From rjsparks@nostrum.com Wed Sep 15 08:50:48 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811A43A6995 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:50:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U7KhNd+WzYi4 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 374E93A69CF for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 08:50:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dn3-177.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8FFp7rT076605 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:51:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) From: Robert Sparks Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-2--831494452 Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 10:51:07 -0500 References: <4C893575.4010906@ietf.org> To: codesprints@ietf.org Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) Subject: [codesprints] Fwd: Beijing IETF Codesprint X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:50:48 -0000 --Apple-Mail-2--831494452 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If you're planning to join the Beijing codesprint, please let us know at . If you're a regular attendee but know for sure you won't be there, = please drop me a note. Thanks! RjS Begin forwarded message: > From: IETF Chair > Date: September 9, 2010 2:28:53 PM CDT > To: IETF Announcement list > Cc: 79all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org > Subject: Beijing IETF Codesprint > Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org >=20 > Beijing IETF Codesprint >=20 > When: 6 November 2010, starting at 9:30 AM >=20 > Where: IETF Hotel >=20 > What: A bunch of hackers get together to work on code for the IETF. > All code will become part of the open source IETF tools. >=20 > Who: Hopefully you can help >=20 > Many of the results of previous codesprint activities are being > used every day by the IETF community. A new Internet-Draft submission > tool and a new liaison statement tool will be available before = November > 6th. Work to polish or improve those tools will be most welcome. >=20 > Steve Conte will be helping with advance planning. Henrik Levkowetz > will be coordinating the event in Bejing. More information is = available at: >=20 > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/IETF79Sprint >=20 > If you are able to participate, please sign up on the wiki at: >=20 > http://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/IETF79SprintSignUp >=20 > Please support the tools development effort, > Russ > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf --Apple-Mail-2--831494452 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii If = you're planning to join the Beijing codesprint, please let us know = at
<h= ttp://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/IETF79SprintSignUp>.

If you're a regular attendee but know for sure = you won't be there, please
drop me a = note.

Thanks!

RjS

Begin forwarded message:

From: IETF Chair <chair@ietf.org>
Date: September 9, 2010 = 2:28:53 PM CDT
To: IETF Announcement list <ietf-announce@ietf.org>
<= /span>
Subject: Beijing IETF = Codesprint
Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org

B= eijing IETF Codesprint

When:  6 November 2010, starting at = 9:30 AM

Where: IETF Hotel

What:  A bunch of hackers = get together to work on code for the IETF.
=       All code will become part of the = open source IETF tools.

Who:   Hopefully you can = help

Many of the results of previous codesprint activities are = being
used every day by the IETF community.  A new = Internet-Draft submission
tool and a new liaison statement tool will = be available before November
6th.  Work to polish or improve = those tools will be most welcome.

Steve Conte will be helping = with advance planning.  Henrik Levkowetz
will be coordinating = the event in Bejing.  More information is available at:

http://= trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/IETF79Sprint

If you are = able to participate, please sign up on the wiki at:

h= ttp://trac.tools.ietf.org/tools/ietfdb/wiki/IETF79SprintSignUp

= Please support the tools development effort,
=  Russ
_______________________________________________
Ietf = mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/ma= ilman/listinfo/ietf

= --Apple-Mail-2--831494452-- From housley@vigilsec.com Wed Sep 15 11:56:28 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4FE83A6A03 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:56:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.329 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.329 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.270, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RLrTVzyl3es2 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:56:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3B83A69B4 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:56:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8673F24036 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:57:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TrG9SuAqcf6y for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:56:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.228] (e5.c4b7d1.client.atlantech.net [209.183.196.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431B5F24034 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:57:05 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C9116F5.1000103@vigilsec.com> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 14:56:53 -0400 From: Russ Housley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: codesprints@ietf.org References: <4C893575.4010906@ietf.org> In-Reply-To: <4C893575.4010906@ietf.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [codesprints] Maastricht Codesprint Evaluation X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 18:56:28 -0000 I'd like to evaluate the last Codesprint. What went right? What went (other than the Bat Cave of a room) wrong? Russ From tony@att.com Fri Sep 17 21:42:55 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9C23A69A5 for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:42:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.33 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.33 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.269, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GgzZXIJkRAGk for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:42:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail129.messagelabs.com (mail129.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.147]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A913A687C for ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 21:42:53 -0700 (PDT) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: tony@att.com X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-129.messagelabs.com!1284784997!16357303!1 X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.4; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [144.160.20.145] Received: (qmail 22795 invoked from network); 18 Sep 2010 04:43:18 -0000 Received: from sbcsmtp6.sbc.com (HELO mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com) (144.160.20.145) by server-13.tower-129.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 18 Sep 2010 04:43:18 -0000 Received: from enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8I4hYdu004191 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 00:43:34 -0400 Received: from alpd052.aldc.att.com (alpd052.aldc.att.com [130.8.42.31]) by mlpd192.enaf.sfdc.sbc.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8I4hVll004179 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 00:43:31 -0400 Received: from aldc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8I4hEKM007464 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 00:43:14 -0400 Received: from mailgw1.maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by alpd052.aldc.att.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8I4h9Bd007375 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 00:43:09 -0400 Received: from [135.70.84.72] (vpn-135-70-84-72.vpn.swst.att.com[135.70.84.72]) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with ESMTP id <20100918044308gw100ei13re> (Authid: tony); Sat, 18 Sep 2010 04:43:09 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [135.70.84.72] Message-ID: <4C94435B.5030808@att.com> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 00:43:07 -0400 From: Tony Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Thunderbird/3.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russ Housley References: <4C893575.4010906@ietf.org> <4C9116F5.1000103@vigilsec.com> In-Reply-To: <4C9116F5.1000103@vigilsec.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: codesprints@ietf.org Subject: Re: [codesprints] Maastricht Codesprint Evaluation X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 04:42:56 -0000 I personally spent more time diagnosing wireless connectivity issues than being productive. A few hardwired connections would have been useful. Tony On 9/15/2010 2:56 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > I'd like to evaluate the last Codesprint. What went right? What went > (other than the Bat Cave of a room) wrong? From housley@vigilsec.com Sat Sep 18 07:44:13 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D083A659B for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:44:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.524 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.524 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dxz2rm456ZSR for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A506D3A657C for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:44:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6A79A478A; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 10:44:43 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XWgHwvRdPJ1j; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 10:44:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-96-231-149-87.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.231.149.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C36D9A476F; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 10:44:43 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C94D057.8040606@vigilsec.com> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 10:44:39 -0400 From: Russ Housley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tony Hansen References: <4C893575.4010906@ietf.org> <4C9116F5.1000103@vigilsec.com> <4C94435B.5030808@att.com> In-Reply-To: <4C94435B.5030808@att.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: codesprints@ietf.org Subject: Re: [codesprints] Maastricht Codesprint Evaluation X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 14:44:13 -0000 I have passed this on to the NOC team. Russ On 9/18/2010 12:43 AM, Tony Hansen wrote: > I personally spent more time diagnosing wireless connectivity issues > than being productive. A few hardwired connections would have been useful. > > Tony > > On 9/15/2010 2:56 PM, Russ Housley wrote: >> I'd like to evaluate the last Codesprint. What went right? What went >> (other than the Bat Cave of a room) wrong? > From henrik@merlot.tools.ietf.org Mon Sep 20 07:46:50 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DDA3A6948 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:46:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kTLoVeacABUs for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:46:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC9EB3A6A7B for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:46:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from henrik by merlot.tools.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Oxhde-0005DD-2r; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:46:38 +0200 Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:46:38 +0200 Message-Id: To: codesprints@ietf.org From: Henrik Levkowetz X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: amorris@amsl.com, avezza@amsl.com, cmorgan@amsl.com, codesprints@ietf.org, fenner@fenron.net, glen@amsl.com, henrik@levkowetz.com, housley@vigilsec.com, rjs@nostrum.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@merlot.tools.ietf.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on merlot.tools.ietf.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: rjs@nostrum.com, avezza@amsl.com, fenner@fenron.net, amorris@amsl.com, cmorgan@amsl.com Subject: [codesprints] New datatracker release: v3.06 X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:46:51 -0000 Hi, This is an automatic notification about a new datatracker release, v3.06, generated when running the mkrelease script. Release notes: ietfdb (3.06) From rjsparks@nostrum.com: * Changed the navigation round editing ballots and sending discuss/email so that the user comes back to the page the edit started from. * Fix for ticket #374 (all in base.js) and removal of a vestigial 'save all changes' button from the iesg/agenda/documents page. * Split the ballot writeups page into three pages, for a more understandable user interface. From henrik@levkowetz.com: * Fix a presentation bug in /iesg/agenda/documents.txt The new version is available through SVN checkout, with 'svn checkout http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/3.06' Regards, Henrik (via the mkrelease script) From glen@amsl.com Mon Sep 20 12:12:55 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E5F3A67D0 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:12:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k9QwUUkDlJX7 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:12:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.amsl.com (mail.amsl.com [64.170.98.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1B53A67C2 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:12:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32F1E08C9; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:13:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com Received: from c1a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c1a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7EWN9RuQ8ysR; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.101] (173-8-133-91-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.133.91]) by c1a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C04EE08C4; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:13:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4C97B24A.9030904@amsl.com> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:13:14 -0700 From: Glen Barney Organization: AMS User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Henrik Levkowetz References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: rjs@nostrum.com, codesprints@ietf.org, avezza@amsl.com, fenner@fenron.net, amorris@amsl.com, cmorgan@amsl.com Subject: Re: [codesprints] New datatracker release: v3.06 X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 19:12:55 -0000 Deployed! Glen On 9/20/2010 7:46 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > Hi, > > This is an automatic notification about a new datatracker release, > v3.06, generated when running the mkrelease script. > > Release notes: > > ietfdb (3.06) > From rjsparks@nostrum.com: > * Changed the navigation round editing ballots and sending discuss/email so > that the user comes back to the page the edit started from. > * Fix for ticket #374 (all in base.js) and removal of a vestigial 'save all > changes' button from the iesg/agenda/documents page. > * Split the ballot writeups page into three pages, for a more > understandable user interface. > From henrik@levkowetz.com: > * Fix a presentation bug in /iesg/agenda/documents.txt > > The new version is available through SVN checkout, with > 'svn checkout http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/3.06' > > Regards, > > Henrik > (via the mkrelease script) > From henrik@levkowetz.com Tue Sep 21 05:09:28 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE813A69EC for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 05:09:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N5MIil43s92d for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 05:09:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC7223A69E6 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 05:09:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from brunello.autonomica.se ([2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e]:56111 helo=dyn-fg124.sth.netnod.se) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Oy1f9-0005nw-Sk; Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:09:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4C98A07B.4010308@levkowetz.com> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:09:31 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Glen Barney References: <4C97B24A.9030904@amsl.com> In-Reply-To: <4C97B24A.9030904@amsl.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig636B2D31DBDB457A56A8CC93" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:3f0:1:0:21e:c2ff:fe13:7e3e X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: glen@amsl.com, henrik@merlot.tools.ietf.org, codesprints@ietf.org, amorris@amsl.com, avezza@amsl.com, cmorgan@amsl.com, fenner@fenron.net, housley@vigilsec.com, rjs@nostrum.com, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org) Cc: rjs@nostrum.com, codesprints@ietf.org, avezza@amsl.com, fenner@fenron.net, Henrik Levkowetz , amorris@amsl.com, cmorgan@amsl.com Subject: Re: [codesprints] New datatracker release: v3.06 X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 12:09:28 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig636B2D31DBDB457A56A8CC93 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thank you! Best, =09 Henrik On 2010-09-20 21:13 Glen Barney said: > Deployed! >=20 > Glen >=20 > On 9/20/2010 7:46 AM, Henrik Levkowetz wrote: >> Hi, >> >> This is an automatic notification about a new datatracker release,=20 >> v3.06, generated when running the mkrelease script. >> >> Release notes: >> >> ietfdb (3.06) >> From rjsparks@nostrum.com: >> * Changed the navigation round editing ballots and sending discuss/e= mail so >> that the user comes back to the page the edit started from. >> * Fix for ticket #374 (all in base.js) and removal of a vestigial 's= ave all >> changes' button from the iesg/agenda/documents page. >> * Split the ballot writeups page into three pages, for a more >> understandable user interface. >> From henrik@levkowetz.com: >> * Fix a presentation bug in /iesg/agenda/documents.txt >> >> The new version is available through SVN checkout, with >> 'svn checkout http://svn.tools.ietf.org/svn/tools/ietfdb/tags/3.06' >> >> Regards, >> >> Henrik >> (via the mkrelease script) >> >=20 --------------enig636B2D31DBDB457A56A8CC93 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAkyYoHsACgkQeVhrtTJkXCPBlgCfWXAGSQRi8Vq+BtulxFtPADAe 7TUAn2z8iP2bNioM+9rqZ42Vx0n5lR7+ =BLfN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig636B2D31DBDB457A56A8CC93-- From rjsparks@nostrum.com Fri Sep 24 14:01:27 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EAF3A6A8B; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:01:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yFvTYX8er0LJ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:01:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B38C3A691F; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dn3-177.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8OL1sGG033958 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:01:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) From: Robert Sparks Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:01:54 -0500 Message-Id: <058D772C-A8A6-4150-8005-D46377CBC538@nostrum.com> To: codesprints@ietf.org, "tools-development@ietf.org Development" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) Subject: [codesprints] Setting codesprint goals for IETF79 X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:01:27 -0000 We have several things to accomplish during the upcoming codesprint. There are two new tools that should be ready for additional testing and polish - the liaison management tool and the ID submissions tool. We have a growing list of small things to work on that would have high impact for the people that have requested them. The full list is at . Here are a few examples that look addressable at the codesprint. (This is not at all comprehensive:) * Periodically email the list of addresses on any given tools alias = (like rai-ads@ or draft-foo-bar@) to that alias to improve the chances = that lists that are wrong get corrected. * Add a new tab for IPR disclosures (probably showing how many there = are in the tab title: e.g. "IPR disclosures (2)"). * Make it possible for an IESG member to add a comment (for the = document history) in the "change document state" dialog. * Show the date of last change to the various writeups on the page = displayed on the IESG writeups tab.=20 * The Atom feed should include everything in the history tab, not just = the document_comments table.=20 * Allowing search by position: "any AD/AD name" has position "any/Yes/NoObj/Discuss/..." * Show "has IPR disclosures" flag in search result list.=20 There are a few medium sized projects out there that I think could be = done during the sprint, but would have a higher chance of success with a = little bit of exploration/analysis before we get there. Please look through the = list and see if there's something there that would solve a problem you are = having. If you know of something that the sprinters should be working on, but = don't see it on the EnhancementIdeas list, please add it, or send me a quick note and = I'll make sure it gets there. Remember that you can download a current snapshot of the database at any = time. Now might be a good time to bring your local development environment = back into action. If you're new to the sprint or haven't set up a local = environment before, these links will help: If you're able to sprint, but haven't signed up yet, please do so now at From rjsparks@nostrum.com Fri Sep 24 14:13:10 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1283A6A0B for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:13:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.6 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5DqvMmXGDnge for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01963A691F for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:13:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dn3-177.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8OLDcds034885 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:13:38 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Robert Sparks In-Reply-To: <4C9116F5.1000103@vigilsec.com> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:13:38 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <7877F6A7-9DC8-4AB9-84D9-DDE5FD35B0F9@nostrum.com> References: <4C893575.4010906@ietf.org> <4C9116F5.1000103@vigilsec.com> To: Russ Housley X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism) Cc: codesprints@ietf.org Subject: Re: [codesprints] Maastricht Codesprint Evaluation X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:13:11 -0000 One thought - I think we could get a quicker start if we made the branches for the people we knew about before Saturday - a week earlier would be great - it would make it easier for people to get their development environment going before they got there. RjS On Sep 15, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > I'd like to evaluate the last Codesprint. What went right? What went > (other than the Bat Cave of a room) wrong? > > Russ > _______________________________________________ > codesprints mailing list > codesprints@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints From warren@kumari.net Fri Sep 24 14:39:10 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9713A6A7A for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:36:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.203 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2bFxP12ZrIy7 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kumari.net (smtp.kumari.net [216.177.58.220]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345943A6A87 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:36:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.116.101.110] (unknown [166.137.10.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.kumari.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 58FC3DEE005; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:35:18 -0400 (EDT) References: <4C893575.4010906@ietf.org> <4C9116F5.1000103@vigilsec.com> In-Reply-To: <4C9116F5.1000103@vigilsec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8A293) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <18F08696-CA37-4532-9611-CDD95F2274D4@kumari.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8A293) From: Warren Kumari Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:35:08 -0400 To: Russ Housley Cc: "codesprints@ietf.org" Subject: Re: [codesprints] Maastricht Codesprint Evaluation X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 21:39:10 -0000 Sorry, I didn't respond earlier because I didn't have complaints :-) Eveything IMO went off well, other than my lack of Django skills ... Warren Kumari ------ Please excuse typing, etc -- This was sent from a device with a tiny keyboar= d. On Sep 15, 2010, at 2:56 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > I'd like to evaluate the last Codesprint. What went right? What went > (other than the Bat Cave of a room) wrong? >=20 > Russ > _______________________________________________ > codesprints mailing list > codesprints@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints From henrik@levkowetz.com Fri Sep 24 16:07:50 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615813A69A4 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:07:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2IBpBYYAJrl5 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from merlot.tools.ietf.org (merlot.tools.ietf.org [IPv6:2a01:3f0:0:31:214:22ff:fe21:bb]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11DBF3A6AF5 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 16:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 90-230-136-60-no45.tbcn.telia.com ([90.230.136.60]:58463 helo=[192.168.1.65]) by merlot.tools.ietf.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OzHMj-0005aN-V8; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 01:07:48 +0200 Message-ID: <4C9D2F2F.6050204@levkowetz.com> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 01:07:27 +0200 From: Henrik Levkowetz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Sparks References: <4C893575.4010906@ietf.org> <4C9116F5.1000103@vigilsec.com> <7877F6A7-9DC8-4AB9-84D9-DDE5FD35B0F9@nostrum.com> In-Reply-To: <7877F6A7-9DC8-4AB9-84D9-DDE5FD35B0F9@nostrum.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 90.230.136.60 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rjsparks@nostrum.com, housley@vigilsec.com, codesprints@ietf.org, henrik-sent@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: henrik@levkowetz.com X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:51:10 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on merlot.tools.ietf.org) Cc: codesprints@ietf.org Subject: Re: [codesprints] Maastricht Codesprint Evaluation X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 23:07:50 -0000 Hi Robert, On 2010-09-24 23:13 Robert Sparks said the following: > One thought - > > I think we could get a quicker start if we made the branches for the people > we knew about before Saturday - a week earlier would be great - it would > make it easier for people to get their development environment going before > they got there. Can do (assuming I remember or am reminded). Best, Henrik From peter.musgrave@magorcorp.com Fri Sep 24 17:21:54 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D800A3A6B87 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:21:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -101.851 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.851 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.126, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zYddNNLX999S for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:21:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f179.google.com (mail-qy0-f179.google.com [209.85.216.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0403A6B1F for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qyk2 with SMTP id 2so3017302qyk.10 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:22:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.10.30 with SMTP id n30mr3028039qan.106.1285374146212; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:22:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.68.39 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Sep 2010 17:22:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4C9116F5.1000103@vigilsec.com> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2010 20:22:26 -0400 Message-ID: From: Peter Musgrave To: Robert Sparks , codesprints@ietf.org, housley@vigilsec.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [codesprints] Maastricht Codesprint Evaluation X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 00:21:54 -0000 Sure. I thought overall it was a good session. I was able to get going and change some code which I found useful (and I now use a lot). I was a bit surprised I got that far - although I had done my homework prior to arriving. (I suspect it has all leaked out my ears over the last three months - but we'll see.) I think the session might benefit from an interruption at some point (maybe a brief stop at coffee once people have settled in - or lunch) and a chance for people to exchange some info on what they are trying to do or ask a question about how a particular section of the tools works. Nothing long - just 30-60 sec. to see if the person wants/needs/can provide advice. I enjoyed the session - and I'll be back in Beijing. Is there any info on how many people try it out and never return? Are there things we could do to help those people stay? (Part of me thinks that it is somewhat self-selecting at present and that may not be a bad thing). Cheers, Peter Musgrave On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Robert Sparks wrote= : > It would be good to respond to this if you can. (Please let me know if yo= u > didn't get it originally) > An "it's all good" message if you don't want something to change would he= lp. > Suggestions for improvement would be better. > RjS > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Russ Housley > Date: September 15, 2010 1:56:53 PM CDT > To: codesprints@ietf.org > Subject: [codesprints] Maastricht Codesprint Evaluation > > I'd like to evaluate the last Codesprint. =A0What went right? =A0What wen= t > (other than the Bat Cave of a room) wrong? > > Russ > _______________________________________________ > codesprints mailing list > codesprints@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints > > From housley@vigilsec.com Sun Sep 26 13:07:13 2010 Return-Path: X-Original-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Delivered-To: codesprints@core3.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6D63A6B7E for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:07:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JEu3hFP+yYYa for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from odin.smetech.net (mail.smetech.net [208.254.26.82]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB453A6B84 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:07:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (unknown [208.254.26.81]) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533B79A478E; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:08:05 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smetech.net Received: from odin.smetech.net ([208.254.26.82]) by localhost (ronin.smetech.net [208.254.26.81]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fW0Pw1ejURMM; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:07:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.2.104] (pool-96-231-149-87.washdc.fios.verizon.net [96.231.149.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by odin.smetech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C849A478A; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:08:04 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C9FA81C.2080408@vigilsec.com> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:07:56 -0400 From: Russ Housley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Sparks References: <4C893575.4010906@ietf.org> <4C9116F5.1000103@vigilsec.com> <7877F6A7-9DC8-4AB9-84D9-DDE5FD35B0F9@nostrum.com> In-Reply-To: <7877F6A7-9DC8-4AB9-84D9-DDE5FD35B0F9@nostrum.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: codesprints@ietf.org Subject: Re: [codesprints] Maastricht Codesprint Evaluation X-BeenThere: codesprints@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: "List for coordinating \(and following up on\) codesprint activities" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:07:13 -0000 This sounds like a good idea, and easy too. On 9/24/2010 5:13 PM, Robert Sparks wrote: > One thought - > > I think we could get a quicker start if we made the branches for the people > we knew about before Saturday - a week earlier would be great - it would > make it easier for people to get their development environment going before > they got there. > > RjS > > On Sep 15, 2010, at 1:56 PM, Russ Housley wrote: > >> I'd like to evaluate the last Codesprint. What went right? What went >> (other than the Bat Cave of a room) wrong? >> >> Russ >> _______________________________________________ >> codesprints mailing list >> codesprints@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/codesprints > >