
From zach@sensinode.com  Thu Dec 29 11:24:28 2011
Return-Path: <zach@sensinode.com>
X-Original-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB30E21F8B68 for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:24:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ezHHhyNblgsI for <architecture-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:24:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from auth-smtp.nebula.fi (auth-smtp.nebula.fi [217.30.180.105]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B020621F8AFB for <architecture-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:24:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (188-67-53-217.bb.dnainternet.fi [188.67.53.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by auth-smtp.nebula.fi (8.13.8/8.13.4) with ESMTP id pBTJOEGE023975 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:24:15 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Zach Shelby <zach@sensinode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EF83EA0.1020700@gmx.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:24:12 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <04124957-CD5D-408B-A1E0-10FBB86C54FE@sensinode.com>
References: <4EF83EA0.1020700@gmx.net>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 02 Jan 2012 09:36:56 -0800
Cc: architecture-discuss@ietf.org, jari.arkko@piuha.net, charles.perkins@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [arch-d] Re Follow-on questions from the "Internet of Things" discussion on Monday
X-BeenThere: architecture-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: open discussion forum for long/wide-range architectural issues <architecture-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/architecture-discuss>,  <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/architecture-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:architecture-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/architecture-discuss>,  <mailto:architecture-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 19:24:28 -0000

On Dec 26, 2011, at 11:30 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:

> > - Comments on 3GPP's M2M work? Does anyone on the panel
> > foresee any application for it in the Internet of Things?
>=20
> I guess you mean the ETSI M2M work.

Charlie actually means 3GPP, as they are making minor improvements to 3G =
to better support M2M terminals in future releases. Yes, that work is of =
course useful for GPRS/UMTS based M2M terminals - which are really =
common already now on the Internet.=20

ETSI M2M is an application layer service architecture with bindings to =
both HTTP and CoAP. That will also play some kind of role in IoT, =
although I am pretty sure it will be limited more to MNO/MVNO offerings, =
so I don't expect it to become very common outside of the Cellular M2M =
market.=20

Zach  =20

--=20
Zach Shelby, Chief Nerd, Sensinode Ltd.
http://www.sensinode.com
http://zachshelby.org  - My blog "On the Internet of Things"
http://6lowpan.net - My book "6LoWPAN: The Wireless Embedded Internet"
Mobile: +358 40 7796297

