From rdroms.ietf@gmail.com Wed May 22 11:05:33 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6DAC21F95D5 for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 May 2013 11:05:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.132 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.132 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.467, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uruhNStvqKG1 for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 May 2013 11:05:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-gh0-f175.google.com (mail-gh0-f175.google.com [209.85.160.175]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BED611E8129 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 May 2013 11:05:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-gh0-f175.google.com with SMTP id z19so811516ghb.34 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 May 2013 11:05:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:references :to:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=yXXyuPo3686h4LC4akcZ6bsjd2nsgeCXyNVilsGrP0s=; b=VnyLsjUqjaFm96LifKPWt3Kicq0VOJb2G/uExfZVXslBqMj1cG1Pikfyr/Z9ROf5Os Frs4rQnwSTldUXe6gvgm2qKgRhmhgSPiZrgRhdb3CIXSx/1JmgbxMoART8pBj30bLe9z cS7eRZ//cWkGSy5nLlDmyyOEyCRexzJmoydZM08pesmWdd1/l0DO+l3Y6EM2GNYiecGp 4VHNS5f7bCKM7+wHlaCh26lOfTPw4r/jK5rLzboZRsSW+Q1wwoO39SZJX07YjFj9sYb4 w1HRpaGf7cxBxdjBglja6OPfMZRqFera4SJnjOmSyBysnR7oC34VgS8K0bm2FqzNC4UM C6lw== X-Received: by 10.236.105.203 with SMTP id k51mr6147762yhg.106.1369245926837; Wed, 22 May 2013 11:05:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.86.255.111] (198-135-0-233.cisco.com. [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w12sm12422733yhj.19.2013.05.22.11.05.23 for <6lowpan@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 22 May 2013 11:05:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Ralph Droms Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 21:05:19 +0300 References: <20130522162039.28519.8235.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: 6lowpan 6lowpan <6lowpan@ietf.org> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) Subject: [6lowpan] Fwd: Last Call: (Terminology for Constrained Node Networks) to Informational RFC X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 18:05:34 -0000 FYI; review and comment from the domain experts on this list is = important. - Ralph Begin forwarded message: > From: The IESG > Subject: Last Call: (Terminology = for Constrained Node Networks) to Informational RFC > Date: May 22, 2013 7:20:39 PM GMT+03:00 > To: IETF-Announce > Cc: lwip@ietf.org > Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org >=20 >=20 > The IESG has received a request from the Light-Weight Implementation > Guidance WG (lwig) to consider the following document: > - 'Terminology for Constrained Node Networks' > as Informational RFC >=20 > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-06-05. Exceptionally, comments may = be > sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. >=20 > Abstract >=20 >=20 > The Internet Protocol Suite is increasingly used on small devices > with severe constraints, creating constrained node networks. This > document provides a number of basic terms that have turned out to be > useful in the standardization work for constrained environments. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-terminology/ >=20 > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-terminology/ballot/ >=20 >=20 > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. >=20 >=20 From rdroms.ietf@gmail.com Sat May 25 03:44:32 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC3B21F9425 for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 May 2013 03:44:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -103.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pg17g9V5wC0I for <6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 May 2013 03:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qe0-f42.google.com (mail-qe0-f42.google.com [209.85.128.42]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C41521F940D for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 May 2013 03:44:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qe0-f42.google.com with SMTP id cz11so3075107qeb.29 for <6lowpan@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 May 2013 03:44:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:references :to:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=hnSDgz0Qq3Cg8AYc0sMhhv6gbluqPWLwVjYGcAwlnns=; b=ETLUx9FeLETvTDdsMhFNTcRgNdGIh9J4i4RBcqlWyFzYbWlIA8AlYJEIhQCIfdHLkP 32z/hQdpSGcdvJvzyPa9+ndEYvX18koSIxhMQ6TYUD7IPDdg+tpPKwhJE+TAUsaIfdoT xb8xjquyzePM6N6fuG+koDBGm44MHKBiK5Pnyd1g/+Ot6hkgpPwnltbrT0oix8LnV/lv 7wToJaqmX5AUmKw5te4Xz0szRapqNxa+Z/QSkV81U3KrJc9+wpK9fywUU5OAkJZ/cE+m edGaXQv60M/doBDS3kMpKo13DWCN/O9oM/6OcwxAGkKo+l6YA7JbTSHnnY1MVpg7D+Tv 7mNA== X-Received: by 10.224.189.16 with SMTP id dc16mr19927346qab.3.1369478660744; Sat, 25 May 2013 03:44:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:420:2481:20:1dc0:7216:c62a:4749? ([2001:420:2481:20:1dc0:7216:c62a:4749]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bc5sm17574653qeb.3.2013.05.25.03.44.19 for <6lowpan@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 25 May 2013 03:44:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Ralph Droms Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 06:44:17 -0400 References: <20130524181840.1900.71091.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: 6lowpan 6lowpan <6lowpan@ietf.org> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) Subject: [6lowpan] Fwd: New Non-WG Mailing List: 6lo -- Mailing list for discussion of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 10:44:32 -0000 FYI... Begin forwarded message: > From: IETF Secretariat > Subject: New Non-WG Mailing List: 6lo -- Mailing list for discussion = of a WG for Internet Area issues in IPv6 over constrained node networks > Date: May 24, 2013 2:18:40 PM EDT > To: IETF Announcement List > Cc: 6lo@ietf.org, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, cabo@tzi.org >=20 >=20 > A new IETF non-working group email list has been created. >=20 > List address: 6lo@ietf.org > Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6lo/ > To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6lo >=20 > Purpose: Since it was set up in 2005, the 6LoWPAN WG has created = specifications > for building IPv6 networks out of devices that use the IEEE 802.15.4 > wireless network standard. This work has culminated in the recent > publication of RFC 6775, 6LoWPAN-ND, and the 6LoWPAN WG is shutting = down. >=20 > This does not mean the work in this space is done. Indeed, 6LoWPAN > produced one more document that isn't even about 802.15.4: > draft-ietf-6lowpan-btle-12.txt, the equivalent of 6LoWPAN for the low > energy mode of the Bluetooth 4.0 specification, is now in IESG > processing, waiting for the assignment of a number from the Bluetooth > SIG. A number of related drafts want to apply 6LoWPAN technology to > other constrained node network layer 2 specifications: >=20 > -- draft-brandt-6man-lowpanz-00.txt > -- draft-ietf-6man-6lobac-01.txt > -- draft-mariager-6lowpan-v6over-dect-ule-02.txt >=20 > Also, some additional specifications are generally regarded as useful > complements of the existing 6LoWPAN work: >=20 > -- draft-schoenw-6lowpan-mib-03.txt > -- draft-bormann-6lowpan-ghc-05.txt > -- draft-kelsey-intarea-mesh-link-establishment-05.txt > -- draft-bormann-6lowpan-roadmap-03.txt >=20 > Beyond that, some older proposals that the 6LoWPAN WG has not picked > up are receiving new attention: >=20 > -- draft-thubert-6lowpan-backbone-router-03.txt > -- draft-thubert-roll-forwarding-frags-01.txt >=20 > Finally, there are some architectural issues raised by 6LoWPAN's use > of adaptation layer fragmentation on top of a lossy radio: >=20 > -- draft-bormann-intarea-alfi-02.txt >=20 > As can be seen, these drafts have been addressed to a zoo of working > groups, including the sunsetting 6LoWPAN WG, the 6MAN WG, INTAREA, and > even ROLL, with the addressed WG often changing over the lifetime of a > draft. It is probably more productive to focus most of this closely > related work on a specific WG. >=20 > One clear candidate is the 6man WG. However, that WG has a number of > other duties in maintaining IPv6 that make it subscribing to its > mailing list too onerous to the group of experts interested in > constrained node networking. It is probably worth separating out the > 6man-related work that focuses on constrained node networks. There > are, however, architectural aspects that are indeed best left in 6man > or even INTAREA. The 6Lo mailing list has been set up to organize the > discussion of a charter for a potential working group that focuses on > IP-over-foo standardization (adaptation layers) for constrained node > networks, working closely with the INT area working groups and other > IETF WGs focused on constrained node networks. >=20 > For additional information, please contact the list administrators. From zach@sensinode.com Tue May 28 01:53:57 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: 6lowpan@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FD121F93E1; Tue, 28 May 2013 01:53:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PHjYumJygOlp; Tue, 28 May 2013 01:53:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from auth-smtp.nebula.fi (auth-smtp.nebula.fi [217.30.180.105]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB2E21F93BF; Tue, 28 May 2013 01:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dyn2980.panoulu.local (nat1.panoulu.net [212.50.147.98]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth-smtp.nebula.fi (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id r4S8rnQI022014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 28 May 2013 11:53:50 +0300 From: Zach Shelby Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <65006D2B-833D-435B-9E17-5D8A3A9207F7@sensinode.com> Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 11:53:51 +0300 To: "core@ietf.org WG" , "6lowpan@ietf.org WG" <6lowpan@ietf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) Subject: [6lowpan] DTLS for IoT working group effort X-BeenThere: 6lowpan@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Working group discussion for IPv6 over LowPan networks <6lowpan.ietf.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 08:53:57 -0000 We are working on a new working group effort focused on making the use = of DTLS even better for Internet of Things applications using CoAP. This = group would first focus on efficient profiling of DTLS and multicast = support using the DTLS record layer. If security for IoT is interesting for you, please join our mailing = list: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dtls-iot We are planning to hold a BOF in Berlin. The group is hosting a Google = Doc with our background information, proposed Charter and action items.=20= Regards, Zach --=20 Zach Shelby, Chief Nerd, Sensinode Ltd. http://www.sensinode.com @SensinodeIoT Mobile: +358 40 7796297 Twitter: @zach_shelby LinkedIn: http://fi.linkedin.com/in/zachshelby 6LoWPAN Book: http://6lowpan.net