Is there any state= =A0transition=A0diagram available for the NCE=A0maintenance=A0in ND-18.

Also, kindly clarify what does "A renewed ARO should mark the cache entry as STALE" .

Is it to say that the fi= rst time a ARO is received the NCE becomes REGISTERED and for all the subse= quent received AROs from the same node the NCE is set to STALE, but not gra= bage-collected and treated as REGISTERED.

Or is that a NCE now has two state variables (4861 stat= e =3D probe,stale etc and ND-18 state - registered or tentative).

Regards,

Thomas Chacko

--bcaec539653284234004b85dbe5d-- From my.mailing.acc@gmail.com Wed Feb 8 08:07:29 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A953B21F84F3 for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:07:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.876 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.876 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.122, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_55=0.6] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JsVfRIHcQjcX for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:07:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lpp01m020-f172.google.com (mail-lpp01m020-f172.google.com [209.85.217.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741F221F8523 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:07:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by lbbgk8 with SMTP id gk8so396249lbb.31 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:07:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=VrKP68kkXRNcPpdLuEdCHbQma0e+UVvJ12VILdQDimE=; b=Ym59o4HIvOy5r0u0az0tNh4fnUq9DnatfaFIOpZ4OrgiJEI9HR+rPtIuZcpNyW7MfB HU1U98QCVlwbAIYbN5MuE5NF/Cd7CmFTHJ94aEtiWHWpN+6k9/TteTvtV7hoXXbmmYOA n5/tY5EZigoyjsswB4S978xwwfNvXeKe/5jds= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.114.74 with SMTP id je10mr15675949lab.40.1328717247191; Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:07:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.76.164 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Feb 2012 08:07:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 21:37:27 +0530 Message-ID: From: Thomas Chacko To: 6lowpan@ietf.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0408d7ed8699d404b87617a2 Subject: Re: [6lowpan] nd-18 NCE X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:07:29 -0000 --f46d0408d7ed8699d404b87617a2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi All, Will really appreciate if you could give some pointers. Regards, Thomas Chacko On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Tom wrote: > > Hi All, > > Is there any state transition diagram available for the NCE maintenance in > ND-18. > > Also, kindly clarify what does "A renewed ARO should mark the cache entry > as STALE" . > > Is it to say that the first time a ARO is received the NCE becomes > REGISTERED and for all the subsequent received AROs from the same node the > NCE is set to STALE, but not grabage-collected and treated as REGISTERED. > > Or is that a NCE now has two state variables (4861 state = probe,stale etc > and ND-18 state - registered or tentative). > > Regards, > Thomas Chacko > > --f46d0408d7ed8699d404b87617a2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All,

Will really appreciate if you could give some pointers.
=
Regards,
Thomas Chacko

On Tue, Feb= 7, 2012 at 4:34 PM, Tom <my.mailing.acc@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi All,
Is there any state=A0transition=A0diagram available for the NCE= =A0maintenance=A0in ND-18.

Also, kindly clarify what does = "A renewed ARO should mark the cache entry as STALE" .

Is it to say that the fi= rst time a ARO is received the NCE becomes REGISTERED and for all the subse= quent received AROs from the same node the NCE is set to STALE, but not gra= bage-collected and treated as REGISTERED.

Or is that a NCE now has two state variables (4861 stat= e =3D probe,stale etc and ND-18 state - registered or tentative).

Regards,
Thomas Chacko

--f46d0408d7ed8699d404b87617a2-- From cabo@tzi.org Fri Feb 24 00:26:02 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD50221F85E7; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:26:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.821 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.821 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.172, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SrlwqWPvFQqq; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:26:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5E721F85E5; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:26:01 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q1O8PrP2018457; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:25:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.217.105] (p5B3E6044.dip.t-dialin.net [91.62.96.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B95A872; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:25:52 +0100 (CET) From: Carsten Bormann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 09:25:53 +0100 To: 6lowpan@ietf.org, "core@ietf.org WG" , roll@ietf.org, lwip@ietf.org Message-Id: <1B2B5C1F-AF12-44CB-BCF1-C5DD2978FBEB@tzi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Subject: [6lowpan] Constrained Node/Network Cluster @ IETF83 X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 08:26:03 -0000 Here is my usual compilation of the draft agenda for IETF83. Note that this agenda is subject to change, so please don't plan travel = around it. This time, we are nicely spread out over the week, so a lot of things = will happen between the meeting slots. Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten ***DRAFT*** Agenda for Constrained Node/Network related events during IETF 83 in Paris ***Subject to change*** -- don't plan travel around this * FRIDAY, March 23, 2012 IAB Workshop on Smart Object Security * SATURDAY, March 24, 2012; SUNDAY, March 25, 2012 ETSI CoAP plugfest * MONDAY, March 26, 2012 0900-1130 Maillot OPS v6ops IPv6 Operations WG * TUESDAY, March 27, 2012 0900-1130 243 APP *core* Constrained RESTful Environments WG Maillot INT homenet Home Networking WG 1300-1500 241 OPS eman Energy Management WG * WEDNESDAY, March 28, 2012 0900-1130 242AB INT 6man IPv6 Maintenance WG 1300-1500 241 RTG *roll* Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks WG * THURSDAY, March 29, 2012 1300-1500 Maillot INT intarea Internet Area Working Group WG 1520-1720 252B INT *lwig* Light-Weight Implementation Guidance WG Maillot OPS v6ops IPv6 Operations WG * FRIDAY, March 30, 2012 0900-1100 253 APP *core* Constrained RESTful Environments WG From dat@exegin.com Wed Feb 29 03:17:15 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8991421F883B for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:17:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.999 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CKTNp8w0WWUH for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:17:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C628F21F8897 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:17:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by wicr5 with SMTP id r5so2593677wic.31 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:17:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dat@exegin.com designates 10.180.24.7 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.24.7; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dat@exegin.com designates 10.180.24.7 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dat@exegin.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.24.7]) by 10.180.24.7 with SMTP id q7mr47547079wif.14.1330514233405 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:17:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.24.7 with SMTP id q7mr37853009wif.14.1330514233356; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:17:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.3.26] (196-210-130-71.dynamic.isadsl.co.za. [196.210.130.71]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hb10sm85635632wib.10.2012.02.29.03.17.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:17:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4E0934.4060000@exegin.com> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:17:08 +0200 From: Dario Tedeschi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.23) Gecko/20110922 Thunderbird/3.1.15 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: 6lowpan@ietf.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnqFwCEHV68LnGi/2Pk8ZPpWBSCI4UUixivQdGTMpOFa8hUkx5iNE7oC/fP94/7x3cGBGik Subject: [6lowpan] Identifying a host X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:17:15 -0000 I was wondering if it would be useful to add an R (Router) flag to the ARO, in 6LoWPAN ND, to indicate whether a node is a router or a host. It would be very handy for route-over topologies (i.e. RPL). When a node registers an address through its default router, that router needs to know whether the node is operating as a router as well or just a host. If it's a host, the router can add a host route to that node, indicating that that node is outside of the routing domain and that the node expects traffic forwarded on it's behalf. The reason for choosing the ARO to add the flag is that NS does not have the R flag like the NA does, and since it's likely that only an NS+ARO will ever be sent from a registering node and the ARO is specific to 6LoWPAN, adding an R flag to the ARO would seem the logical choice. Dario