4nOcBu+/NFUpLTHmGA/kZ7YMGbgvB13AxqNqp3pjJCzpbhWVqFa3BulFMyxizkgUYVy Fw9g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:message-id:date:to; bh=KB7b4qFFzATBC5TVVCmtVsh+mMqdOOctPuivxAY8MtI=; b=qfy7LkxtB4bRSReOyHoxwtiromg8RiOw3EcPQPhHKgH4v1kHM8svBp8yO2tvHJewJs xfFBJg794lufDEbLJCECo3WiALSadgX+oxDn8cvFA8LEM3R07l5Wx4dQaJ/fTkXRN/EE YJrDzBVj64DbAAvqyndRSzNfBTzRXgzm/9uzUY3wWSEUf5kh1n0JF4+lDQ79zVGPaYR4 0Ir8x1TaXzj1EbIPZD3H0aMI7VaPpPkKGqQ8/WDOX2Qcl65Z1hZsoWijWobEg4P6Ix5K uxI4hznsXXEdB0BOZbCThz6smh/9NkEPM14PDb2GJwta8pZMNecW0uEWAwLHVD/iGYcd Q2sA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5323AE9k2QjMWwPFOSkSmDYCxsK7Xs5HijN7xQZsvbWHNJQTzm9f LBQWOAlPgW8a2RqJR8ihbkZJl1q5YRYWhqpG X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyRQGlJf5syOiNeYYeL73crS0cq1G54Yw/ofTyi9SRMokEg8BEtszS5sGsGA3WhoDHM+UM8Sg== X-Received: by 2002:a02:9708:: with SMTP id x8mr12974019jai.43.1605970667131; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 06:57:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from mithrandir.lan (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t8sm3985597ilf.80.2020.11.21.06.57.46 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 21 Nov 2020 06:57:46 -0800 (PST) From: Ted Lemon Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0ECB6812-EE94-4616-B1F8-591ACECFC177" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.21\)) Message-Id: <90226536-8F3E-4FF6-98D1-6400D994094E@fugue.com> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 09:57:45 -0500 To: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.40.0.2.21) Archived-At: Subject: [xml2rfc] What's going on with embedded unicode in xml2rfc v3? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 14:57:51 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_0ECB6812-EE94-4616-B1F8-591ACECFC177 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 See: = https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-06.html#name-acknowle= dgments = I thought at one point that it would be required that we do something = special to insert unicode, but RFC7991 says that it=E2=80=99s just = supported. --Apple-Mail=_0ECB6812-EE94-4616-B1F8-591ACECFC177 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 See: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-06.html#na= me-acknowledgments

I thought at one point that it would be required that we do = something special to insert unicode, but RFC7991 says that it=E2=80=99s = just supported.

= --Apple-Mail=_0ECB6812-EE94-4616-B1F8-591ACECFC177-- From nobody Sat Nov 21 07:20:25 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0429B3A0D93 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 07:20:24 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lnwKsnnbOvnb for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 07:20:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1C093A0D92 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 07:20:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.217.120] (p548dce71.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.206.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CdcYG0QdjzybD; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:20:18 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: <90226536-8F3E-4FF6-98D1-6400D994094E@fugue.com> Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 16:20:17 +0100 Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 627664817.595286-2a33b4ecfc3537f79b14c6818bcad358 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <463BBE13-F5D8-431C-8ACC-6FE088F36E86@tzi.org> References: <90226536-8F3E-4FF6-98D1-6400D994094E@fugue.com> To: Ted Lemon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] What's going on with embedded unicode in xml2rfc v3? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 15:20:24 -0000 On 2020-11-21, at 15:57, Ted Lemon wrote: >=20 > See: = https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnssd-srp-06.html#name-acknowle= dgments >=20 > I thought at one point that it would be required that we do something = special to insert unicode, but RFC7991 says that it=E2=80=99s just = supported. If you need beyond-ASCII characters outside of artwork, use or {{{=C2=BB=C3=BC=C3=B1=C3=AE=C3=A7=C3=B8=C3=B0=C3=A9=C2=AB}}} in kramdown-rfc. (Yes, that is abuse of the semantic markup, but it seems to be all we = have right now.) Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten From nobody Sat Nov 21 07:53:54 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: xml2rfc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC113A0E00 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 07:53:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.886 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.886 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, T_SPF_TEMPERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0rsHIGheqLmk for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 07:53:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-qv1-xf30.google.com (mail-qv1-xf30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE24F3A0DFB for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 07:53:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qv1-xf30.google.com with SMTP id ek7so6260240qvb.6 for ; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 07:53:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=M6xUGvlEXR9a/k9FKA7xkfZ8YJq6iHaDdnOH+cY+T+4=; b=m+mwVXJcBMZwWmPZd4vt+vh4U7Dhy7+EbtXPM0khILd/trlYQFm4zN7UQRfxn3+05b X8dcW2CRV9Q7WRspEbyJ+11tyJqlB84WWQ7I0sbKnghmcScKxH9zX/h9sUXGiIgx9sFv 0T26omSUTz3P3z4FG9MqrauRIeD+UdH9n/wYJMRdZsUlIqance4NQO5oLkUV0PHT5iZL ljVwtbY5g8WJ/yzaZ1dVMdjYRv1DYHox7p+Yl2mGPvvTth+5/y4OTGW5+4mwwXvJf4xb 8XJAFA1LGfdWDWIyv1tZto55SNHCd67kauH8JEczUU2RrG6ieXZ9R7vVBo+KQx3zH9b4 lyTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=M6xUGvlEXR9a/k9FKA7xkfZ8YJq6iHaDdnOH+cY+T+4=; b=NMF9LdbD1fWz+aN82f4x0kjs55yRAVr0Y63+9SAfsHjWHXKSwsonidJ8LS6NiRNvt1 BtS/T/YVDPHYVRkE3aonqtz6U/qq2WWUdwPPaLdty1cqkc43Q/JhPcHjzQmC6pCUs94x 289Z31PTUGOlEOruCWNurwFIRb+sBzdUEXzHUYekWY9OJ99dj1J+L8VvMP+q+VGAM3nH UhYiavRzU4oWO+93qN5grAM2rr6lbANU1J7rySVXzEbaJl9os43RoGXLVRFZsmaKbrlb 0x/M6uSdqiCTUthqk/p6J69J5w/YFvt2sBoy6E5aaUHIieeEMR3KgVXBonw8ApW8ddZ2 8GCA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533xb/wUVSnrJK4hN6Cwb25c+V3tjhoGFd/LAfWlraggJW3mUsZP Yw0O4hArLfpz81wH0pAaYrdkrP84twI+xrvN X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwsFHTg2ea6cxZgxz0C7Iq6HZP5OIORDt6gsQlhNtQf4Q6Fixwrhup+h0rBc0BPhMOXpZPyBw== X-Received: by 2002:a0c:cb04:: with SMTP id o4mr22130533qvk.15.1605974029446; Sat, 21 Nov 2020 07:53:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from mithrandir.lan (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v9sm4201731qkv.34.2020.11.21.07.53.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 21 Nov 2020 07:53:48 -0800 (PST) From: Ted Lemon Message-Id: <507634F3-CF47-4849-836D-4182E4C99AAB@fugue.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E929A378-BE94-4158-9367-5A839AE366EB" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.21\)) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 10:53:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <463BBE13-F5D8-431C-8ACC-6FE088F36E86@tzi.org> Cc: xml2rfc@ietf.org To: Carsten Bormann References: <90226536-8F3E-4FF6-98D1-6400D994094E@fugue.com> <463BBE13-F5D8-431C-8ACC-6FE088F36E86@tzi.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.40.0.2.21) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [xml2rfc] What's going on with embedded unicode in xml2rfc v3? X-BeenThere: xml2rfc@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2020 15:53:53 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_E929A378-BE94-4158-9367-5A839AE366EB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On Nov 21, 2020, at 10:20 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > That did it. Thanks! --Apple-Mail=_E929A378-BE94-4158-9367-5A839AE366EB Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 On = Nov 21, 2020, at 10:20 AM, Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> = wrote:
<contact fullname=3D"=C2=BB=C3=BC=C3=B1=C3=AE=C3=A7=C3=B8=C3= =B0=C3=A9=C2=AB=E2=80=9D/>

That did it. Thanks!

= --Apple-Mail=_E929A378-BE94-4158-9367-5A839AE366EB--