From btns-bounces@ietf.org  Tue Oct  7 14:04:22 2008
Return-Path: <btns-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: btns-archive-1@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-btns-archive-1@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7393A6A2C;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2008 14:04:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: btns@ietf.org
Delivered-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30)
	id 0D9213A6B61; Tue,  7 Oct 2008 07:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-idtracker: yes
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <20081007142105.0D9213A6B61@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Tue,  7 Oct 2008 07:21:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:04:21 -0700
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>,
	btns mailing list <btns@ietf.org>, btns chair <btns-chairs@tools.ietf.org>,
	RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [btns] Protocol Action: 'Better-Than-Nothing-Security: An
 Unauthenticated Mode of IPsec' to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: btns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Better-Than-Nothing-Security Working Group discussion list
	<btns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>,
	<mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/btns>
List-Post: <mailto:btns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>,
	<mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: btns-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: btns-bounces@ietf.org

The IESG has approved the following document:

- 'Better-Than-Nothing-Security: An Unauthenticated Mode of IPsec '
   <draft-ietf-btns-core-07.txt> as a Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the Better-Than-Nothing Security Working 
Group. 

The IESG contact persons are Tim Polk and Pasi Eronen.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-btns-core-07.txt

Technical Summary
 
   The Internet network security protocol suite, IPsec, consisting of
   IKE, ESP, and AH, generally requires authentication of network layer
   entities to bootstrap security. This authentication can be based on
   mechanisms such as pre-shared symmetric keys, certificates and
   associated asymmetric keys, or the use of Kerberos. The need to
   deploy authentication information and its associated identities to
   network layer entities can be a significant obstacle to use of
   network security.  This document describes extensions to the SPD and
PAD to allow BTNS IPsec.
 
Working Group Summary
 
   This document had rough consensus of the BTNS working group.
 
Protocol Quality

   Sam Hartman reviewed the specification for the IESG.

Note to RFC Editor
 
Section 2:
old: bind the same public key.  These certificates need not to have been
new: bind the same public key.  These certificates do not need to be

_______________________________________________
btns mailing list
btns@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns


From btns-bounces@ietf.org  Tue Oct  7 14:04:23 2008
Return-Path: <btns-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: btns-archive-1@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-btns-archive-1@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1815B3A6B4C;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2008 14:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: btns@ietf.org
Delivered-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 30)
	id 2B6113A6B1D; Tue,  7 Oct 2008 08:09:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-idtracker: yes
From: The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <20081007150937.2B6113A6B1D@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Tue,  7 Oct 2008 08:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:04:21 -0700
Cc: Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>,
	btns mailing list <btns@ietf.org>, btns chair <btns-chairs@tools.ietf.org>,
	RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Subject: [btns] Document Action: 'Problem and Applicability Statement for
 Better Than Nothing Security (BTNS)' to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: btns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Better-Than-Nothing-Security Working Group discussion list
	<btns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>,
	<mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/btns>
List-Post: <mailto:btns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>,
	<mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: btns-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: btns-bounces@ietf.org

The IESG has approved the following document:

- 'Problem and Applicability Statement for Better Than Nothing Security 
   (BTNS) '
   <draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-07.txt> as an Informational RFC

This document is the product of the Better-Than-Nothing Security Working 
Group. 

The IESG contact persons are Tim Polk and Pasi Eronen.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-btns-prob-and-applic-07.txt

Technical Summary

   The Internet network security protocol suite, IPsec, consisting of
   IKE, ESP, and AH, generally requires authentication of network layer
   entities to bootstrap security. This authentication can be based on
   mechanisms such as pre-shared symmetric keys, certificates and
   associated asymmetric keys, or the use of Kerberos. The need to
   deploy authentication information and its associated identities to
   network layer entities can be a significant obstacle to use of
   network security. This document explains the rationale for extending
   the Internet network security suite to enable use of IPsec security
   mechanisms without authentication. These extensions are intended to
   protect communication in a "better than nothing" (BTNS) fashion. The
   extensions may be used on their own (Stand Alone BTNS, or SAB), or
   may be useful in providing network layer security that can be
   authenticated by higher layers in the protocol stack, called Channel
   Bound BTNS (CBB). This document also explains situations in which use
   of SAB and CBB extensions are appropriate.

Working Group Summary

   This document is a product of the Better Than Nothing Security (BTNS)
   working group.

Document Quality

This document was reviewed by Sam Hartman for the IESG.
Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Julien Laganier (BTNS
   co-chair) and the Responsible Area Director is Tim Polk.

_______________________________________________
btns mailing list
btns@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns


From btns-bounces@ietf.org  Tue Oct  7 14:31:12 2008
Return-Path: <btns-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: btns-archive-1@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-btns-archive-1@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AE53A6AA0;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2008 14:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668913A6A2E
	for <btns@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  7 Oct 2008 14:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.184
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.184 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.862, 
	BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id v0tTQ5XsKx56 for <btns@core3.amsl.com>;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2008 14:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sca-ea-mail-1.sun.com (sca-ea-mail-1.Sun.COM [192.18.43.24])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3303A6768
	for <btns@ietf.org>; Tue,  7 Oct 2008 14:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dm-central-02.central.sun.com ([129.147.62.5])
	by sca-ea-mail-1.sun.com (8.13.7+Sun/8.12.9) with ESMTP id
	m97LVJ5u014553 for <btns@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:31:19 GMT
Received: from binky.Central.Sun.COM (binky.Central.Sun.COM [129.153.128.104])
	by dm-central-02.central.sun.com (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/ENSMAIL,
	v2.2) with ESMTP id m97LVJnM045734
	for <btns@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 15:31:19 -0600 (MDT)
Received: from binky.Central.Sun.COM (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by binky.Central.Sun.COM (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3) with ESMTP id
	m97LNPlR001104
	for <btns@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:23:28 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from nw141292@localhost)
	by binky.Central.Sun.COM (8.14.3+Sun/8.14.3/Submit) id m97LNIEL001099
	for btns@ietf.org; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:23:18 -0500 (CDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: binky.Central.Sun.COM: nw141292 set sender to
	Nicolas.Williams@sun.com using -f
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 16:23:18 -0500
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
To: btns mailing list <btns@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20081007212317.GL8906@Sun.COM>
References: <20081007150937.2B6113A6B1D@core3.amsl.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20081007150937.2B6113A6B1D@core3.amsl.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i
Subject: Re: [btns] Document Action: 'Problem and Applicability Statement
	for Better Than Nothing Security (BTNS)' to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: btns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Better-Than-Nothing-Security Working Group discussion list
	<btns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>,
	<mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/btns>
List-Post: <mailto:btns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>,
	<mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: btns-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: btns-bounces@ietf.org

The applicability statement and btns core are in the RFC-Editor queue
now.  Woohoo!

Where are we on connection latching?

Nico
-- 
_______________________________________________
btns mailing list
btns@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns


From btns-bounces@ietf.org  Tue Oct  7 15:14:10 2008
Return-Path: <btns-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: btns-archive-1@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-btns-archive-1@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA15D3A6B9B;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2008 15:14:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: btns@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F25E3A686C
	for <btns@core3.amsl.com>; Tue,  7 Oct 2008 15:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32])
	by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id eIVy6HQPO2qG for <btns@core3.amsl.com>;
	Tue,  7 Oct 2008 15:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from deprox.docomolab-euro.com (deprox.docomolab-euro.com
	[212.119.9.186])
	by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9947B3A68D7
	for <btns@ietf.org>; Tue,  7 Oct 2008 15:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by deprox.docomolab-euro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854A017037;
	Wed,  8 Oct 2008 00:14:47 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from deprox.docomolab-euro.com ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (deprox.docomolab-euro.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new,
	port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 6A5hBD6QsGtC; Wed,  8 Oct 2008 00:14:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from DEMAIL.docomolab-euro.com (demail.docomolab-euro.com
	[172.27.20.3]) by deprox.docomolab-euro.com (Postfix) with ESMTP;
	Wed,  8 Oct 2008 00:14:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [192.168.99.12] ([192.168.99.12]) by DEMAIL.docomolab-euro.com
	with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); 
	Wed, 8 Oct 2008 00:14:45 +0200
Message-ID: <48EBDF58.6030408@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 00:14:48 +0200
From: Julien Laganier <julien.laganier.IETF@googlemail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
References: <20081007150937.2B6113A6B1D@core3.amsl.com>
	<20081007212317.GL8906@Sun.COM>
In-Reply-To: <20081007212317.GL8906@Sun.COM>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Oct 2008 22:14:45.0553 (UTC)
	FILETIME=[1AD65A10:01C928CA]
Cc: btns mailing list <btns@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [btns] Document Action: 'Problem and Applicability Statement
 for Better Than Nothing Security (BTNS)' to Informational RFC
X-BeenThere: btns@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Better-Than-Nothing-Security Working Group discussion list
	<btns.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>,
	<mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/btns>
List-Post: <mailto:btns@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns>,
	<mailto:btns-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: btns-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: btns-bounces@ietf.org

Connection latching is currently in AD review.

--julien

Nicolas Williams wrote:
> The applicability statement and btns core are in the RFC-Editor queue
> now.  Woohoo!
> 
> Where are we on connection latching?
> 
> Nico

_______________________________________________
btns mailing list
btns@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/btns


