Subject: Re: [bess] draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-02

From: "Ali Sajassi (sajassi)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 12:21:52 +0000

Hi Wim,

The current draft is for vlan-based mode of EVPN-VPWS; where each EVPN P2P LSP tunnel is mapped to a single service. If needed, it can be expanded to vlan-bundle EVPN-VPWS mode as well.

Cheers,
Ali

From: BESS <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>> on behalf of "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Thursday, April 7, 2016 at 3:58 PM
To: "[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Cc: "[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-02

Resending with proper email address of Sami

From: Wim Henderickx <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Thursday 7 April 2016 at 15:51
To: "[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Cc: "[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-02

The draft tries to address a 1:1 auto-provisioning between the VPWS and Service on the service PE.
Would the draft also address a 1:N provisioning model, meaning 1 VPWS to multiple services using VLAN multiplexing on the service PE?

---

From: "Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 12:48:59 +0000

I believe if we go for the solutions we should include this scenario.

From: Ali Sajassi <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Date: Friday 8 April 2016 at 09:21
To: Wim Henderickx <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>, "[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Cc: "[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>" <[email-masked]<mailto:[email-masked]>>
Subject: Re: [bess] draft-boutros-bess-evpn-vpws-service-edge-gateway-02

Hi Wim,

Cheers,
Ali