From nobody Wed Jul 5 07:13:26 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C23131D1B; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 07:13:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NzpTWf1oGdcJ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4BC012762F; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 07:13:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v65EDIQj023371; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:13:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2001:638:708:18::55] (unknown [IPv6:2001:638:708:18::55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3x2jWy1vklz3b5t; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:13:18 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) From: Carsten Bormann Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:13:17 +0200 Cc: cose X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 520956797.778528-2bf8ae63a734369d9a130a1cb175f567 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: To: hackathon@ietf.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: Subject: [COSE] COSE in the network: Secure Wake-on-Radio (SWORN) X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 14:13:24 -0000 At the IETF99 Hackathon, we plan to do some work on using COSE in the = network. See below. Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten # COSE in the network: Secure Wake-on-Radio (SWORN) ## Champions * Olaf Bergmann * Benjamin Piepiora ## Background COSE is the CBOR object signing and encryption specification, RFC = 8152-to-be. COSE is mostly thought as a component for application protocols, but it can be used in the network as well. Wake-on-Radio can save a lot of power for battery-operated devices by having them wake up and consume power only when there is actually something to do. But Wake-on-Radio provides a too easy DoS vector for a battery depletion attack. Secure Wake-on-Radio Nudging (SWORN) enables a last-hop router to find out if the correspondent node was authorized to wake up the device with a packet. ## Project * Implement SWORN in an actual IoT scenario with Wake-on-Radio * Demonstrate the power savings achievable * Demonstrate the workflow for getting a correspondent node authorized * Cooperate with other COSE connoisseurs and IoT power savers * Specification: From nobody Wed Jul 5 11:16:44 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A32131560; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:16:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0voSzy8pi5Bm; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F69A131445; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:16:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 29A05B81904; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:16:05 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf-announce@ietf.org, rfc-dist@rfc-editor.org X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:ams_util_lib.php From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, drafts-update-ref@iana.org, cose@ietf.org Message-Id: <20170705181605.29A05B81904@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:16:05 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [COSE] RFC 8152 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 18:16:44 -0000 A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 8152 Title: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) Author: J. Schaad Status: Standards Track Stream: IETF Date: July 2017 Mailbox: ietf@augustcellars.com Pages: 121 Characters: 256190 Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None I-D Tag: draft-ietf-cose-msg-24.txt URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8152 DOI: 10.17487/RFC8152 Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is a data format designed for small code size and small message size. There is a need for the ability to have basic security services defined for this data format. This document defines the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) protocol. This specification describes how to create and process signatures, message authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR for serialization. This specification additionally describes how to represent cryptographic keys using CBOR. This document is a product of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption Working Group of the IETF. This is now a Proposed Standard. STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for the standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited. This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. To subscribe or unsubscribe, see https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for unlimited distribution. The RFC Editor Team Association Management Solutions, LLC From nobody Wed Jul 5 11:36:32 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B506131D9E for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:36:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z83-xfb0ZjJ6 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:36:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98C48131442 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:36:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [134.102.201.11]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v65IaPwN020390 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 20:36:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p5DC7F3A7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.199.243.167]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3x2qMY2X5cz3bBw; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 20:36:25 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) From: Carsten Bormann In-Reply-To: <20170705181605.29A05B81904@rfc-editor.org> Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 20:36:23 +0200 X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 520972583.785324-1e5e97f471191ff85c1d098d088f3791 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <8B866506-E4AA-4EB6-B942-E24CC0AB2236@tzi.org> References: <20170705181605.29A05B81904@rfc-editor.org> To: cose X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) Archived-At: Subject: Re: [COSE] RFC 8152 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 18:36:30 -0000 Congratulations, Jim! This has been a long time coming, and I started to think we might never = touch the asymptote=E2=80=A6 But it is done now, and now we can charge forward with CWT and related = documents, but also with specialized protocols such as SWORN. Thank you to everybody who helped make this happen! Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Carsten > On Jul 5, 2017, at 20:16, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: >=20 > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. >=20 >=20 > RFC 8152 >=20 > Title: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)=20 > Author: J. Schaad > Status: Standards Track > Stream: IETF > Date: July 2017 > Mailbox: ietf@augustcellars.com > Pages: 121 > Characters: 256190 > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None >=20 > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-cose-msg-24.txt >=20 > URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8152 >=20 > DOI: 10.17487/RFC8152 >=20 > Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is a data format designed > for small code size and small message size. There is a need for the > ability to have basic security services defined for this data format. > This document defines the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) > protocol. This specification describes how to create and process > signatures, message authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR > for serialization. This specification additionally describes how to > represent cryptographic keys using CBOR. >=20 > This document is a product of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption = Working Group of the IETF. >=20 > This is now a Proposed Standard. >=20 > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track > protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and = suggestions > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official > Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for = the=20 > standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of = this=20 > memo is unlimited. >=20 > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist >=20 > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk >=20 > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. = Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. >=20 >=20 > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC >=20 >=20 >=20 From nobody Wed Jul 5 11:57:12 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B505131479 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:57:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.221 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4UDCMJMdSmOp for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu [18.7.68.36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D30812EC12 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 11:57:07 -0700 (PDT) X-AuditID: 12074424-ea3ff700000004eb-39-595d3682604c Received: from mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu ( [18.9.21.43]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by dmz-mailsec-scanner-7.mit.edu (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 0F.F5.01259.2863D595; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:57:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (OUTGOING-AUTH-1.MIT.EDU [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-3.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id v65Iv53R022370 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:57:06 -0400 Received: from artemisia.richer.local (static-96-237-195-53.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [96.237.195.53]) (authenticated bits=0) (User authenticated as jricher@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id v65Iv3tV013312 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:57:05 -0400 From: Justin Richer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 14:57:03 -0400 References: <20170705181605.29A05B81904@rfc-editor.org> To: cose In-Reply-To: <20170705181605.29A05B81904@rfc-editor.org> Message-Id: <70635E3E-53E9-41B8-89E5-2BBAA9B97C3C@mit.edu> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrAIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixCmqrdtkFhtp8G2hlsW0rVNZHRg9liz5 yRTAGMVlk5Kak1mWWqRvl8CVMfH3EZaCLrGKb4eWsjQwbhTsYuTkkBAwkbi5ZD1bFyMXh5DA YiaJp68eskM4RxglZlzsYoZwvjBJfGj+wwbSwiagKjF9TQsTiM0soC7xZ94lZghbW2LZwtdA NgcHr4C+RO9zRpCwsICnxLN1PWCtLAIqEvNvvwRrFRIwl9h0/hMrSLmIgITEhQ1lIGFOAQuJ c98fsILYvAJWEk+WfWeEOFRW4tbsS8wTGPlnIVk8C8niWQiLFzAyr2KUTcmt0s1NzMwpTk3W LU5OzMtLLdI118vNLNFLTSndxAgKPHYXlR2M3T3ehxgFOBiVeHgN3sRECrEmlhVX5h5ilORg UhLl/aMfGynEl5SfUpmRWJwRX1Sak1p8iFGCg1lJhHeqHlCONyWxsiq1KB8mJc3BoiTOK67R GCEkkJ5YkpqdmlqQWgSTleHgUJLg9TEFahQsSk1PrUjLzClBSDNxcIIM5wEavloYZHhxQWJu cWY6RP4Uoy7Hqwn/vzEJseTl56VKifOygwwSACnKKM2DmwNKGAlvD5u+YhQHekuYtwekigeY bOAmvQJawgS0RLExBmRJSSJCSqqBcfuEaZcb058eE/V3UzvKddhqfq7t13krTTv38Jzcv3X6 zbtMt178l2uY4Nj4IjZRMM+OYc7cl+96rs2f0Juqr77uYgmjVdWkqxPue/3PYklPeXThTaFc 68zI7Yu1P/xr/vLDPmjf+XWcO28duP1QXehhY9ljk4hXvXoH/thZiIqrRPoI7HWx2qjEUpyR aKjFXFScCAD0PID98wIAAA== Archived-At: Subject: Re: [COSE] RFC 8152 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 18:57:10 -0000 Congratulations to the working group! It=E2=80=99s wonderful seeing = something finally cross the finish line. Your formerly COSE chair, =E2=80=94 Justin > On Jul 5, 2017, at 2:16 PM, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: >=20 > A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. >=20 >=20 > RFC 8152 >=20 > Title: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)=20 > Author: J. Schaad > Status: Standards Track > Stream: IETF > Date: July 2017 > Mailbox: ietf@augustcellars.com > Pages: 121 > Characters: 256190 > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None >=20 > I-D Tag: draft-ietf-cose-msg-24.txt >=20 > URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8152 >=20 > DOI: 10.17487/RFC8152 >=20 > Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is a data format designed > for small code size and small message size. There is a need for the > ability to have basic security services defined for this data format. > This document defines the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) > protocol. This specification describes how to create and process > signatures, message authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR > for serialization. This specification additionally describes how to > represent cryptographic keys using CBOR. >=20 > This document is a product of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption = Working Group of the IETF. >=20 > This is now a Proposed Standard. >=20 > STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track > protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and = suggestions > for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official > Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for = the=20 > standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of = this=20 > memo is unlimited. >=20 > This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. > To subscribe or unsubscribe, see > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce > https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist >=20 > For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search > For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk >=20 > Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the > author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. = Unless > specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for > unlimited distribution. >=20 >=20 > The RFC Editor Team > Association Management Solutions, LLC >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > COSE mailing list > COSE@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose From nobody Wed Jul 5 18:15:20 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962DE1316B8 for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 18:15:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alibaba-inc.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qe0Z3c585Hfq for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 18:15:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from out0-236.mail.aliyun.com (out0-236.mail.aliyun.com [140.205.0.236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C3E11316CF for ; Wed, 5 Jul 2017 18:15:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alibaba-inc.com; s=default; t=1499303711; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Message-ID:Mime-version:Content-type; bh=B5774lpoexsMV5dFpGWdf053EoIyRYfCsnBlRyi0rag=; b=WlJa/MNRvNl1r+RRzjZP/kiAtIlsiZOUc96GKzVsfk9amKz6voL2TA2pX/FMwuTrW86zpvbZbPCOlBI3qCeCctASgpeIcT8QIZWuzLk29oVjq7q3G+eGe/RMPOxiSIF/Uq5C9+LyuS/N4oC22b3eTAUMRzc9kRnvAp0Z3egILHU= X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R151e4; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=e02c03292; MF=kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=2; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---.8Ly-AQX_1499303585; Received: from 30.6.252.21(mailfrom:kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com ip:42.120.74.234) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Thu, 06 Jul 2017 09:15:08 +0800 User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.6.8.160830 Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 09:14:28 +0800 From: "Kepeng Li" To: Justin Richer , cose Message-ID: Thread-Topic: [COSE] RFC 8152 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) References: <20170705181605.29A05B81904@rfc-editor.org> <70635E3E-53E9-41B8-89E5-2BBAA9B97C3C@mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <70635E3E-53E9-41B8-89E5-2BBAA9B97C3C@mit.edu> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="GB2312" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: Re: [COSE] RFC 8152 on CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2017 01:15:19 -0000 Congratulation!=20 Well done, everybody! Kepeng =D4=DA 06/07/2017, 2:57 AM=A3=AC "COSE on behalf of Justin Richer" =D0=B4=C8=EB: >Congratulations to the working group! It=A1=AFs wonderful seeing something >finally cross the finish line. > >Your formerly COSE chair, > =A1=AA Justin > >> On Jul 5, 2017, at 2:16 PM, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org wrote: >>=20 >> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. >>=20 >>=20 >> RFC 8152 >>=20 >> Title: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) >> Author: J. Schaad >> Status: Standards Track >> Stream: IETF >> Date: July 2017 >> Mailbox: ietf@augustcellars.com >> Pages: 121 >> Characters: 256190 >> Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None >>=20 >> I-D Tag: draft-ietf-cose-msg-24.txt >>=20 >> URL: https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8152 >>=20 >> DOI: 10.17487/RFC8152 >>=20 >> Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR) is a data format designed >> for small code size and small message size. There is a need for the >> ability to have basic security services defined for this data format. >> This document defines the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) >> protocol. This specification describes how to create and process >> signatures, message authentication codes, and encryption using CBOR >> for serialization. This specification additionally describes how to >> represent cryptographic keys using CBOR. >>=20 >> This document is a product of the CBOR Object Signing and Encryption >>Working Group of the IETF. >>=20 >> This is now a Proposed Standard. >>=20 >> STANDARDS TRACK: This document specifies an Internet Standards Track >> protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and >>suggestions >> for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the Official >> Internet Protocol Standards (https://www.rfc-editor.org/standards) for >>the=20 >> standardization state and status of this protocol. Distribution of >>this=20 >> memo is unlimited. >>=20 >> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists. >> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce >> https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist >>=20 >> For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search >> For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk >>=20 >> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the >> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org. Unless >> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for >> unlimited distribution. >>=20 >>=20 >> The RFC Editor Team >> Association Management Solutions, LLC >>=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> COSE mailing list >> COSE@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose > >_______________________________________________ >COSE mailing list >COSE@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cose From nobody Tue Jul 11 11:03:08 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A07E131773 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:03:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.202 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.202 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ojsZHqbtpD2b for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:03:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E084B12778E for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:03:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 10D30B80E58; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:03:04 -0700 (PDT) To: ietf@augustcellars.com, Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com, ekr@rtfm.com, jricher@mit.edu, kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php From: RFC Errata System Cc: ietf@augustcellars.com, cose@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <20170711180304.10D30B80E58@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Archived-At: Subject: [COSE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8152 (5066) X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:03:07 -0000 The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8152, "CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5066 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Jim Schaad Section: 14 Original Text ------------- o The restriction applies to the encoding of the Sig_structure, the Enc_structure, and the MAC_structure. Corrected Text -------------- o The restriction applies to the encoding of the COSE_KDF_Context, Sig_structure, the Enc_structure, and the MAC_structure. Notes ----- When listing the set of structure that need to be canonically encoded, I missed this one. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8152 (draft-ietf-cose-msg-24) -------------------------------------- Title : CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) Publication Date : July 2017 Author(s) : J. Schaad Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : CBOR Object Signing and Encryption Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Tue Jul 11 11:06:07 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F91313178C for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:06:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=augustcellars.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kkIB0-3gdgf3 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail4.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 051FF13178B for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Language: en-us DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=augustcellars.com; s=winery; c=simple/simple; t=1499796347; h=from:subject:to:date:message-id; bh=UC1cy2BoM0qC/mJlbKBHQQyIi/KRF7fCKQwiZWiuT0E=; b=XPMe9bEEhQp4OV9MujmrffFDsaKcH433WrRs1TND2qb53SffYmviYqweSppEZuErnjUbo7vGeXA F6jOc1gyyukWWAFtuemCCjXMBeMLqp69d1rGlLQVMv41Uk4u6phwYirdz1YIIuS9mHUTz+eShT1Wo N2/x3uVumERpoH1c7KjqasS2ioGCs4rbadbp7aEUN8VtHRN0jdo8h3jzwm+wW53zX/P86ZCq/7q17 1jMoUGCWzE7V4ukU3Ff3ckwVoIpXukT08wbRBswLY3xfyWq0vsqTbsY2to8rdboqam1Nf8AlbzQPZ 1Igw8DCKrUD3SEpDmiI4TBwFXJYfnfpW0O9Q== Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.1.201) by mail4.augustcellars.com (192.168.1.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:05:46 -0700 Received: from Hebrews (104.129.192.109) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:05:45 -0700 From: Jim Schaad To: 'RFC Errata System' , , , , CC: References: <20170711180304.10D30B80E58@rfc-editor.org> In-Reply-To: <20170711180304.10D30B80E58@rfc-editor.org> Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 11:05:54 -0700 Message-ID: <044101d2fa70$58f63fa0$0ae2bee0$@augustcellars.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Thread-Index: AQJ+4FccglqkQy8EysYbhzbduvyIVKD3H+Xw X-Originating-IP: [104.129.192.109] Archived-At: Subject: Re: [COSE] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8152 (5066) X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2017 18:06:05 -0000 I reported it, so yes I believe that this should be approved. Jim -----Original Message----- From: RFC Errata System [mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org]=20 Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 11:03 AM To: ietf@augustcellars.com; Kathleen.Moriarty.ietf@gmail.com; = ekr@rtfm.com; jricher@mit.edu; kepeng.lkp@alibaba-inc.com Cc: ietf@augustcellars.com; cose@ietf.org; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org Subject: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8152 (5066) The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8152, "CBOR Object = Signing and Encryption (COSE)". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5066 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Jim Schaad Section: 14 Original Text ------------- o The restriction applies to the encoding of the Sig_structure, the Enc_structure, and the MAC_structure. Corrected Text -------------- o The restriction applies to the encoding of the COSE_KDF_Context,=20 Sig_structure, the Enc_structure, and the MAC_structure. Notes ----- When listing the set of structure that need to be canonically encoded, I = missed this one. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use = "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a = decision is reached, the verifying party can log in to change the status = and edit the report, if necessary.=20 -------------------------------------- RFC8152 (draft-ietf-cose-msg-24) -------------------------------------- Title : CBOR Object Signing and Encryption (COSE) Publication Date : July 2017 Author(s) : J. Schaad Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : CBOR Object Signing and Encryption Area : Security Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG From nobody Fri Jul 14 10:42:26 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A44131760 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:42:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.011 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=github.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tn-8gK_Pa7gf for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:42:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from o1.sgmail.github.com (o1.sgmail.github.com [192.254.114.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B32E113189C for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 10:42:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=github.com; h=from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=s20150108; bh=O4+ituMKJ2E6T1x84ay809AVv84=; b=gXmtNeAJXwd7+BZJ tIH8M8hpBQG4lQdI5IRbdzPcDObIv2huAkITap7LwsUF5xGGUKNQ7HWJSU5X9wmL MTMdVNHSLGVgNWt177h1KAeIWM9g/1+U65pCezSw2e5Fuwb+jOSls9SzAGvKL7ux f3VAO7IrcbkRyjsV5nm0c+J0ArI= Received: by filter1104p1mdw1.sendgrid.net with SMTP id filter1104p1mdw1-17069-5969026D-16 2017-07-14 17:42:05.28741112 +0000 UTC Received: from github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net (github-smtp2b-ext-cp1-prd.iad.github.net [192.30.253.17]) by ismtpd0002p1iad1.sendgrid.net (SG) with ESMTP id _NR0l_VFRTuQ4uwSH9w_9w for ; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:42:05.233 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:42:05 +0000 (UTC) From: GitHub To: cose-ietf Message-ID: <5969026da36b_664a3f9e601ffc001235715@github-staff3-cp1-prd.iad.github.net.mail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5969026d9988_664a3f9e601ffc0012356d8"; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All categories: terms-of-service-update X-SG-EID: zBqibVgUFnkdEwCKSWwpoXMmwkeqHk+WPQjRqKYzszwx4axyDQ5qW5ATKdjXJY62Gnmuxw7Y6v9Jxy pPO2s9Ki4AA1gbhxNfOQ64ZW8JsrlknzrpPntDkCIDLERm34C9bPOc1K5cC7UAiVhhwJiq5H+9Mvt5 PcGF2DeOB3eg7TamRsILtaHYyKwN38rGIE34SkJHa6ei4WemmdNBRwq9Tg== X-SG-ID: r8NHDv7ipxry1t+c3B8AksGE44bQ0laBULM2PGBCaHQV210sHWwZZ+atgUAUDUGO Archived-At: Subject: [COSE] Updates to GitHub Terms of Service X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:42:24 -0000 ----==_mimepart_5969026d9988_664a3f9e601ffc0012356d8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Updated Terms of Service and new Site Policy repository ------------------------------------------------------------ We're updating our Terms of Service (https://help.github.com/articles/githu= b-terms-of-service/) and Corporate Terms of Service (https://help.github.co= m/articles/github-corporate-terms-of-service/). These revisions are the res= ult of community feedback, along with clarifications and improvements to th= e readability of both documents. All changes are in separate pull requests = in a new working repository, github/site-policy (https://github.com/github/= site-policy). Here, you can view, comment, and suggest additional updates= =E2=80=94or fork a copy to adapt for your own site. Please submit your comments by 5:00 pm PST on Friday, July 28. After that, = we=E2=80=99ll take a week to go through your comments and make changes to i= mprove the Terms. The new Terms will become effective on Monday, August 7. Pull requests welcome ------------------------------------------------------------ We welcome you to look over our changes and share your input using the new = Site Policy repository. Please follow our Contributor Guidelines (https://g= ithub.com/github/site-policy/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md) , and let us know= if you see anything you think should be different=E2=80=94whether it=E2=80= =99s a missed typo or a rule that might have implications we haven=E2=80=99= t thought of. Overview of changes ------------------------------------------------------------ * Updates to GitHub Terms of Service (https://github.com/github/site-policy= /pull/1) : Added a =E2=80=9CPrivate Repositories=E2=80=9D section as Sectio= n E, updated the licenses granted in Section D for clarity, and updated the= Complete Agreement subsection in Section S, =E2=80=9CMiscellaneous=E2=80= =9D * Updates to GitHub Corporate Terms of Service (https://github.com/github/s= ite-policy/pull/2) : Added a "Private Repositories" section as Section E, u= pdated the licenses granted in Section D for clarity, updated the Complete = Agreement subsection, and added a Publicity subsection to Section S, "Misce= llaneous" * Added a product description to the GitHub Business Plan Addendum (https:/= /help.github.com/articles/github-business-plan-addendum/) * Updated the Amendment to GitHub Terms of Service Applicable to U.S. Feder= al Government Users (https://help.github.com/amendment-to-github-terms-of-s= ervice-applicable-to-u-s-federal-government-users/) to reflect previous cha= nges to notification policy Can't comment before July 28? No problem! The site policy repository is alw= ays open, so you can send us feedback any time. Check out the blog post (ht= tps://github.com/blog/2393-open-sourcing-our-site-policies-and-new-changes-= to-our-terms-of-service) to learn more, or give us your feedback (https://g= ithub.com/github/site-policy/issues/). We'd love to hear if our project hel= ped you create policy foundations for your business. ------------------------------------------------------------ Email preferences (https://github.com/settings/emails) =C2=B7 Terms (https:= //help.github.com/articles/github-terms-of-service/) =C2=B7 Privacy (https:= //help.github.com/articles/github-privacy-policy/) =C2=B7 Sign into GitHub = (https://github.com/login) GitHub, Inc. 88 Colin P Kelly Jr St. San Francisco, CA 94107 ----==_mimepart_5969026d9988_664a3f9e601ffc0012356d8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Terms of service update
Updated Terms of Service and new Site P= olicy repository
3D"GitHub"

Updated Terms of Service and new Site P= olicy repository

We're updating our Terms of Service and Corporate Terms of Service. These revisions are the result of communit= y feedback, along with clarifications and improvements to the readability o= f both documents. All changes are in separate pull requests in a new workin= g repository, github/s= ite-policy. Here, you can view, comment, and suggest additional updates= —or fork a copy to adapt for your own site.

Please submit your comments by 5:00 pm PST on Frida= y, July 28. After that, we=E2=80=99ll take a week to go through your commen= ts and make changes to improve the Terms. The new Terms will become effecti= ve on Monday, August 7.

Pull requests welcome

We welcome you to look over our changes and share y= our input using the new Site Policy repository. Please follow our C= ontributor Guidelines, and let us know if you see anything you think sh= ould be different=E2=80=94whether it=E2=80=99s a missed typo or a rule that= might have implications we haven=E2=80=99t thought of.

Overview of changes

Can't comment before July 28? No problem! The site = policy repository is always open, so you can send us feedback any time. Che= ck out the blog post to learn = more, or give us your feedback. We'd love to hear if our project helped you create po= licy foundations for your business.

Email preferences · Terms · Privacy · Sign into GitHub

GitH= ub, Inc.
= 88 Colin P Kelly Jr St.
San Francisco, CA 94107
----==_mimepart_5969026d9988_664a3f9e601ffc0012356d8-- From nobody Fri Jul 14 23:40:35 2017 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: cose@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E84E12EC37; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 23:40:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.199 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O0dK-0KLeLrQ; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 23:40:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED05012EB69; Fri, 14 Jul 2017 23:40:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at informatik.uni-bremen.de Received: from submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de [IPv6:2001:638:708:30c9::b]) by mailhost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v6F6eHeC024634; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 08:40:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from aung.tzi.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:370:128:224:d6ff:fe13:2040]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by submithost.informatik.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3x8g0c60DTz3YrZ; Sat, 15 Jul 2017 08:40:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Olaf Bergmann To: hackathon@ietf.org Cc: cose References: Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 08:40:16 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Carsten Bormann's message of "Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:13:17 +0200") Message-ID: <87mv86yzhr.fsf@aung.informatik.uni-bremen.de> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Archived-At: Subject: Re: [COSE] [hackathon] COSE in the network: Secure Wake-on-Radio (SWORN) X-BeenThere: cose@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: CBOR Object Signing and Encryption List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2017 06:40:27 -0000 Hi all, Carsten Bormann writes: > # COSE in the network: Secure Wake-on-Radio (SWORN) I have uploaded a small slide set that shows what we are trying to do at: https://libcoap.net/files/ietf99-hackathon/hackathon-sworn.pdf Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe Olaf