From sanjay.wadhwa@alcatel-lucent.com Wed Sep 26 10:43:02 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0032721F85C4 for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:43:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -10.248 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z0ZDeblN+vTs for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:43:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.57]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 196C621F85AD for ; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:43:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.62]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id q8QHgjpu024906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:42:58 +0200 Received: from US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com (135.5.2.49) by FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (135.120.45.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 19:42:55 +0200 Received: from US70UWXCHMBA02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.8.219]) by US70UWXCHHUB02.zam.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.5.2.49]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:42:52 -0400 From: "Wadhwa, Sanjay (Sanjay)" To: "Bitar, Nabil N" , "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" , "draft-ietf-ancp-pon@tools.ietf.org" Thread-Topic: IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon Thread-Index: Ac2Q0fwlpUh+4PDXQVqRVKLyo/3wHgHSxYGAAPwymkA= Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:42:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [135.5.27.16] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B66EE816915EC24DB7CF609C6E73B13C038422US70UWXCHMBA02zam_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.80 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 01 Oct 2012 01:34:45 -0700 Cc: "ancp@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [ANCP] IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:43:02 -0000 --_000_B66EE816915EC24DB7CF609C6E73B13C038422US70UWXCHMBA02zam_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am not aware of any undisclosed related IPR either. Thanks -Sanjay From: Bitar, Nabil N [mailto:nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 6:18 AM To: Bocci, Matthew (Matthew); draft-ietf-ancp-pon@tools.ietf.org Cc: ancp@ietf.org Subject: Re: IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon Hi, I am not aware of any relevant IPR that has not already been disclosed. Thanks, Nabil From: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" > Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 06:32:58 -0400 To: "draft-ietf-ancp-pon@tools.ietf.org" > Cc: "ancp@ietf.org" > Subject: IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon Before forwarding the latest version of this draft back to the IESG, I need= to poll for knowledge of any additional IPR that applies to this drafts, t= o ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see= RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details). If you are listed as a document author or contributor please respond to thi= s email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR that has not alrea= dy been disclosed. This draft will not be forwarded to the IESG until a res= ponse has been received from each author and contributor. Best regards Matthew --_000_B66EE816915EC24DB7CF609C6E73B13C038422US70UWXCHMBA02zam_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I am not aware of any undisclosed related IPR either.

 

Thanks

-Sanjay

 

From: Bitar, N= abil N [mailto:nabil.n.bitar@verizon.com]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2012 6:18 AM
To: Bocci, Matthew (Matthew); draft-ietf-ancp-pon@tools.ietf.org
Cc: ancp@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon

 

Hi,

I am not aware of any relevant IPR that has not already been d= isclosed.

 

Thanks,

Nabil

 

From: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" <matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 06:32:58 -0400
To: "draf= t-ietf-ancp-pon@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ancp-pon@tools.ietf.org>
Cc: "ancp@ietf.org" &= lt;ancp@ietf.org>
Subject: IPR check on draft-ietf-ancp-pon

 

Before forwarding the latest version of this draft back to the= IESG, I need to poll for knowledge of any additional IPR that applies= to this drafts, to ensure that IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules (see RF= Cs 3979, 4879, 3669 and 5378 for more details).

 

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please r= espond to this email whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR = that has not already been disclosed. This draft will not be forwarded to the IESG until a respo= nse has been received from each author and contributor. 

 

Best regards

 

Matthew

--_000_B66EE816915EC24DB7CF609C6E73B13C038422US70UWXCHMBA02zam_-- From internet-drafts@ietf.org Mon Oct 22 05:24:53 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B370B21F8B4A; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 05:24:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.532 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.532 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.067, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KV+dNrUBn-pm; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 05:24:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCFB21F8422; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 05:24:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.34 Message-ID: <20121022122452.30831.83343.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 05:24:52 -0700 Cc: ancp@ietf.org Subject: [ANCP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08.txt X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:24:53 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Access Node Control Protocol Working Grou= p of the IETF. Title : Multicast Control Extensions for ANCP Author(s) : Francois Le Faucheur Roberta Maglione Tom Taylor Filename : draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08.txt Pages : 97 Date : 2012-10-22 Abstract: This document specifies the extensions to the Access Node Control Protocol required for support of the multicast use cases defined in the Access Node Control Protocol framework document and one additional use case described in this document. These use cases are organized into the following ANCP capabilities: o NAS-initiated multicast replication; o conditional access with white and black lists; o conditional access with grey lists; o bandwidth delegation; o committed bandwidth reporting. These capabilities may be combined according to the rules given in this specification. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08 Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com Mon Oct 22 05:27:36 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BCD321F8B6F for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 05:27:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.43 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.43 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.169, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TY6HqwYFQvCm for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 05:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ie0-f172.google.com (mail-ie0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C6D21F8A87 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 05:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ie0-f172.google.com with SMTP id 9so4151692iec.31 for ; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 05:27:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-antivirus :x-antivirus-status; bh=tQDijjBmpMnAB/+sefYex+WkfP7rbDfU2hyzfoRr6eo=; b=Sh6KA+Kjp8pe+np3fP4jHEJUz72Qu4o5foTxIE/2bT77uSDxyRHwFpavDEBDUblaNt yujCpzwSkP98Lp7Y/zC6AjvPQ9XdHE7XytER6wRpScbjw5SnsH+yXRz//OGck3tVcnmP 9beR1dy5wJBoK2xImnby2/yYJvRITVylX9tfb0+g2mSl94zgOjCZ6BKoFOrA7QgFMkaz 4Y4PffK1NSqnqTtCAE+/Sm9m5k63cESosK//e7tmEfxDLz6XuHjl48stwQfBFQFqIyEG M91lHhdj2skQ1NM3YAvdTjKlEzaz7BH6IZUVKuVI3+Eb1cG6fy7Onjcitn11l0PeK41D E6mQ== Received: by 10.50.7.232 with SMTP id m8mr8824664iga.48.1350908855188; Mon, 22 Oct 2012 05:27:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dsl-173-206-103-201.tor.primus.ca. [173.206.103.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s3sm8491467igb.14.2012.10.22.05.27.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 22 Oct 2012 05:27:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50853BB7.1020506@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 08:27:35 -0400 From: Tom Taylor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ancp@ietf.org References: <20121022122452.30831.83343.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <20121022122452.30831.83343.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 121022-0, 22/10/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [ANCP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08.txt X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:27:36 -0000 This was a keep-alive update. Only the version number changed. Still hoping ... On 22/10/2012 8:24 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > This draft is a work item of the Access Node Control Protocol Working Group of the IETF. > > Title : Multicast Control Extensions for ANCP > Author(s) : Francois Le Faucheur > Roberta Maglione > Tom Taylor > Filename : draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08.txt > Pages : 97 > Date : 2012-10-22 > > Abstract: > This document specifies the extensions to the Access Node Control > Protocol required for support of the multicast use cases defined in > the Access Node Control Protocol framework document and one > additional use case described in this document. These use cases are > organized into the following ANCP capabilities: > > o NAS-initiated multicast replication; > > o conditional access with white and black lists; > > o conditional access with grey lists; > > o bandwidth delegation; > > o committed bandwidth reporting. > > These capabilities may be combined according to the rules given in > this specification. > ... From tom.taylor.stds@gmail.com Thu Oct 25 08:23:55 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E86E21F912A for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:23:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.444 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.444 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.155, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cD-eZsey4eVJ for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ia0-f172.google.com (mail-ia0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD04A21F9127 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ia0-f172.google.com with SMTP id o25so1598918iad.31 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:23:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-antivirus :x-antivirus-status; bh=+Ra8Zq/yNxXg8Y5/iSQlB17Edjpj7zsrZzGyrBtSqOg=; b=wEk14k4uWTms3eJnO+5IVitSWhEV1baLtIiD2zYbA1gyReS8naN1hQN+4hIrQJkv3B 9Fzxz8P7b+Iq7aoV/oPrNtwpu/u5VbejsuwJu16qZigluK4JaL4WPZJ8BoBVqQEW0qtC U2zw92CKmlkKTNSY9ZXFvlrX4hlhq36W7FEgtS0kaKJt4eRuIug0C+3XDqDh/j7SZasa +eRFUSK2GBDeh3SfkwPshWoGwLWSStCpaNg+PsaHvSiDwHH0k7ROjXheeVmPnowgVgrB SJUeixSzPjS1ZLEAkNaJb/nmQ7iCIQOB7L81bFolsal3E6mQNJgGTZEKPjREIg74OtmR 8Ayg== Received: by 10.50.0.168 with SMTP id 8mr6420347igf.24.1351178634351; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dsl-173-206-103-201.tor.primus.ca. [173.206.103.201]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id az4sm4768069igb.2.2012.10.25.08.23.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <50895989.8020103@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:23:53 -0400 From: Tom Taylor User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "ancp@ietf.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 121025-1, 25/10/2012), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Subject: [ANCP] Review it or lose it! X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:23:55 -0000 I am advised that draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08.txt will not advance unless three people besides me review it. Since it involves IANA updates requiring Standards Action, that means that without the necessary reviews there will be NO standardized IANA codepoints for multicast. Tom Taylor From matthew.bocci@alcatel-lucent.com Thu Oct 25 08:36:51 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: ancp@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E99F21F8901 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:36:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -109.641 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.641 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.608, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SAubvBxpJtxk for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smail3.alcatel.fr (smail3.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808BD21F8928 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 08:36:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.62]) by smail3.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id q9PFZVwr005264 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:36:43 +0200 Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSA3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.36]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB02.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.62]) with mapi; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:36:35 +0200 From: "Bocci, Matthew (Matthew)" To: Tom Taylor , "ancp@ietf.org" Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 17:36:35 +0200 Thread-Topic: [ANCP] Review it or lose it! Thread-Index: Ac2yxoPYSkiZfcqrTOWowrnLBIPebw== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <50895989.8020103@gmail.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.4.120824 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.69 on 155.132.188.83 Subject: Re: [ANCP] Review it or lose it! X-BeenThere: ancp@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Access Node Control Protocol working group mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:36:51 -0000 Folks, Just to reiterate Tom's call for review. We have had two WG last calls on this draft, but there has been little evidence that the draft has been widely reviewed at the time of the WG last calls. If you have read and are OK with the draft moving forward, please indicate this to the list. If you have comments, please indicate them to the list. If you have an implementation / deployment using these extensions, please review the draft, otherwise we will likely not be able to progress the draft and thus not be able to ask IANA to allocate the requisite code points, many of which require standards action. Best regards Matthew On 25/10/2012 16:23, "Tom Taylor" wrote: >I am advised that draft-ietf-ancp-mc-extensions-08.txt will not advance >unless three people besides me review it. Since it involves IANA updates >requiring Standards Action, that means that without the necessary >reviews there will be NO standardized IANA codepoints for multicast. > >Tom Taylor >_______________________________________________ >ANCP mailing list >ANCP@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ancp