Subject: [cuss] Encoding of protocol discriminator in the uui-isdn package

From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:33:28 +0100

In trying to sort our whether we have adequately specified the protocol discriminator (I think we have), I notice that I have been using the term "payload" and "UUI payload" in the package draft.

It looks to me like the mechanism draft uses the term "UUI data" to refer to the material that goes in the ABNF construct 

"uui-data    = token / quoted-string"

I propose to replace the ISDN package terminology with "UUI data" to be consistent assuming I see no objections.

It may be worth checking the mechanism draft to ensure this term is used only in the context identified above in the mechanism draft (and therefore does not encompass the header field parameters as well).

Responses?

Keith