Subject: [Dime] Section 4.5: Relevance of "SHLD NOT" column

From: "Satendra Gera (satgera)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:22:37 +0530

Hi Victor/All,
 
There have been changes in section 4.5: Diameter Base Protocol AVPs
between bis3-bis6 document. 
Can you please explain
 
a) the rational behind retaining "SHLD NOT" column in the table. 
b) use case where marking a AVP bit to "SHLD NOT" will help. AFAIR
haven't seen an application marking an AVP bit as "SHLD NOT".
c) what should be the behavior incase a message is received with an AVP,
where a "SHLD NOT" bit is set in the header.
 
Regards,
Satendra
_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
[email-masked]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime