From nobody Tue May 26 04:42:47 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F811A871E for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 04:42:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -5.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t4jVM1WcvnTC for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 04:42:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx144.netapp.com (mx144.netapp.com [216.240.21.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0B281A872E for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 04:42:41 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,497,1427785200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="45133698" Received: from hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.38]) by mx144-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 26 May 2015 04:37:41 -0700 Received: from HIOEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.34) by hioexcmbx05-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Tue, 26 May 2015 04:37:41 -0700 Received: from HIOEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.34]) by hioexcmbx01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.34]) with mapi id 15.00.1076.000; Tue, 26 May 2015 04:37:41 -0700 From: "Eggert, Lars" To: dclc Thread-Topic: Status of the group Thread-Index: AQHQl6hfoPVoFTSg6EKYy/AhpvdAYQ== Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 11:37:40 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.2100) x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.122.56.79] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AE84C105-5874-4227-862D-F75E7FB35D31"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Subject: [Dclc] Status of the group X-BeenThere: dclc@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of Data Center Latency Control List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 11:42:46 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_AE84C105-5874-4227-862D-F75E7FB35D31 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hi folks, there hasn't been any activity in this group in the last six months. I'm = wondering if we should let it fizzle out? Or is someone feeling = sufficiently motivated to take the flag from Fred and Lingli, put the = energy in and make this happen? Lars --Apple-Mail=_AE84C105-5874-4227-862D-F75E7FB35D31 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEARECAAYFAlVkWwQACgkQIWcjmsUTWRpf9wCgqRKVqxc1SE7o33Tgb/l3AijB 2icAoKWT4sIh8oiFu9idf4qqtLVDezRX =TBcL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_AE84C105-5874-4227-862D-F75E7FB35D31-- From nobody Tue May 26 11:04:05 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57DC1B2C91 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 11:04:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -114.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 759Re5MFfTtx for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 11:04:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E0091ACD5D for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 11:03:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1636; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432663420; x=1433873020; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=JWgRW/RydQC4r4dhOR9PhfME9LMWshtBU/JBvoTLG4I=; b=C/PQLrAd/otKN/8QlJO9hvGtDvfqzrQtIyzs1aLCkzQ4ge+t07UFVHuB d48gbbOcD3sU2A57ADuD4uBzwZZLgtDuTKH6XyRJ1fEGDAXUU69Kpcpip WXEAFRY8Amh/8DrZfOy16PIQBPeZR8vrPLT8rBY7fHjdTis/ljI2/zKNY 8=; X-Files: signature.asc : 487 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ANBQA2tWRV/40NJK1cgxCBMgbKfQKBR0wBAQEBAQGBC4QiAQEBAwF5BQsCAQgYLjIlAgQOBQ6IFgjUAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLOoUFB4MXgRYFkwiCEoFDhzqXLyODeG+BRoEBAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,500,1427760000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="422807361" Received: from alln-core-8.cisco.com ([173.36.13.141]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 26 May 2015 18:03:39 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by alln-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4QI3cex004114 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 26 May 2015 18:03:38 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.134]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 26 May 2015 13:03:38 -0500 From: "Fred Baker (fred)" To: "Eggert, Lars" Thread-Topic: [Dclc] Status of the group Thread-Index: AQHQl95KlQ/tFCDuxESzQlOHPKjbow== Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 18:03:37 +0000 Message-ID: <25089274-843E-41D8-B486-E0900FC52A7F@cisco.com> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.24.163.30] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C5334AE1-9EE7-47EA-B72C-4C530FFBE720"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: dclc Subject: Re: [Dclc] Status of the group X-BeenThere: dclc@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of Data Center Latency Control List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 18:04:04 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_C5334AE1-9EE7-47EA-B72C-4C530FFBE720 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On May 26, 2015, at 4:37 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote: >=20 > there hasn't been any activity in this group in the last six months. = I'm wondering if we should let it fizzle out? Or is someone feeling = sufficiently motivated to take the flag from Fred and Lingli, put the = energy in and make this happen? For the record, I have not asked for a meeting room in Prague, although = I imagine we can get a side room for the price of asking. That is on the = basis of how hard it has been to get people to talk about what they are = doing. Happy to revive the work, or to see it revived by someone else, = but I need people to step up. --Apple-Mail=_C5334AE1-9EE7-47EA-B72C-4C530FFBE720 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEVAwUBVWS1eJ9ieig10VPpAQKcqAf/X3v7GRM48/greBI6rO/0gKcAixiZFDLr 5l80fFWu3NwiUMPA9I+cgVaSeelJlb/lLjYZYhx+srvMP1xowSGwlSJPcCUVDSo7 kqGTPpDtYRHdYXgy7Zs+1YQZkscw7nJ+iCeqmfayVB8Hn57bDdLVRApf+YYJFSiP E68LuqeNjKCVgU1KSNCHhRvARL/yM8q+AX4PxjSqB/+CbgriERn6lAV+edYuQij4 mWg8PmDbBwCv2IB4/K4Yae6FXSvPvYhUebPg6IIrvjwmdSbboNHL6nqZ4JCYNcuY Yn/C81fAMYuLN7YcHSc2jVJa91kA6GFKcWgQgx2LPc+eBIdjoWPZPg== =h3TM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_C5334AE1-9EE7-47EA-B72C-4C530FFBE720-- From nobody Tue May 26 17:03:21 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAD01B3343 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:03:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.311 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I4eWUbnyOlKd for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:03:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE961ACDB6 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.7]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app07-12007 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee7556509bcffd-24228; Wed, 27 May 2015 08:03:09 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee7556509bcffd-24228 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from cmccPC (unknown[221.223.64.187]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee4556509bbb93-86585; Wed, 27 May 2015 08:03:09 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee4556509bbb93-86585 From: "Hui Deng" To: "'Fred Baker \(fred\)'" , "'Eggert, Lars'" References: <25089274-843E-41D8-B486-E0900FC52A7F@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <25089274-843E-41D8-B486-E0900FC52A7F@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 08:03:07 +0800 Message-ID: <004501d09810$84260fd0$8c722f70$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AQHQl95KlQ/tFCDuxESzQlOHPKjbo52O8Niw Content-Language: zh-cn Archived-At: Cc: 'dclc' Subject: Re: [Dclc] Status of the group X-BeenThere: dclc@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of Data Center Latency Control List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 00:03:20 -0000 Yesterday, Lingli just had a new baby(girl). I would suggest that dclc could consider to meet in Nov. By that time, = Lingli will come back to IETF. -----Original Message----- From: Dclc [mailto:dclc-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker (fred) Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:04 AM To: Eggert, Lars Cc: dclc Subject: Re: [Dclc] Status of the group > On May 26, 2015, at 4:37 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote: >=20 > there hasn't been any activity in this group in the last six months. = I'm wondering if we should let it fizzle out? Or is someone feeling = sufficiently motivated to take the flag from Fred and Lingli, put the = energy in and make this happen? For the record, I have not asked for a meeting room in Prague, although = I imagine we can get a side room for the price of asking. That is on the = basis of how hard it has been to get people to talk about what they are = doing. Happy to revive the work, or to see it revived by someone else, = but I need people to step up. From nobody Tue May 26 17:35:59 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33B031B3358 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:35:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -114.511 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wMtX10MGDoqo for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:35:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAC0B1A1A3D for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 17:35:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2932; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1432686956; x=1433896556; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=FbYQMQ9azxEodbZdB3J57xFuyRenVXdhDuq5ZGrhqk4=; b=ggUHGK+BHaKm7LFSeHh+3FpjwoMXppi/8HrK16SnQsOrszhjE7/g00SY HnmV8x9gQ7imlf2wLtaf3tS+7Hml4+wnKqTtVB3ci0cLUxcFJPhBjxgQ9 UC0AszeVRLM0ZlwhSvmnbhP9SrZD8lkMKVFPsENmoqdgOwwTpRUKIir0N M=; X-Files: signature.asc : 487 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AfBADLEGVV/4ENJK1cgxCBMgbDLQmHUAKBQTgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCIBAQEDAXkFBwQCAQgRBAEBAScHMhQJCAIEDgUODIgKCM1cAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4o4gQKFBQcGgxGBFgWQTII8ghKBQ4c6ly8jg3hvgUaBAQEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,502,1427760000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="153502760" Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 27 May 2015 00:35:55 +0000 Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4R0Ztsj011342 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 27 May 2015 00:35:55 GMT Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.134]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Tue, 26 May 2015 19:35:55 -0500 From: "Fred Baker (fred)" To: Hui Deng Thread-Topic: [Dclc] Status of the group Thread-Index: AQHQmBUXwXj1tHbZVk6JxXP6CoZSCQ== Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 00:35:54 +0000 Message-ID: <3C51B145-54A8-458F-828E-7D9458C22CC9@cisco.com> References: <25089274-843E-41D8-B486-E0900FC52A7F@cisco.com> <004501d09810$84260fd0$8c722f70$@com> In-Reply-To: <004501d09810$84260fd0$8c722f70$@com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.24.163.30] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_482E8340-AEC0-4157-9256-1B19168A3EF0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Archived-At: Cc: "Eggert, Lars" , dclc Subject: Re: [Dclc] Status of the group X-BeenThere: dclc@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of Data Center Latency Control List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 00:35:58 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_482E8340-AEC0-4157-9256-1B19168A3EF0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > On May 26, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Hui Deng wrote: >=20 > Yesterday, Lingli just had a new baby(girl). Congratulations to her! > I would suggest that dclc could consider to meet in Nov. By that time, = Lingli will come back to IETF. OK, I'll request a side room during that meeting. My previous statement = stands, however. Since March of last year, it has been Lingli, myself, = and a couple of speakers. When we have been aware of people putting = together papers, they have declined to share their research pending = publication, and when the publication came out, we haven't heard from = them. If folks are looking for a venue to discuss and push a research = agenda, we need for them to step up and say so - and the list would be a = great place to start. If they wish the meetings were in some other = venue, we need for them to step up and say so. If people have another = opinion, we need for them to step up and say so. Right now, it's crickets. No news is not good news. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dclc [mailto:dclc-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker = (fred) > Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:04 AM > To: Eggert, Lars > Cc: dclc > Subject: Re: [Dclc] Status of the group >=20 >=20 >> On May 26, 2015, at 4:37 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote: >>=20 >> there hasn't been any activity in this group in the last six months. = I'm wondering if we should let it fizzle out? Or is someone feeling = sufficiently motivated to take the flag from Fred and Lingli, put the = energy in and make this happen? >=20 > For the record, I have not asked for a meeting room in Prague, = although I imagine we can get a side room for the price of asking. That = is on the basis of how hard it has been to get people to talk about what = they are doing. Happy to revive the work, or to see it revived by = someone else, but I need people to step up. >=20 >=20 >=20 --Apple-Mail=_482E8340-AEC0-4157-9256-1B19168A3EF0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEVAwUBVWURaZ9ieig10VPpAQKHpgf+N0NlMHObHYfG9Hzy8IYghYmpnrML3NGP 3C4wpcuX5WuuqVq+jfPLTI61y5mLfDF/DZwuf3aGB8WOXOFDOxgl7b8d2Kyq0zES bsQCJO5ir5UTREYa1L06PzaMwFvZNJqIhlmX7HYXnXA2jJtZxXpNqve/6tB/0QGH KcgsCQx0ZrTnMINd6g60GTR5rI0U12APqyF1KX1ICVxq1dSneX+n82vRFcru+85/ ORURvWlF9WeKtiNz6q4/BDpK+3DYE41CGwmiwgfOj/Df8amgsT461jFletK7oiQ9 7BNINvDHJcAk1NQVzt3vrWwdZhGzBP0WxQeeuwpeGYETgEyB7SgTOw== =WNEH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_482E8340-AEC0-4157-9256-1B19168A3EF0-- From nobody Tue May 26 18:18:54 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6881A1A83 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 18:18:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.311 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RELAY_IS_221=2.222, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NFBff5E7srU4 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 18:18:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cmccmta3.chinamobile.com (cmccmta3.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79EFC1A1A82 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 18:18:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.19]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app11-12011 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eeb55651b7221c-9ab35; Wed, 27 May 2015 09:18:44 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2eeb55651b7221c-9ab35 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from cmccPC (unknown[10.2.41.141]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr10-12010 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2eea55651b72aa9-25aab; Wed, 27 May 2015 09:18:44 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2eea55651b72aa9-25aab From: "Hui Deng" To: "'Fred Baker \(fred\)'" References: <25089274-843E-41D8-B486-E0900FC52A7F@cisco.com> <004501d09810$84260fd0$8c722f70$@com> <3C51B145-54A8-458F-828E-7D9458C22CC9@cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <3C51B145-54A8-458F-828E-7D9458C22CC9@cisco.com> Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 09:18:43 +0800 Message-ID: <001301d0981b$132e8860$398b9920$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AQHQmBUXwXj1tHbZVk6JxXP6CoZSCZ2PBU7g Content-Language: zh-cn Archived-At: Cc: "'Eggert, Lars'" , 'dclc' Subject: Re: [Dclc] Status of the group X-BeenThere: dclc@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of Data Center Latency Control List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 01:18:54 -0000 > Yesterday, Lingli just had a new baby(girl). Congratulations to her! =3D=3D > thanks for her, she has two now, a boy and a girl, good life. > I would suggest that dclc could consider to meet in Nov. By that time, = Lingli will come back to IETF. OK, I'll request a side room during that meeting. My previous statement = stands, however. Since March of last year, it has been Lingli, myself, = and a couple of speakers. When we have been aware of people putting = together papers, they have declined to share their research pending = publication, and when the publication came out, we haven't heard from = them. If folks are looking for a venue to discuss and push a research = agenda, we need for them to step up and say so - and the list would be a = great place to start. If they wish the meetings were in some other = venue, we need for them to step up and say so. If people have another = opinion, we need for them to step up and say so. Right now, it's crickets. No news is not good news. =3D=3D> agree, fair enough DENG Hui > -----Original Message----- > From: Dclc [mailto:dclc-bounces@irtf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker = (fred) > Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 2:04 AM > To: Eggert, Lars > Cc: dclc > Subject: Re: [Dclc] Status of the group >=20 >=20 >> On May 26, 2015, at 4:37 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote: >>=20 >> there hasn't been any activity in this group in the last six months. = I'm wondering if we should let it fizzle out? Or is someone feeling = sufficiently motivated to take the flag from Fred and Lingli, put the = energy in and make this happen? >=20 > For the record, I have not asked for a meeting room in Prague, = although I imagine we can get a side room for the price of asking. That = is on the basis of how hard it has been to get people to talk about what = they are doing. Happy to revive the work, or to see it revived by = someone else, but I need people to step up. >=20 >=20 >=20 From nobody Tue May 26 22:56:11 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dclc@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F13C1A00FA for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 22:56:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.123 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.123 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TSOdvlGKQn6y for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 22:56:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-la0-x233.google.com (mail-la0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFCEA1A00F4 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 22:56:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by laat2 with SMTP id t2so82155775laa.1 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 22:56:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uJC9zXmSLwHTojdwLF9FpoDMY1I/wqVO1GBxqNjMZHk=; b=1DfDz+HSNlWYs5TqamO1qquBYwlOsrcZoqxiXapAGyWrufnmZUkin+AHkFO6u63vjn x96nn5fFOZUVVxwzSF/x72z+t3e0EcOGs1R030FTY0bTk6nRPQKetL/VwDouBrXjKIpX O+hh670phKETiNTA0OuU9qX26hfVe3cOuFJLa0ielYYDgbm2Ok1EoyA2XUJHhOipd+Nx RRoy1qc8+bnGSu+cQjyOpMWEFVqjI1mJnAkq18K93m1sBKPx/TCOxXhrAM4F8mGKbftk txpRJSvThMo0farMR4aI8eigZ/U7vkAbjDu++SMjMzHGZ1mzMWrF6b2snkeKr9IcLMhp ZzlA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.140.231 with SMTP id rj7mr26017286lbb.76.1432706167223; Tue, 26 May 2015 22:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: crowcroft@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.14.205 with HTTP; Tue, 26 May 2015 22:56:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.14.205 with HTTP; Tue, 26 May 2015 22:56:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 06:56:07 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: EVOzYtJKSuT6rVWKmyoRnMEtf1E Message-ID: From: Jon Crowcroft To: Lars Eggert Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c26a302a3ab9051709e6b9 Archived-At: Cc: dclc Subject: Re: [Dclc] Status of the group X-BeenThere: dclc@irtf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of Data Center Latency Control List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 05:56:10 -0000 --001a11c26a302a3ab9051709e6b9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Too busy working..see http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/srg/netos/camsas/blog/2015-05-12-qjump.html On 26 May 2015 12:42, "Eggert, Lars" wrote: > Hi folks, > > there hasn't been any activity in this group in the last six months. I'm > wondering if we should let it fizzle out? Or is someone feeling > sufficiently motivated to take the flag from Fred and Lingli, put the > energy in and make this happen? > > Lars > > _______________________________________________ > Dclc mailing list > Dclc@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dclc > > --001a11c26a302a3ab9051709e6b9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Too busy working..see
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/srg/netos/camsas/blog/2015-0= 5-12-qjump.html

On 26 May 2015 12:42, "Eggert, Lars" &= lt;lars@netapp.com> wrote:
Hi folks,

there hasn't been any activity in this group in the last six months. I&= #39;m wondering if we should let it fizzle out? Or is someone feeling suffi= ciently motivated to take the flag from Fred and Lingli, put the energy in = and make this happen?

Lars

_______________________________________________
Dclc mailing list
Dclc@irtf.org
ht= tps://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/dclc

--001a11c26a302a3ab9051709e6b9--