Subject: [avtext] Submit Considerations for RAMS Scenarios for Informational

From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:17:33 +0200

(As WG chair)

This is not a confirmation of an IETF#80 decision, but more a plea for input.

We have a milestone as above, and it is the nearest in terms of current date as to when we have to produce a deliverable (June 2011) to any other.

Ali has a draft covering this:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-begen-avtext-rams-scenarios/

Do please look at this draft, and consider the scenarios he has identified. 

Are these the useful ones? Are any of them not particularly useful? Has he missed scenarios that would be more useful in terms of RAMS use cases?

Do consider whether the document is too long, or indeed conversely needs more detail. Which is it?

We'd like to make a decision on adopting the text fairly soon (like a couple of weeks at most), and it would be nice to hammer out some of these points before we get to doing that. The answers to these sort of questions identify what sort of document you want to adopt.

And if you believe that the answer lies in an entirely different direction, you can always point that direction in an alternative author generated draft, if you consider this a better way of opening the discussion that criticising / improving an existing author draft.

Regards

Keith