Subject: RE: [dcp] dccp acronym

From: Tuexen Michael <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 13:23:36 +0200

Ok,

then it is a problem only when you want DCCP to be integrated
into Ethereal (under that name). Sorry, I did not search the web.

Best regards
Michael

Michael Tuexen    Tel.:   +49 89 722 47210
Siemens AG        Fax:    +49 89 722 48212
ICN WN CC SE 7    e-Mail: [email-masked]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eddie Kohler [mailto:[email-masked]]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 9:56 PM
> To: Michael Tuexen
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [dcp] dccp acronym 
> 
> 
> > Unfortunately the acronym resolves to
> > Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse Protocol. So maybe DCP was
> > a better choice...
> 
> Arrgh... 
> 
> We might be OK here. People were pretty against DCP at one of 
> our meetings,
> because of the semi-homonym with TCP. But searching on the Web for
> "Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse Protocol" doesn't turn up 
> any results.
> Furthermore, the Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse pages 
> refer to "the DCC
> protocol", never "DCCP".
> 
> Eddie
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dcp mailing list: [email-masked]
> archives: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcp
> project: http://www.icir.org/kohler/dcp/
> 

_______________________________________________
dcp mailing list: [email-masked]
archives: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dcp
project: http://www.icir.org/kohler/dcp/