Subject: [AAA-DOCTORS] Fwd: Re: Informal telechat: RFC3575 errata, "IANA Considerations for RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial In User Service)"

From: Benoit Claise <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:17:38 +0100

Dear all,

Good news. This errata now shows under OPS.

Next step: agree whether or not this errata is correct.
                   we have the IETF 80 WG meeting participants 
consensus, but Glen is not convinced.

Regards, Benoit.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	Re: Informal telechat: RFC3575 errata, "IANA Considerations 
for RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial In User Service)"
Date: 	Tue, 4 Dec 2012 12:05:25 -0500
From: 	Alice Russo <[email-masked]>
To: 	Benoit Claise <[email-masked]>
CC: 	Bernard Aboba <[email-masked]>, RFC Editor 
<[email-masked]>, ISE <[email-masked]>

FYI, the source data for RFC 3575 has been corrected to IETF NON WORKING GROUP. It was incorrectly marked as Independent upon being added to the RFC Editor queue in 2003. We have notified the Secretariat so the datatracker will show the corrected document stream.

Thank you.
RFC Editor/ar

On Dec 4, 2012, at 10:12 AM, I wrote:

> Regarding the source of RFC 3575, I will check with the team about whether it should be corrected from Independent to IETF NON-WG based on the Protocol Action message from 2003 (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web-old/ietf-announce-old/current/msg23959.html):
>
>> The IESG has approved the Internet-Draft 'IANA Considerations for
>> RADIUS' <draft-aboba-radius-iana-07.txt> as a Proposed Standard.
>> This has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an
>> IETF Working Group.
>>
> (For the purposes of errata review, the area assignment would be ops.)