Subject: [avtext] Submit Support for multiple clock rates in an RTP session for Proposed Standard

From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 22:23:17 +0200

The final update of todays discussion. Again no decision to make immediately.

Marc has some current discussions to work through and produce an update of:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-petithuguenin-avtext-multiple-clock-rates/

At that point we would like to make a call for the WG to adopt text to fulfil the current milestone.

So now would be a good point to review the text, and identify if this document is something on which such a call should be performed, or whether you envisage an entirely different document. 

If so, either make suggestions to Marc on what he might incorporate in his document, or alternatively produce an alternative draft pointing a better way forward. Note we are not identifying completeness at this point, merely laying the ground for the best direction to get some working group consensus text on the table.

Regards

Keith