Subject: Re: [Aeon] fan-intarea-conet-ps-uc

From: 樊鹏 <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 21:46:50 +0800

It seems there is problem with my last email. So, send it again. Sorry if
you received duplicated emails.

2014-04-22 21:44 GMT+08:00 Fan, Peng <[email-masked]>:

> Hello Alper,
>
> Thanks a lot for your kind review. For mobile IP, DPI will have this
> problem. But for network based mobility, it may not be that serious issue
> at
> this moment. We can add this description in our document to clarify it.
>
> Best regards,
> Peng
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aeon [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Alper Yegin
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 7:39 PM
> To: Peng Fan; Hui Deng
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Aeon] fan-intarea-conet-ps-uc
>
> Hello Peng and Hui,
>
> I've read your draft. It's a good reading, thank you.
>
> One of the ways to differentiate the network service provided to individual
> apps is to bind them to distinct IP addresses.
> For example, an app that needs full mobility service can be bound to an IP
> address managed by a Mobile IP Home Agent, whereas other apps can be bound
> to the IP address managed by the on-link default IP gateway.
>
> This intelligent binding action needs to take place before the app sends
> its
> first bit of IP traffic. Hence, it's too late for DPI-based solutions to
> help with that.
>
> This is another shortcoming of the DPI solutions.
>
> Alper
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Aeon mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aeon
>
>
>
>