Subject: CAP plumbing

From: "Preston Stephenson" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2003 13:38:01 -0700

I guess I'm trying to combine steps.
I would like the capability to say:
CUA: create VFREEBUSY REQUEST
CS: create succeeded (Oh, by the way, here is the VFREEBUSY REPLY)
 
If the CS doesn't support that functionality, then the CUA(s) could do
the processing.
 
Does this break CAP too much?
Preston