From cabo@tzi.org Mon Mar 5 10:53:00 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B10221F8857; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:53:00 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -105.577 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.072, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7qtREwG4ZZcA; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:52:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80EC21F8836; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 10:52:56 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q25IqjpP004456; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 19:52:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from eduroam-pool6-0113.wlan.uni-bremen.de (eduroam-pool6-0113.wlan.uni-bremen.de [134.102.24.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D02DB38B; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 19:52:45 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: <1B2B5C1F-AF12-44CB-BCF1-C5DD2978FBEB@tzi.org> Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 19:52:45 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <95A48EF5-8E0A-46C7-9677-83D5B218497F@tzi.org> References: <1B2B5C1F-AF12-44CB-BCF1-C5DD2978FBEB@tzi.org> To: 6lowpan@ietf.org, "core@ietf.org WG" , roll@ietf.org, lwip@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Subject: Re: [6lowpan] [core] Constrained Node/Network Cluster @ IETF83 X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:53:01 -0000 In the final agenda, homenet and 6man have exchanged places. 6man still is a bit of a conflict for core, but much less so than = homenet. Thanks to our ADs for fixing this! https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/83/agenda.html Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten On Feb 24, 2012, at 09:25, Carsten Bormann wrote: > Here is my usual compilation of the draft agenda for IETF83. > Note that this agenda is subject to change, so please don't plan = travel around it. > This time, we are nicely spread out over the week, so a lot of things = will happen between the meeting slots. >=20 > Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten >=20 >=20 > ***DRAFT*** Agenda for Constrained Node/Network related events during > IETF 83 in Paris > ***Subject to change*** -- don't plan travel around this >=20 > * FRIDAY, March 23, 2012 >=20 > IAB Workshop on Smart Object Security >=20 > * SATURDAY, March 24, 2012; SUNDAY, March 25, 2012 >=20 > ETSI CoAP plugfest >=20 > * MONDAY, March 26, 2012 >=20 > 0900-1130 > Maillot OPS v6ops IPv6 Operations WG >=20 > * TUESDAY, March 27, 2012 >=20 > 0900-1130 > 243 APP *core* Constrained RESTful Environments WG > Maillot INT homenet Home Networking WG >=20 > 1300-1500 > 241 OPS eman Energy Management WG >=20 > * WEDNESDAY, March 28, 2012 >=20 > 0900-1130 > 242AB INT 6man IPv6 Maintenance WG >=20 > 1300-1500 > 241 RTG *roll* Routing Over Low power and Lossy networks WG >=20 > * THURSDAY, March 29, 2012 >=20 > 1300-1500 > Maillot INT intarea Internet Area Working Group WG >=20 > 1520-1720 > 252B INT *lwig* Light-Weight Implementation Guidance WG > Maillot OPS v6ops IPv6 Operations WG >=20 > * FRIDAY, March 30, 2012 >=20 > 0900-1100 > 253 APP *core* Constrained RESTful Environments WG >=20 > _______________________________________________ > core mailing list > core@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/core From johanna.1.nieminen@nokia.com Tue Mar 6 02:20:58 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719A421F8852 for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 02:20:58 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.848 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.750, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F9gfEARQEsoz for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 02:20:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from mgw-sa02.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.1.48]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00B521F8691 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 02:20:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh101.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.22]) by mgw-sa02.nokia.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id q26AKlNH005074 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:20:53 +0200 Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.61]) by vaebh101.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 6 Mar 2012 12:20:53 +0200 Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-061.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.1.91]) by 008-AM1MMR1-006.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.61]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.003; Tue, 6 Mar 2012 11:20:52 +0100 From: To: <6lowpan@ietf.org> Thread-Topic: New version of IPv6 over BT-LE draft Thread-Index: Acz7glVX0HRLqJ4UQwKnS8M1yjiO4g== Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:20:52 +0000 Message-ID: <5FA713B99ACAA6478C065A155E206B46176A10CC@008-AM1MPN1-061.mgdnok.nokia.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-headerinfofordlp: None x-titus-version: 3.3.8.1 x-tituslabs-classifications-30: TLPropertyRoot=Nokia;Confidentiality=Nokia Internal Use Only;Project=None; x-tituslabs-classificationhash-30: 0Ywc1/TmJmZP14okFmB8GMO2kJcVBwV+hYOal1xlCH/U/xW5WbIVqXDdh8Grq8aOMmn9LgcV2JfhS41TeDRF59vmPqut5oqD6n6QnaOTz/XeqOguqV6Z1sIdgeCsrsIPrg+dkeV3ivtbEDsDZhbexPt4o4FsabR5SGJzKws9UYCwC8Vkn3yH57Zy7vRs+LmPSUFZeNBdhNRbGjTVmUOem3P9FZQ9th8nA0u3IWakXunLu97X97uS4GiCNEfx308Z x-originating-ip: [172.21.34.127] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5FA713B99ACAA6478C065A155E206B46176A10CC008AM1MPN1061mg_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Mar 2012 10:20:53.0468 (UTC) FILETIME=[CFA159C0:01CCFB82] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Subject: [6lowpan] New version of IPv6 over BT-LE draft X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:20:58 -0000 --_000_5FA713B99ACAA6478C065A155E206B46176A10CC008AM1MPN1061mg_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Our draft "Transmission of IPv6 Packets over Bluetooth Low Energy" has bee= n updated based on the comments provided by Carsten after WGLC was complete= d. The changes are mostly editorial, but header compression section include= s a few content related changes and there is also a new section explaining = how neighbor discovery works with our solution. Version 6 is available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle/. Johanna --_000_5FA713B99ACAA6478C065A155E206B46176A10CC008AM1MPN1061mg_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

 

Our draft “Transmission of IPv6 Packets over B= luetooth Low Energy” has  been updated based on the comments pro= vided by Carsten after WGLC was completed. The changes are mostly editorial= , but header compression section includes a few content related changes and there is also a new section explaining how neighbor di= scovery works with our solution. Version 6 is available at:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle/= .

 

Johanna

 

--_000_5FA713B99ACAA6478C065A155E206B46176A10CC008AM1MPN1061mg_-- From d42roth@gmail.com Fri Mar 9 06:51:28 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26B421F85ED for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 06:51:28 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.751 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.751 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_SUMOF=5, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gBZ3Eowt4ZhY for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 06:51:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-we0-f172.google.com (mail-we0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2895B21F85F3 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 06:51:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by werb10 with SMTP id b10so1437906wer.31 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 06:51:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=pl/Yd/VAyxFifTzBuw+zFzsgvKU4BEe/u1Nng6spICA=; b=LDyfdu/MrTLg/kwjztfpx5x4LlAG4OSBTPob9JPz49niZoLRaJvAekQhKza3bC2TU9 OF3gM+6cKVmxkmO1URvQiaZGhIOcR9DzFu3rdmOKNp8EROJp1ccySGbNYEuJuTtkE5ql DQVMv/XZltdRyCmgy6fiBKuDiTeEJSV9pkdV7sZNkvthanRrFii8zMWMvQdihA5pZrNy H80ryvjM30LU4zAWS7y1Cm0nQc8Ga9/6KD/iCRQ4CFnD2p8PoXaY1QflfW67o26tYuB+ dA1yMxsa1+gChZUASUnSkpLZr1fVl16JaKonkrhs0XuqFN0KkX/is4nB2Ec9tNiI7xmq 5gMA== Received: by 10.216.138.223 with SMTP id a73mr1578507wej.86.1331304687309; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 06:51:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from holonet.u-strasbg.fr (holonet.u-strasbg.fr. [130.79.90.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e6sm2571300wix.8.2012.03.09.06.51.26 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 09 Mar 2012 06:51:26 -0800 (PST) From: Damien Roth Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 15:51:25 +0100 Message-Id: To: 6lowpan@ietf.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Subject: [6lowpan] Question about RA packets X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 14:51:28 -0000 Hello, I have a question about the Router Advertisement (RA) packets described = in draft-ietf-6lowpan-nd-18. As I figure out, the RA packets are built like this :=20 RA header + SLLAO + ABRO + ( PIO + 6CO ) * number_of_prefixes With one prefix, the sum of the header / options length is equal to 104 = bytes. Here is the detail : RA : 16 bytes SLLAO : 16 bytes ABRO : 24 bytes PIO : 32 bytes 6CO : 16 bytes -------------- 104 bytes However, in 802.15.4 the maximum length of the payload is 102 bytes (127 = bytes - 25 bytes for the MAC header). Which means that every RA packet = have to be fragmented before being sent to the MAC layer. Is my reasoning correct ? Regards, --=20 Damien ROTH - PhD student Strasbourg University, France From cabo@tzi.org Fri Mar 9 07:27:31 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C58221F86B9 for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:27:31 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.312 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.312 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ow9B9+BXi0SK for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:27:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E7121F86AF for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 07:27:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q29FRMll014495; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:27:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.217.117] (p5B3E6A4A.dip.t-dialin.net [91.62.106.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCFBE7AC; Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:27:21 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:27:19 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <00539C06-F953-4EAF-A54D-7CD2995A24CA@tzi.org> References: To: Damien Roth X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: 6lowpan@ietf.org Subject: Re: [6lowpan] Question about RA packets X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 15:27:31 -0000 On Mar 9, 2012, at 15:51, Damien Roth wrote: > Is my reasoning correct ? I didn't check the numbers, but they sound about right. Can you give me a sample packet (preferably in pcap form)? I would like to check how much draft-bormann-6lowpan-ghc-03.txt improves = the situation. Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten From teemu.savolainen@nokia.com Sun Mar 25 01:26:59 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15F921F85CE; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 01:26:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.966 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.966 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.632, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GgSt4oERjKhA; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 01:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mgw-da01.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [147.243.128.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F90621F85CD; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 01:26:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (vaebh106.europe.nokia.com [10.160.244.32]) by mgw-da01.nokia.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2/Sentrion-MTA-4.2.2) with ESMTP id q2P8QsWw002643; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:26:54 +0300 Received: from smtp.mgd.nokia.com ([65.54.30.23]) by vaebh106.NOE.Nokia.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:26:53 +0300 Received: from 008-AM1MPN1-053.mgdnok.nokia.com ([169.254.3.161]) by 008-AM1MMR1-007.mgdnok.nokia.com ([65.54.30.23]) with mapi id 14.01.0355.003; Sun, 25 Mar 2012 10:26:53 +0200 From: To: <6lowpan@ietf.org>, Thread-Topic: Sensors using CoAP over IPv6 over BT-LE demo on Tuesday morning 8-9 Thread-Index: Ac0KYKiE/Ur8Ku9CTYWYai5l+JOTZQ== Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:26:52 +0000 Message-ID: <916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE443096962042FD0BB@008-AM1MPN1-053.mgdnok.nokia.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-tituslabs-classifications-30: TLPropertyRoot=Nokia;Confidentiality=Nokia Internal Use Only;Project=None; x-titus-version: 3.3.8.1 x-headerinfofordlp: None x-tituslabs-classificationhash-30: 2PrCjJ7f5poVv9TjWbkmkgp4C4l3DgqNTbbQxwIS3sD87UILzeGyKsoSx2kUrOZ1J5qxkrRfBjK7VTnAvN2JC7MYfA+rdloBInCpUOScMgwsdig1dykh/y/UlPSoWbxz7n15dZ6L07biESVaa2PDuUUaB77Ig0tcxbJc2qA5efy3FE4ItPJacLl4NChgvB80dhruenCqIPZVZecOkGGBLxZsskxN5SK3lD39/WOR8AbMkIhQt+a+s5a62L2sq3ewnBY9S4uVbjJo5C+ZHY/nQ5ZJrI5klycPMO8aMPxJbJg= x-originating-ip: [10.162.86.87] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE443096962042FD0BB008AM1MPN1053mg_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Mar 2012 08:26:53.0399 (UTC) FILETIME=[087AE670:01CD0A61] X-Nokia-AV: Clean Subject: [6lowpan] Sensors using CoAP over IPv6 over BT-LE demo on Tuesday morning 8-9 X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2012 08:26:59 -0000 --_000_916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE443096962042FD0BB008AM1MPN1053mg_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Please come and see demonstration of IPv6 over Bluetooth Low Energy impleme= ntation related to draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-06. In the demo we have IPv6 enabled heart-rate belt and thermistor sensor. The= se sensors act as CoAP servers and provide measurements for CoAP client run= ning on a web server. We did not (yet at least) got any specific room for this, so we plan to sho= w the demo just prior to Core WG meeting at: Tuesday March 27, 08:00 - 9:00 room 243. As a fallback we will show this on corridor just next to 243 (the demo is q= uite portableJ Best regards, Teemu --_000_916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE443096962042FD0BB008AM1MPN1053mg_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

 

Please come and see demonstration of IPv6 over Bluet= ooth Low Energy implementation related to draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-06.<= /o:p>

 

In the demo we have IPv6 enabled heart-rate belt and= thermistor sensor. These sensors act as CoAP servers and provide measureme= nts for CoAP client running on a web server.

 

We did not (yet at least) got any specific room for = this, so we plan to show the demo just prior to Core WG meeting at:

 

Tuesday March 27, 08:00 – 9:00 room 243.<= /o:p>

 

As a fallback we will show this on corridor just nex= t to 243 (the demo is quite portableJ=

 

Best regards,

 

        &nbs= p;       Teemu

--_000_916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE443096962042FD0BB008AM1MPN1053mg_-- From cabo@tzi.org Mon Mar 26 01:57:40 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F8721F84E2 for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:57:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id znvw7P9jQaYv for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:57:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA64F21F84B6 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 01:57:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2Q8vVrZ007254 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:57:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dhcp-9069.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9069.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.8.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 66DDE2A9; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:57:31 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) From: Carsten Bormann Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 10:52:29 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20120326083549.10700.80057.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Subject: [6lowpan] 6LoWPAN roadmap updated X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 08:57:40 -0000 6LoWPANners, I have updated the 6LoWPAN roadmap document. While the WG is still busy completing 6LoWPAN-ND and IPv6 over BT-LE, = this document is intended to provide an overview over the set of = "6LoWPAN" standards, how they fit together, and what rough edges must be = filed off to fit them together. Please review again at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-6lowpan-roadmap-01 This document is not intended for immediate publication, but as a = running working document that keeps the threads together while the = specifications are being deployed. If you have any comments or updates, I'll update it as quickly as = possible. Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten > Title : 6LoWPAN Roadmap and Implementation Guide > Author(s) : Carsten Bormann > Filename : draft-bormann-6lowpan-roadmap-01.txt > Pages : 14 > Date : 2012-03-26 >=20 > 6LoWPAN is defined in RFC 4944 in conjunction with a number of > specifications that are currently nearing completion. The entirety > of these specifications may be hard to understand, pose specific > implementation problems, or be simply inconsistent. >=20 > The present guide aims to provide a roadmap to these documents as > well as provide specific advice how to use these specifications in > combination. In certain cases, it may provide clarifications or = even > corrections to the specifications referenced. >=20 > This guide is intended as a continued work-in-progress, i.e. a long- > lived Internet-Draft, to be updated whenever new information becomes > available and new consensus on how to handle issues is formed. > Similar to the ROHC implementation guide, RFC 4815, it might be > published as an RFC at some future time later in the acceptance = curve > of the specifications. >=20 > This document does not describe a new protocol or attempts to set a > new standard of any kind - it mostly describes good practice in = using > the existing specifications, but it may also document emerging > consensus where a correction needs to be made. >=20 > The current version -01 of this document is an early draft that is > intended to spark the further collection of relevant information. From cabo@tzi.org Mon Mar 26 07:35:28 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B530921E80B2 for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:35:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.249 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QHRe935VyF+d for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A41921E80AD for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:35:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2QEZIep006801 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:35:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dhcp-9069.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9069.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.8.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C923D599; Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:35:18 +0200 (CEST) From: Carsten Bormann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:35:18 +0200 To: 6lowpan@ietf.org Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Subject: [6lowpan] 6LoWPAN GHC updated X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 14:35:28 -0000 I have updated the GHC draft. There is no technical change that would affect interoperability; I have = mainly clarified what the (remaining 47 bits in the) 6CIO option also = could be used for. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-6lowpan-ghc-04 I think this specification is now ready for use and would like to hear = from implementors. Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten From zach@sensinode.com Wed Mar 28 15:34:17 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E9D21E810A for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:34:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ow6h1TF+UTXF for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth-smtp.nebula.fi (auth-smtp.nebula.fi [217.30.180.105]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6886521E8117 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 15:34:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp-4377.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-4377.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.67.119]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth-smtp.nebula.fi (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id q2SMY3O3001325 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Mar 2012 01:34:03 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) From: Zach Shelby In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 00:34:02 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: 6lowpan WG <6lowpan@ietf.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Subject: Re: [6lowpan] 6LoWPAN GHC updated X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:34:17 -0000 Folks, The GHC draft has been around for quite some time, and seems like a good = general solution for increasing the efficiency of ICMPv6, routing = (RPL...) and other headers. For example in the ROLL meeting today = concern over the fragmentation of messages was expressed. Could we = consider making this a working group document? Do people think this = would be a solid starting point for solving this problem, and is there = interest to work on, implement and use it? I personally do think it = would be useful. Zach =20 On Mar 26, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > I have updated the GHC draft. > There is no technical change that would affect interoperability; I = have mainly clarified what the (remaining 47 bits in the) 6CIO option = also could be used for. >=20 > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bormann-6lowpan-ghc-04 >=20 > I think this specification is now ready for use and would like to hear = from implementors. >=20 > Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten >=20 > _______________________________________________ > 6lowpan mailing list > 6lowpan@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lowpan --=20 Zach Shelby, Chief Nerd, Sensinode Ltd. http://www.sensinode.com http://zachshelby.org - My blog "On the Internet of Things" http://6lowpan.net - My book "6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet" Mobile: +358 40 7796297 From cabo@tzi.org Fri Mar 30 05:36:17 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CFCB21F86DE for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:36:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zHHzt5IBnMew for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:36:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8744821F86DB for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:36:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.224.120]) by informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2UCZcO7020157; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:35:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dhcp-9069.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-9069.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.8.105]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-fb3.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A31A248; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:35:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Carsten Bormann Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:35:37 +0200 To: 6lowpan@ietf.org, intarea@ietf.org Message-Id: <3A9E203F-588B-4AF2-B2AF-45CFA2D39835@tzi.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Subject: [6lowpan] IPv6 over Bluetooth Low-Energy (BT-LE): Please review draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-06.txt X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:36:17 -0000 draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle has passed working-group last call in the = 6LoWPAN Working Group in January. While preparing IESG submission, I noticed a few more things that needed = to be taken care of. This led to draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-06.txt, which should have all these = items fixed. However, I believe the draft would benefit from a bit more eyeballs = before I send it on to the IESG. -- could you implement IPv6 over BT-LE from this draft (and its = normative references),=20 or is anything that would be important for interoperability left = unspecified? -- general comments about draft quality and the technical decisions = taken are also welcome. I'm asking for feedback from the intarea working group as well as the = 6lowpan working group. The draft is only 12 pages, so this can be done quickly. Please reply until Friday, April 13, 2012. ( Bluetooth Low-Energy is also known as Bluetooth Smart, a part of = Bluetooth 4. =20 The iPhone 4S has it. Zillions of IPv6 packets will flow over it. So you really want to review this draft! ) Gr=FC=DFe, Carsten