Subject: Re: [avtext] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-avtext-sdes-hdr-ext-05: (with COMMENT)

From: "Ben Campbell" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2016 13:54:04 -0500

On 26 Apr 2016, at 9:10, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF) wrote:

>>> 2) Should this doc also register MID?
>
>>
>> Nope, as this document now has overtaken 
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-bundle-negotiation/ 
>> it will be BUNDLE that has to define the registration. Initially we 
>> thought that BUNDLE would be done, and we would catch up and have to 
>> move the registration, but that didn't happen.
>
>
> Okay. Didn’t see that it also defines the RTP extension. That’s 
> fine.

Magnus, since this draft mentions MID, would it make sense to also 
mention that it is (or will be) be registered in bundle-negotiation?

Thanks!

Ben.