<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>

<!DOCTYPE rfc [
  <!ENTITY nbsp    "&#160;">
  <!ENTITY zwsp   "&#8203;">
  <!ENTITY nbhy   "&#8209;">
  <!ENTITY wj     "&#8288;">
]>

<rfc xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude" category="std" docName="draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-12" number="9702" consensus="true" ipr="trust200902" obsoletes="" updates="" submissionType="IETF" xml:lang="en" tocInclude="true" symRefs="true" sortRefs="true" version="3">

<!-- [rfced] Please note that the title of the document has been updated 
to expand abbreviations per Section 3.6 of RFC 7322 ("RFC Style
Guide"). Please let us know if you prefer otherwise.

Original:
YANG Data Model for Maximum SID Depth Types and MPLS Maximum SID Depth

Current:
YANG Data Model for Maximum Segment Identifier (SID) Depth Types 
and MPLS Maximum SID Depth
-->
  <front>
    <title abbrev="MPLS MSD YANG">YANG Data Model for Maximum Segment Identifier (SID) Depth Types and MPLS Maximum SID Depth </title>
    <seriesInfo name="RFC" value="9702"/>
    <author fullname="Yingzhen Qu" initials="Y" surname="Qu">
      <organization>Futurewei Technologies</organization>
      <address>
        <email>yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Acee Lindem" initials="A." surname="Lindem">
      <organization>LabN Consulting, L.L.C.</organization>
      <address>
        <email>acee.ietf@gmail.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Stephane Litkowski" initials="S" surname="Litkowski">
      <organization>Cisco Systems</organization>
      <address>
        <email>slitkows.ietf@gmail.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <author fullname="Jeff Tantsura" initials="J" surname="Tantsura">
      <organization>Nvidia</organization>
      <address>
        <email>jefftant.ietf@gmail.com</email>
      </address>
    </author>
    <date month="December" year="2024"/>

    <area>RTG</area>
    <workgroup>mpls</workgroup>

<!-- [rfced] Please insert any keywords (beyond those that appear in
the title) for use on https://www.rfc-editor.org/search. -->

<keyword>example</keyword>

    <abstract>
      <t>This document defines two YANG data modules. The first is the initial
      version of the IANA-maintained YANG module for Maximum Segment
      Identifier (SID) Depth (MSD) Types, which includes identities for both
      the MPLS data plane and Segment Routing over IPv6 (SRv6) data plane. The second augments the IETF MPLS YANG model to provide support for MPLS MSDs as defined in RFCs 8476 and
      8491. </t>
    </abstract>
  </front>
  <middle>
    <section numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Overview</name>
      <t>There are two YANG modules defined in this document. Module
      iana-msd-types defines the identities for Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Types as per the "IGP MSD-Types" IANA registry <xref
      target="IANA-IGP-MSD-Types" format="default"/>, which includes MSD types
      for both the MPLS and SRv6 data planes. This document also
      defines module ietf-mpls-msd augmenting the IETF MPLS YANG data model <xref
      target="RFC8960" format="default"/>, which augments the routing RIB data
      model <xref target="RFC8349" format="default"/> to provide operational
      state for various MSDs <xref target="RFC8662" format="default"/> for the
      MPLS data plane. The module augments the base MPLS model with a list of
      various types of Node MSDs as well as various types of MSDs on links.
      </t>
      <t>
        The YANG modules in this document conform to the Network Management
        Datastore Architecture (NMDA) <xref target="RFC8342" format="default"/>.
      </t>
    </section>
    <section numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Design of the Model</name>
      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>IANA MSD Types Module</name>
        <t>
        IANA has created a registry titled "IGP MSD-Types"
        under the "Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) Parameters" registry group to
        identify MSD-Types. Module iana-msd-types is an IANA-maintained
        module, which defines the identities for the MSD-Types as in the
        IANA "IGP MSD-Types" registry.
        </t>
        <t>
        On top of the base identity "msd-base", identity "msd-base-mpls"
        is defined to serve as the base for MSD types for the MPLS data
        plane, and identity "msd-base-srh" is defined to serve as the
        base for MSD types for the Segment Routing Header (SRH) in the IPv6
        data plane.
        </t>
        <t>
        This module is maintained by IANA and will be updated if and when
        there is any change to the registry.
        </t>
      </section>
      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>IETF MPLS MSD Module</name>
        <t>
        Module ietf-mpls-msd augments the base MPLS model <xref target="RFC8960" format="default"/>,
        and it provides support of different types of MSDs in the
        MPLS data plane.
        </t>
        <t>
        As defined in <xref target="RFC8491" format="default"/>, a Link MSD is
        the number of SIDs supported by a node's link, while a Node MSD is
        the smallest MSD supported by the node across all its interfaces.
        The module defines lists
        of MSDs with different MSD Types for a node and links. Please
        note that these are read-only data as per the node's hardware
        capability.
        </t>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Tree for IETF MPLS MSD Types YANG Module</name>
      <t>
      This document uses the graphical representation of data models
      per <xref target="RFC8340" format="default"/>.
      </t>

<sourcecode name="" type="yangtree">
module: ietf-mpls-msd

  augment /rt:routing/mpls:mpls:
    +--ro node-msds
       +--ro node-msd* [msd-type]
          +--ro msd-type     identityref
          +--ro msd-value?   uint8
  augment /rt:routing/mpls:mpls/mpls:interfaces/mpls:interface:
    +--ro link-msds
       +--ro link-msd* [msd-type]
          +--ro msd-type     identityref
          +--ro msd-value?   uint8
</sourcecode>

    </section>
    <section numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>YANG Modules</name>
      <t>There are two YANG modules defined in this document.</t>
      <section anchor="iana-msd-types" numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>IANA-Maintained Module for MSD-Types</name>
        <t>This document defines the initial version of the IANA-maintained YANG
      module for MSD Types that mirrors the IANA "IGP MSD-Types"
      registry <xref target="IANA-IGP-MSD-Types" format="default"/>.
        </t>

<!--[rfced] We note that two RFCs in the reference clauses in the
iana-msd-types module do not appear in the reference section of the RFC. 
May a sentence be added before the YANG module stating that it refers to 
the following RFCs? For example:

  This module references [RFC8476], [RFC8491], [RFC8662], [RFC8664], 
  [RFC8814], [RFC9088], and [RFC9352].

(where [RFC8664] and [RFC8814] would be added as Informative References)

Alternatively, you could let us know a different place to cite [RFC8664] 
and [RFC8814] in this document.
-->

        <sourcecode name="iana-msd-types@2024-07-04.yang" type="yang" markers="true"><![CDATA[
module iana-msd-types {
  yang-version 1.1;
  namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-msd-types";
  prefix iana-msd-types;

  organization
    "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA)";

  contact
    "Internet Assigned Numbers Authority

     ICANN
     12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 300
     Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536
     United States of America
     
     Tel:    +1 310 301 5800
     <mailto:iana@iana.org>";

  description
    "The YANG module defines the identities for Maximum Segment
     Identifier (SID) Depth (MSD) Types.

     This YANG module is maintained by IANA and reflects the 'IGP
     MSD-Types' registry.

     Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
     authors of the code.  All rights reserved.

     Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
     without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
     the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set
     forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
     Relating to IETF Documents
     (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).

     This initial version of this YANG module is part of RFC 9702
     (https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9702); see the RFC itself
     for full legal notices.

     The latest version of this YANG module is available at
     https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters.";

  revision 2024-07-04 {
    description
      "Initial Version";
    reference
      "RFC 9702: YANG Data Model for Maximum Segment Identifier (SID)
                 Depth Types and MPLS Maximum SID Depth";
  }

  identity msd-base {
    description
      "Base identity for Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Type. The MSD type
       definition is defined in the IANA 'IGP MSD-Types' registry.";
  }

  identity msd-base-mpls {
    base msd-base;
    description
      "Base identity of MSD types for the MPLS data plane.";
  }

  identity base-mpls-imposition-msd {
    base msd-base-mpls;
    description
      "Base MPLS Imposition MSD.";
    reference
      "RFC 8491: Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Using IS-IS
       RFC 8476: Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Using OSPF
       RFC 8664: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol
                 (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing
       RFC 8814: Signaling Maximum SID Depth (MSD) Using the Border
                 Gateway Protocol - Link State";
  }

  identity erld-msd {
    base msd-base-mpls;
    description
      "msd-erld is defined to advertise the Entropy Readable
       Label Depth (ERLD).";
    reference
      "RFC 8662: Entropy Label for Source Packet Routing in
                 Networking (SPRING) Tunnels
       RFC 9088: Signaling Entropy Label Capability and Entropy
                 Readable Label Depth Using IS-IS";
  }

  identity msd-base-srh {
    base msd-base;
    description
      "Base identity of MSD types for Segment Routing Header (SRH).";
  }

  identity srh-max-sl {
    base msd-base-srh;
    description
      "The Maximum Segment Left MSD type.";
    reference
      "RFC 9352: IS-IS Extensions to Support Segment Routing
                 over the IPv6 Data Plane";
  }

  identity srh-max-end-pop {
    base msd-base-srh;
    description
      "The Maximum End Pop MSD Type.";
    reference
      "RFC 9352: IS-IS Extensions to Support Segment Routing
                 over the IPv6 Data Plane";
  }

  identity srh-max-h-encaps {
    base msd-base-srh;
    description
      "The Maximum H.Encaps MSD Type.";
    reference
      "RFC 9352: IS-IS Extensions to Support Segment Routing
                 over the IPv6 Data Plane";
  }

  identity srh-max-end-d {
    base msd-base-srh;
    description
      "The Maximum End D MSD Type.";
    reference
      "RFC 9352: IS-IS Extensions to Support Segment Routing
                 over the IPv6 Data Plane";
  }
}
]]></sourcecode>
      </section>
      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>MPLS MSD YANG</name>
        <t>This document also defines a YANG module for MSD extensions 
      <xref target="RFC8476" format="default"/> <xref target="RFC8491" format="default"/> to the MPLS base 
      model as defined in <xref target="RFC8960" format="default"/>.
        </t>
        <sourcecode name="ietf-mpls-msd@2024-07-05.yang" type="yang" markers="true"><![CDATA[
module ietf-mpls-msd {
  yang-version 1.1;
  namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-mpls-msd";
  prefix mpls-msd;

  import ietf-routing {
    prefix rt;
    reference
      "RFC 8349: A YANG Data Model for Routing
                 Management (NMDA Version)";
  }
  import ietf-mpls {
    prefix mpls;
    reference
      "RFC 8960: A YANG Data Model for MPLS Base";
  }
  import iana-msd-types {
    prefix iana-msd-types;
  }

  organization
    "IETF Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Working Group";
  contact
    "WG Web:   <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/mpls/>
     WG List:  <mailto:mpls@ietf.org>

     Author:    Yingzhen Qu
               <mailto:yingzhen.ietf@gmail.com>
     Author:    Acee Lindem
               <mailto:acee.ietf@gmail.com>
     Author:    Stephane Litkowski
               <mailto:slitkows.ietf@gmail.com>
     Author:    Jeff Tantsura
               <mailto:jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
     
    ";
  description
    "This YANG module augments the base MPLS model, and it is to
     provide support for different types of Maximum SID Depth (MSD).

     This YANG module conforms to the Network Management
     Datastore Architecture (NMDA) as described in RFC 8342.

     Copyright (c) 2024 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
     authors of the code.  All rights reserved.

     Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
     without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to
     the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License set
     forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
     Relating to IETF Documents
     (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).

     This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 9702;
     see the RFC itself for full legal notices.";

  revision 2024-07-05 {
    description
      "Initial Version";
    reference
      "RFC 9702: YANG Data Model for Maximum Segment Identifier (SID)
                 Depth Types and MPLS Maximum SID Depth";
  }

  grouping msd-type-value {
    description
      "Grouping for MSD type and value.";
    leaf msd-type {
      type identityref {
        base iana-msd-types:msd-base-mpls;
      }
      description
        "MSD types. The MSD type is defined in IANA 'IGP
         MSD-Types' registry.";
    }
    leaf msd-value {
      type uint8;
      description
        "MSD value, in the range of 0-255. 0 represents the lack
         of ability to support a SID stack of any depth.";
    }  
  }
  augment "/rt:routing/mpls:mpls" {
    description
      "This module augments MPLS data model (RFC 8960)
       with Node MSD.";
    container node-msds {
      config false;
      description
        "Maximum SID Depth (MSD) of a node.";
      list node-msd {
        key "msd-type";
        uses msd-type-value;
        description
          "List of different types of Node MSDs. For the same
           type, the value of Node MSD is the smallest among Link MSD
           values.";
      }
    }
  }

  augment "/rt:routing/mpls:mpls/mpls:interfaces/mpls:interface" {
    description
      "This module augments MPLS data model (RFC 8960)
       with Link MSD.";
    container link-msds {
      config false;
      description
        "Maximum SID Depth (MSD) of an interface.";
      list link-msd {
        key "msd-type";
        uses msd-type-value;
        description
          "List of different types of MSDs on the link.";
      }
    }
  }
}
]]></sourcecode>
      </section>
    </section>
    <section anchor="Security" numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>Security Considerations</name>
<!--[rfced] FYI, the Security Considerations section has been updated 
to match https://wiki.ietf.org/group/ops/yang-security-guidelines.
If the differences from the approved template should be reinstated,
please let us know.

Specifically, this text is no longer present:
   ... without the "none" authentication
   option, Transport Layer Security (TLS) [RFC8446] with mutual X.509
   authentication, and HTTPS with HTTP authentication (Section 11 of
   [RFC9110]).

The normative reference [RFC9110] has been removed, as it was not 
cited elsewhere in the document.
-->

      <t>
<!-- DNE begins-->
      The YANG modules specified in this document define a schema for data
      that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such as
      NETCONF <xref target="RFC6241" format="default"/> or RESTCONF <xref
      target="RFC8040" format="default"/>.  
The lowest NETCONF layer
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) <xref target="RFC6242" format="default"/>.  The lowest RESTCONF layer
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
<xref target="RFC8446" format="default"/>.</t>
      <t>The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) <xref target="RFC8341" format="default"/> provides the 
      means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or RESTCONF users to a
      pre-configured subset of all available NETCONF or RESTCONF protocol 
      operations and content.</t>
<!-- DNE ends -->
      <t>Some of the readable data nodes in the ietf-mpls-msd YANG module
      may be considered sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is
      thus important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or notification)
      to these data nodes. These are the
      subtrees and data nodes and their sensitivity/vulnerability:
      </t>
          <t indent="3">/rt:routing/mpls:mpls/msd/node-msds</t>
          <t indent="3">/rt:routing/mpls:mpls/msd/link-msds</t>
          <t indent="3">Exposure of the node's maximum SID depth may be useful in mounting a
          Denial-of-Service (DoS) attack by sending packets to the node that 
          the router can't process.</t>
      <t>
      The iana-msd-types YANG module defines a set of identities that mirror
      the IANA "IGP MSD-Types" registry. These identities are intended to be reused
      by other YANG modules. The module by itself does not expose any data nodes
      that are writable or readable. As such, there are no additional security
      issues related to this YANG module that need to be considered.
      </t>
    </section>
    <section numbered="true" toc="default">
      <name>IANA Considerations</name>
      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>Registering YANG Modules</name>
        <t>This document registers URIs in the IETF XML registry 
   as defined in <xref target="RFC3688" format="default"/>.  
   The following registrations have been made:
        </t>
  <dl spacing="compact">
   <dt>URI:</dt><dd>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-msd-types</dd>
   <dt>Registrant Contact:</dt><dd>The IESG.</dd>
   <dt>XML:</dt><dd>N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.</dd>
  </dl>
  <dl spacing="compact">
   <dt>URI:</dt><dd>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-mpls-msd</dd>
   <dt>Registrant Contact:</dt><dd>The IESG.</dd>
   <dt>XML:</dt><dd>N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.</dd>
  </dl>

        <t>This document registers the YANG modules in the "YANG Module Names"
   registry as defined in <xref target="RFC6020" format="default"/>.
        </t>

  <dl spacing="compact">
   <dt>Name:</dt><dd>iana-msd-types</dd>
   <dt>Maintained by IANA?</dt><dd>Y</dd>
   <dt>Namespace:</dt><dd>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:iana-msd-types</dd>
   <dt>Prefix:</dt><dd>iana-msd-types</dd>
   <dt>Reference:</dt><dd>RFC 9702</dd>
  </dl>

  <dl spacing="compact">
   <dt>Name:</dt><dd>ietf-mpls-msd</dd>
   <dt>Maintained by IANA?</dt><dd>N</dd>
   <dt>Namespace:</dt><dd>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-mpls-msd</dd>
   <dt>Prefix:</dt><dd>mpls-msd</dd>
   <dt>Reference:</dt><dd>RFC 9702</dd>
  </dl>

      </section>
      <section numbered="true" toc="default">
        <name>IANA MSD-Types Module</name>
        <t>This document defines the initial version of the IANA-maintained
      "iana-msd-types" YANG module (<xref target="iana-msd-types" format="default"/>). The latest
      version of the YANG module is available from the "YANG Parameters"
      registry <xref target="IANA-YANG-Parameters" format="default"/>.</t>
        <t>
      IANA has added this note to the "YANG Module Names" registry:
        </t>
      <blockquote>
<t>New values must not be directly added to the "iana-msd-types" YANG module. They must instead be added to the "IGP MSD-Types" registry in the "Interior Gateway Protocol (IGP) Parameters" registry group <xref target="IANA-IGP-MSD-Types" format="default"/>.</t>
      </blockquote>
        <t>
      The identities defined in the iana-msd-types YANG module are organized hierarchically
      based on the data plane. In this initial version, only MPLS and SRv6 data
      planes are supported, hence "msd-base-mpls" and "msd-base-srh" are defined.
      When a new data plane is added to the "IGP MSD-Types" registry, a new "identity"
      statement should be added to the "iana-msd-types" YANG module. The name of the
      "identity" is the prefix "msd-base-" plus a lowercase version of the data plane name.
      The identity statement should have the following sub-statements defined:</t>
        <dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
          <dt>"base":</dt>
          <dd>Contains 'msd-base'.</dd>
          <dt>"description":</dt>
          <dd>Replicates the description from "msd-base-mpls" and changes the corresponding data plane name.</dd>
          <dt>"reference":</dt>
          <dd>Replicates the reference from
            the registry with the title of the document added.</dd>
        </dl>
        <t>
      When an MSD type is added to the "IGP MSD-Types" registry, a new "identity"
      statement must be added to the "iana-msd-types" YANG module. The name of the
      "identity" is a lowercase version of the type name provided in the name with
      the space replaced with "-". The "identity" statement should have the
      following sub-statements defined:</t>
        <dl newline="false" spacing="normal">
          <dt>"base":</dt>
          <dd>Contains the base name of the corresponding data plane.</dd>
          <dt>"description":</dt>
          <dd>Replicates the name from the registry.</dd>
          <dt>"reference":</dt>
          <dd>Replicates the reference from
            the registry with the title of the document added.</dd>
        </dl>
        <t>Unassigned or reserved values are not present in the module.</t>
        <t>When the "iana-msd-types" YANG module is updated, a new "revision"
        statement with a unique revision date must be added in front of the
        existing revision statements.</t>
<!--[rfced] We suggest naming the column "Data Plane" no hyphen, as the
hyphen seems unnecessary. If you agree, we will ask IANA to update the 
registry accordingly.

Current:   IANA has added a "Data-Plane" column 
Suggested: IANA has added a "Data Plane" column
 [and other instances]
-->
        <t>
      IANA has added a "Data-Plane" column to the 
     "IGP MSD-Types" registry. This will unequivocally identify the 
     base identity for MSD-Types. The values for the "Data-Plane"
     column for existing MSD-Types are: </t>

<!--[rfced] FYI, "N/A" has been removed from Table 1 in order
to match the IANA registry, which does not use "N/A" for empty fields.
-->

<table anchor="tab-1">
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>Value</th>
      <th>Name</th>
      <th>Data-Plane</th>
      <th>Reference</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody>
    <tr>
      <td>0</td>
      <td>Reserved</td>
      <td></td>
      <td><xref target="RFC8491"/></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>1</td>
      <td>Base MPLS Imposition MSD</td>
      <td>MPLS</td>
      <td><xref target="RFC8491"/></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>2</td>
      <td>ERLD-MSD</td>
      <td>MPLS</td>
      <td><xref target="RFC9088"/></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>3-40</td>
      <td>Unassigned</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>41</td>
      <td>SRH Max SL</td>
      <td>SRv6</td>
      <td><xref target="RFC9352"/></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>42</td>
      <td>SRH Max End Pop</td>
      <td>SRv6</td>
      <td><xref target="RFC9352"/></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>43</td>
      <td>Unassigned</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>44</td>
      <td>SRH Max H.encaps</td>
      <td>SRv6</td>
      <td><xref target="RFC9352"/></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>45</td>
      <td>SRH Max End</td>
      <td>SRv6</td>
      <td><xref target="RFC9352"/></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>46-250</td>
      <td>Unassigned</td>
      <td></td>
      <td></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>251-254</td>
      <td>Experimental Use</td>
      <td></td>
      <td><xref target="RFC8491"/></td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>255</td>
      <td>Reserved</td>
      <td></td>
      <td><xref target="RFC8491"/></td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

        <t>
        IANA has added this note to <xref target="IANA-IGP-MSD-Types" format="default"/>:
        </t>
    <blockquote>
            <t>When this registry is modified, the YANG module "iana-msd-types"
          must be updated as defined in RFC 9702.</t>
    </blockquote>
      </section>
    </section>
  </middle>
  <back>

    <references>
      <name>References</name>
      <references>
        <name>Normative References</name>
	<xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.3688.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6020.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6241.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.6242.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.7950.xml"/>

<!-- [rfced] RFC 7950 is not cited anywhere in this document.  Please let us
know where it should be cited; otherwise, this reference will be removed 
from the Normative References.

Original:
 [RFC7950]  Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
            RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
            <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>. -->

        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8040.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8341.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8342.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8349.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8446.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8476.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8491.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8960.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9088.xml"/>
<!--        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9110.xml"/>
-->
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.9352.xml"/>

        <reference anchor="IANA-IGP-MSD-Types" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/igp-parameters">
          <front>
            <title>IGP MSD-Types</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>

        <reference anchor="IANA-YANG-Parameters" target="https://www.iana.org/assignments/yang-parameters">
          <front>
            <title>YANG Module Names</title>
            <author>
              <organization>IANA</organization>
            </author>
            <date/>
          </front>
        </reference>

      </references>
      <references>
        <name>Informative References</name>
	<xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8340.xml"/>
        <xi:include href="https://bib.ietf.org/public/rfc/bibxml/reference.RFC.8662.xml"/>
      </references>
    </references>
    <section anchor="Acknowledgements" numbered="false" toc="default">
      <name>Acknowledgements</name>
      <t>The YANG model was developed using the suite of YANG tools written
      and maintained by numerous authors.</t>
      <t>We would like to thank <contact fullname="Jan Lindblad"/>, <contact
      fullname="Tom Petch"/>, <contact fullname="Dhruv Dhody"/>, <contact
      fullname="Mohamed Boucadair"/>, and <contact fullname="Susan Hares"/>
      for their reviews and comments.</t>
    </section>
<!-- [rfced] Terminology

a) We have received guidance from Benoît Claise and the YANG Doctors that 
the terms "YANG module" and "YANG data model" are preferred.  Please review 
the usage in this document. For example, should text be updated as follows 
or otherwise?

Abstract
   Original: This document defines two YANG data modules.
   Perhaps:  This document defines two YANG modules.
       [Section 1 already uses the latter.]
   
   Original: The second augments the IETF MPLS YANG model to provide ...
   Perhaps:  The second augments the IETF MPLS YANG data model to provide ...
       [And the same for similar text in Section 1.]
   
Acknowledgements
   Original: The YANG model was developed ...
   Perhaps:  The YANG data model was developed ...


b) FYI, we have updated the terms below to use the form on the right, 
as this is how they appear in the referenced documents (e.g., RFC 8491).

node MSD vs. Node MSD
link MSD vs. Link MSD
-->

<!-- [rfced] Please review the "Inclusive Language" portion of the online
Style Guide <https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#inclusive_language>
and let us know if any changes are needed.  Updates of this nature typically
result in more precise language, which is helpful for readers. Note that our
script did not flag any words in particular, but this should still be reviewed
as a best practice.
-->

<!-- [rfced] FYI - We have added expansions for abbreviations upon first use
per Section 3.6 of RFC 7322 ("RFC Style Guide"). Please review each
expansion in the document carefully to ensure correctness.
-->
</back>
</rfc>
