From owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Mon May 01 23:43:49 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Falnh-0007vT-61 for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 23:43:49 -0400 Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu ([198.108.1.26]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Falnf-0004fG-Tm for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 01 May 2006 23:43:49 -0400 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 8999B9120D; Mon, 1 May 2006 23:43:38 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 594529125C; Mon, 1 May 2006 23:43:38 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30CFC9120D for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 23:43:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 1E3CA58286; Mon, 1 May 2006 23:43:37 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@segue.merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu (fiji.merit.edu [198.108.1.12]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A15958285 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 23:43:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) id 038F2185A; Mon, 1 May 2006 23:43:37 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fiji.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 08217-07 for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 23:43:36 -0400 (EDT) X-Greylist: delayed 2805 seconds by postgrey-1.21 at fiji.merit.edu; Mon, 01 May 2006 23:43:36 EDT Received: from mgw-ext14.nokia.com (mgw-ext14.nokia.com [131.228.20.173]) by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25A7B184C for ; Mon, 1 May 2006 23:43:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-ext14.nokia.com (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k422uk2j029742; Tue, 2 May 2006 05:56:46 +0300 Received: from esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.33]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 2 May 2006 05:56:46 +0300 Received: from esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.118]) by esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 2 May 2006 05:56:45 +0300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [AAA-WG]: FW: IETF Meeting Survey Date: Tue, 2 May 2006 05:56:45 +0300 Message-ID: <615BD9B54CB01B41838C323DB9E91AAB40766C@esebe100.NOE.Nokia.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: IETF Meeting Survey Thread-Index: AcZtM1sYPortiF/kR6uLPlMsAqmacgAYIF1w From: To: , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 May 2006 02:56:45.0586 (UTC) FILETIME=[0C50FF20:01C66D94] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Sender: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f Hi all, Please take the time and fill out the survey below. This will help us run the IETF meetings more effectively, and ensure that your requirements are heard. thanks, John >-----Original Message----- >From: ext Ray Pelletier [mailto:rpelletier@isoc.org]=20 >Sent: 01 May, 2006 18:25 >To: wgchairs@ietf.org >Subject: IETF Meeting Survey > >All; >It has been suggested that if I really wanted to get feedback=20 >on the Meeting Survey (and I do) I should have it forwarded=20 >by the WG Chairs to the working groups - so this is a request=20 >that you ask members of the working groups to complete a short=20 >survey that focuses primarily, but not exclusively, on their=20 >meeting experience in Dallas.=20 > >I truly want the info to make the changes members of the=20 >community want, if possible and greatly appreciate your=20 >assistance in this regard. > >Those interested in taking the survey can find it at: >http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=3D649182049947 > >Thanks >Ray Pelletier >IETF Admininstrative Director > > > > From owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Wed May 10 13:43:17 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FdsiT-0007wN-3t for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:43:17 -0400 Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu ([198.108.1.26]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FdsiO-0000Iz-IF for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:43:17 -0400 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 2A9B291233; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:43:03 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id EA5EB91243; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:43:02 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9ED91233 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:43:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 5E6625828B; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:43:01 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@segue.merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu (fiji.merit.edu [198.108.1.12]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B89358288 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:43:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) id 4B050188A; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:43:01 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fiji.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 10358-07 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:43:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Greylist: delayed 480 seconds by postgrey-1.21 at fiji.merit.edu; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:42:59 EDT Received: from inoavrex07.ptin.corpPT.com (unknown [194.65.138.21]) by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B056217EF for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 13:42:54 -0400 (EDT) Received: from INOAVREX06.ptin.corpPT.com ([10.112.15.68]) by inoavrex07.ptin.corpPT.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 10 May 2006 18:33:40 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C67457.F4A630B1" Subject: [AAA-WG]: Diameter Redirect Behaviour Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 18:34:13 +0100 Message-ID: <75D349FBF7C131408F5061B7168072C302CF2C02@INOAVREX06.ptin.corpPT.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Diameter Redirect Behaviour Thread-Index: AcZ0V/R1V9V0DYrQRKaw3BfILAP/2w== From: "Paulo Rolo" To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 May 2006 17:33:40.0562 (UTC) FILETIME=[E0973320:01C67457] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Sender: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 68ba2b07ef271dba6ee42a93832cfa4c This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C67457.F4A630B1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, =20 I have some questions regarding diameter redirect behavior: 1) Redirect reply message should be of the type request or reply? For example, if redirect agent receives an UAR it should reply with a UAR or with a UAA, performing the redirect actions? 2) If Redirect-Host-Usage AVP is used with a value of ALL_USER, how this is reflected on diameter routing table? As routing table only concerns realms and apps, should this routing entry be cached in an implementation specific table and this table used prior checking diameter routing table? =20 Thanks in advance, Paulo Rolo ------_=_NextPart_001_01C67457.F4A630B1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

 

I have some questions regarding diameter redirect = behavior:

1) Redirect reply message should be of the type = request or reply? For example, if redirect agent receives an UAR it should reply = with a UAR or with a UAA, performing the redirect = actions?

2) If Redirect-Host-Usage AVP is used with a value = of ALL_USER, how this is reflected on diameter routing table? As routing table only = concerns realms and apps, should this routing entry be cached in an = implementation specific table and this table used prior checking diameter routing = table?

 

Thanks in advance,

Paulo Rolo

------_=_NextPart_001_01C67457.F4A630B1-- From owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Sun May 14 16:12:20 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfMwu-0004H6-39 for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 16:12:20 -0400 Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu ([198.108.1.26]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FfMws-0003gH-Qz for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Sun, 14 May 2006 16:12:20 -0400 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 5D4F69121B; Sun, 14 May 2006 16:12:09 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 331D991228; Sun, 14 May 2006 16:12:09 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290BC9121B for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 16:12:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 1870758284; Sun, 14 May 2006 16:12:08 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@segue.merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu (fiji.merit.edu [198.108.1.12]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D8658282 for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 16:12:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) id 03B2D1881; Sun, 14 May 2006 16:12:08 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fiji.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20948-10 for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 16:12:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outbound.mailhop.org (outbound.mailhop.org [63.208.196.171]) by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915D017E7 for ; Sun, 14 May 2006 16:12:07 -0400 (EDT) Received: from c-67-182-139-247.hsd1.wa.comcast.net ([67.182.139.247] helo=internaut.com) by outbound.mailhop.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1FfMwg-000JQW-O6 for aaa-wg@merit.edu; Sun, 14 May 2006 16:12:06 -0400 Received: by internaut.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1800C70BF1; Sun, 14 May 2006 13:11:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Mail-Handler: MailHop Outbound by DynDNS X-Originating-IP: 67.182.139.247 X-Report-Abuse-To: abuse@dyndns.com (see http://www.mailhop.org/outbound/abuse.html for abuse reporting information) X-MHO-User: aboba Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 13:11:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Bernard Aboba To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Subject: [AAA-WG]: Re: Review of RADIUS Digest-07 Document In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Sender: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 8ac499381112328dd60aea5b1ff596ea An updated version of the document is now available: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-radext-digest-auth-08.txt Please review this document and let us know if there are any remaining issues. From owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Mon May 15 11:29:51 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fff15-0004hD-QU for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:29:51 -0400 Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu ([198.108.1.26]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fff12-0008ER-Ux for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:29:51 -0400 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 0A9D991250; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:29:40 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id B7F28912A8; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:29:39 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C9E91250 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:29:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 1A1225828D; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:29:37 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@segue.merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu (fiji.merit.edu [198.108.1.12]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33B058284 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:29:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) id EE54C1846; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:29:36 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fiji.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05073-10 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:29:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from inoavrex07.ptin.corpPT.com (unknown [194.65.138.21]) by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B06217E5 for ; Mon, 15 May 2006 11:29:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from INOAVREX06.ptin.corpPT.com ([10.112.15.68]) by inoavrex07.ptin.corpPT.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 15 May 2006 16:27:52 +0100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C67834.37DA9259" Subject: [AAA-WG]: Diameter Error Handling Date: Mon, 15 May 2006 16:28:29 +0100 Message-ID: <75D349FBF7C131408F5061B7168072C302CF35F5@INOAVREX06.ptin.corpPT.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Diameter Error Handling Thread-Index: AcZ0/kjHHz8XnRDpSBG88BvnyDlL1gDM4KGQ From: "Paulo Rolo" To: Cc: "selina" , "Rui Miguel Gomes" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 15 May 2006 15:27:52.0171 (UTC) FILETIME=[2176E3B0:01C67834] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Sender: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 38a35b5fc88e9b9a2affced027b040a4 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C67834.37DA9259 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello all, =20 I have some questions regarding diameter error handling behavior, which I was unable to check on rfc 3588: - should diameter server, when replying with a message with E bit set, include all the AVPs from received request? (as far as I know, some diameter implementations do this on redirect messages) - this applies both to redirect and protocol and application errors?=20 - what is the meaning of *[AVP] on answer-message format? =20 ::=3D < Diameter Header: code, ERR [PXY] > 0*1< Session-Id > { Origin-Host } { Origin-Realm } { Result-Code } [ Origin-State-Id ] [ Error-Reporting-Host ] [ Proxy-Info ] * [ AVP ] =20 Regards, Paulo Rolo =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 =20 ________________________________ From: selina [mailto:zhangkewei@huawei.com]=20 Sent: quinta-feira, 11 de Maio de 2006 14:03 To: Paulo Rolo Subject: RE: [AAA-WG]: Diameter Redirect Behaviour =20 Hi,Paulo: =20 Please see my comments in line. =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu [mailto:owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Paulo Rolo > Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 1:34 AM > To: aaa-wg@merit.edu > Subject: [AAA-WG]: Diameter Redirect Behaviour >=20 > Hello,=20 > I have some questions regarding diameter redirect behavior:=20 > 1) Redirect reply message should be of the type request or reply? For example, if redirect agent receives an UAR it =20 > should reply with a UAR or with a UAA, performing the redirect actions?=20 =20 I think redirect reply message should be of the type reply,I mean reply message is the answer message,you can read the RFC3588,section 6.1.7 =20 > 2) If Redirect-Host-Usage AVP is used with a value of ALL_USER, how this is reflected on diameter routing table? As =20 > routing table only concerns realms and apps, should this routing entry be cached in an implementation specific table=20 > and this table used prior checking diameter routing table?=20 =20 If the Redirect-Host-Usage AVP's value is ALL_USER,I think it means all message from any user should be sent to the host specified in the Redirect-Host AVP.This is my consideration,and how do you think? =20 Selina Thanks =20 >=20 > Thanks in advance,=20 > Paulo Rolo ------_=_NextPart_001_01C67834.37DA9259 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 邮件

Hello all,

 

I have some questions regarding diameter error handling behavior, which I was = unable to check on rfc 3588:

- should diameter server, when replying with a message with E bit set, = include all the AVPs from received request? (as far as I know, some diameter = implementations do this on redirect messages)

- this applies both to redirect and protocol and application errors? =

- what is the meaning of *[AVP] on answer-message = format?

  

            <answer-message> = ::=3D < Diameter Header: code, ERR [PXY] = >

            = ;         0*1< Session-Id >

            = ;            { Origin-Host }

            = ;            { Origin-Realm }

            = ;            { Result-Code }

            = ;            [ Origin-State-Id ]

            = ;            [ Error-Reporting-Host ]

            = ;            [ Proxy-Info ]

            = ;          * [ AVP ]

 

Regards,

Paulo Rolo

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: = selina [mailto:zhangkewei@huawei.com]
Sent: quinta-feira, 11 de = Maio de 2006 14:03
To: Paulo Rolo
Subject: RE: [AAA-WG]: = Diameter Redirect Behaviour

 

Hi,Paulo:

 

Please see my comments in = line.

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu [mailto:owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Paulo Rolo
> Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 1:34 AM
> To: aaa-wg@merit.edu
> Subject: [AAA-WG]: Diameter Redirect Behaviour
> 
> Hello, 

> I have some questions regarding diameter redirect = behavior: 

> 1) Redirect reply message should be of the type request or reply? For = example, if redirect agent receives an UAR it  

> should reply with a UAR or with a UAA, performing the redirect = actions? 

 

I think redirect reply message should be of = the type reply,I mean reply message is the answer message,you can read the RFC3588,section 6.1.7

 

> 2) If Redirect-Host-Usage AVP is used with a value of ALL_USER, how this is reflected on diameter routing table? As  

> routing table only concerns realms and apps, should this routing entry be cached = in an implementation specific table 

> and this table used prior checking diameter routing = table? 

 

If the Redirect-Host-Usage AVP's value is ALL_USER,I think it means all message from any user = should be sent to the host specified in the Redirect-Host AVP.This is my consideration,and how do you think?

 

Selina

Thanks

 

> 

> Thanks in advance, 

> Paulo Rolo

------_=_NextPart_001_01C67834.37DA9259-- From owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Wed May 31 04:42:49 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlMHw-00071g-UX for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 31 May 2006 04:42:49 -0400 Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu ([198.108.1.26]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlMHv-0003Sn-M8 for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 31 May 2006 04:42:48 -0400 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id EC39691234; Wed, 31 May 2006 04:42:38 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id BBE8891269; Wed, 31 May 2006 04:42:38 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770DF91234 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 04:42:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 6634A58284; Wed, 31 May 2006 04:42:37 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@segue.merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu (fiji.merit.edu [198.108.1.12]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E1258280 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 04:42:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) id 1D2D617A5; Wed, 31 May 2006 04:42:37 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fiji.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15746-02 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 04:42:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from smail3.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.56]) by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F45179C for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 04:42:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from missrv1.nextenso.alcatel.fr (proxy.nextenso.alcatel.fr [139.54.130.250]) by smail3.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/NETFR) with ESMTP id k4V8gZdv023540 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 10:42:35 +0200 Received: from [139.54.130.59] (nx0059.nextenso.alcatel.fr [139.54.130.59]) by missrv1.nextenso.alcatel.fr (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4V8gOsY030104 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 10:42:24 +0200 Message-ID: <447D587C.5010600@alcatel.fr> Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 10:49:00 +0200 From: Gerard Tixier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (X11/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Subject: [AAA-WG]: Diameter OriginHost and OriginRealm values Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-yoursite-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-yoursite-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact your Internet E-Mail Service Provider for details X-Alcanet-MTA-scanned-and-authorized: yes X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Sender: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8 Hello, i could not find the answer to my question in rfc 3588 or in the mail archive, so here it is: does the Origin-Host value has to include the Origin-Realm ? for example is the following correct ? Origin-Host : myclient Origin-Realm : acme.com or does it have to be : Origin-Host : myclient.acme.com Origin-Realm : acme.com all the examples in rfc 3588 seem to favour the second solution. but is it normative ? Thank you and best regards Gerard. From owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Wed May 31 07:07:24 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlOXs-0001c7-Sb for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:07:24 -0400 Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu ([198.108.1.26]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlOXr-00084y-KJ for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:07:24 -0400 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 7169891267; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:07:13 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 42EB691269; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:07:13 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A65691267 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:07:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id E717A58286; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:07:11 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@segue.merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu (fiji.merit.edu [198.108.1.12]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26DE58280 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:07:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) id B8A6A17A8; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:07:11 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fiji.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17479-06 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:07:11 -0400 (EDT) X-Greylist: delayed 4836 seconds by postgrey-1.21 at fiji.merit.edu; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:07:11 EDT Received: from mgw-ext11.nokia.com (mgw-ext11.nokia.com [131.228.20.170]) by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A77217A2 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:07:08 -0400 (EDT) Received: from esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh107.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.143]) by mgw-ext11.nokia.com (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k4V9kXdO029884 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 12:46:33 +0300 Received: from esebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.177]) by esebh107.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 31 May 2006 12:46:16 +0300 Received: from esebe107.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.89]) by esebh101.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 31 May 2006 12:46:16 +0300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: RE: [AAA-WG]: Diameter OriginHost and OriginRealm values Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 12:46:15 +0300 Message-ID: <165947868C470B4889510CCB51416F6DE6C576@esebe107.NOE.Nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <447D587C.5010600@alcatel.fr> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [AAA-WG]: Diameter OriginHost and OriginRealm values Thread-Index: AcaEjrq57lJ1y/97RNSnVWmNiM/FzQAB058A From: To: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 May 2006 09:46:16.0483 (UTC) FILETIME=[0FB11730:01C68497] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Sender: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 8b431ad66d60be2d47c7bfeb879db82c Hi, > does the Origin-Host value has to include the Origin-Realm ? No. But Origin-Host has to be fully qualified host name. > for example is the following correct ? > Origin-Host : myclient > Origin-Realm : acme.com Probably not. Name 'myclient' does not look like a valid host name. The following might be a better example: Origin-Host : myclient.example.com Origin-Realm : acme.com BR, Mikko Aittola > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu [mailto:owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu]=20 > On Behalf Of ext Gerard Tixier > Sent: 31 May, 2006 11:49 > To: aaa-wg@merit.edu > Subject: [AAA-WG]: Diameter OriginHost and OriginRealm values >=20 > Hello, >=20 > i could not find the answer to my question in rfc 3588 or in the mail=20 > archive, so here it is: >=20 > does the Origin-Host value has to include the Origin-Realm ? >=20 > for example is the following correct ? > Origin-Host : myclient > Origin-Realm : acme.com >=20 > or does it have to be : > Origin-Host : myclient.acme.com > Origin-Realm : acme.com >=20 > all the examples in rfc 3588 seem to favour the second solution. > but is it normative ? >=20 > Thank you and best regards > Gerard. >=20 From owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Wed May 31 07:27:50 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlOre-00017s-9C for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:27:50 -0400 Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu ([198.108.1.26]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlOrd-0001cE-1e for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:27:50 -0400 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 7047E91269; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:27:41 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 45EB19126C; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:27:41 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0745191269 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:27:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id E8FAD58286; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:27:39 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@segue.merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu (fiji.merit.edu [198.108.1.12]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11B558280 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:27:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) id B70C617A8; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:27:39 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fiji.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17932-09 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:27:39 -0400 (EDT) X-Greylist: delayed 960 seconds by postgrey-1.21 at fiji.merit.edu; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:27:39 EDT Received: from harmonica.digitalroute.se (mail.digitalroute.se [213.142.6.23]) by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6AE17A2 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:27:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [10.0.0.108] ([10.0.0.108]) by harmonica.digitalroute.se (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k4VBBbtC021972 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 13:11:37 +0200 Message-ID: <447D7A20.6000209@digitalroute.com> Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 13:12:32 +0200 From: Andreas Fredriksson Organization: Digital Route AB User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (X11/20060427) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Subject: Re: [AAA-WG]: Diameter OriginHost and OriginRealm values References: <165947868C470B4889510CCB51416F6DE6C576@esebe107.NOE.Nokia.com> In-Reply-To: <165947868C470B4889510CCB51416F6DE6C576@esebe107.NOE.Nokia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Sender: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370 mikko.aittola@nokia.com wrote: > Hi, > >> does the Origin-Host value has to include the Origin-Realm ? > > No. But Origin-Host has to be fully qualified host name. Does this rule out IPv4 addresses (e.g. 10.20.30.40)? We're having problems with our stack because some vendors actually send a textual IP address in their Origin-Host. Thanks, Andreas -- Andreas Fredriksson Software Engineer, Digital Route From owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Wed May 31 07:31:02 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlOuj-0002PV-Vt for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:31:01 -0400 Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu ([198.108.1.26]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlOui-0002Eo-Og for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:31:01 -0400 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 185B99126D; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:30:54 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id DC10A9126C; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:30:53 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649AA9126D for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:30:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id C6B2958287; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:30:51 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@segue.merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu (fiji.merit.edu [198.108.1.12]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33B958280 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:30:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) id 982D817A8; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:30:51 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fiji.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18216-03 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:30:51 -0400 (EDT) X-Greylist: delayed 408 seconds by postgrey-1.21 at fiji.merit.edu; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:30:49 EDT Received: from elitecore.com (mailhost.elitecore.com [203.88.135.194]) by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA5417A2 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 07:30:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 31543 invoked from network); 31 May 2006 11:06:18 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO elitecore58) ([192.168.15.108]) (envelope-sender ) by elitecore.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 31 May 2006 11:06:18 -0000 X-Anti-Virus: Cyberoam Anti-Virus for SMTP; Kaspersky 5.5.3/RELEASE, bases: 31052006 #185540; status: clean Message-ID: <005301c684a4$97c2d930$6c0fa8c0@elitecore58> From: "darshak" To: References: <165947868C470B4889510CCB51416F6DE6C576@esebe107.NOE.Nokia.com> Subject: [AAA-WG]: Hi, Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 16:53:08 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Formal (381/060530) X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Detect Hard (4/030526) X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: SysLog X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 2.0.0 [0124], KAS/Release X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Sender: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: d17f825e43c9aed4fd65b7edddddec89 Hi all I m new to this AAA stuff,I have read DIAMETER RFCs,But i dont understand Translation Agent Can any1 giude me how DIAMETER tnaslates radius request to diameter and diameter request to radius From owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Wed May 31 15:18:10 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlWCo-0001Ro-Kj for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 31 May 2006 15:18:10 -0400 Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu ([198.108.1.26]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlWCn-0005Np-8A for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 31 May 2006 15:18:10 -0400 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id B63C991238; Wed, 31 May 2006 15:17:57 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 87EC29123A; Wed, 31 May 2006 15:17:57 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EBBB91238 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 15:17:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 1E6F45828A; Wed, 31 May 2006 15:17:56 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@segue.merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu (fiji.merit.edu [198.108.1.12]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D223958285 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 15:17:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) id B80E717A5; Wed, 31 May 2006 15:17:55 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fiji.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 24535-07 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 15:17:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mgw-ext11.nokia.com (mgw-ext11.nokia.com [131.228.20.170]) by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3B417A1 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 15:17:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh106.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.138.213]) by mgw-ext11.nokia.com (Switch-3.1.8/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id k4VJHlD0010695; Wed, 31 May 2006 22:17:48 +0300 Received: from esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.143.33]) by esebh106.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 31 May 2006 22:17:47 +0300 Received: from esebe199.NOE.Nokia.com ([172.21.138.143]) by esebh103.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 31 May 2006 22:17:47 +0300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: [AAA-WG]: FW: Protocol Action: 'Diameter Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Application' to Proposed Standard Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 22:17:46 +0300 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Protocol Action: 'Diameter Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Application' to Proposed Standard Thread-Index: AcaE0/EdhvGZN+drTxGtun+yVatn+wAEuf6g From: To: , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 May 2006 19:17:47.0005 (UTC) FILETIME=[E66F82D0:01C684E6] X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Sender: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Score: 0.8 (/) X-Scan-Signature: b4a0a5f5992e2a4954405484e7717d8c FYI - thanks Miguel for the final push to get this out. John=20 >-----Original Message----- >From: ext The IESG [mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org]=20 >Sent: 31 May, 2006 20:01 >To: IETF-Announce >Cc: Internet Architecture Board; RFC Editor; aaa mailing list;=20 >aaa chair; aaa chair; Loughney John (Nokia-NRC/Helsinki) >Subject: Protocol Action: 'Diameter Session Initiation=20 >Protocol (SIP) Application' to Proposed Standard=20 > >The IESG has approved the following document: > >- 'Diameter Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Application ' > as a Proposed Standard > >This document is the product of the Authentication,=20 >Authorization and Accounting Working Group.=20 > >The IESG contact persons are Dan Romascanu and David Kessens. > >A URL of this Internet-Draft is: >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-sip -app-12.txt > >Technical Summary >=20 > This draft proposes Diameter application to allow SIP-based services > to be used within a AAA deployment, for authentication of users and > authorization of SIP resources usages. The document defines the > overall framework for this as well as the Diameter AVPs and Command > Codes to be used.=09 > >Working Group Summary > > There have been 3 WGLC on the document. Effort was made to align this > with the RADIUS Extension for Digest Authentication draft. There is > strong WG consensus behind this document, and some WG members have > indicated that they are implementing the draft. > >Protocol Quality > > This document was reviewed by the working group chairs as well as > key Diameter and RADIUS experts. They feel that this document is > ready. > > The document was also reviewed by the SIPPING WG, which produced > RFC 3701 - "Authentication, Authorization, and Accounting > Requirements for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)". > > Further, people participating from 3GPP have also reviewed this > document. > > Additionally, this document has participated in the Early > Copy-Edit experiment. > > This document was reviewed for the IESG by Bert Wijnen > >Note to RFC Editor >=20 > For your info: revision 08 of this document was reviewed by the > RFC-Editor (Alice) as part of the "early-copy-editing" experiment. > > From owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Wed May 31 21:43:44 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FlcDw-00036R-So for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 31 May 2006 21:43:44 -0400 Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu ([198.108.1.26]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Flbns-00020v-PQ for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 31 May 2006 21:16:52 -0400 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 9E5EC9123B; Wed, 31 May 2006 21:16:40 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 700D89123D; Wed, 31 May 2006 21:16:40 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335239123B for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 21:16:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 1B94A58289; Wed, 31 May 2006 21:16:39 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@segue.merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu (fiji.merit.edu [198.108.1.12]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080C858281 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 21:16:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) id E20EF17A5; Wed, 31 May 2006 21:16:38 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fiji.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 29042-01 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 21:16:38 -0400 (EDT) X-Greylist: delayed 399 seconds by postgrey-1.21 at fiji.merit.edu; Wed, 31 May 2006 21:16:37 EDT Received: from asdc.com.cn (unknown [211.151.89.22]) by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA39417A1 for ; Wed, 31 May 2006 21:16:37 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 17181 invoked by uid 503); 1 Jun 2006 01:09:57 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 17150, pid: 17155, t: 0.1836s scanners: attach: 1.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO mike) (203.86.89.82) by asdc.com.cn with SMTP; 1 Jun 2006 01:09:55 -0000 From: "yangming" To: Subject: [AAA-WG]: Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 09:09:51 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.1830 Thread-Index: AcaFGBVrmJRG+Ru6RsOz1A4wBsrhEw== X-Virus-Scanned: by Qfilter 1.1 Message-Id: <20060601011637.CA39417A1@fiji.merit.edu> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Sender: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 0f1ff0b0158b41ac6b9548d0972cdd31 unsubscribe