Subject: Re: [AAA-DOCTORS] any more modification suggestions for draft-ietf-softwire-6rd-radius-attrib-08?

From: Glen Zorn <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 13:24:55 +0700

On 12/17/2012 09:33 AM, Sheng Jiang wrote:

> Hi, dear ADs,
 >
 > The discussion on AAA-doctors has gone to quite now. The below list
 > is all unsolved issues we have collected. We are planning to give an
 > update version late this week. We believe they are enough to solve
 > your DISCUSSes. If you have any more modification suggestions, please
 > reply to this email. We will solve them together.

Please post the new version so that we have a more reasonable basis for 
conversation.

>
 >
 > 1. A pointer to the 6rd RFC/draft that discusses how to secure the
 > CE<->BNG bit (i.e., DHCP), I believe, is warranted.
 >
 > 2. Clearly define that the 6rd CE MAC address should be filled in the
 > Access-Request as authentication hint.
 >
 > 3. Using Message-authenticator (type 80) [RFC2865] to protect both
 > Access-Request and Access-Accept messages.
 >
 > Best regards,
 >
 > Sheng