Subject: Re: [bess] WG feedback on early allocation requests for new EVPN Route types

From: Martin Vigoureux <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 16:51:23 +0100

WG,

we haven't heard any opposition to proceeding with this early allocation.
We will thus move forward.

-m

Le 31/01/2017 à 11:55, Martin Vigoureux a écrit :
> Dear WG,
>
> we have received early allocation requests from the authors of
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-prefix-advertisement and
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-bum-procedure-updates: (see details below).
>
> Please let us know if you are aware of any code-point conflict, or
> if you have issues with the WG moving forward with this early allocation.
>
> We envisage to proceed with the request on the 6th of February.
>
> Thank you
> M&T
>
> ---
> "EVPN Route Types" from registry defined by RFC7432
> https://www.iana.org/assignments/evpn/evpn.xhtml
>
>     5 - IP Prefix route
>     9 - Per-Region I-PMSI A-D route
>    10 - S-PMSI A-D route
>    11 - Leaf A-D route
> ---
>
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>