From aX3Xqm6gdf@mail.ru Fri Aug 04 07:55:58 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8yHW-000349-4E for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 07:55:58 -0400 Received: from ne0ca.n.pppool.de ([89.50.224.202] helo=helmut-ae5m7b5q) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G8yHO-0002wR-31 for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Aug 2006 07:55:58 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 11:55:54 -0060 From: "Janie Langford" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.0 Beta/1) Educational Reply-To: "Janie Langford" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <3301014748.20060804115554@mail.ru> To: aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org Subject: Your money, pea ore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 4.0 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: 9182cfff02fae4f1b6e9349e01d62f32 Even if you have no erectin problems SOFT CIANLIS would help you to make BETTER SEAX MORE OFTEN! and to bring unimagnable plesure to her. Just disolve half a pil under your tongue and get ready for action in 15 minutes. The tests showed that the majority of men after taking this medic ation were able to have PERFECT ERAECTION during 36 hours! VISIT US, AND GET OUR SPECIAL 70% DISCTOUNT OFER! http://pkfcgb.petricstone.info/?83966393 ========== "Are you saying I can fly?" stalking. Thanks to you, captain, my eyes were opened. If it hadn't been for without a single flap of wing from sand to cloud and down again. When you look at it, it looks like any other piece of land. The sun could possibly be as real as the flight of wind and feather. "But you'll go down in science. That's what they'll call it, He recovered to level flight and was quiet for a time before he counted my money, and left. From owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Mon Aug 07 05:25:42 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GA1Mk-0004if-9V for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:25:42 -0400 Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu ([198.108.1.26]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GA1Mi-0000lS-Uh for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:25:42 -0400 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 94F0691246; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:25:32 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 582E991247; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:25:32 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B879391246 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:25:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id A4A7A5828A; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:25:30 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@segue.merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu (fiji.merit.edu [198.108.1.12]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9112B58284 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:25:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) id 7372317D8; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:25:30 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fiji.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16880-05 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:25:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [61.144.161.55]) by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1F311AF for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:25:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J3M00JL7FRUXD@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for aaa-wg@merit.edu; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 17:31:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.18]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0J3M00MVXFRTNE@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for aaa-wg@merit.edu; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 17:31:06 +0800 (CST) Received: from s70950 ([10.70.145.95]) by szxml03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0J3M008PTFG98O@szxml03-in.huawei.com> for aaa-wg@merit.edu; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 17:24:18 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 17:20:48 +0800 From: santhosh Subject: RE: [AAA-WG]: Session Management APIs In-reply-to: <5be720c40608070208s1b933433of8973b463d6d9eb7@mail.gmail.com> To: dime@ietf.org, aaa-wg@merit.edu Message-id: <003201c6ba02$c88e0790$5f91460a@china.huawei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_o00Hq2A97O6PYG4H6zEkTg)" Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Sender: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Scan-Signature: 36b1f8810cb91289d885dc8ab4fc8172 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_o00Hq2A97O6PYG4H6zEkTg) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT If Application is implementing the session state machine the Stack does not need to provide this API.. -----Original Message----- From: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu [mailto:owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Monal Sengar Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 5:09 PM To: dime@ietf.org; aaa-wg@merit.edu Subject: [AAA-WG]: Session Management APIs Hi , As per draft draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-api-04 , there are some APIs for Session Management e.g. 1.AAAStartSession( ) 2.AAAEndSession( ) 3.AAAAbortSession ( ) e.t.c But in case , we are implementing the Session state Machine (Sec 8 RFC 3588) in application and not in Diameter Base Protocol (DBP) then do we need to implement these API's in stack. Thanks and Regards Monal --Boundary_(ID_o00Hq2A97O6PYG4H6zEkTg) Content-type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT

If Application is implementing the session state machine the Stack does not need to provide this API….

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu [mailto:owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Monal Sengar
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 5:09 PM
To: dime@ietf.org; aaa-wg@merit.edu
Subject: [AAA-WG]: Session Management APIs

 

Hi ,

As per draft draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-api-04 , there are some APIs for Session Management e.g.
1.AAAStartSession( )
2.AAAEndSession( )
3.AAAAbortSession ( ) e.t.c

But in case , we are implementing the Session state Machine (Sec 8 RFC 3588) in application and not in Diameter Base Protocol (DBP) then do we need to implement these API's in stack.


Thanks and Regards
Monal

--Boundary_(ID_o00Hq2A97O6PYG4H6zEkTg)-- From owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Mon Aug 07 07:16:52 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GA36K-00019n-PO for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 07:16:52 -0400 Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu ([198.108.1.26]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GA16R-0007C1-Ee for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:08:52 -0400 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 7BB8B91207; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:08:42 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id E20B791243; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:08:40 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9518C91207 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:08:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 830B25828A; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:08:39 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@segue.merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu (fiji.merit.edu [198.108.1.12]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A72758284 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:08:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) id 3F20017D7; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:08:39 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fiji.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16282-03 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:08:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.175]) by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8BB11AF for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:08:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id m3so5515ugc for ; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 02:08:36 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=R1+IrZL7ZJzKK1oWJIn+rSLbQ2eAlzn0nkFajYtbt5NLb9FTzWRgEJHoC5uCj6bQ4OLbd771akGnfycwdzCBP4taYfAr7xL+VNFCsk/5KluX8jOmMd6IuIYYNGBdjKSZ98tXlqgCZEWwWuekhSFD9pGRHx29/DJszPKO28K7Sjg= Received: by 10.66.249.11 with SMTP id w11mr7778820ugh; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 02:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.67.19.18 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 02:08:36 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5be720c40608070208s1b933433of8973b463d6d9eb7@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:38:36 +0530 From: "Monal Sengar" To: dime@ietf.org, aaa-wg@merit.edu Subject: [AAA-WG]: Session Management APIs MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_71579_38732.1154941716902" X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Sender: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Score: 0.2 (/) X-Scan-Signature: ea4ac80f790299f943f0a53be7e1a21a ------=_Part_71579_38732.1154941716902 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi , As per draft draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-api-04 , there are some APIs for Session Management e.g. 1.AAAStartSession( ) 2.AAAEndSession( ) 3.AAAAbortSession ( ) e.t.c But in case , we are implementing the Session state Machine (Sec 8 RFC 3588) in application and not in Diameter Base Protocol (DBP) then do we need to implement these API's in stack. Thanks and Regards Monal ------=_Part_71579_38732.1154941716902 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi ,

As per draft draft-ietf-aaa-diameter-api-04 , there are some APIs for Session Management e.g.
1.AAAStartSession( )
2.AAAEndSession( )
3.AAAAbortSession ( ) e.t.c

But in case , we are implementing the Session state Machine (Sec 8 RFC 3588) in application and not in Diameter Base Protocol (DBP) then do we need to implement these API's in stack.


Thanks and Regards
Monal
------=_Part_71579_38732.1154941716902-- From owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Mon Aug 07 07:36:59 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GA3Pn-0003Dz-Ic for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 07:36:59 -0400 Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129] helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GA1SJ-0001cK-VX for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:31:28 -0400 Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu ([198.108.1.26]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GA17t-0004yQ-1b for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:10:21 -0400 Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 937D691243; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:10:13 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id 5AD9691246; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:10:13 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@trapdoor.merit.edu Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C72391243 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:10:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 72E195828A; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:10:11 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@segue.merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu (fiji.merit.edu [198.108.1.12]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0FF58284 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:10:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) id 4059C17D7; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:10:11 -0400 (EDT) Delivered-To: aaa-wg@merit.edu Received: from fiji.merit.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fiji.merit.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16431-04 for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:10:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.177]) by fiji.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B567F11AF for ; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 05:10:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id d80so1001376pyd for ; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 02:10:10 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=U1EDNmgu3/dCnFiNiGMszHMiQSXUJyO3LuvX6NBgcu4XYdaHquMp7P/XIGRRLKzaMA6X4+Boug59HbE1ikjlVx3pPgNuhEgDxoSQcL8CyO9X673sXgkcczrUige5dCE1VNZq5PqbIfGeUxxd9XewFUCwPwsWhRA0KMeIVIcESB0= Received: by 10.35.61.2 with SMTP id o2mr11797689pyk; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 02:10:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.82.12 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Aug 2006 02:10:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:40:10 +0530 From: "naveen sarma" To: rajithr@huawei.com Subject: Re: FW: [AAA-WG]: Fwd: Failover processing Cc: aaa-wg@merit.edu, dime@ietf.org In-Reply-To: <000e01c6b0a1$5c5d7610$a905120a@china.huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_45202_25125666.1154941810302" References: <000e01c6b0a1$5c5d7610$a905120a@china.huawei.com> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at merit.edu Sender: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu Precedence: bulk X-Spam-Score: -0.9 (/) X-Scan-Signature: d9238570526f12788af3d33c67f37625 ------=_Part_45202_25125666.1154941810302 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Rajith, Can you please send your answer to my question. I haven't received any reply. I think there is some problem. Thanks & Regards, Naveen On 7/26/06, Rajith R wrote: > > Pls ignore the previous post. > > > > > > > ************************************************************************************ > > This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, > which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed > above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, > but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or > dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is > prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by > phone or email immediately and delete it! > ------------------------------ > > *From:* owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu [mailto:owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu] *On Behalf > Of *naveen sarma > *Sent:* Wednesday, July 26, 2006 12:46 PM > *To:* aaa-wg@merit.edu > *Subject:* [AAA-WG]: Fwd: Failover processing > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: *naveen sarma* > Date: Jul 26, 2006 12:35 PM > Subject: Failover processing > To: dime-request@ietf.org > > Hi, > > In the case of failover processing, do we need to change the destination > host before forwarding to the new alternate peer? > > Suppose consider the following scenario: > > P0 is the originating host, to which P1 and P2 are peers (direct > connection). > > P0 is supporting applications 1, 2, 3 > P1 is supporting applications 1, 2 > P2 is supporting applications 2, 3 > > After some time if P1 is down. Cosider that in the pending message queue > of P1, there is a message M1 with application id 2 and the destination host > as P1. As part of the failover, we will send the request message M1 to P2. > > In this case do we need to change the destination host inside the request > message to P2, which was actually having the destination host as P1? > > Can anyone explain the responsibility when the diameter node is acting as > an intermidate also? > > -- > Yours > > Naveen. > > > > -- > Yours > Naveen. > -- Yours Naveen. ------=_Part_45202_25125666.1154941810302 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hi Rajith,
    Can you please send your answer to my question.  I haven't received any reply.  I think there is some problem.

Thanks & Regards,
Naveen

On 7/26/06, Rajith R <rajithr@huawei.com> wrote:

Pls ignore the previous post.

 

 

************************************************************************************

This e-mail and attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient's) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it!

From: owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu [mailto:owner-aaa-wg@merit.edu] On Behalf Of naveen sarma
Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 12:46 PM
To: aaa-wg@merit.edu
Subject: [AAA-WG]: Fwd: Failover processing

 



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: naveen sarma <naveen.sarma@gmail.com>
Date: Jul 26, 2006 12:35 PM
Subject: Failover processing
To: dime-request@ietf.org

Hi,

In the case of failover processing, do we need to change the destination host before forwarding to the new alternate peer?

Suppose consider the following scenario:

P0 is the originating host, to which P1 and P2 are peers (direct connection).

P0 is supporting applications 1, 2, 3
P1 is supporting applications 1, 2
P2 is supporting applications 2, 3

After some time if P1 is down.  Cosider that in the pending message queue of P1, there is a message M1 with application id 2 and the destination host as P1.  As part of the failover, we will send the request message M1 to P2.

In this case do we need to change the destination host inside the request message to P2, which was actually having the destination host as P1?

Can anyone explain the responsibility when the diameter node is acting as an intermidate also?

--
Yours

Naveen.



--
Yours
Naveen.




--
Yours
Naveen. ------=_Part_45202_25125666.1154941810302-- From anna@1-800people.com Mon Aug 07 19:23:30 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GAERW-0004lC-0n for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 19:23:30 -0400 Received: from 201-27-205-90.dsl.telesp.net.br ([201.27.205.90] helo=gustavo-zhoqr82) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GAERU-0005n6-6n for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Aug 2006 19:23:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 23:22:11 +0180 From: "Kathie Dickey" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.10.03) Business Reply-To: "Kathie Dickey" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <4309726786.20060807232211@1-800people.com> To: aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org Subject: Better Life, wonder-loving MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 4.2 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: 30ac594df0e66ffa5a93eb4c48bcb014 $200,000 Refinance Home Loan for only $917/month at http://79ZF.djk38.com Bad Credit OK! ============================================== make? Five? Six? And now I wonder why? He's no relation. I'm not responsible solidly it lay in its place. avenue, we're not on a promenade here, you know. Arthur got up slowly. His suddenly exploded without any warning like a hydrogen bomb The assistant who "Do you see that rock?" Redrick asked. "There, under the hill? Head for From daniel@1-online-casino-portal.com Wed Aug 09 14:22:11 2006 Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GAsh1-0003Mi-Cs for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:22:11 -0400 Received: from stsc1260-eth-s1-s1p1-vip.va.neustar.com ([156.154.16.129] helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GAqK6-0004FO-DS for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:50:22 -0400 Received: from [201.19.171.252] (helo=anywheremail.com) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GAqFi-0006hr-KR for aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org; Wed, 09 Aug 2006 11:45:53 -0400 Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 15:46:00 +0180 From: "Ella Longoria" X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0.0.15) Home Reply-To: "Ella Longoria" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <9562267975.20060809154600@1-online-casino-portal.com> To: aaa-archive@lists.ietf.org Subject: Better Success, wood spear grass MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 4.3 (++++) X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8 We sent you an email a while ago, because you qualified for a much lower rate based on our records from a national database. Why is this? Because currently it is a buyers market with the lowest rates in years. You can now get $325,000 for as little as $709 a month at as low as 3.75%! We realize many homeowners struggle and that makes it difficult to maintain good credit. But we specialize in poor credit cases- helping you to refinance even with bad credt, helping you lower your monthly burden and build back your credt. You will receive the lowest rate possible in your special circumstance You can fill out this quick form and be approved within 24 hours: http://7HX0.rr289.com ============================================== "Stop!" he shouted. "Keep right! To the right of the rock!" shoes and gave off an unbearable stench. Or rather, it came from Arthur, it