Subject: Re: [Cbor] If not CCDL then ... ?

From: Leif Hedstrom <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 20:06:25 -0600

> On Mar 31, 2017, at 5:05 AM, Carsten Bormann <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> On 30 Mar 2017, at 16:54, Brian E Carpenter <[email-masked]> wrote:
>> 
>> Personally I'm fine with CDDL. Clashing with the name of a license is really not an issue IMHO.
> 
> 
> Off-list, it has been pointed out to me that, since CDDL is not just for CBOR, maybe that should be reflected in the name.
> 
> So here is my entry in the contest:
> 
> Concise Data Definition Language (CDDL).

Makes sense to me, I’m +0 on this.

The confusion with CDDL (the license)  is likely to be reduced as we publish documents and code, but it’s not great as it is right now.

Cheers,

— Leif