Subject: Re: [avtext] Call for adoption of text for audio level milestones

From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:23:32 +0100

(As WG chair)

I have seen no objections to the use of the text of these two drafts in fulfilment of the milestones and therefore declare WG consensus on this question.

The WG chairs would like to ask Emil Ivov to act as editor for Submit RTP Header extension for mixer to client audio level indication as Proposed Standard and submit the text as:

draft-ietf-avtext-mixer-to-client-audio-level-00

and Jonathan Lennox to act as editor for Submit RTP Header extension for client to mixer audio level indication as proposed standard and submit the text as:

draft-ietf-avtext-client-to-mixer-audio-level-00

Note the existing author draft names are somewhat obscure as to the difference between the two documents hence the renaming.

Regards

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] 
> [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> Sent: 27 January 2011 14:56
> To: IETF AVT WG; [email-masked]
> Subject: [avtext] Call for adoption of text for audio level milestones
> 
> (As AVTEXT WG cochair)
> 
> This message is copied to the AVTCORE list for those who are 
> not yet on the new list.
> 
> AVTEXT has two milestones relating to audio levels.
> 
> Oct 2011  Submit RTP Header extension for mixer to client 
> audio level indication as Proposed Standard 
>  
> Oct 2011  Submit RTP Header extension for client to mixer 
> audio level indication as proposed standard  
> 
> We have the following author drafts providing candidate text 
> for these milestones:
> 
> A Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) Extension Header for 
> Mixer-to-client Audio Level Indication 
> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ivov-avt-slic-04.txt
> 
> A Real-Time Transport Protocol (RTP) Header Extension for 
> Client-to-Mixer Audio Level Indication 
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-lennox-avt-rtp-audio-level-exth
> dr-02.txt
> 
> respectively.
> 
> This is a WG consensus call to adopt the above text as 
> baseline text for these milestones. At this stage the text 
> does not have to be regarded perfect, the question is more 
> "Does this text form a better basis for completing the work 
> in the working group that some text yet to be submitted?"
> 
> While the prime intention of this call is to adopt the entire 
> text of the author draft, if you consider that some of the 
> text is appropriate, but that some of the text does not form 
> a reasonable start for the work, then please indicate that 
> text and we will make a separate call on it (and adopt the rest).
> 
> Please respond by Thursday 10th February 2011 with your positions. 
> 
> ######### Please respond to the AVTEXT list only #############
> 
> Regards
> 
> Keith
> 
> _______________________________________________
> avtext mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avtext
>