From Brian_Street@ec01-hou.bmc.com Wed Jan 13 16:58:02 1999 Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (fw-us-hou-1.bmc.com [198.207.223.250]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id QAA20686 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 16:58:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from dorothy.bmc.com (dorothy.bmc.com [192.146.153.65]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA18341; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:54:38 -0600 (CST) Received: from ec01-hou.bmc.com (ec01-hou.bmc.com [172.17.0.150]) by dorothy.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id NAA21205 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 13:43:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by ec01-hou.bmc.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:43:34 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Street, Brian" To: "'agentx@peer.com'" Cc: "Street, Brian" Subject: Test - do not respond Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:43:33 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" This is a test of the agentx email list. From mdavidson@a1results.net Sat Jan 16 05:30:23 1999 Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (fw-us-hou-1.bmc.com [198.207.223.250]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id FAA14190 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 05:30:22 -0500 (EST) From: mdavidson@a1results.net Received: from dorothy.bmc.com (dorothy.bmc.com [192.146.153.65]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id EAA12013; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 04:27:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (root@tangelo.bmc.com [172.17.7.166]) by dorothy.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id CAA17439 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 02:15:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw-us-hou1.bmc.com (fw-us-hou1.bmc.com [172.17.0.250]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id EAA08854 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 04:02:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from 6565@alphastar by apipa.org.tw (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id CAA16124; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 02:47:40 +0800 Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 02:47:40 +0800 Message-Id: <199901151847.CAA16124@apipa.org.tw> To: Subject: Search Engine Registration adv I saw your listing on the internet. I work for a company that submits websites to search engines. We can submit your website to over 350 of the worlds best search engines and directories for a one time charge of only $39.95. If you would like to put your website in the fast lane and receive more traffic call me on our toll-free number listed below. All work is verified! Sincerely, Mike Davidson (800) 484-2621 X5568 From mdavidson@a1results.net Sat Jan 16 06:02:04 1999 Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (fw-us-hou-1.bmc.com [198.207.223.250]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id GAA14353 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 06:02:03 -0500 (EST) From: mdavidson@a1results.net Received: from dorothy.bmc.com (dorothy.bmc.com [192.146.153.65]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id EAA16170; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 04:59:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (root@tangelo.bmc.com [172.17.7.166]) by dorothy.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id CAA17543 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 02:55:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw-us-hou1.bmc.com (fw-us-hou1.bmc.com [172.17.0.250]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id EAA15444 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 04:55:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from 6565@alphastar by apipa.org.tw (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id CAA16146; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 02:47:46 +0800 Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 02:47:46 +0800 Message-Id: <199901151847.CAA16146@apipa.org.tw> Subject: Search Engine Registration adv I saw your listing on the internet. I work for a company that submits websites to search engines. We can submit your website to over 350 of the worlds best search engines and directories for a one time charge of only $39.95. If you would like to put your website in the fast lane and receive more traffic call me on our toll-free number listed below. All work is verified! Sincerely, Mike Davidson (800) 484-2621 X5568 From mdavidson@a1results.net Sat Jan 16 10:44:47 1999 Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (fw-us-hou-1.bmc.com [198.207.223.250]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id KAA15582 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 10:44:46 -0500 (EST) From: mdavidson@a1results.net Received: from dorothy.bmc.com (dorothy.bmc.com [192.146.153.65]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id EAA16170; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 04:59:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (root@tangelo.bmc.com [172.17.7.166]) by dorothy.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id CAA17543 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 02:55:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw-us-hou1.bmc.com (fw-us-hou1.bmc.com [172.17.0.250]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id EAA15444 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 04:55:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from 6565@alphastar by apipa.org.tw (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id CAA16146; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 02:47:46 +0800 Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 02:47:46 +0800 Message-Id: <199901151847.CAA16146@apipa.org.tw> Subject: Search Engine Registration adv I saw your listing on the internet. I work for a company that submits websites to search engines. We can submit your website to over 350 of the worlds best search engines and directories for a one time charge of only $39.95. If you would like to put your website in the fast lane and receive more traffic call me on our toll-free number listed below. All work is verified! Sincerely, Mike Davidson (800) 484-2621 X5568 From mdavidson@a1results.net Sat Jan 16 10:46:40 1999 Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (fw-us-hou-1.bmc.com [198.207.223.250]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id KAA15598 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 10:46:40 -0500 (EST) From: mdavidson@a1results.net Received: from dorothy.bmc.com (dorothy.bmc.com [192.146.153.65]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id EAA12013; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 04:27:48 -0600 (CST) Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (root@tangelo.bmc.com [172.17.7.166]) by dorothy.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id CAA17439 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 02:15:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw-us-hou1.bmc.com (fw-us-hou1.bmc.com [172.17.0.250]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id EAA08854 for ; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 04:02:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from 6565@alphastar by apipa.org.tw (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id CAA16124; Sat, 16 Jan 1999 02:47:40 +0800 Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 02:47:40 +0800 Message-Id: <199901151847.CAA16124@apipa.org.tw> To: Subject: Search Engine Registration adv I saw your listing on the internet. I work for a company that submits websites to search engines. We can submit your website to over 350 of the worlds best search engines and directories for a one time charge of only $39.95. If you would like to put your website in the fast lane and receive more traffic call me on our toll-free number listed below. All work is verified! Sincerely, Mike Davidson (800) 484-2621 X5568 From mwhite@cmu.edu Wed Jan 20 17:10:28 1999 Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (fw-us-hou-1.bmc.com [198.207.223.250]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id RAA26928 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 17:10:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from dorothy.bmc.com (dorothy.bmc.com [192.146.153.65]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA08453; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 16:04:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (root@tangelo.bmc.com [172.17.7.166]) by dorothy.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id NAA17927 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 13:55:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw-us-hou1.bmc.com (fw-us-hou1.bmc.com [172.17.0.250]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id PAA06546 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 15:55:32 -0600 (CST) Received: from FRAUGHT.NET.CMU.EDU (FRAUGHT.NET.CMU.EDU [128.2.6.66]) by smtp2.andrew.cmu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.2) with ESMTP id QAA23919 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 16:55:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 16:55:24 -0500 From: Matt White To: agentx@dorothy.bmc.com Subject: Hello? Message-ID: <2023290736.916851324@FRAUGHT.NET.CMU.EDU> Originator-Info: login-id=; server=cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu X-Mailer: Mulberry (Win32) [1.4.0, s/n S-100002] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline So this list has been pretty dead of late (except for spam). Is any progress being made by anybody? Are we meeting in March? Everyone swamped and need help? -Matt ---------- Matt White Network Systems Designer Canegie Mellon Computing Services From rpresuhn@dorothy.bmc.com Wed Jan 20 18:14:17 1999 Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (fw-us-hou-1.bmc.com [198.207.223.250]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id SAA28056 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 18:14:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from dorothy.bmc.com (dorothy.bmc.com [192.146.153.65]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id RAA23731; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 17:09:42 -0600 (CST) Received: (from rpresuhn@localhost) by dorothy.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) id PAA20701 for agentx@dorothy.bmc.com; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 15:05:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 15:05:05 -0800 (PST) From: Randy Presuhn Message-Id: <199901202305.PAA20701@dorothy.bmc.com> To: agentx@dorothy.bmc.com Subject: Re: Hello? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi - > Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 16:55:24 -0500 > From: Matt White > To: agentx@dorothy.bmc.com > Subject: Hello? > > So this list has been pretty dead of late (except for spam). Is any > progress being made by anybody? Are we meeting in March? Everyone swamped > and need help? ... I suspect most of the active contributors are a bit distracted by at the moment. I know several working groups that could use help. Any interest in disman? :-) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Randy Presuhn Email: rpresuhn@peer.com http://www.bmc.com Voice: +1 408 616-3100 BMC Software, Inc. 965 Stewart Drive Fax: +1 408 616-3101 Sunnyvale, California 94086 USA ----------------------------------------------------------------------- In accordance with the BMC Communications Systems Use and Security Policy, I explicitly state that although my affiliation with BMC may be apparent, implied, or provided, my opinions are not necessarily those of BMC Software and that all external representations on behalf of BMC must first be cleared with a member of "the top management team." ----------------------------------------------------------------------- From bnatale@acecomm.com Wed Jan 20 23:28:20 1999 Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (fw-us-hou-1.bmc.com [198.207.223.250]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id XAA02735 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 23:28:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from dorothy.bmc.com (dorothy.bmc.com [192.146.153.65]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id WAA20896; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 22:25:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (root@tangelo.bmc.com [172.17.7.166]) by dorothy.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA24534 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 20:21:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw-us-hou1.bmc.com (fw-us-hou1.bmc.com [172.17.0.250]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id WAA20296 for ; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 22:21:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from [192.152.208.5] (helo=acecomm.com) by relay3.smtp.psi.net with smtp (Exim 1.90 #1) id 103BcO-00019w-00; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 23:21:20 -0500 Received: from ppp11 by acecomm.com (5.65/3.2.083191-ACE*COMM) id AA05506; Wed, 20 Jan 1999 23:24:19 -0500 Message-Id: <4.1.19990120230843.00948740@nips.acec.com> X-Sender: natale@nips.acec.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Wed, 20 Jan 1999 23:21:55 -0500 To: Matt White From: Bob Natale Subject: Re: AgentX status [Hello?] Cc: agentx@dorothy.bmc.com In-Reply-To: <2023290736.916851324@FRAUGHT.NET.CMU.EDU> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >At 1/20/99:04:55 PM, Matt White wrote: Hi Max, >Is any progress being made by anybody? Yes, the design team is reviewing a revised draft of RFC2257 submitted by Mike. This review is nearly complete and the resulting draft will be posted to the list...my guess is that this can happen within the next week to 10 days. This will be followed by a compatible revision of the MIB doc. >Are we meeting in March? The consensus among the design team at this time is that we should forego a meeting in Minneapolis in favor of continued work on the documents on the list and--above all-- getting our implementations up-to-speed with the resulting new drafts. I suspect we will then try to arrange another bake-off prior to any next administrative meeting. All of the above is open to discussion on the list. >Everyone swamped and need help? Everyone is swamped--that's is undeniable and appears to be steadily getting worse over time. There are so many "core" SNMPv3 and SMIv2 issues being discussed these days that most of my (limited) "IETF time" is spent on them...I suspect (as Randy noted) that this is true for just about everyone. Help could be used in the following areas: - When the new draft RFC and MIB come out, please review them as soon as you can and post your comments/questions/suggestions to the list. - Work on implementations and post reports detailing (or even outlining) problems and performance statistics, and a list of functions/features implemented and tested (or not). - Feel free to try to "push" the work along on the list if you are so inclined--we [by which I mean primarily "I"] have not been doing a satisfactory job of keeping to our schedules and milestones. You-- i.e., the WG membership at-large--don't have to put up with that failure. So, any ideas any of you have wrt content and/or process improvements will be welcomed. Cordially, BobN ------------ ISO 9001 Registered Quality Supplier ----------- Bob Natale | ACE*COMM | 301-721-3000 [v] Dir, Net Mgmt Prod | 704 Quince Orchard Rd | 301-721-3001 [f] bnatale@acecomm.com| Gaithersburg MD 20878 | www.acecomm.com ------------- Free downloads at www.winsnmp.com ------------- From daniele@zk3.dec.com Thu Jan 21 14:22:24 1999 Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (fw-us-hou-1.bmc.com [198.207.223.250]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id OAA18048 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:22:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from dorothy.bmc.com (dorothy.bmc.com [192.146.153.65]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id NAA14458; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 13:16:42 -0600 (CST) Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (root@tangelo.bmc.com [172.17.7.166]) by dorothy.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA27671 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:07:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw-us-hou1.bmc.com (fw-us-hou1.bmc.com [172.17.0.250]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id NAA12391 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 13:07:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from iota.zk3.dec.com (iota.zk3.dec.com [16.140.32.65]) by mail13.digital.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/WV2.0c) with ESMTP id OAA15118; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:07:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from zk3.dec.com by iota.zk3.dec.com (8.8.8/1.1.20.3/24Apr98-0811AM) id OAA0000003580; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:07:23 -0500 (EST) Sender: daniele@zk3.dec.com Message-ID: <36A77A19.D845C9BF@zk3.dec.com> Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:03:53 -0500 From: Mike Daniele Organization: Compaq 64-bit UNIX networking X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; OSF1 X5.0 alpha) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt White CC: agentx@dorothy.bmc.com Subject: Re: Hello? References: <2023290736.916851324@FRAUGHT.NET.CMU.EDU> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Matt White wrote: > So this list has been pretty dead of late (except for spam). Is any > progress being made by anybody? Are we meeting in March? Everyone swamped > and need help? > > -Matt Hi Matt, I have to take the heat for not getting started on a new draft until recently. I'll make sure something gets posted next week. There are very few on the wire changes, just clarifications. So, have you finshed your implementation yet? :-) Mike From mwhite@cmu.edu Thu Jan 21 14:30:27 1999 Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (fw-us-hou-1.bmc.com [198.207.223.250]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id OAA18168 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:30:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from dorothy.bmc.com (dorothy.bmc.com [192.146.153.65]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id NAA16677; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 13:26:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (root@tangelo.bmc.com [172.17.7.166]) by dorothy.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id LAA27709 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 11:19:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw-us-hou1.bmc.com (fw-us-hou1.bmc.com [172.17.0.250]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id NAA15175 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 13:19:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from FRAUGHT.NET.CMU.EDU (FRAUGHT.NET.CMU.EDU [128.2.6.66]) by smtp1.andrew.cmu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.2) with ESMTP id OAA10495; Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:19:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 21 Jan 1999 14:19:16 -0500 From: Matt White To: agentx@dorothy.bmc.com cc: Mike Daniele Subject: Re: Hello? Message-ID: <2100321995.916928356@FRAUGHT.NET.CMU.EDU> In-Reply-To: <36A77A19.D845C9BF@zk3.dec.com> Originator-Info: login-id=; server=cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu X-Mailer: Mulberry (Win32) [1.4.0, s/n S-100002] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Hah, no I haven't. Been working on migrating our campus DNS over to Bind 8. Wouldn't have been a problem except that we utilize CNAME chains to do DNS load balancing (Bind 8 no longer allows this). Almost got the replacement system working and will be going back to AgentX AnyDayNow(tm). -Matt --On Thursday, January 21, 1999, 2:03 PM -0500 Mike Daniele wrote: > Matt White wrote: > >> So this list has been pretty dead of late (except for spam). Is any >> progress being made by anybody? Are we meeting in March? Everyone >> swamped and need help? >> >> -Matt > > Hi Matt, > > I have to take the heat for not getting started on a new draft > until recently. I'll make sure something gets posted next week. > > There are very few on the wire changes, just clarifications. > So, have you finshed your implementation yet? :-) > > Mike > From daniele@zk3.dec.com Thu Jan 28 11:53:53 1999 Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (fw-us-hou-1.bmc.com [198.207.223.250]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id LAA00023 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:53:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from dorothy.bmc.com (dorothy.bmc.com [192.146.153.65]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA29408; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 10:38:30 -0600 (CST) Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (root@tangelo.bmc.com [172.17.7.166]) by dorothy.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id IAA12284 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 08:30:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw-us-hou1.bmc.com (fw-us-hou1.bmc.com [172.17.0.250]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id KAA27288 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 10:30:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from flume.zk3.dec.com (flume.zk3.dec.com [16.140.112.3]) by mail13.digital.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/WV2.0d) with ESMTP id LAA28908 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:29:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from bernie.zk3.dec.com by flume.zk3.dec.com (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/16Jan95-0946AM) id LAA0000003042; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:29:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost by bernie.zk3.dec.com; (5.65/1.1.8.2/22Aug96-1117AM) id AA01514; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 11:30:59 -0500 Message-Id: <9901281630.AA01514@bernie.zk3.dec.com> To: agentx@dorothy.bmc.com Subject: change log for updated RFC 2257 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 99 11:30:59 -0500 From: Mike Daniele X-Mts: smtp Hello, Later today I'll be posting an updated version of RFC 2257. Dale hasn't had a chance to go over it, so pagination, table of contents, etc are not correct. I apologize to all concerned for taking so long to get this out. There aren't change bars, but I've included a log of changes below. This addresses (I believe) all the feedback we got on the list and during/after the bakeoff. It's worth noting that this is just about all clarification, The only changes on the wire are o possibly new value to use as r.range_subid (depending on how you interpreted 2257) o Notify and Close PDUs generate responses o new error codes are available Regards, Mike Change Log ---------- 1) specifically defined "admin" pdu types vs "SNMP request processing" types in 6.1 h.type description. use this distinction to update res.sysuptime and res.error descriptions, and E of P. SMIv2 error codes are NOT returned in responses to admin pdus. (added noAgentXError (0) to make this distinction) Instances of "noError" are changed to "noAgentXError" everywhere appropriate. 2) res.error, added parseFailed (266), requestDenied (267), processingError (268) Added `requestDenied' to E of P for Register. 3) removed the text in 7. on parse errors and protocol errors. 4) added new "common processing" section to 7.1, which defines how to use parseFailed and processingError instead of closing a session, and how to handle context. 5) removed this common processing description from the other admin pdu E of P and updated them to reference 7.1: o 7.1.2 index allocation o 7.1.4 index deallocation o 7.1.5 registration o 7.1.6 unregister o 7.1.7 addagentcaps o 7.1.8 removeagentcaps o 7.1.9 close o 7.1.11 notify o 7.1.12 ping 6) Reworked 7.1.1 (Open-PDU) to include new error codes, not refer to an indicated context, be tighter, etc, 7) modified E of P for Notify and Close PDUs to generate response PDUs. Notify also does context checking. 8) modified 6.2.3 (register pdu) to be clearer o new default priority of 127, and ptr to new section on how to register o better description of r.range_subid, independent of prefix in r.region o better description/examples of how this mechanism can be used. o added description for r.upper_bound (missing from rfc!) o changed r.region to r.subtree I did this because the text uses the terms region, range, and OID range too loosely. this field is an Object Identifier. It can't represent anything more by itself than a simple subtree. In conjunction w/ r.range_subid and r.upper_bound, it can represent a "region", that is a union of subtrees. Added much text about this and updated other areas of the spec accordingly. See bullet 12. 9) modified 6.2.4 Unregister PDU to include descriptions of u.range_subid and u.upper_bound (missing from rfc!) 10) modified 7.1.6 E of P for Unregister to require a match also on u.range_subid and u.upper_bound (if present). 11) Changed 7.1.5.1 Handling Duplicate OID Ranges to say Handling Duplicate or Overlapping Subtrees, and substantially modified the section 12) Removed all references to "splitting", and all uses of the term "OID range". OID range was used to mean the section of a r.subtree left after splitting, and was more confusing than useful. Now just refer to regions or subtrees directly, and let rule 1) in 7.2.1 be enough for implementations to figure out their own "splitting" or other algorithms for doing it. This required modifications to 7.2.4.3. Added new example. 13) In 7.2.1 removed the definition of "contains" because it is never used! :-) 14) Updated transport mappings to prohibit interleaved sends and added caution about receiving TCP. 15) Reworded 4.2 Applicability step 4). I've received several queries about why agentx "doesn't support ifTable"? It actually does of course, what we were trying to acknowledge is row counters like ifNumber could be a problem. So i separated the 2 things: row creation and counters that count rows. 16) Deleted 7.1.3 (Using IndexAllocate-PDU) and added 7.1.5.2 Registering Stuff. This is a hopefully more cohesive description of how things are supposed to work. Made clear the OID to allocate is an OBJECT-TYPE, does not contain instance subidentifiers. NOTE: We've had some discussion about multiply-indexed tables and can we support "tuples". That is, session A allocates fooIndex value = 1 and barIndex value = 2. Session B wishes to allocate fooIndex value 1 and barIndex value 3. Currently this would fail. I've left it this way, mainly because i couldn't think of a case where this is required AND one can't resonably assume the primary index values are known a priori or attainable without support in AgentX. 17) Added common processing for subagents in 7.2.2, and bumped all subsequent sections (get* processing became 7.2.3, etc.) 18) Replaced "subagent" with "session" in many places. 19) Cleaned up Test/Commit/Undo master processing to make it clear only "involved" sessions get Commit/Undos, not all of em, etc. Use "transaction" isntead of "packet" etc where appropriate to distinguish the overall transaction from particular packets/PDUs. Explicitly stated a session is not required to support concurrent sets. From daniele@zk3.dec.com Thu Jan 28 17:00:02 1999 Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (fw-us-hou-1.bmc.com [198.207.223.250]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id QAA09710 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 16:59:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from dorothy.bmc.com (dorothy.bmc.com [192.146.153.65]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA07315; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:45:01 -0600 (CST) Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (root@tangelo.bmc.com [172.17.7.166]) by dorothy.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id NAA17582 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 13:40:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw-us-hou1.bmc.com (fw-us-hou1.bmc.com [172.17.0.250]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id PAA06315 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 15:40:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from flume.zk3.dec.com (flume.zk3.dec.com [16.140.112.3]) by mail11.digital.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/WV2.0d) with ESMTP id QAA29466 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 16:39:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from bernie.zk3.dec.com by flume.zk3.dec.com (8.8.8/1.1.8.2/16Jan95-0946AM) id QAA0000004441; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 16:39:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost by bernie.zk3.dec.com; (5.65/1.1.8.2/22Aug96-1117AM) id AA00818; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 16:40:48 -0500 Message-Id: <9901282140.AA00818@bernie.zk3.dec.com> To: agentx@dorothy.bmc.com Subject: Draft of updated RFC 2257 Date: Thu, 28 Jan 99 16:40:47 -0500 From: Mike Daniele X-Mts: smtp Network Working Group M. Daniele Request for Comments: 2257 Digital Equipment Corporation Category: Standards Track B. Wijnen T.J. Watson Research Center, IBM Corp. D. Francisco, Ed. Cisco Systems, Inc. January 1998 Agent Extensibility (AgentX) Protocol Version 1 Status of this Memo This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. Copyright Notice Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved. Table of Contents 1 Introduction......................................................4 2 The SNMP Framework................................................4 2.1 A Note on Terminology.........................................4 3 Extending the MIB.................................................5 3.1 Motivation for AgentX.........................................5 4 AgentX Framework..................................................6 4.1 AgentX Roles..................................................7 4.2 Applicability.................................................8 4.3 Design Features of AgentX.....................................9 4.4 Non-Goals....................................................10 5 AgentX Encodings.................................................10 5.1 Object Identifier............................................11 5.2 SearchRange..................................................13 5.3 Octet String.................................................14 5.4 Value Representation.........................................14 6 Protocol Definitions.............................................16 6.1 AgentX PDU Header............................................16 Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 1] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 6.1.1 Context..................................................19 6.2 AgentX PDUs..................................................20 6.2.1 The agentx-Open-PDU......................................20 6.2.2 The agentx-Close-PDU.....................................21 6.2.3 The agentx-Register-PDU..................................22 6.2.4 The agentx-Unregister-PDU................................25 6.2.5 The agentx-Get-PDU.......................................27 6.2.6 The agentx-GetNext-PDU...................................29 6.2.7 The agentx-GetBulk-PDU...................................30 6.2.8 The agentx-TestSet-PDU...................................31 6.2.9 The agentx-CommitSet, -UndoSet, -CleanupSet PDUs.....................................................33 6.2.10 The agentx-Notify-PDU...................................33 6.2.11 The agentx-Ping-PDU.....................................34 6.2.12 The agentx-IndexAllocate-PDU............................35 6.2.13 The agentx-IndexDeallocate-PDU..........................36 6.2.14 The agentx-AddAgentCaps-PDU.............................37 6.2.15 The agentx-RemoveAgentCaps-PDU..........................38 6.2.16 The agentx-Response-PDU.................................39 7 Elements of Procedure............................................41 7.1 Processing AgentX Administrative Messages....................42 7.1.1 Processing the agentx-Open-PDU...........................42 7.1.2 Processing the agentx-IndexAllocate-PDU..................43 7.1.3 Using the agentx-IndexAllocate-PDU.......................45 7.1.4 Processing the agentx-IndexDeallocate-PDU................47 7.1.5 Processing the agentx-Register-PDU.......................48 7.1.5.1 Handling Duplicate OID Ranges........................50 7.1.6 Processing the agentx-Unregister-PDU.....................51 7.1.7 Processing the agentx-AddAgentCaps-PDU...................51 7.1.8 Processing the agentx-RemoveAgentCaps-PDU................52 7.1.9 Processing the agentx-Close-PDU..........................52 7.1.10 Detecting Connection Loss...............................53 7.1.11 Processing the agentx-Notify-PDU........................53 7.1.12 Processing the agentx-Ping-PDU..........................54 7.2 Processing Received SNMP Protocol Messages...................54 7.2.1 Dispatching AgentX PDUs..................................55 7.2.1.1 agentx-Get-PDU.......................................57 7.2.1.2 agentx-GetNext-PDU...................................58 7.2.1.3 agentx-GetBulk-PDU...................................59 7.2.1.4 agentx-TestSet-PDU...................................60 7.2.1.5 Dispatch.............................................60 7.2.2 Subagent Processing of agentx-Get, GetNext, GetBulk-PDUs.............................................61 7.2.2.1 Subagent Processing of the agentx-Get-PDU............61 7.2.2.2 Subagent Processing of the agentx-GetNext-PDU...................................62 Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 2] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 7.2.2.3 Subagent Processing of the agentx-GetBulk-PDU...................................62 7.2.3 Subagent Processing of agentx-TestSet, -CommitSet, -UndoSet, -CleanupSet-PDUs...................63 7.2.3.1 Subagent Processing of the agentx-TestSet-PDU...................................64 7.2.3.2 Subagent Processing of the agentx-CommitSet-PDU.................................65 7.2.3.3 Subagent Processing of the agentx-UndoSet-PDU...................................65 7.2.3.4 Subagent Processing of the agentx-CleanupSet-PDU................................65 7.2.4 Master Agent Processing of AgentX Responses..............66 7.2.4.1 Common Processing of All AgentX Response PDUs.................................................66 7.2.4.2 Processing of Responses to agentx-Get-PDUs...........66 7.2.4.3 Processing of Responses to agentx-GetNext-PDU and agentx-GetBulk-PDU............67 7.2.4.4 Processing of Responses to agentx-TestSet-PDUs..................................68 7.2.4.5 Processing of Responses to agentx-CommitSet-PDUs................................68 7.2.4.6 Processing of Responses to agentx-UndoSet-PDUs..................................69 7.2.5 Sending the SNMP Response-PDU............................69 7.2.6 MIB Views................................................69 7.3 State Transitions............................................70 7.3.1 Set Transaction States...................................70 7.3.2 Transport Connection States..............................71 7.3.3 Session States...........................................73 8 Transport Mappings...............................................74 8.1 AgentX over TCP..............................................74 8.1.1 Well-known Values........................................74 8.1.2 Operation................................................74 8.2 AgentX over UNIX-domain Sockets..............................75 8.2.1 Well-known Values........................................75 8.2.2 Operation................................................75 9 Security Considerations..........................................76 10 Acknowledgements................................................77 11 Authors' and Editor's Addresses.................................77 12 References......................................................78 13 Full Copyright Statement........................................80 Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 3] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 1. Introduction This memo defines a standardized framework for extensible SNMP agents. It defines processing entities called master agents and subagents, a protocol (AgentX) used to communicate between them, and the elements of procedure by which the extensible agent processes SNMP protocol messages. 2. The SNMP Framework A management system contains: several (potentially many) nodes, each with a processing entity, termed an agent, which has access to management instrumentation; at least one management station; and, a management protocol, used to convey management information between the agents and management stations. Operations of the protocol are carried out under an administrative framework which defines authentication, authorization, access control, and privacy policies. Management stations execute management applications which monitor and control managed elements. Managed elements are devices such as hosts, routers, terminal servers, etc., which are monitored and controlled via access to their management information. Management information is viewed as a collection of managed objects, residing in a virtual information store, termed the Management Information Base (MIB). Collections of related objects are defined in MIB modules. These modules are written using a subset of OSI's Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) [1], termed the Structure of Management Information (SMI) (see RFC 1902 [2]). 2.1. A Note on Terminology The term "variable" refers to an instance of a non-aggregate object type defined according to the conventions set forth in the SMI (RFC 1902, [2]) or the textual conventions based on the SMI (RFC 1903 [3]). The term "variable binding" normally refers to the pairing of the name of a variable and its associated value. However, if certain kinds of exceptional conditions occur during processing of a retrieval request, a variable binding will pair a name and an indication of that exception. A variable-binding list is a simple list of variable bindings. The name of a variable is an OBJECT IDENTIFIER, which is the concatenation of the OBJECT IDENTIFIER of the corresponding object type together with an OBJECT IDENTIFIER fragment identifying the Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 4] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 instance. The OBJECT IDENTIFIER of the corresponding object-type is called the OBJECT IDENTIFIER prefix of the variable. For the purpose of exposition, the original Internet-standard Network Management Framework, as described in RFCs 1155 (STD 16), 1157 (STD 15), and 1212 (STD 16), is termed the SNMP version 1 framework (SNMPv1). The current framework, as described in RFCs 1902-1908, is termed the SNMP version 2 framework (SNMPv2). 3. Extending the MIB New MIB modules that extend the Internet-standard MIB are continuously being defined by various IETF working groups. It is also common for enterprises or individuals to create or extend enterprise-specific or experimental MIBs. As a result, managed devices are frequently complex collections of manageable components that have been independently installed on a managed node. Each component provides instrumentation for the managed objects defined in the MIB module(s) it implements. Neither the SNMP version 1 nor version 2 framework describes how the set of managed objects supported by a particular agent may be changed dynamically. 3.1. Motivation for AgentX This very real need to dynamically extend the management objects within a node has given rise to a variety of "extensible agents", which typically comprise - a "master" agent that is available on the standard transport address and that accepts SNMP protocol messages - a set of "subagents" that each contain management instrumentation - a protocol that operates between the master agent and subagents, permitting subagents to "connect" to the master agent, and the master agent to multiplex received SNMP protocol messages amongst the subagents. - a set of tools to aid subagent development, and a runtime (API) environment that hides much of the protocol operation between a subagent and the master agent. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 5] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 The wide deployment of extensible SNMP agents, coupled with the lack of Internet standards in this area, makes it difficult to field SNMP-manageable applications. A vendor may have to support several different subagent environments (APIs) in order to support different target platforms. It can also become quite cumbersome to configure subagents and (possibly multiple) master agents on a particular managed node. Specifying a standard protocol for agent extensibility (AgentX) provides the technical foundation required to solve both of these problems. Independently developed AgentX-capable master agents and subagents will be able to interoperate at the protocol level. Vendors can continue to differentiate their products in all other respects. 4. AgentX Framework Within the SNMP framework, a managed node contains a processing entity, called an agent, which has access to management information. Within the AgentX framework, an agent is further defined to consist of - a single processing entity called the master agent, which sends and receives SNMP protocol messages in an agent role (as specified by the SNMP version 1 and version 2 framework documents) but typically has little or no direct access to management information. - 0 or more processing entities called subagents, which are "shielded" from the SNMP protocol messages processed by the master agent, but which have access to management information. The master and subagent entities communicate via AgentX protocol messages, as specified in this memo. Other interfaces (if any) on these entities, and their associated protocols, are outside the scope of this document. While some of the AgentX protocol messages appear similar in syntax and semantics to the SNMP, bear in mind that AgentX is not SNMP. The internal operations of AgentX are invisible to an SNMP entity operating in a manager role. From a manager's point of view, an extensible agent behaves exactly as would a non-extensible (monolithic) agent that has access to the same management instrumentation. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 6] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 This transparency to managers is a fundamental requirement of AgentX, and is what differentiates AgentX subagents from SNMP proxy agents. 4.1. AgentX Roles An entity acting in a master agent role performs the following functions: - Accepts AgentX session establishment requests from subagents. - Accepts registration of MIB regions by subagents. - Sends and accepts SNMP protocol messages on the agent's specified transport addresses. - Implements the agent role Elements of Procedure specified for the administrative framework applicable to the SNMP protocol message, except where they specify performing management operations. (The application of MIB views, and the access control policy for the managed node, are implemented by the master agent.) - Provides instrumentation for the MIB objects defined in RFC 1907 [5], and for any MIB objects relevant to any administrative framework it supports. - Sends and receives AgentX protocol messages to access management information, based on the current registry of MIB regions. - Forwards notifications on behalf of subagents. An entity acting in a subagent role performs the following functions: - Initiates AgentX sessions with the master agent. - Registers MIB regions with the master agent. - Instantiates managed objects. - Binds OIDs within its registered MIB regions to actual variables. - Performs management operations on variables. - Initiates notifications. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 7] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 4.2 Applicability It is intended that this memo specify the smallest amount of required behavior necessary to achieve the largest benefit, that is, to cover a very large number of possible MIB implementations and configurations with minimum complexity and low "cost of entry". This section discusses several typical usage scenarios. 1) Subagents implement separate MIB modules--for example, subagent A implements "mib-2", subagent b implements "host- resources". It is anticipated that this will be the most common subagent configuration. 2) Subagents implement rows in a "simple table". A simple table is one in which row creation is not specified, and for which the MIB does not define an object that counts entries in the table. Examples of simple tables are rdbmsDbTable, udpTable, and hrSWRunTable. This is the most commonly defined type of MIB table, and probably represents the next most typical configuration that AgentX would support. 3) Subagents share MIBs along non-row partitions. Subagents register "chunks" of the MIB that represent multiple rows, due to the nature of the MIB's index structure. Examples include registering ipNetToMediaEntry.n, where n represents the ifIndex value for an interface implemented by the subagent, and tcpConnEntry.a.b.c.d, where a.b.c.d represents an IP address on an interface implemented by the subagent. AgentX supports these three common configurations, and all permutations of them, completely. The consensus is that they comprise a very large majority of current and likely future uses of multi-vendor extensible agent configurations. 4) Subagents implement rows in tables that permit row creation, for example, the RMON historyControlTable. To implement row creation in such tables, at least one AgentX subagent must register at a point "higher" in the OID tree than an individual row (per AgentX's dispatching procedure). 5) Subagents implement rows in tables whose MIB also defines an object that counts entries in the table, for example the MIB-2 ifTable (due to ifNumber). The subagent that implements such a counter object (like ifNumber) must go beyond AgentX to correctly implement it. This is an implementation issue (and most new MIB designs no longer include such objects). Scenarios in these latter 2 categories were thought to occur somewhat rarely in configurations where subagents are independently implemented by different vendors. The focus of a standard protocol, however, must be in just those areas where multi- vendor interoperability must be assured. Note that it would be inefficient (due to AgentX registration overhead) to share a table among AgentX subagents if the table contains very dynamic instances, and each subagent registers fully qualified instances. ipRouteTable could be an example of such a table in some environments. 4.3. Design Features of AgentX The primary features of the design described in this memo are: 1) A general architectural division of labor between master agent and subagent: The master agent is MIB ignorant and SNMP omniscient, while the subagent is SNMP ignorant and MIB omniscient (for the MIB variables it instantiates). That is, master agents, exclusively, are concerned with SNMP protocol operations and the translations to and from AgentX protocol operations needed to carry them out; subagents are exclusively concerned with management instrumentation; and neither should intrude on the other's territory. 2) A standard protocol and "rules of engagement" to enable interoperability between management instrumentation and extensible agents. 3) Mechanisms for independently developed subagents to integrate into the extensible agent on a particular managed node in such a way that they need not be aware of any other existing subagents. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 9] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 4) A simple, deterministic registry and dispatching algorithm. For a given extensible agent configuration, there is a single subagent who is "authoritative" for any particular region of the MIB (where "region" may extend from an entire MIB down to a single object-instance). 5) Performance considerations. It is likely that the master agent and all subagents will reside on the same host, and in such cases AgentX is more a form of inter-process communication than a traditional communications protocol. Some of the design decisions made with this in mind include: - 32-bit alignment of data within PDUs - Native byte-order encoding by subagents - Large AgentX PDU payload sizes. 4.4 Non-Goals 1) Subagent-to-subagent communication. This is out of scope, due to the security ramifications and complexity involved. 2) Subagent access (via the master agent) to MIB variables. This is not addressed, since various other mechanisms are available and it was not a fundamental requirement. 3) The ability to accommodate every conceivable extensible agent configuration option. This was the most contentious aspect in the development of this protocol. In essence, certain features currently available in some commercial extensible agent products are not included in AgentX. Although useful or even vital in some implementation strategies, the rough consensus was that these features were not appropriate for an Internet Standard, or not typically required for independently developed subagents to coexist. The set of supported extensible agent configurations is described above, in Section 4.2. Some possible future version of the AgentX protocol may provide coverage for one or more of these "non-goals" or for new goals that might be identified after greater deployment experience. 5. AgentX Encodings AgentX PDUs consist of a common header, followed by PDU-specific data of variable length. Unlike SNMP PDUs, AgentX PDUs are not encoded using the BER (as specified in ISO 8824 [1]), but are transmitted as Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 10] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 a contiguous byte stream. The data within this stream is organized to provide natural alignment with respect to the start of the PDU, permitting direct (integer) access by the processing entities. The first four fields in the header are single-byte values. A bit (NETWORK_BYTE_ORDER) in the third field (h.flags) is used to indicate the byte ordering of all multi-byte integer values in the PDU, including those which follow in the header itself. This is described in more detail in Section 6.1, "AgentX PDU Header", below. PDUs are depicted in this memo using the following convention (where byte 1 is the first transmitted byte): +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | byte 1 | byte 2 | byte 3 | byte 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | byte 5 | byte 6 | byte 7 | byte 8 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Fields marked "" are reserved for future use and must be zero-filled. 5.1. Object Identifier An object identifier is encoded as a 4-byte header, followed by a variable number of contiguous 4-byte fields representing sub- identifiers. This representation (termed Object Identifier) is as follows: Object Identifier +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | include | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Object Identifier header fields: n_subid The number (0-128) of sub-identifiers in the object identifier. An ordered list of "n_subid" 4-byte sub-identifiers follows the 4-byte header. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 11] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 prefix An unsigned value used to reduce the length of object identifier encodings. A non-zero value "x" is interpreted as the first sub-identifier after "internet" (1.3.6.1), and indicates an implicit prefix "internet.x" to the actual sub- identifiers encoded in the Object Identifier. For example, a prefix field value 2 indicates an implicit prefix "1.3.6.1.2". A value of 0 in the prefix field indicates there is no prefix to the sub-identifiers. include Used only when the Object Identifier is the start of a SearchRange, as described in section 5.2. sub-identifier 1, 2, ... n_subid A 4-byte unsigned integer, encoded according to the header's NETWORK_BYTE_ORDER bit. A null Object Identifier consists of the 4-byte header with all bytes set to 0. Examples: sysDescr.0 (1.3.6.1.2.1.1.1.0) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 0 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ 1.2.3.4 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 2 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 3 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 12] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 5.2. SearchRange A SearchRange consists of two Object Identifiers. In its communication with a subagent, the master agent uses a SearchRange to identify a requested variable binding, and, in GetNext and GetBulk operations, to set an upper bound on the names of managed object instances the subagent may send in reply. The first Object Identifier in a SearchRange (called the starting OID) indicates the beginning of the range. It is frequently (but not necessarily) the name of a requested variable binding. The "include" field in this OID's header is a boolean value (0 or 1) indicating whether or not the starting OID is included in the range. The second object identifier (ending OID) indicates the non-inclusive end of the range, and its "include" field is always 0. A null value for ending OID indicates an unbounded SearchRange. Example: To indicate a search range from 1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2 (inclusive) to 1.3.6.1.2.1.25.2.1 (exclusive), the SearchRange would be (start) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 25 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 2 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (end) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 25 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 2 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ A SearchRangeList is a contiguous list of SearchRanges. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 13] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 5.3. Octet String An octet string is represented by a contiguous series of bytes, beginning with a 4-byte integer (encoded according to the header's NETWORK_BYTE_ORDER bit) whose value is the number of octets in the octet string, followed by the octets themselves. This representation is termed an Octet String. If the last octet does not end on a 4-byte offset from the start of the Octet String, padding bytes are appended to achieve alignment of following data. This padding must be added even if the Octet String is the last item in the PDU. Padding bytes must be zero filled. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Padding (as required) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ A null Octet String consists of a 4-byte length field set to 0. 5.4. Value Representation Variable bindings may be encoded within the variable-length portion of some PDUs. The representation of a variable binding (termed a VarBind) consists of a 2-byte type field, a name (Object Identifier), and the actual value data. VarBind +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | v.type | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (v.name) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | 0 | 0 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 14] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 (v.data) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | data | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | data | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ VarBind fields: v.type Indicates the variable binding's syntax, and must be one of the following values: Integer (2), Octet String (4), Null (5), Object Identifier (6), IpAddress (64), Counter32 (65), Gauge32 (66), TimeTicks (67), Opaque (68), Counter64 (70), noSuchObject (128), noSuchInstance (129), endOfMibView (130) v.name The Object Identifier which names the variable. v.data The actual value, encoded as follows: - Integer, Counter32, Gauge32, and TimeTicks are encoded as 4 contiguous bytes, according to the header's NETWORK_BYTE_ORDER bit. - Counter64 is encoded as 8 contiguous bytes, according to the header's NETWORK_BYTE_ORDER bit. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 15] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 - Object Identifiers are encoded as described in section 5.1, Object Identifier. - IpAddress, Opaque, and Octet String are all octet strings and are encoded as described in section 5.3, Octet String. Note that the octets used to represent IpAddress are always ordered most significant to least significant. Value data always follows v.name whenever v.type is one of the above types. These data bytes are present even if they will not be used (as, for example, in certain types of index allocation). - Null, noSuchObject, noSuchInstance, and endOfMibView do not contain any encoded value. Value data never follows v.name in these cases. Note that the VarBind itself does not contain the value size. That information is implied for the fixed-length types, and explicitly contained in the encodings of variable-length types (Object Identifier and Octet String). A VarBindList is a contiguous list of VarBinds. Within a VarBindList, a particular VarBind is identified by an index value. The first VarBind in a VarBindList has index value 1, the second has index value 2, and so on. 6. Protocol Definitions 6.1. AgentX PDU Header The AgentX PDU header is a fixed-format, 20-octet structure: +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version | h.type | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ An AgentX PDU header contains the following fields: h.version The version of the AgentX protocol (1 for this memo). Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 16] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 h.type The PDU type; one of the following values: agentx-Open-PDU (1), agentx-Close-PDU (2), agentx-Register-PDU (3), agentx-Unregister-PDU (4), agentx-Get-PDU (5), agentx-GetNext-PDU (6), agentx-GetBulk-PDU (7), agentx-TestSet-PDU (8), agentx-CommitSet-PDU (9), agentx-UndoSet-PDU (10), agentx-CleanupSet-PDU (11), agentx-Notify-PDU (12), agentx-Ping-PDU (13), agentx-IndexAllocate-PDU (14), agentx-IndexDeallocate-PDU (15), agentx-AddAgentCaps-PDU (16), agentx-RemoveAgentCaps-PDU (17), agentx-Response-PDU (18) The set of PDU types for "administrative processing" are 1-4 and 12-17. The set of PDU types for "SNMP request processing" are 5-11. h.flags A bitmask, with bit 0 the least significant bit. The bit definitions are as follows: Bit Definition --- ---------- 0 INSTANCE_REGISTRATION 1 NEW_INDEX 2 ANY_INDEX 3 NON_DEFAULT_CONTEXT 4 NETWORK_BYTE_ORDER 5-7 (reserved) The NETWORK_BYTE_ORDER bit applies to all multi-byte integer values in the entire AgentX packet, including the remaining header fields. If set, then network byte order (most significant byte first; "big endian") is used. If not set, then least significant byte first ("little endian") is used. The NETWORK_BYTE_ORDER bit applies to all AgentX PDUs. The NON_DEFAULT_CONTEXT bit is used only in the AgentX PDUs described in section 6.1.1. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 17] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 The NEW_INDEX and ANY_INDEX bits are used only within the agentx-IndexAllocate-, and -IndexDeallocate-PDUs. The INSTANCE_REGISTRATION bit is used only within the agentx- Register-PDU. h.sessionID The session ID uniquely identifies a session over which AgentX PDUs are exchanged between a subagent and the master agent. The session ID has no significance and no defined value in the agentx-Open-PDU sent by a subagent to open a session with the master agent; in this case, the master agent will assign a unique sessionID that it will pass back in the corresponding agentx-Response-PDU. From that point on, that same sessionID will appear in every AgentX PDU exchanged over that session between the master and the subagent. A subagent may establish multiple AgentX sessions by sending multiple agentx-Open-PDUs to the master agent. In master agents that support multiple transport protocols, the sessionID should be globally unique rather than unique just to a particular transport. h.transactionID The transaction ID uniquely identifies, for a given session, the single SNMP management request (and single SNMP PDU) with which an AgentX PDU is associated. If a single SNMP management request results in multiple AgentX PDUs being sent by the master agent with the same sessionID, each of these AgentX PDUs must contain the same transaction ID; conversely, AgentX PDUs sent during a particular session, that result from distinct SNMP management requests, must have distinct transaction IDs within the limits of the 32-bit field). Note that the transaction ID is not the same as the SNMP PDU's request-id (as described in section 4.1 of RFC 1905 [4]), nor can it be, since a master agent might receive SNMP requests with the same request-ids from different managers. The transaction ID has no significance and no defined value in AgentX administrative PDUs, i.e., AgentX PDUs that are not associated with an SNMP management request. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 18] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 h.packetID A packet ID generated by the sender for all AgentX PDUs except the agentx-Response-PDU. In an agentx-Response-PDU, the packet ID must be the same as that in the received AgentX PDU to which it is a response. A master agent might use this field to associate subagent response PDUs with their corresponding request PDUs. A subagent might use this field to correlate responses to multiple (batched) registrations. h.payload_length The size in octets of the PDU contents, excluding the 20-byte header. As a result of the encoding schemes and PDU layouts, this value will always be either 0, or a multiple of 4. 6.1.1. Context In the SNMPv1 or v2c frameworks, the community string may be used as an index into a local repository of configuration information that may include community profiles or more complex context information. Future versions of the SNMP will likely formalize this notion of "context". AgentX provides a mechanism for transmitting a context specification within relevant PDUs, but does not place any constraints on the content of that specification. An optional context field may be present in the agentx-Register-, UnRegister-, AddAgentCaps-, RemoveAgentCaps-, Get-, GetNext-, GetBulk-, IndexAllocate-, IndexDeallocate-, Notify-, TestSet-, and Ping- PDUs. If the NON_DEFAULT_CONTEXT bit in the AgentX header field h.flags is clear, then there is no context field in the PDU, and the operation refers to the default context. (This does not mean there is a zero-length Octet String, it means there is no Octet String present.) If the NON_DEFAULT_CONTEXT bit is set, then a context field immediately follows the AgentX header, and the operation refers to that specific context. The context is represented as an Octet String. There are no constraints on its length or contents. Thus, all of these AgentX PDUs (that is, those listed immediately above) refer to, or "indicate" a context, which is either the default context, or a non-default context explicitly named in the PDU. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 19] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 6.2. AgentX PDUs 6.2.1. The agentx-Open-PDU An agentx-Open-PDU is generated by a subagent to request establishment of an AgentX session with the master agent. (AgentX header) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (1) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | o.timeout | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (o.id) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | 0 | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | subidentifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | subidentifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (o.descr) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Padding (as required) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ An agentx-Open-PDU contains the following fields: Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 20] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 o.timeout The length of time, in seconds, that a master agent should allow to elapse after dispatching a message on a session before it regards the subagent as not responding. This is the default value for the session, and may be overridden by values associated with specific registered MIB regions. The default value of 0 indicates that there is no session-wide default value. o.id An Object Identifier that identifies the subagent. Subagents that do not support such an notion may send a null Object Identifier. o.descr An Octet String containing a DisplayString describing the subagent. 6.2.2. The agentx-Close-PDU An agentx-Close-PDU issued by either a subagent or the master agent terminates an AgentX session. (AgentX header) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (2) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | c.reason | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ An agentx-Close-PDU contains the following field: Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 21] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 c.reason An enumerated value that gives the reason that the master agent or subagent closed the AgentX session. This field may take one of the following values: reasonOther(1) None of the following reasons reasonParseError(2) Too many AgentX parse errors from peer reasonProtocolError(3) Too many AgentX protocol errors from peer reasonTimeouts(4) Too many timeouts waiting for peer reasonShutdown(5) Sending entity is shutting down reasonByManager(6) Due to Set operation; this reason code can be used only by the master agent, in response to an SNMP management request. 6.2.3. The agentx-Register-PDU An agentx-Register-PDU is generated by a subagent for each region of the MIB variable naming tree (within one or more contexts) that it wishes to support. (AgentX header) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (3) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 22] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 (r.context) (OPTIONAL) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Padding (as required) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | r.timeout | r.priority | r.range_subid | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (r.subtree) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | 0 | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (r.upper_bound) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | optional upper-bound sub-identifier | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ An agentx-Register-PDU contains the following fields: r.context An optional non-default context. r.timeout The length of time, in seconds, that a master agent should allow to elapse after dispatching a message on a session before it regards the subagent as not responding. r.timeout applies only to messages that concern MIB objects within r.subtree. It overrides both the session's default value (if any) indicated when the AgentX session with the master agent was established, and the master agent's default timeout. The default value for r.timeout is 0 (no override). Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 23] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 r.priority A value between 1 and 255, used to achieve a desired configuration when different sessions register identical or overlapping regions. Subagents with no particular knowledge of priority should register with the default value of 127. In the master agent's dispatching algorithm, smaller values of r.priority take precedence over larger values, as described in section 7.1.5.1. r.subtree An Object Identifier that names the basic subtree of a MIB region for which a subagent indicates its support. The term "subtree" is used generically here, it may represent a fully-qualified instance name, a partial instance name, a MIB table, an entire MIB, etc. The choice of what to register is implementation-specific; this memo does not specify permissible values. Standard practice however is for a subagent to register at the highest level of the naming tree that makes sense. Registration of fully- qualified instances is typically done only when a subagent can perform management operations only on particular rows of a conceptual table. If r.subtree is in fact a fully qualified instance name, the INSTANCE_REGISTRATION bit in h.flags must be set, otherwise it must be cleared. The master agent may save this information to optimize subsequent operational dispatching. r.range_subid Permits specifying a range in place of one of r.subtree's sub- identifiers. If this value is 0, no range is being specified and there is no r.upper_bound field present in the PDU. In this case the MIB region being registered is the single subtree named by r.subtree. Otherwise the "r.range_subid"-th sub-identifier in r.subtree is a range lower bound, and the range upper bound sub-identifier (r.upper_bound) immediately follows r.subtree. In this case the MIB region being registered is the union of the subtrees formed by enumerating this range. Note that r.range_subid indicates the (1-based) index of this sub-identifier within the OID represented by r.subtree, regardless of whether or not r.subtree is encoded using a prefix. (See the example below.) r.upper_bound The upper bound of a sub-identifier's range. This field is present only if r.range_subid is not 0. The use of r.range_subid and r.upper_bound provide a general shorthand mechanism for specifying a MIB region. For example, if r.subtree is the OID 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.7, r.range_subid is 10, and r.upper_bound is 22, the specified MIB region can be denoted 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.[1-22].7. Registering this region is equivalent to registering the union of subtrees 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.1.7 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.2.7 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.3.7 ... 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.22.7 One expected use of this mechanism is registering a conceptual row with a single PDU. In the example above, the MIB region happens to be row 7 of the RFC 1573 ifTable. The actual PDU would be: Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 24] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 (AgentX header) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (3) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | r.timeout | r.priority | 10 | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (r.subtree) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 6 | 2 | 0 | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 2 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 2 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 7 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (r.upper_bound) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 22 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Note again that here r.range_subid is 10, even though n_subid in r.subtree is only 6. r.range_subid may be used at any level within a subtree, it need not represent row-level registration. This mechanism may be used in any way that is convenient for a subagent to achieve its registrations. 6.2.4. The agentx-Unregister-PDU The agentx-Unregister-PDU is sent by a subagent to remove a MIB region that was previously registered on this session. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 25] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 (AgentX header) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (4) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (u.context) OPTIONAL +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Padding (as required) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | | u.priority | u.range_subid | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (u.subtree) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | 0 | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (u.upper_bound) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | optional upper-bound sub-identifier | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ An agentx-Unregister-PDU contains the following fields: Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 26] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 u.context An optional non-default context. u.priority The priority at which this region was originally registered. u.subtree Indicates a previously-registered region of the MIB that a subagent no longer wishes to support. u.range_subid Indicates a sub-identifier in u.subtree is a range lower bound. u.upper_bound The upper bound of the range sub-identifier. This field is present in the PDU only if u.range_subid is not 0. 6.2.5. The agentx-Get-PDU (AgentX header) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (5) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (g.context) OPTIONAL +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Padding (as required) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (g.sr) (start 1) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | include | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 27] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (end 1) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... (start n) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | include | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (end n) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ An agentx-Get-PDU contains the following fields: g.context An optional non-default context. g.sr A SearchRangeList containing the requested variables for this session. Within the agentx-Get-PDU, the Ending OIDs within SearchRanges are null-valued Object Identifiers. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 28] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 6.2.6. The agentx-GetNext-PDU (AgentX header) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (6) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (g.context) OPTIONAL +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Padding (as required) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (g.sr) (start 1) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | include | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (end 1) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | 0 | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 29] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... (start n) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | include | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (end n) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | 0 | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... An agentx-GetNext-PDU contains the following fields: g.context An optional non-default context. g.sr A SearchRangeList containing the requested variables for this session. 6.2.7. The agentx-GetBulk-PDU (AgentX header) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (7) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 30] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 (g.context) OPTIONAL +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Padding (as required) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | g.non_repeaters | g.max_repetitions | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (g.sr) ... An agentx-GetBulk-PDU contains the following fields: g.context An optional non-default context. g.non_repeaters The number of variables in the SearchRangeList that are not repeaters. g.max_repetitions The maximum number of repetitions requested for repeating variables. g.sr A SearchRangeList containing the requested variables for this session. 6.2.8. The agentx-TestSet-PDU (AgentX header) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (8) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (t.context) OPTIONAL +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Padding (as required) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (t.vb) Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 31] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 (VarBind 1) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | v.type | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | 0 | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | data | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | data | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... (VarBind n) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | v.type | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | 0 | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | data | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | data | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ An agentx-TestSet-PDU contains the following fields: t.context An optional non-default context. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 32] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 t.vb A VarBindList containing the requested VarBinds for this subagent. 6.2.9. The agentx-CommitSet, -UndoSet, -CleanupSet PDUs These PDUs consist of the AgentX header only. The agentx-CommitSet-, -UndoSet-, and -Cleanup-PDUs are used in processing an SNMP SetRequest operation. 6.2.10. The agentx-Notify-PDU An agentx-Notify-PDU is sent by a subagent to cause the master agent to forward a notification. (AgentX header) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (12) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (n.context) OPTIONAL +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Padding (as required) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (n.vb) ... An agentx-Notify-PDU contains the following fields: Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 33] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 n.context An optional non-default context. n.vb A VarBindList whose contents define the actual PDU to be sent. This memo places the following restrictions on its contents: - If the subagent supplies sysUpTime.0, it must be present as the first varbind. - snmpTrapOID.0 must be present, as the second varbind if sysUpTime.0 was supplied, as the first if it was not. 6.2.11 The agentx-Ping-PDU The agentx-Ping-PDU is sent by a subagent to the master agent to monitor the master agent's ability to receive and send AgentX PDUs over their AgentX session. (AgentX header) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (13) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (p.context) OPTIONAL +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Padding (as required) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ An agentx-Ping-PDU may contain the following field: Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 34] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 p.context An optional non-default context. Using p.context a subagent can retrieve the sysUpTime value for a specific context, if required. 6.2.12. The agentx-IndexAllocate-PDU An agentx-IndexAllocate-PDU is sent by a subagent to request allocation of a value for specific index objects. Refer to section 7.1.3 (Using the agentx-IndexAllocate-PDU) for suggested usage. (AgentX header) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (14) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (i.context) OPTIONAL +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Padding (as required) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (i.vb) ... An agentx-IndexAllocate-PDU contains the following fields: i.context An optional non-default context. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 35] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 i.vb A VarBindList containing the index names and values requested for allocation. 6.2.13. The agentx-IndexDeallocate-PDU An agentx-IndexDeallocate-PDU is sent by a subagent to release previously allocated index values. +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (15) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (i.context) OPTIONAL +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Padding (as required) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (i.vb) ... An agentx-IndexDeallocate-PDU contains the following fields: i.context An optional non-default context. i.vb A VarBindList containing the index names and values to be released. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 36] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 6.2.14. The agentx-AddAgentCaps-PDU An agentx-AddAgentCaps-PDU is generated by a subagent to inform the master agent of agent capabilities for the specified session. (AgentX header) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (16) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (a.context) (OPTIONAL) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Optional Padding | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (a.id) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | 0 | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (a.descr) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 37] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Optional Padding | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ An agentx-AddAgentCaps-PDU contains the following fields: a.context An optional non-default context. a.id An Object Identifier containing the value of an invocation of the AGENT-CAPABILITIES macro, which the master agent exports as a value of sysORID for the indicated context. (Recall that the value of an invocation of an AGENT-CAPABILITIES macro is an object identifier that describes a precise level of support with respect to implemented MIB modules. A more complete discussion of the AGENT-CAPABILITIES macro and related sysORID values can be found in section 6 of RFC 1904 [10].) a.descr An Octet String containing a DisplayString to be used as the value of sysORDescr corresponding to the sysORID value above. 6.2.15. The agentx-RemoveAgentCaps-PDU An agentx-RemoveAgentCaps-PDU is generated by a subagent to request that the master agent stop exporting a particular value of sysORID. This value must have previously been advertised by the subagent in an agentx-AddAgentCaps-PDU for this session. (AgentX header) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (17) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 38] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 (a.context) (OPTIONAL) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet String Length (L) | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet 1 | Octet 2 | Octet 3 | Octet 4 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | Octet L - 1 | Octet L | Optional Padding | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ (a.id) +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | n_subid | prefix | 0 | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #1 | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | sub-identifier #n_subid | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ An agentx-RemoveAgentCaps-PDU contains the following fields: a.context An optional non-default context. a.id An ObjectIdentifier containing the value of sysORID that should no longer be exported. 6.2.16. The agentx-Response-PDU +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.version (1) | h.type (18) | h.flags | | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.sessionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.transactionID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.packetID | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | h.payload_length | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 39] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | res.sysUpTime | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ | res.error | res.index | +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ ... An agentx-Response-PDU contains the following fields: h.sessionID If this is a response to an agentx-Open-PDU, then it contains the new and unique sessionID (as assigned by the master agent) for this session. Otherwise it must be identical to the h.sessionID value in the PDU to which this PDU is a response. h.transactionID Must be identical to the h.transactionID value in the PDU to which this PDU is a response. In an agentx response PDU from the master agent to the subagent, the value of h.transactionID has no significance and can be ignored by the subagent. h.packetID Must be identical to the h.packetID value in the PDU to which this PDU is a response. res.sysUpTime This field contains the current value of sysUpTime for the context indicated within the PDU to which this PDU is a response. It is relevant only in agentx response PDUs sent from the master agent to a subagent in response to the set of administrative PDUs listed in 6.1. In an agentx response PDU from the subagent to the master agent, the value of res.sysUpTime has no significance and is ignored by the master agent. res.error Indicates error status. Within responses to the set of "administrative" PDU types listed in 6.1, values are limited to the following: noAgentXError (0), openFailed (256), notOpen (257), indexWrongType (258), indexAlreadyAllocated (259), indexNoneAvailable (260), indexNotAllocated (261), unsupportedContext (262), duplicateRegistration (263), unknownRegistration (264), unknownAgentCaps (265), parseFailed (266), requestDenied (267), processingError (268) Within responses to the set of "SNMP request processing" PDU types listed in 6.1, values may also include those defined for errors in the SNMPv2 PDUs (RFC 1905 [4]). res.index In error cases, this is the index of the failed variable binding within a received request PDU. (Note: As explained in section 5.4, Value Representation, the index values of variable bindings within a variable binding list are 1-based.) A VarBindList may follow res.index, depending on which AgentX PDU is being responded to. These data are specified in the subsequent elements of procedure. 7. Elements of Procedure This section describes the actions of protocol entities (master agents and subagents) implementing the AgentX protocol. Note, however, that it is not intended to constrain the internal architecture of any conformant implementation. The actions of AgentX protocol entities can be broadly categorized under two headings, each of which is described separately: (1) processing AgentX administrative messages (e.g., registration requests from a subagent to a master agent); and (2) processing SNMP messages (the coordinated actions of a master agent and one or more subagents in processing, for example, a received SNMP GetRequest-PDU). 7.1. Processing AgentX Administrative Messages This subsection describes the actions of AgentX protocol entities in processing AgentX administrative messages. Such messages include those involved in establishing and terminating an AgentX session between a subagent and a master agent, those by which a subagent requests allocation of instance index values, and those by which a subagent communicates to a master agent which MIB regions it supports. Processing is defined specifically for each PDU type in its own section. For the master agent, many of these PDU types require the same initial processing steps. This common processing is defined here, and referenced as needed in the PDU type-specific descriptions. Common Processing: The master agent initially processes a received AgentX PDU as follows: 1) An agentx-Response-PDU is created, res.sysUpTime is set to the value of sysUpTime.0 for the default context, res.error is set to `noAgentXError', and res.index is set to 0. 2) If the received PDU cannot be parsed, res.error is set to `parseError'. Examples of a parse error are o PDU length (h.payload) too short to contain current construct (Object Identifier header indicates more sub-identifiers, VarBind v.type indicates data follows, etc) o An unrecognized value is encountered for h.type, v.type, etc. 3) Otherwise, if h.sessionID does not correspond to a currently established session with this subagent, res.error is set to `notOpen'. 4) Otherwise, if the NON_DEFAULT_CONTEXT bit is set and the master agent does not support the indicated context, res.error is set to `unsupportedContext'. If the master agent does support the indicated context, the value of res.sysUpTime is set to the value of sysUpTime.0 for that context. Note: Non-default contexts might be added on the fly by the master agent, or the master agent might require such non-default contexts to be pre-configured. The choice is implementation-specific. 5) If resources cannot be allocated or some other condition prevents processing, res.error is set to `processingError'. 6) At this point, if res.error is not `noAgentXError', the received PDU is not processed further. If the received PDU's header was successfully parsed, the AgentX-Response-PDU is sent in reply. If the received PDU contained a VarBindList which was successfully parsed, the AgentX-Response-PDU contains the identicial VarBindList. If the received PDU's header was not successfully parsed or for some other reason the master agent cannot send a reply, processing is complete. 7.1.1. Processing the agentx-Open-PDU When the master agent receives an agentx-Open-PDU, it processes it as follows: 1) An agentx-Response-PDU is created, res.sysUpTime is set to the value of sysUpTime.0 for the default context, res.error is set to `noAgentXError', and res.index is set to 0. 2) If the received PDU cannot be parsed, res.error is set to `parseError'. Examples of a parse error are o PDU length (h.payload) too short to contain current construct (Object Identifier header indicates more sub-identifiers, VarBind v.type indicates data follows, etc) o An unrecognized value is encountered for h.type, v.type, etc. 3) Otherwise, if the master agent is unable to open an AgentX session for any reason, res.error is set to `openFailed'. 4) Otherwise: The master agent assigns a sessionID to the new session and puts the value in the h.sessionID field of the agentx-Response-PDU. This value must be unique among all existing open sessions. The master agent retains session-specific information from the PDU for this session: - The NETWORK_BYTE_ORDER value in h.flags is retained. All subsequent AgentX protocol operations initiated by the master agent for this session must use this byte ordering and set this bit accordingly. The subagent typically sets this bit to correspond to its native byte ordering, and typically does not vary byte ordering for an initiated session. The master agent must be able to decode each PDU according to the h.flag NETWORK_BYTE_ORDER bit in the PDU, but does not need to toggle its retained value for the session if the subagent varies its byte ordering. - The o.timeout value is used in calculating response timeout conditions for this session. - The o.id and o.descr fields are used for informational purposes. (Such purposes are implementation-specific for now, and may be used in a possible future standard AgentX MIB.) << FIX ME: Should we refer to mib spec now? >> 5) The agentx-Response-PDU is sent with the res.error field indicating the result of the session initiation. If processing was successful, an AgentX session is considered established between the master agent and the subagent. An AgentX session is a distinct channel for the exchange of AgentX protocol messages between a master agent and one subagent, qualified by the session-specific attributes listed in 4) above. AgentX session establishment is initiated by the subagent. An AgentX session can be terminated by either the master agent or the subagent. 7.1.2. Processing the agentx-IndexAllocate-PDU When the master agent receives an agentx-IndexAllocate-PDU, it performs the common processing described in 7.1. If as a result res.error is `noAgentXError', processing continues as follows: 1) Each VarBind in the VarBindList is processed until either all are successful, or one fails. If any VarBind fails, the agentx- Response-PDU is sent in reply containing the original VarBindList, with res.index set to indicate the failed VarBind, and with res.error set as described subsequently. All other VarBinds are ignored; no index values are allocated. VarBinds are processed as follows: - v.name is the OID prefix of the MIB OBJECT-TYPE for which a value is to be allocated. - v.type is the syntax of the MIB OBJECT-TYPE for which a value is to be allocated. - v.data indicates the specific index value requested. If the NEW_INDEX or the ANY_INDEX bit is set, the actual value in v.data is ignored and an appropriate index value is generated. a) If there are no currently allocated index values for v.name in the indicated context, and v.type does not correspond to a valid index type value, the VarBind fails and res.error is set to `indexWrongType'. b) If there are currently allocated index values for v.name in the indicated context, but the syntax of those values does not match v.type, the VarBind fails and res.error is set to `indexWrongType'. c) Otherwise, if both the NEW_INDEX and ANY_INDEX bits are clear, allocation of a specific index value is being requested. If the requested index is already allocated for v.name in the indicated context, the VarBind fails and res.error is set to `indexAlreadyAllocated'. d) Otherwise, if the NEW_INDEX bit is set, the master agent should generate the next available index value for v.name in the indicated context, with the constraint that this value must not have been allocated (even if subsequently released) to any subagent since the last re-initialization of the master agent. If no such value can be generated, the VarBind fails and res.error is set to `indexNoneAvailable'. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 44] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 e) Otherwise, if the ANY_INDEX bit is set, the master agent should generate an index value for v.name in the indicated context, with the constraint that this value is not currently allocated to any subagent. If no such value can be generated, then the VarBind fails and res.error is set to `indexNoneAvailable'. 5) If all VarBinds are processed successfully, the agentx-Response-PDU is sent in reply with res.error set to `noAgentXError'. A VarBindList is included that is identical to the one sent in the agentx-IndexAllocate-PDU, except that VarBinds requesting a NEW_INDEX or ANY_INDEX value are generated with an appropriate value. See "Registering Stuff" for more information on how subagents should perform index allocations. 7.1.4 Processing the agentx-IndexDeallocate-PDU When the master agent receives an agentx-IndexDeallocate-PDU, it performs the common processing described in 7.1. If as a result res.error is `noAgentXError', processing continues as follows: 1) Each VarBind in the VarBindList is processed until either all are successful, or one fails. If any VarBind fails, the agentx- Response-PDU is sent in reply, containing the original VarBindList, with res.index set to indicate the failed VarBind, and with res.error set as described subsequently. All other VarBinds are ignored; no index values are released. VarBinds are processed as follows: - v.name is the name of the index for which a value is to be released - v.type is the syntax of the index object - v.data indicates the specific index value to be released. The NEW_INDEX and ANY_INDEX bits are ignored. a) If the index value for the named index is not currently allocated to this session, the VarBind fails and res.error is set to `indexNotAllocated'. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 47] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 5) If all VarBinds are processed successfully, res.error is set to `noAgentXError' and the agentx-Response-PDU is sent. A VarBindList is included which is identical to the one sent in the agentx-IndexDeallocate-PDU. All released index values are now available, and may be used in response to subsequent allocation requests for ANY_INDEX values for the particular index. 7.1.5. Processing the agentx-Register-PDU When the master agent receives an agentx-Register-PDU, it performs the common processing described in 7.1. If as a result res.error is `noAgentXError', processing continues as follows: If any of the union of subtrees defined by this MIB region is exactly the same as any subtree defined by a MIB region currently registered within the indicated context, those subtrees are termed "duplicate subtrees". If any of the union of subtrees defined by this MIB region overlaps, or is itself overlapped by, any subtree defined by a MIB region currently registered within the indicated context, those subtrees are termed "overlapping subtrees". 1) If this registration would result in duplicate subtrees registered with the same value of r.priority, the request fails and an agentx-Response-PDU is returned with res.error set to `duplicateRegistration'. 2) Otherwise, if the master agent does not wish to permit this registration for implementation-specific reasons, the request fails and an agentx-Response-PDU is returned with res.error set to `requestDenied'. 3) Otherwise, the agentx-Response-PDU is returned with res.error set to `noAgentXError'. The master agent adds this MIB region to its registration data store for the indicated context, to be considered during the dispatching phase for subsequently received SNMP protocol messages. 7.1.5.1. Handling Duplicate and Overlapping Subtrees As a result of this registration algorithm there are likely to be duplicate and/or overlapping subtrees within the registration data store of the master agent. Whenever the master agent's dispatching algorithm (see 7.2.1, Dispatching AgentX PDUs) determines that there are multiple subtrees that could potentially contain the same MIB object instances, the master agent selects one to use, termed the 'authoritative region', as follows: 1) Choose the one whose original agentx-Register-PDU r.subtree contained the most subids, i.e., the most specific r.subtree. Note: The presence or absence of a range subid has no bearing on how "specific" one object identifier is compared to another. 2) If still ambiguous, there were duplicate subtrees. Choose the one whose original agentx-Register-PDU specified the smaller value of r.priority. 7.1.5.2 Registering Stuff This section describes more fully how AgentX subagents use the agentx-IndexAllocate-PDU and agentx-Register-PDU to achieve desired configurations. 7.1.5.2.1 Registration Priority The r.priority field in the agentx-Register-PDU is intended to be manipulated by human administrators to achieve a desired subagent configuration. Typically this would be needed where a legacy application registers a specific subtree, and a different (configurable) application may need to become authoratative for the identical subtree. The result of this configuration (the same subtree registered on different sessions with different priorities) is that the session using the better priority (7.1.5.1) will be authoratative. The other session will simply never be dispatched to. This is useful in the case described above, but is NOT useful in other cases, particularly when subagents share tables indexed by arbitrary values (see below). In general, subagents should register using the default priority (127). 7.1.5.2.2 Index Allocation Index allocation is a service provided by an AgentX master agent. It provides generic support for sharing MIB conceptual tables among subagents who are assumed to have no knowledge of each other. The master agent maintains a database of index objects (OIDs), and, for each index, the values that have been allocated for it. It is unaware of what MIB variables (if any) the index objects represent. By convention, subagents use the MIB variable listed in the INDEX clause as the index object for which values must be allocated. For tables indexed by multiple variables, values may be allocated for each index (although this is frequently unnecessary; see example 2 below). The subagent may request allocation of a) a specific index value b) an index value that is not currently allocated c) an index value that has never been allocated The last two alternatives reflect the uniqueness and constancy requirements present in many MIB specifications for arbitrary integer indexes (e.g., ifIndex in the IF MIB (RFC 1573 [11]), snmpFddiSMTIndex in the FDDI MIB (RFC 1285 [12]), or sysApplInstallPkgIndex in the System Application MIB [13]). The need for subagents to share tables using such indexes is the main motivation for index allocation in AgentX. It is important to note that index allocation and MIB region registration are not coupled in the master agent. The current state of index allocations is not considered when processing registration requests, and the current registry is not considered when processing index allocation requests. (This is mainly to accomodate non-AgentX subagents.) AgentX subagents should follow the model of "first request allocation of an index, then register the corresponding region". Then a successful index allocation request gives a subagent a good hint (but no guarantee) of what it should be able to register. The registration may fail (with `duplicateRegistration') because some other subagent session has already registered that row of the table. The recommended mechanism for subagents to register conceptual rows in a shared table is 1) Successfully allocate an index value. 2) Use that value to fully qualify the MIB region(s), and attempt to register using the default priority. 3) If the registration fails with `duplicateRegistration' deallocate the previously allocated index value(s) for this row and go to step 1). Note that index allocation is necessary only when the index in question is an arbitrary value, and hence the subagent has no other reasonable way to determine which index values to use. When index values have intrinsic meaning it is not expected that subagents will allocate their index values. For example, RFC 1514's table of running software processes (hrSWRunTable) is indexed by the system's native process identifier (pid). A subagent implementing the row of hrSWRunTable corresponding to its own process would simply register the region defining that row's object instances without allocating index values. 7.1.5.2.3 Examples Example 1: A subagent implements an interface, and wishes to register a single row of the RFC 1573 ifTable. It requests an allocation for the index object "ifIndex", for a value that has never been allocated (since ifIndex values must be unique). The master agent returns the value "7". The subagent now attempts to register row 7 of ifTable, by specifying a MIB region in the agentx-Register-PDU of 1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.[1-22].7. If the registration succeeds, no further processing is required. The master agent will dispatch to this subagent correctly. If the registration failed with `duplicateRegistration', the subagent should request allocation of a new index i, and attempt to register ifTable.[1-22].i, until successful. Example 2: This same subagent wishes to register ipNetToMediaTable rows corresponding to its interface (ifIndex i). Due to the structure of this table, no further index allocation need be done. The subagent can register the MIB region ipNetToMediaTable.[1-4].i, It is claiming responsibility for all rows of the table whose value of ipNetToMediaIfIndex is i. Example 3: A network device consists of a set of processors, each of which accepts network connections for a unique set of IP addresses. Further, each processor contains a subagent that implements tcpConnTable. In order to represent tcpConnTable for the entire managed device, the subagents need to share tcpConnTable. In this case, no index allocation need be done at all. Each subagent can register a MIB region of tcpConnTable.[1-5].a.b.c.d, where a.b.c.d represents an unique IP address of the individual processor. Each subagent is claiming responsibility for the region of tcpConnTable where the value of tcpConnLocalAddress is a.b.c.d. << FIX ME: examples from applmib refer to an i-d. >> Example 4: The Application Management MIB [APPL-MIB] uses two objects to index several tables. A partial description of them is: applSrvIndex OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Unsigned32 (1..'ffffffff'h) MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "An applSrvIndex is the system-unique identifier of an instance of a service. The value is unique not only across all instances of a given service, but also across all services in a system. applSrvName OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX SnmpAdminString MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS current DESCRIPTION "The human-readable name of a service. Where appropriate, as in the case where a service can be identified in terms of a single protocol, the strings should be established names such as those assigned by IANA and found in STD 2 [13], or defined by some other authority. In some cases private conventions apply and the string should in these cases be consistent with these non-standard conventions. An applicability statement may specify the service name(s) to be used. Since applSrvIndex is an arbitrary value, it would be reasonable for subagents to allocate values for this index. applSrvName however has intrinsic meaning and any values a subagent would use should be known a priori, hence it is not reasonable for subagents to allocate values of this index. 7.1.6. Processing the agentx-Unregister-PDU When the master agent receives an agentx-Unregister-PDU, it performs the common processing described in 7.1. If as a result res.error is `noAgentXError', processing continues as follows: 1) If u.subtree, u.priority, u.range_subid (and if u.range_subid is not 0, u.upper_bound), and the indicated context do not match an existing registration made during this session, the agentx- Response-PDU is returned with res.error set to `unknownRegistration'. 2) Otherwise, the agentx-Response-PDU is sent in reply with res.error set to `noAgentXError', and the previous registration is removed from the registration data store. 7.1.7. Processing the agentx-AddAgentCaps-PDU When the master agent receives an agentx-AddagentCaps-PDU, it performs the common processing described in 7.1. If as a result res.error is `noAgentXError', processing continues as follows: 1) The master agent adds this agent capabilities information to the sysORTable for the indicated context. An agentx-Response-PDU is sent in reply with res.error set to `noAgentXError'. 7.1.8. Processing the agentx-RemoveAgentCaps-PDU When the master agent receives an agentx-RemoveAgentCaps-PDU, it performs the common processing described in 7.1. If as a result res.error is `noAgentXError', processing continues as follows: 1) If the combination of a.id and the optional a.context does not represent a sysORTable entry that was added by this subagent during this session, the agentx-Response-PDU is returned with res.error set to `unknownAgentCaps'. 2) Otherwise the master agent deletes the corresponding sysORTable entry and sends in reply the agentx-Response-PDU, with res.error set to `noAgentXError'. 7.1.9. Processing the agentx-Close-PDU When the master agent receives an agentx-Close-PDU, it performs the common processing described in 7.1, with the exception that step 4) is not performed since the agentx-Close-PDU does may not contain a context field. If as a result res.error is `noAgentXError', processing continues as follows: 1) The master agent closes the AgentX session as described below, and sends in reply the agentx-Response-PDU with res.error set to `noAgentXError': - All MIB regions that have been registered during this session are unregistered, as described in 7.1.6. - All index values allocated during this session are freed, as described in section 7.1.4. - All sysORID values that were registered during this session are removed, as described in section 7.1.8. The master agent does not maintain state for closed sessions. If a subagent wishes to re-establish a session after it has been closed, it needs to re-register MIB regions, agent capabilities, etc. 7.1.10. Detecting Connection Loss If a master agent is able to detect (from the underlying transport) that a subagent cannot receive AgentX PDUs, it should close all affected AgentX sessions as described in 7.1.9, step 1). 7.1.11. Processing the agentx-Notify-PDU A subagent sending SNMPv1 trap information must map this into (minimally) a value of snmpTrapOID.0, as described in 3.1.2 of RFC 1908 [8]. When the master agent receives an agentx-Notify-PDU, it performs the common processing described in 7.1. If as a result res.error is `noAgentXError', processing continues as follows: 1) Each VarBind in the VarBindList is processed until either all are successful, or one fails. If any VarBind fails, the agentx- Response-PDU is sent in reply containing the original VarBindList, with res.index set to indicate the failed VarBind, and with res.error set as described subsequently. All other VarBinds are ignored; no index values are allocated. 1) If the first VarBind is sysUpTime.0; (a) if the second VarBind is not snmpTrapOID.0, res.error is set to `processingError' and res.index to 2 (b) otherwise these two VarBinds are used as the first two VarBinds within the generated notification. 2) If the first VarBind is not sysUpTime.0; (a) if the first VarBind is not snmpTrapOID.0, res.error is set to `processingError' and res.index to 1 (b) otherwise this VarBinds is used for snmpTrapOID.0 within the generated notification, and the master agent uses the current value of sysUpTime.0 for the indicated context as sysUpTime.0 within the notification. 3) An agentx-Response-PDU is sent containing the original VarBindList, and with res.error and res.index set as described above. If res.error is `noAgentXError', notifications are sent according to the implementation-specific configuration of the master agent. If SNMPv1 Trap PDUs are generated, the recommended mapping is as described in RFC 2089 [9]. If res.error indicates an error in processing, no notifications are generated. Note that the master agent's successful response indicates the agentx-Notify-PDU was received and validated. It does not indicate that any particular notifications were actually generated or received by notification targets. << FIX ME: Is 2089 correct reference now? >> 7.1.12. Processing the agentx-Ping-PDU When the master agent receives an agentx-Ping-PDU, it performs the common processing described in 7.1. If a subagent does not receive a response to its pings, or if it is able to detect (from the underlying transport) that the master agent is not able to receive AgentX messages, then it eventually must initiate a new AgentX session, re-register its MIB regions, etc. 7.2. Processing Received SNMP Protocol Messages When an SNMP GetRequest, GetNextRequest, GetBulkRequest, or SetRequest protocol message is received by the master agent, the master agent applies its access control policy. In particular, for SNMPv1 or SNMPv2c PDUs, the master agent applies the Elements of Procedure defined in section 4.1 of RFC 1157 [6] that apply to receiving entities. (For other versions of SNMP, the master agent applies the access control policy defined in the Elements of Procedure for those versions.) Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 54] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 In the SNMPv1 or v2c frameworks, the master agent uses the community string as an index into a local repository of configuration information that may include community profiles or more complex context information. If application of the access control policy results in a valid SNMP request PDU, then an SNMP Response-PDU is constructed from information gathered in the exchange of AgentX PDUs between the master agent and one or more subagents. Upon receipt and initial validation of an SNMP request PDU, a master agent uses the procedures described below to dispatch AgentX PDUs to the proper subagents, marshal the subagent responses, and construct an SNMP response PDU. << FIX ME: Do we want to mention SNMPv3? >> 7.2.1. Dispatching AgentX PDUs Upon receipt and initial validation of an SNMP request PDU, a master agent uses the procedures described below to dispatch AgentX PDUs to the proper subagents. General Rules of Procedure While processing a particular SNMP request, the master agent may send one or more AgentX PDUs on one or more subagent sessions. The following rules of procedure apply in general to the AgentX master agent. PDU-specific rules are listed in the applicable sections. 1) Honoring the registry Because AgentX supports registration of duplicate and overlapping regions, it is possible for the master agent to obtain a value for a requested varbind from within multiple registered MIB regions. The master agent must ensure that the value (or exception) actually returned in the SNMP response PDU is taken from the authoritative region (as defined in section 7.1.5.1). Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 55] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 2) GetNext and GetBulk Processing The master agent may choose to send agentx-Get-PDUs while servicing an SNMP GetNextRequest-PDU. The master agent may choose to send agentx-Get-PDUs or agentx-GetNext-PDUs while servicing an SNMP GetBulkRequest-PDU. One possible reason for this would be if the current iteration has targeted instance-level registrations. The master agent may choose to "scope" the possible instances returned by a subagent by specifying an ending OID in the SearchRange. If such scoping is used, typically the ending OID would be the first lexicographical successor to the target region that was registered on a session other than the target session. Regardless of this choice, rule (1) must be obeyed. The master agent may require multiple request-response iterations on the same subagent session, to determine the final value of all requested variables. All AgentX PDUs sent on the session while processing a given SNMP request must contain identical values of transactionID. Each different SNMP request processed by the master agent must present a unique value of transactionID (within the limits of the 32-bit field) to the session. 3) Number and order of variables sent per AgentX PDU For Get/GetNext/GetBulk operations, at any stage of the possibly iterative process, the master agent may need to dispatch several SearchRanges to a particular subagent session. The master agent may send one, some, or all of the SearchRanges in a single AgentX PDU. The master agent must ensure that the correct contents and ordering of the VarBindList in the SNMP Response-PDU are maintained. The following rules govern the number of VarBinds in a given AgentX PDU: a) The subagent must support processing of AgentX PDUs with multiple VarBinds. b) When processing an SNMP Set request, the master agent must send all of the VarBinds applicable to a particular subagent session in a single agentx-TestSet-PDU. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 56] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 c) When processing an SNMP Get, GetNext, or GetBulk request, the master agent may send a single AgentX PDU on the session with all applicable VarBinds, or multiple PDUs with single VarBinds, or something in between those extremes. The determination of which method to use in a particular case is implementation-specific. 4) Timeout Values The master agent chooses a timeout value for each MIB region being queried, which is a) the value specified during registration of the MIB region, if it was non-zero b) otherwise, the value specified during establishment of the session in which this region was subsequently registered, if that value was non-zero c) otherwise, the master agent's implementaton-specific default value When an AgentX PDU that references multiple MIB regions is dispatched, the timeout value used for the PDU is the maximum value of the timeouts so determined for each of the referenced MIB regions. 5) Context If the master agent has determined that a specific non-default context is associated with the SNMP request PDU, that context is encoded into the AgentX PDU's context field and the NON_DEFAULT_CONTEXT bit is set in h.flags. Otherwise, no context Octet String is added to the PDU, and the NON_DEFAULT_CONTEXT bit is cleared. 7.2.1.1. agentx-Get-PDU Each variable binding in the SNMP request PDU is processed as follows: (1) Identify the target MIB region. Within a lexicographically ordered set of registered MIB regions, valid for the indicated context, locate the authoritative region (according to 7.1.5.1) that contains the binding's name. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 57] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 (2) If no such region exists, the variable binding is not processed further, and its value is set to `noSuchObject'. (3) Identify the subagent session in which this region was registered, termed the target session. (4) If this is the first variable binding to be dispatched over the target session in a request-response exchange entailed in the processing of this management request: - Create an agentx-Get-PDU for this session, with the header fields initialized as described above (see 6.1 AgentX PDU Header). (5) Add a SearchRange to the end of the target session's PDU for this variable binding. - The variable binding's name is encoded into the starting OID. - The ending OID is encoded as null. 7.2.1.2. agentx-GetNext-PDU Each variable binding in the SNMP request PDU is processed as follows: (1) Identify the target MIB region. Within a lexicographically ordered set of registered MIB regions, valid for the indicated context, locate the authoritative region (according to 7.1.5.1) that a) contains the variable binding's name and is not a fully qualified instance, or b) is the first lexicographical successor to the variable binding's name. (2) If no such region exists, the variable binding is not processed further, and its value is set to `endOfMibView'. (3) Identify the subagent session in which this region was registered, termed the target session. (4) If this is the first variable binding to be dispatched over the target session in a request-response exchange entailed in the processing of this management request: Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 58] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 - Create an agentx-GetNext-PDU for the session, with the header fields initialized as described above (see 6.1 AgentX PDU Header). (5) Add a SearchRange to the end of the target session's agentx-GetNext-PDU for this variable binding. - if (1a) applies, the variable binding's name is encoded into the starting OID, and the OID's "include" field is set to 0. - if (1b) applies, the target region's r.subtree is encoded into the starting OID, and its "include" field is set to 1. (This is the recommended method. An implementation may choose to use a Starting OID value that preceeds r.subtree, in which case the include bit must be 0. A starting OID value that succeeds r.subtree is not permitted.) - the Ending OID for the SearchRange is encoded to be either NULL, or a value that lexicographically succeeds the Starting OID. This is an implementation-specific choice depending on how the master agent wishes to "scope" the possible returned instances. 7.2.1.3. agentx-GetBulk-PDU (Note: The outline of the following procedure is based closely on section 4.2.3, "The GetBulkRequest-PDU" of RFC 1905 [4]. Please refer to it for details on the format of the SNMP GetBulkRequest-PDU itself.) Each variable binding in the request PDU is processed as follows: (1) Identify the authoritative target region and target session, exactly as described for the agentx-GetNext-PDU (see 7.2.1.2). (2) If this is the first variable binding to be dispatched over the target session in a request-response exchange entailed in the processing of this management request: - Create an agentx-GetBulk-PDU for the session, with the header fields initialized as described above (see 6.1 AgentX PDU Header). (3) Add a SearchRange to the end of the target session's agentx-GetBulk-PDU for this variable binding, as described for the agentx-GetNext-PDU. If the variable binding was a non- repeater in the original request PDU, it must be a non-repeater in the agentx-GetBulk-PDU. The value of g.max_repetitions in the agentx-GetBulk-PDU may be less than (but not greater than) the value in the original request PDU. The master agent may make such alterations due to simple sanity checking, optimizations for the current iteration based on the registry, the maximum possible size of a potential Response-PDU, known constraints of the AgentX transport, or any other implementation-specific constraint. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 59] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 7.2.1.4. agentx-TestSet-PDU AgentX employs test-commit-undo-cleanup phases to achieve "as if simultaneous" semantics of the SNMP SetRequest-PDU within the extensible agent. The initial phase involves the agentx-TestSet-PDU. Each variable binding in the SNMP request PDU is processed in order, as follows: (1) Identify the target MIB region and target session exactly as described in 7.2.1.1 step 1). Within a lexicographically ordered set of OID ranges, valid for the indicated context, locate the authoritative range that contains the variable binding's name. (2) If no such target region exists, this variable binding fails with an error of `notWritable'. Processing is complete for this request. (3) If this is the first variable binding to be dispatched over the target session in a request-response exchange entailed in the processing of this management request: - create an agentx-TestSet-PDU for the session, with the header fields initialized as described above (see 6.1 AgentX PDU Header). (4) Add a VarBind to the end of the target session's PDU for this variable binding, as described in section 5.4. Note that all VarBinds applicable to a given session must be sent in a single agentx-TestSet-PDU. 7.2.1.5. Dispatch A timeout value is calculated for each PDU to be sent, which is the maximum value of the timeouts determined for each of the PDU's SearchRanges (as described above in 7.2.1 Dispatching AgentX PDUs, item 4). Each pending PDU is mapped (via its h.sessionID value) to a particular transport domain/endpoint, as described in section 8 (Transport Mappings). Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 60] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 7.2.2 Subagent Processing A subagent initially processes a received AgentX PDU as follows: - If the received PDU is an agentx-Response-PDU: 1) If there are any errors parsing or interpreting the PDU, it is silently dropped. 2) Otherwise the response is matched to the original request via h.packetID, and handled in an implementation-specific manner. For example, if this response indicates an error attempting to register a MIB region, the subagent may wish to register a different region, or log an error and halt, etc. - If the received PDU is any other type: 3) an agentx-Response-PDU is created whose header fields are identical to the received request PDU except that h.type is set to Response, res.error to `noError', res.index to 0, and the VarBindList to null. 4) If the received PDU cannot be parsed, res.error is set to `parseError'. 5) Otherwise, if h.sessionID does not correspond to a currently established session, res.error is set to `notOpen'. 6) At this point, if res.error is not `noAgentXError', the received PDU is not processed further. If the received PDU's header was successfully parsed, the AgentX-Response-PDU is sent in reply. If the received PDU's header was not successfully parsed or for some other reason the subagent cannot send a reply, processing is complete. 7.2.3 Subagent Processing of agentx-Get, GetNext, GetBulk-PDUs A conformant AgentX subagent must support the agentx-Get, -GetNext, and -GetBulk PDUs, and must support multiple variables being supplied in each PDU. When a subagent receives an agentx-Get-, GetNext-, or GetBulk-PDU, it performs the indicated management operations and returns an agentx- Response-PDU. Each SearchRange in the request PDU's SearchRangeList is processed as described below, and a VarBind is added in the corresponding location of the agentx-Response-PDU's VarbindList. If processing should fail for any reason not described below, res.error is set to `genErr', res.index to the index of the failed SearchRange, the VarBindList is reset to null, and this agentx-Response-PDU is returned to the master agent. 7.2.3.1. Subagent Processing of the agentx-Get-PDU Upon the subagent's receipt of an agentx-Get-PDU, each SearchRange in the request is processed as follows: (1) The starting OID is copied to v.name. (2) If the starting OID exactly matches the name of a variable instantiated by this subagent within the indicated context and session, v.type and v.data are encoded to represent the variable's syntax and value, as described in section 5.4, Value Representation. (3) Otherwise, if the starting OID does not match the object identifier prefix of any variable instantiated within the indicated context and session, the VarBind is set to `noSuchObject', in the manner described in section 5.4, Value Representation. (4) Otherwise, the VarBind is set to `noSuchInstance' in the manner described in section 5.4, Value Representation. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 61] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 7.2.3.2. Subagent Processing of the agentx-GetNext-PDU Upon the subagent's receipt of an agentx-GetNext-PDU, each SearchRange in the request is processed as follows: (1) The subagent searches for a variable within the lexicographically ordered list of variable names for all variables it instantiates (without regard to registration of regions) within the indicated context and session, as follows: - if the "include" field of the starting OID is 0, the variable's name is the closest lexicographical successor to the starting OID. - if the "include" field of the starting OID is 1, the variable's name is either equal to, or the closest lexicographical successor to, the starting OID. - If the ending OID is not null, the variable's name lexicographically precedes the ending OID. If a variable is successfully located, v.name is set to that variable's name. v.type and v.data are encoded to represent the variable's syntax and value, as described in section 5.4, Value Representation. (2) If the subagent cannot locate an appropriate variable, v.name is set to the starting OID, and the VarBind is set to `endOfMibView', in the manner described in section 5.4, Value Representation. 7.2.3.3. Subagent Processing of the agentx-GetBulk-PDU A maximum of N + (M * R) VarBinds are returned, where N equals g.non_repeaters, M equals g.max_repetitions, and R is (number of SearchRanges in the GetBulk request) - N. The first N SearchRanges are processed exactly as for the agentx- GetNext-PDU. If M and R are both non-zero, the remaining R SearchRanges are processed iteratively to produce potentially many VarBinds. For each iteration i, such that i is greater than zero and less than or equal to M, and for each repeated SearchRange s, such that s is greater than zero and less than or equal to R, the (N+((i-1)*R)+s)-th VarBind is added to the agentx-Response-PDU as follows: Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 62] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 1) The subagent searches for a variable within the lexicographically ordered list of variable names for all variables it instantiates (without regard to registration of regions) within the indicated context and session, for which the following are all true: - The variable's name is the (i)-th lexicographical successor to the (N+s)-th requested OID. (Note that if i is 0 and the "include" field is 1, the variable's name may be equivalent to, or the first lexicographical successor to, the (N+s)-th requested OID.) - If the ending OID is not null, the variable's name lexicographically precedes the ending OID. If all of these conditions are met, v.name is set to the located variable's name. v.type and v.data are encoded to represent the variable's syntax and value, as described in section 5.4, Value Representation. 2) If no such variable exists, the VarBind is set to `endOfMibView' as described in section 5.4, Value Representation. v.name is set to v.name of the (N+((i- 2)*R)+s)-th VarBind unless i is currently 1, in which case it is set to the value of the starting OID in the (N+s)-th SearchRange. Note that further iterative processing should stop if - For any iteration i, all s values of v.type are `endOfMibView'. - An AgentX transport constraint or other implementation-specific constraint is reached. 7.2.4. Subagent Processing of agentx-TestSet, -CommitSet, -UndoSet, -CleanupSet-PDUs A conformant AgentX subagent must support the agentx-TestSet, -CommitSet, -UndoSet, and -CleanupSet PDUs, and must support multiple variables being supplied in the agentx-TestSet-PDU. These four PDUs are used to collectively perform the indicated management operation. An agentx-Response-PDU is sent in reply to each of the PDUs (except -CleanupSet), to inform the master agent of the state of the operation. The master agent must serialize Set transactions for each session. That is, a session need not handle multiple concurrent Set transactions. 7.2.4.1. Subagent Processing of the agentx-TestSet-PDU Upon the subagent's receipt of an agentx-TestSet-PDU, each VarBind in the PDU is validated until they are all successful, or until one fails, as described in section 4.2.5 of RFC 1905 [4]. The subagent validates variables with respect to the context and session indicated in the testSet-PDU. If each VarBind is successful, the subagent has a further responsibility to ensure the availability of all resources (memory, write access, etc.) required for successfully carrying out a subsequent agentx-CommitSet operation. If this cannot be guaranteed, the subagent should set res.error to `resourceUnavailable'. As a result of this validation step, an agentx-Response-PDU is sent in reply whose res.error field is set to one of the following (SNMPv2 SMI) values: noError (0), genErr (5), noAccess (6), wrongType (7), wrongLength (8), wrongEncoding (9), wrongValue (10), noCreation (11), inconsistentValue (12), resourceUnavailable (13), notWritable (17), inconsistentName (18) If this value is not `noError', the res.index field must be set to the index of the VarBind for which validation failed. Implementation of rigorous validation code may be one of the most demanding aspects of subagent development. Implementors are strongly encouraged to do this right, so as to avoid if at all possible the extensible agent's having to return `commitFailed' or `undoFailed' during subsequent processing. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 64] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 7.2.4.2. Subagent Processing of the agentx-CommitSet-PDU The agentx-CommitSet-PDU indicates that the subagent should actually perform (as described in the post-validation sections of 4.2.5 of RFC 1905 [4]) the management operation indicated by the previous TestSet-PDU. After carrying out the management operation, the subagent sends in reply an agentx-Response-PDU whose res.error field is set to one of the following (SNMPv2 SMI) values: noError (0), commitFailed (14) If this value is `commitFailed', the res.index field must be set to the index of the VarBind for which the operation failed. Otherwise res.index is set to 0. 7.2.4.3. Subagent Processing of the agentx-UndoSet-PDU The agentx-UndoSet-PDU indicates that the subagent should undo the management operation requested in a preceding CommitSet-PDU. The undo process is as described in section 4.2.5 of RFC 1905 [4]. After carrying out the undo process, the subagent sends in reply an agentx-Response-PDU whose res.index field is set to 0, and whose res.error field is set to one of the following (SNMPv2 SMI) values: noError (0), undoFailed (15) If this value is `undoFailed', the res.index field must be set to the index of the VarBind for which the operation failed. Otherwise res.index is set to 0. This PDU also signals the end of processing of the management operation initiated by the previous TestSet-PDU. The subagent should release resources, etc. as described in section 7.2.3.4. 7.2.4.4. Subagent Processing of the agentx-CleanupSet-PDU The agentx-CleanupSet-PDU signals the end of processing of the management operation requested in the previous TestSet-PDU. This is an indication to the subagent that it may now release any resources it may have reserved in order to carry out the management request. No response is sent by the subagent. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 65] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 7.2.5. Master Agent Processing of AgentX Responses The master agent now marshals all subagent AgentX response PDUs and builds an SNMP response PDU. In the next several subsections, the initial processing of all subagent AgentX response PDUs is described, followed by descriptions of subsequent processing for each specific subagent Response. 7.2.5.1. Common Processing of All AgentX Response PDUs 1) If a response is not received on a session within the timeout interval for this dispatch, it is treated as if the subagent had returned `genErr' and processed as described below. A timeout may be due to a variety of reasons, and does not necessarily denote a failed or malfunctioning subagent. As such, the master agent's response to a subagent timeout is implementation-specific, but with the following constraint: A session that times out on three consecutive AgentX requests is considered unable to respond, and the master agent must close the AgentX session as described in 7.1.9, step (2). 2) Otherwise, the h.packetID, h.sessionID, and h.transactionID fields of the AgentX response PDU are used to correlate subagent responses. If the response does not pertain to this SNMP operation, it is ignored. 3) Otherwise, the responses are processed jointly to form the SNMP response PDU. 7.2.5.2. Processing of Responses to agentx-Get-PDUs After common processing of the subagent's response to an agentx-Get- PDU (see 7.2.4.1 above), processing continues with the following steps: 1) For any received AgentX response PDU, if res.error is not `noError', the SNMP response PDU's error code is set to this value, and its error index to the index of the variable binding corresponding to the failed VarBind in the subagent's AgentX response PDU. All other AgentX response PDUs received due to processing this SNMP request are ignored. Processing is complete; the SNMP Response PDU is ready to be sent (see section 7.2.5, Sending the SNMP Response-PDU). Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 66] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 2) Otherwise, the content of each VarBind in the AgentX response PDU is used to update the corresponding variable binding in the SNMP Response-PDU. 7.2.5.3. Processing of Responses to agentx-GetNext-PDU and agentx-GetBulk-PDU After common processing of the subagent's response to an agentx- GetNext-PDU or agentx-GetBulk-PDU (see 7.2.4.1 above), processing continues with the following steps: 1) For any received AgentX response PDU, if res.error is not `noError', the SNMP response PDU's error code is set to this value, and its error index to the index of the VarBind corresponding to the failed VarBind in the subagent's AgentX response PDU. All other AgentX response PDUs received due to processing this SNMP request are ignored. Processing is complete; the SNMP response PDU is ready to be sent (see section 7.2.5, Sending the SNMP Response PDU). 2) Otherwise, the content of each VarBind in the AgentX response PDU is used to update the corresponding VarBind in the SNMP response PDU. After all expected AgentX response PDUs have been processed, if any VarBinds still contain the value `endOfMibView' in their v.type fields, processing must continue: 3) A new iteration of AgentX request dispatching is initiated (as described in section 7.2.1.2), in which only those VarBinds whose v.type is `endOfMibView' are processed. 4) For each such VarBind, an authoratative target MIB region is identified in which the master agent expects to find suitable MIB variables. The target session is the one on which this new target region was registered. The starting OID in each SearchRange is set to the value of v.name for the corresponding VarBind, and its "include" field is set to 0. 5) The value of transactionID must be identical to the value used during the previous iteration. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 67] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 6) The AgentX PDUs are sent on the target session(s), and the responses are received and processed according to the steps described in section 7.2.4. 7) This process continues iteratively until a complete SNMP Response-PDU has been built, or until there remain no authoratative MIB regions to query. Note that r.subtree for the new target region identified in step 4) may not lexicographically succeed r.subtree for the region that has returned `endOfMibView'. For example, consider the following registry: session A `mib-2' (1.3.6.1.2.1) session B `ip' (1.3.6.1.2.1.4) session C `tcp' (1.3.6.1.2.1.6) If while processing a GetNext-Request-PDU session B returns `endOfMibView' for a variable name within 1.3.6.1.2.1.4, the target MIB region identified in step 4) would be 1.3.6.1.2.1 (since it may contain variables whose names preceed 1.3.6.1.2.1.6). Note also that if session A returned variables from within 1.3.6.1.2.1.6, they must be discarded since session A is NOT authoratative for that region. 7.2.5.4. Processing of Responses to agentx-TestSet-PDUs After common processing of the subagent's response to an agentx- TestSet-PDU (see 7.2.4.1 above), processing continues with the further exchange of AgentX PDUs. The value of h.transactionID in the agentx-CommitSet, -UndoSet, and -CleanupSet-PDUs must be identical to the value sent in the testSet-PDU. The state transitions and PDU sequences are depicted in section 7.3. The set of all sessions who have been sent an agentx-TestSet-PDU for this particular transaction are referred to below as "involved sessions". 1) If any target session's response is not `noError', all other agentx-Response-PDUs received due to processing this SNMP request are ignored. An agentx-CleanupSet-PDU is sent to all involved sessions. Processing is complete; the SNMP response PDU is constructed as described below in 7.2.4.6. 2) Otherwise an agentx-CommitSet-PDU is sent to all involved sessions. 7.2.5.5. Processing of Responses to agentx-CommitSet-PDUs After common processing of the subagent's response to an agentx- CommitSet-PDU (see 7.2.4.1 above), processing continues with the following steps: 1) If any response is not `noError', all other agentx-Response-PDUs received due to processing this SNMP request are ignored. An agentx-UndoSet-PDU is sent to each target session that has been sent an agentx-CommitSet-PDU. An agentx-CleanupSet-PDU is sent to the remainder of the involved sessions. 2) Otherwise an agentx-CleanupSet-PDU is sent to all involved sessions. Processing is complete; the SNMP response PDU is constructed as described below in 7.2.4.6. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 68] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 7.2.5.6. Processing of Responses to agentx-UndoSet-PDUs After common processing of the subagent's response to an agentx- UndoSet-PDU (see 7.2.4.1 above), processing continues with the following steps: 1) If any response is not `noError' the SNMP response PDU's error code is set to this value, and its error index to the index of the VarBind corresponding to the failed VarBind in the agentx-TestSet-PDU. Otherwise the SNMP response PDU's error code is set to `noError' and its error index to 0. 7.2.6. Sending the SNMP Response-PDU Once the processing described in sections 7.2.1 - 7.2.4 is complete, there is an SNMP response PDU available. The master agent now implements the Elements of Procedure for the applicable version of the SNMP protocol in order to encapsulate the PDU into a message, and transmit it to the originator of the SNMP management request. Note that this may involve altering the PDU contents (for instance, to replace the original VarBinds if an error condition is to be returned). The response PDU may also be altered in order to support the SNMP version 1 framework. In such cases the required mapping is that defined in RFC 2089 [9]. (Note in particular that the rules for handling Counter64 syntax may require re-sending AgentX GetBulk or GetNext PDUs until a VarBind of suitable syntax is returned.) << FIX ME: 2089 still correct?>> 7.2.7. MIB Views AgentX subagents are not aware of MIB views, since view information is not contained in AgentX PDUs. As stated above, the descriptions of procedures in section 7 of this memo are not intended to constrain the internal architecture of any conformant implementation. In particular, the master agent procedures described in sections 7.2.1 and 7.2.4 may be altered so as to optimize AgentX exchanges when implementing MIB views. Such optimizations are beyond the scope of this memo. But note that section 7.2.3 defines subagent behavior in such a way that alteration of SearchRanges may be used in such optimizations. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 69] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 7.3. State Transitions State diagrams are presented from the master agent's perspective for transport connection and session establishment, and from the subagent's perspective for Set transaction processing. 7.3.1. Set Transaction States The following table presents, from the subagent's perspective, the state transitions involved in Set transaction processing: STATE +----------------+--------------+---------+--------+-------- | A | B | C | D | E | (Initial | TestOK | Commit | Test | Commit | State) | | OK | Fail | Fail | | | | | EVENT | | | | | ---------+----------------+--------------+---------+--------+-------- | 7.2.3.1 | | | | Receive | All varbinds | | | | TestSet | OK? | X | X | X | X PDU | Yes ->B | | | | | No ->D | | | | ---------+----------------+--------------+---------+--------+-------- | | 7.2.3.2 | | | Receive | | NoError? | | | Commit- | X | Yes ->C | X | X | X Set PDU | | No ->E | | | ---------+----------------+--------------+---------+--------+-------- Receive | | | 7.2.3.3 | |7.2.4.5 UndoSet | X | X | ->done | X | ->done PDU | | | | | ---------+----------------+--------------+---------+--------+-------- Receive | | 7.2.4.4 | 7.2.3.4 |7.2.4.4 | Cleanup- | X | ->done | ->done | ->done | X Set PDU | | | | | ---------+----------------+--------------+---------+--------+-------- Session | | rollback | undo | | Loss | ->done | ->done | ->done | ->done | ->done ---------+----------------+--------------+---------+--------+-------- There are three possible sequences that a subagent may follow for a particular set transaction: 1) TestSet CommitSet CleanupSet 2) TestSet CommitSet UndoSet 3) TestSet CleanupSet Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 70] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 Note that a single PDU sequence may result in multiple paths through the finite state machine (FSM). For example, the sequence TestSet CommitSet UndoSet may walk through either of these two state sequences: (initial) TestOK CommitOK (done) (initial) TestOK CommitFail (done) 7.3.2 Transport Connection States The following table presents, from the master agent's perspective, the state transitions involved in transport connection setup and teardown: Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 71] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 STATE +--------------+-------------- | A | B | No transport | Transport | | connected | | EVENT | | ----------------+--------------+-------------- Transport | | connect | ->B | X indication | | ----------------+--------------+-------------- Receive | | if no resources Open-PDU | | available | | reject, else | X | establish | | session | | | | ->B ----------------+--------------+-------------- Receive | | if matching Response-PDU | | session id, | | feed to that | X | session's FSM | | else ignore | | | | ->B ----------------+--------------+-------------- Receive other | | if matching PDUs | | session id, | | feed to that | X | session's FSM | | else reject | | | | ->B ----------------+--------------+-------------- Transport | |notify all disconnect | |sessions on indication | X |this transport | | | | ->A ----------------+--------------+-------------- Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 72] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 7.3.3 Session States The following table presents, from the master agent's perspective, the state transitions involved in session setup and teardown: STATE +-------------+---------------- | A | B | No session | Session | | established EVENT | | ---------------+-------------+---------------- | 7.1.1 | Receive | | X Open PDU | ->B | ---------------+-------------+---------------- | | 7.1.9 Receive | X | Close PDU | | ->A ---------------+-------------+---------------- Receive | | 7.1.5 Register PDU | X | | | ->B ---------------+-------------+---------------- Receive | | 7.1.6 Unregister | X | PDU | | ->B ---------------+-------------+---------------- Receive | | Get PDU | | GetNext PDU | | GetBulk PDU | X | X TestSet PDU | | CommitSet PDU | | UndoSet PDU | | CleanupSet PDU | | ---------------+-------------+---------------- Receive | | 7.1.11 Notify PDU | X | | | ->B ---------------+-------------+---------------- Receive Ping | | 7.1.12 PDU | X | | | ->B ---------------+-------------+---------------- (continued next page) Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 73] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 ---------------+-------------+---------------- Receive | | 7.1.2 IndexAllocate | X | PDU | | ->B ---------------+-------------+---------------- Receive | | 7.1.4 IndexDeallocate| X | PDU | | ->B ---------------+-------------+---------------- Receive | | 7.1.7 AddAgentxCaps | X | PDU | | ->B ---------------+-------------+---------------- Receive | | 7.1.8 RemoveAgentxCap| X | PDU | | ->B ---------------+-------------+---------------- Receive | | 7.2.4 Response PDU | X | | | ->B ---------------+-------------+---------------- Receive | | Other PDU | X | X ---------------+-------------+---------------- 8. Transport Mappings The same AgentX PDU formats, encodings, and elements of procedure are used regardless of the underlying transport. 8.1. AgentX over TCP 8.1.1. Well-known Values The master agent accepts TCP connection requests for the well-known port 705. Subagents connect to the master agent using this port number. 8.1.2. Operation Once a TCP connection has been established, the AgentX peers use this connection to carry all AgentX PDUs. Multiple AgentX sessions may be established using the same TCP connection. AgentX PDUs are sent within an AgentX session. AgentX peers are responsible for mapping the h.sessionID to a particular TCP connection. The AgentX entity must not "interleave" AgentX PDUs within the TCP byte stream. All the bytes of one PDU must be sent before any bytes of a different PDU. The receiving entity must be prepared for TCP to deliver byte sequences that do not coincide with AgentX PDU boundaries. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 74] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 8.2. AgentX over UNIX-domain Sockets Many (BSD-derived) implementations of the UNIX operating system support the UNIX pathname address family (AF_UNIX) for socket communications. This provides a convenient method of sending and receiving data between processes on the same host. Mapping AgentX to this transport is useful for environments that - wish to guarantee subagents are running on the same managed node as the master agent, and where - sockets provide better performance than TCP or UDP, especially in the presence of heavy network I/O 8.2.1. Well-known Values The master agent creates a well-known UNIX-domain socket endpoint called "/var/agentx/master". (It may create other, implementation- specific endpoints.) This endpoint name uses the character set encoding native to the managed node, and represents a UNIX-domain stream (SOCK_STREAM) socket. 8.2.2. Operation Once a connection has been established, the AgentX peers use this connection to carry all AgentX PDUs. Multiple AgentX sessions may be established using the same connection. AgentX PDUs are sent within an AgentX session. AgentX peers are responsible for mapping the h.sessionID to a particular connection. The AgentX entity must not "interleave" AgentX PDUs within the socket byte stream. All the bytes of one PDU must be sent before any bytes of a different PDU. The receiving entity must be prepared for the socket to deliver byte sequences that do not coincide with AgentX PDU boundaries. 9. Security Considerations This memo defines a protocol between two processing entities, one of which (the master agent) is assumed to perform authentication of received SNMP requests and to control access to management information. The master agent performs these security operations independently of the other processing entity (the subagent). Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 75] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 Security considerations require three questions to be answered: 1. Is a particular subagent allowed to initiate a session with a particular master agent? 2. During an AgentX session, is any SNMP security-related information (for example, community names) passed from the master agent to the subagent? 3. During an AgentX session, what part of the MIB tree is this subagent allowed to register? The answer to the third question is: A subagent can register any subtree (subject to AgentX elements of procedure, section 7.1.5). Currently there is no access control mechanism defined in AgentX. A concern here is that a malicious subagent that registers an unauthorized "sensitive" subtree, could see modification requests to those objects, or by giving its own clever answer to NMS queries, could cause the NMS to do something that leads to information disclosure or other damage. The answer to the second question is: No. Now we can answer the first question. AgentX does not contain a mechanism for authorizing/refusing session initiations. Thus, controlling subagent access to the master agent may only be done at a lower layer (e.g., transport). An AgentX subagent can connect to a master agent using either a network transport mechanism (e.g., TCP), or a "local" mechanism (e.g., shared memory, named pipes). In the case where a local transport mechanism is used and both subagent and master agent are running on the same host, connection authorization can be delegated to the operating system features. The answer to the first security question then becomes: "If and only if the subagent has sufficient privileges, then the operating system will allow the connection". If a network transport is used, currently there is no inherent security. Transport Layer Security or SSL could be used to control subagent connections, but that is beyond the scope of this document. Thus it is recommended that subagents always run on the same host as the master agent and that operating system features be used to ensure that only properly authorized subagents can establish connections to the master agent. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 76] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 10. Acknowledgements The initial development of this memo was heavily influenced by the DPI 2.0 specification RFC 1592 [7]. This document was produced by the IETF Agent Extensibility (AgentX) Working Group, and benefited especially from the contributions of the following working group members: David Battle, Uri Blumenthal, Jeff Case, Maria Greene, Dave Keeney, Harmen van der Linde, Bob Natale, Randy Presuhn, Aleksey Romanov, Don Ryan, and Juergen Schoenwaelder. The AgentX Working Group is chaired by: Bob Natale ACE*COMM Corporation 704 Quince Orchard Road Gaithersburg MD 20878 Phone: +1-301-721-3000 Fax: +1-301-721-3001 EMail: bnatale@acecomm.com 11. Authors' and Editor's Addresses Mike Daniele Digital Equipment Corporation 110 Spit Brook Rd Nashua, NH 03062 Phone: +1-603-881-1423 EMail: daniele@zk3.dec.com Bert Wijnen IBM Professional Services Watsonweg 2 1423 ND Uithoorn The Netherlands Phone: +31-79-322-8316 EMail: wijnen@vnet.ibm.com Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 77] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 Dale Francisco (editor) Cisco Systems 150 Castilian Dr Goleta CA 93117 Phone: +1-805-961-3642 Fax: +1-805-961-3600 EMail: dfrancis@cisco.com 12. References [1] Information processing systems - Open Systems Interconnection - Specification of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1), International Organization for Standardization. International Standard 8824, (December, 1987). [2] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1902, January 1996. [3] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1903, January 1996. [4] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1905, January 1996. [5] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Management Information Base for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1907, January 1996. [6] Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and J. Davin, "Simple Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC 1157, SNMP Research, Performance Systems International, MIT Laboratory for Computer Science, May 1990. [7] Wijnen, B., Carpenter, G., Curran, K., Sehgal, A. and G. Waters, "Simple Network Management Protocol: Distributed Protocol Interface, Version 2.0", RFC 1592, March 1994. [8] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Coexistence between Version 1 and Version 2 of the Internet- standard Network Management Framework", RFC 1908, January 1996. [9] Wijnen, B. and D. Levi, "V2ToV1: Mapping SNMPv2 onto SNMPv1 Within a Bilingual SNMP Agent", RFC 2089, January 1997. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 78] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 [10] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1904, January 1996. [11] McCloghrie, K. and F. Kastenholz, "Evolution of the Interfaces Group of MIB-II", RFC 1573, January 1994. [12] Case, J., "FDDI Management Information Base", RFC 1285, January 1992. [13] Application MIB Working Group, Krupczak, C., and J. Saperia, "Definitions of System-Level Managed Objects for Applications", draft-ietf-applmib-sysapplmib-08.txt, 15 Apr 1997. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 79] RFC 2257 AgentX January 1998 13. Full Copyright Statement Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved. This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than English. The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns. This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Daniele, et. al. Standards Track [Page 80] From mik8849@yahoo.com Fri Jan 29 07:15:47 1999 Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (fw-us-hou-1.bmc.com [198.207.223.250]) by ietf.org (8.8.5/8.8.7a) with ESMTP id HAA25428 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 07:15:47 -0500 (EST) From: mik8849@yahoo.com Received: from dorothy.bmc.com (dorothy.bmc.com [192.146.153.65]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id GAA02564; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 06:12:56 -0600 (CST) Received: from tangelo.bmc.com (root@tangelo.bmc.com [172.17.7.166]) by dorothy.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_12836)/8.8.6) with ESMTP id EAA19360; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 04:10:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from fw-us-hou1.bmc.com (fw-us-hou1.bmc.com [172.17.0.250]) by tangelo.bmc.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/8.8.6) with SMTP id GAA02267; Fri, 29 Jan 1999 06:10:26 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <199901291210.GAA02267@tangelo.bmc.com> Subject: .your web site Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1999 12:35:27 We'll Submit Your Site To Over 900 Search Engines, Directories, & Indices For A "One Time Cost" Of Only $ 39.95 *** 100% Money Back Guarantee *** *** Immediately Increase Your Sites Exposure *** For Less Than 4 Cents Each We Will Submit Your Web Site To Over 900 Of The Net's Hottest Search Engines, Directories & Indices. If your site isn't listed in the Search Engines, how can people find you to buy your products or services? For just $39.95 we'll take the work load off your back instead of you trying to do it manually which can take days to do. We're the professionals that are here to help you have a successful marketing experience with the internet. You know as well as we that your time is best utilized managing your business and not sitting at some keyboard hours upon hours trying to save less than 4 cents for each submission. it's alomst crazy to try to tackle this on your own. It's just not cost effective to try to do this yourself to save just $39.95. See why thousands of businesses from all over the world, both large and small, have come to us to utilize our services. Hotels, Motels, On-Line Stores, Travel Agents, Colleges, Universities, Governments, Fortune 500 companies, Movie Studios, Chambers Of Commerce and many, many more. Shouldn't you give us a call now? To Learn More, Visit Our Web Site By Double Clicking This Link: http://209.160.21.6/RESELLER.ASP?id=2017 Or call toll free in the USA/Canada (800) 771-2003 or outside the USA at (916) 771-4739. PLEASE MENTION AD# 2017 WHEN ORDERING. THANK YOU To be removed from our mailing list, please respond with the word remove in the subject.