From nobody Thu Feb 1 02:40:07 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dispatch@ietf.org Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992881317A7; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 02:40:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: IETF Meeting Session Request Tool To: Cc: alexey.melnikov@isode.com, ben@nostrum.com, dispatch@ietf.org, dispatch-chairs@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.71.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <151748160559.7974.9463696963919567152.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 02:40:05 -0800 Archived-At: Subject: [dispatch] dispatch - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 101 X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 10:40:06 -0000 A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Alexey Melnikov, a ART Area Director. --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: Dispatch Area Name: Applications and Real-Time Area Session Requester: Alexey Melnikov Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 1.5 Hours Number of Attendees: 100 Conflicts to Avoid: First Priority: dmarc uta jmap xrblock stir sipcore rtcweb rmcat payload netvc mmusic insipid ecrit avtcore bfcpbis clue core dcrup doh extra cfrg Second Priority: tram tsvwg tsvarea opsarea lmap People who must be present: Alexey Melnikov Mary Barnes Adam Roach Ben Campbell Cullen Jennings Murray Kucherawy Resources Requested: Special Requests: Please schedule in the 1st slot on Monday morning, list the meeting as coupled with ARTAREA, and avoid the same kind of conflicts with other area meetings and any Bofs and potential new ART WGs. --------------------------------------------------------- From nobody Sat Feb 3 05:41:48 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C62A12D778 for ; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 05:41:47 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=luWcnXz/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=LgO+BGpb Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DB6KubBFW4mS for ; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 05:41:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDE2712D0C3 for ; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 05:41:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE2720C79; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 08:41:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from web2 ([10.202.2.212]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 03 Feb 2018 08:41:42 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=2tYQyHEvERR6l+bLzyg6cv2ixNaAM4t+la1E174OtXM=; b=luWcnXz/ q61MABXDYN7gVOv0dodV6ZdpM0Dq8PLJEpuZhCt1UJvxVKuSDuzCrUsEUb8HadnZ 2YSc408ADYmqqGGWHwNrUZLpzIq+dY43qYA3T2xYWVJdmsfBm8HuvDuNEzujZDLi RP30Z+5gX0qCoilpC3+osB30Nr2u2DParqiem6mxuEUpBd1eQJpFcbrgkNdlB4YP joCNNtcltqlUUQ9zEwZwMFiEjk4GQHL+gkGXItrRDj/gc3KcJhmqvlKNKTDK7xom gZ6QtNJB97iRamvsN2Uq460oXkV9uZczpD6YCZdCuHllRaziLPkCTbncx75ve29n oC8ppncrQiCrUw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=2tYQyHEvERR6l+bLzyg6cv2ixNaAM 4t+la1E174OtXM=; b=LgO+BGpb3q/558fJkNjJ7NCjxPEOCOPM93BwBxI262m8b oFNGEmelABMft7P2czmhfU11EUkz0f8tvCPp/0ozo4RaQtxrs910mN05BGBMZDda zTc8rUX4PfVS+UGL6TnXzt5vkk6UNW/rO5HxBEI9eNS3+lP5hSWPZVn43mfjBTk3 fcjr+Gu0YZbXjOIx+QePiN+soH5W4rmfrZE5aT9rvPAfdJ+KLn/ZH040g35DxL8j b8qUwVCxc29rFSvz4LOxE5rImLHRp6Y/mg78fQIXZLj3DYBhn//4JYAZ33WmX7e2 vcIXRix7pU9PXwBMm80Inmo1Tq6ozTaBRS3nf1kdg== X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 41C2062B77; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 08:41:42 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1517665302.2777878.1258215904.59CF8AFC@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Alexey Melnikov To: tzdist@ietf.org, DISPATCH Cc: Ken Murchison MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-fde26eb3 Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 13:41:42 +0000 Archived-At: Subject: [dispatch] Possible revival of the TZDIST WG X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 13:41:47 -0000 Hi, I've been asked by Ken Murchison to help progress 2 of his drafts: draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-00 The Time Zone Information Format (TZif) and draft-murchison-tzdist-geolocate-01 The Time Zone Data Distribution Service (TZDIST) Geolocate Extension I am considering reviving of the TZDIST WG to precess these documents, as well as another possible one that would discuss how to store/retrieve different versions of tzdata for historical purposes. At this point I would like to assess how much interest there is in doing this work. If you are interested in reviewing/participating in discussions of these topics, please reply to tzdist@ietf.org or directly to me. Thank you, Alexey, as an ART AD From nobody Sat Feb 3 05:50:44 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123ED12D88F for ; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 05:50:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fastmail.fm header.b=czA8cH/M; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=EP6PAWZt Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Art0-I3bYdit for ; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 05:50:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A55DE127201 for ; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 05:50:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A0020DC8; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 08:46:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from web2 ([10.202.2.212]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 03 Feb 2018 08:46:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.fm; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=lGohk6XJV0rSeiAVRwR5o5HrFlZgp UA1xZaJ11uM21A=; b=czA8cH/MtlwhpCGsxIoEKh2eZlf46G6hsaddCgVXuMGah XIGy1K/fj1MH7+N33szBq4XS6S/CPAN+ca716jpM1GcR0jlg/LSafME0Cf386KLO ACHkktNFmsiydov/xt33l4yFY030MvRvf15uTnEq/tTO6+4LRQyQQ9md/IIYLGv9 MPxg8l4NOrAi29a8IyQZpHYjnDZMUnqbn1YBCB/1VzxvtPRrvPzW4dMrpMB7QRvZ gj4q7ZHeNASoznNXBH20dKu4E7osvl4fvEODOsPbkoeKoaWrOcwSwFpb62cwIgKY khzY8sunSQlscXNAZJHWOX1KPas1z/UVKuMBt9n2w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=lGohk6 XJV0rSeiAVRwR5o5HrFlZgpUA1xZaJ11uM21A=; b=EP6PAWZtpCN7nu3HjvyFpz 6I4AsyNhVDyls+kNdXJ8x+oRt48AmrAbatvXacZxQ5BIQPwkw5hJtOwGEHsgWhJE N+VarfygZgyRMwfHmwvHzjwZfqkEZIbTyMxP3QjILBmEqlZlztepYutGVYgaw49N Qp1jadP7MJSA0x0nR+94IMjc29ydupvFEiY6vQC+jJlvcfRqy+7wMvBCkSyuntoA xKam4zov5j7DsuR0dFhAp/puX7Ul73dW9ze8eykJFpqE+HpgJmJ4UZQ35cjobmvl U1KrvxesAkqJWE8+dmJXMW/dTo+vdnla98KzA+dKez3m/UZUgWeWCIia4A5hC0WA == X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 27A8362B77; Sat, 3 Feb 2018 08:46:49 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1517665609.2779778.1258224072.19913E6B@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Alexey Melnikov To: DISPATCH Cc: Ken Murchison MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-fde26eb3 References: <1517665302.2777878.1258215904.59CF8AFC@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: <1517665302.2777878.1258215904.59CF8AFC@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 13:46:49 +0000 Archived-At: Subject: Re: [dispatch] Possible revival of the TZDIST WG X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2018 13:50:42 -0000 Correction: tzdist@ietf.org mailing list was closed, so please reply to dispatch@ietf.org (or me). On Sat, Feb 3, 2018, at 1:41 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Hi, > I've been asked by Ken Murchison to help progress 2 of his drafts: > > draft-murchison-tzdist-tzif-00 > The Time Zone Information Format (TZif) > > and > > draft-murchison-tzdist-geolocate-01 > The Time Zone Data Distribution Service (TZDIST) Geolocate Extension > > I am considering reviving of the TZDIST WG to precess these documents, > as well as another possible one that would discuss how to store/retrieve > different versions of tzdata for historical purposes. At this point I > would like to assess how much interest there is in doing this work. If > you are interested in reviewing/participating in discussions of these > topics, please reply to tzdist@ietf.org or directly to me. > > Thank you, > Alexey, as an ART AD From nobody Sun Feb 4 15:55:45 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A76126C22 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 15:55:44 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=OpEt5+Mn; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=QlwEy3Z+ Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ueS-7XH4Vq2s for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 15:55:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D820120725 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 15:55:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 683CF20B97 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 18:55:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 04 Feb 2018 18:55:40 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Mr5XJI YO7ycWBVl0V3CWI0KiK+wWqlxa/EeHk2vnIi8=; b=OpEt5+Mnrb+ZppuQ6w77iJ ceFm8aCBpZoTCo7St2LV9TQdIk5xd9dIVHIuHs0wt9Vgyl/hlN0KJW3byb/+mscA MrASz7CUOri+WaMw47YNxMiuQOTJTRda3KGrcp4VSjgpU7fb+k9+wQlJAZqx6yyG V2NSLUT0mb9S8cnsyD6DT+jx1egZL215TW9nycNwJOdVPi/fpBfXTJVzP4mCtUft xzC4FjrnaPWqbR4dVhg78yjhjB8SGVWPoLCrq6r2vYDLr2nYXR8VdJRDkv1tUKkQ tYpUmt8c1Bgm4thT/EcTAgLCz2h+gFq96cEAB/rvPyNsm0LvzmzhD9cU+gYfseXg == DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Mr5XJIYO7ycWBVl0V3CWI0KiK+wWqlxa/EeHk2vnI i8=; b=QlwEy3Z+OP39Hf1UeRslsX2zdzyk7jkNXwY9Y8DdOieizZYn2qKkA9iFr 911D5fafd4Vp59mLC6UoAstjn/HkEgXEaYDIWXwd2oADpOo4PqqLvuJm5dYry/UE LXuM1go1y0exb7cfYI1ywoSa9+bgKF4XH1lOLL5nlggR9VboEjLUIm3AMfrhucT2 ZcENCNT8s62zqsUqjIOBgFvFszuoqgmsJnvZnUMa0tpJj6jagKCxixkhAup+ebLe XL4WyOzV7MwNxqBglCy4iIQZePhElS5bIoQPmU37SlWlWuCy6O/h0u4pohsEymxm C3+BRlp6r5OXDlfaFWlSPkfozqBwQ== X-ME-Sender: Received: from [192.168.1.18] (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5DA2A7E0FD for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2018 18:55:39 -0500 (EST) From: Mark Nottingham Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_7F853F28-3320-46CA-92DD-5D73370D604F" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) Message-Id: <4320BB59-CC0C-47B7-999A-ACEB5ED7B040@mnot.net> References: <151778734897.5727.8188635946026313824.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: DISPATCH list Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2018 10:55:36 +1100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) Archived-At: Subject: [dispatch] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-02.txt X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2018 23:55:44 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_7F853F28-3320-46CA-92DD-5D73370D604F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Could I please have some time in London to discuss this? 10 minutes = should suffice. Thanks, > Begin forwarded message: >=20 > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > Subject: New Version Notification for = draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-02.txt > Date: 5 February 2018 at 10:35:48 am AEDT > To: "Mark Nottingham" >=20 >=20 > A new version of I-D, draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-02.txt > has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted to the > IETF repository. >=20 > Name: draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis > Revision: 02 > Title: Defining Well-Known Uniform Resource Identifiers = (URIs) > Document date: 2018-02-05 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 8 > URL: = https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-02.txt > Status: = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis/ > Htmlized: = https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-02 > Htmlized: = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-02 > Diff: = https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-02 >=20 > Abstract: > This memo defines a path prefix for "well-known locations", "/.well- > known/", in selected Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) schemes. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of = submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >=20 > The IETF Secretariat >=20 -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ --Apple-Mail=_7F853F28-3320-46CA-92DD-5D73370D604F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Could= I please have some time in London to discuss this? 10 minutes should = suffice.

Thanks,


Begin = forwarded message:

From: = internet-drafts@ietf.org
Subject: = New Version = Notification for draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-02.txt
Date: = 5 February 2018 at 10:35:48 am = AEDT
To: = "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>

A new version of I-D, draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted = to the
IETF repository.

Name: = = draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis
Revision: 02
Title:= = Defining Well-Known Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)
Document date: 2018-02-05
Group:= = Individual Submission
Pages: 8
URL: =            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-rfc5785bi= s-02.txt
Status: =         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-02<= br class=3D"">Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nottingham-rfc5785b= is-02
Diff: =           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-nottingham-rfc5785bis= -02

Abstract:
=   This memo defines a path prefix for "well-known locations", = "/.well-
  known/", in selected Uniform = Resource Identifier (URI) schemes.




Please note that it may take a = couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the = htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat


--
Mark Nottingham  =  https://www.mnot.net/

= --Apple-Mail=_7F853F28-3320-46CA-92DD-5D73370D604F-- From nobody Wed Feb 14 21:57:39 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96176127136 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:57:38 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=q6vsrsw+; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=Y1+ttkA5 Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1GhLwZskCWgW for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:57:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8612A12025C for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 21:57:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DE420BFE for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:57:34 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:57:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=unKWDQ tVy/FHQQ8zMPOvszdy46O9IjOTPZ+fYD0Xz2Y=; b=q6vsrsw+4xoKmj+hA6H8Xv KxJLEQdn0b2fHToNEruT6G+NT4h3HQTn5/xYHxo+D4T0xV407xq75w9eZmEv7iIH I/3gBCl4z0wWmDo3AJWV+pPGiepEJSDG13AeuIw+1rSn4/A/UiIpsTFk51zM22t8 MopwxIipChF+4OUDucnAN19tTtWKvygNazqtG5sVBdvIN0SfUxnntU7x6K/skeiu faBGZ1XCz3z4B7dECOixNK+iol5dloBNfLpTy6SPyLJlRREPqOlNoIolC0LyYmub AEF0W58F6FSS669TV0+ceBpxYF5l6cPZDlhb9PLnYPLwz7DY96u390I9QOL2dDIA == DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=unKWDQtVy/FHQQ8zMPOvszdy46O9IjOTPZ+fYD0Xz 2Y=; b=Y1+ttkA5XHMLqmH3rIZ6BOvdviaH8wYO6/etEd8Vr/GLFZXugkItCP221 mU75eaWR1ivbxGa2ky3jsc+tjzHDmhP2c7oJ8ysh9DhzXqLUct8FLZl3XPYHLMpW fnxPUlKN+Y7q/jCplxuIM+XK1ONZxvsA3L/NMNNwhFyP2rUP4h1vXbbeP9VYWuYc xdvjoRp7ZzBfqQCmY18CPc+LyWqn//Jf+zy8PXTAE/lJgN5ImU9YCSoDNCERSKKQ RESJrgCNE8Qt2F7slhV3xtRENWQHk4ZcBpwvqz9vki5ukMKJyrFRibTjA94FPilD QtsKW0jDDKCpQ2SwsRH94doMCuCRQ== X-ME-Sender: Received: from [192.168.1.18] (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C320B240DE for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:57:33 -0500 (EST) From: Mark Nottingham Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_07C89F32-5C31-49F1-961C-015E13CB8AF3" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\)) Message-Id: References: <151867418245.7554.10364856757545679841.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> To: DISPATCH list Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:57:29 +1100 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20) Archived-At: Subject: [dispatch] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-04.txt X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 05:57:39 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_07C89F32-5C31-49F1-961C-015E13CB8AF3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii An update after some off-list feedback. > Begin forwarded message: >=20 > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org > Subject: New Version Notification for = draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-04.txt > Date: 15 February 2018 at 4:56:22 pm AEDT > To: "Mark Nottingham" >=20 >=20 > A new version of I-D, draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-04.txt > has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted to the > IETF repository. >=20 > Name: draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis > Revision: 04 > Title: Defining Well-Known Uniform Resource Identifiers = (URIs) > Document date: 2018-02-15 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 9 > URL: = https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-04.txt > Status: = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis/ > Htmlized: = https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-04 > Htmlized: = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-04 > Diff: = https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-04 >=20 > Abstract: > This memo defines a path prefix for "well-known locations", "/.well- > known/", in selected Uniform Resource Identifier (URI) schemes. >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of = submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. >=20 > The IETF Secretariat >=20 -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/ --Apple-Mail=_07C89F32-5C31-49F1-961C-015E13CB8AF3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii An = update after some off-list feedback.


Begin forwarded message:

From: = internet-drafts@ietf.org
Subject: = New Version = Notification for draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-04.txt
Date: = 15 February 2018 at 4:56:22 pm = AEDT
To: = "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net>

A new version of I-D, draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-04.txt
has been successfully submitted by Mark Nottingham and posted = to the
IETF repository.

Name: = = draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis
Revision: 04
Title:= = Defining Well-Known Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs)
Document date: 2018-02-15
Group:= = Individual Submission
Pages: 9
URL: =            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-nottingham-rfc5785bi= s-04.txt
Status: =         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-nottingham-rfc5785bis-04<= br class=3D"">Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-nottingham-rfc5785b= is-04
Diff: =           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-nottingham-rfc5785bis= -04

Abstract:
=   This memo defines a path prefix for "well-known locations", = "/.well-
  known/", in selected Uniform = Resource Identifier (URI) schemes.




Please note that it may take a = couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the = htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat


--
Mark Nottingham  =  https://www.mnot.net/

= --Apple-Mail=_07C89F32-5C31-49F1-961C-015E13CB8AF3-- From nobody Thu Feb 15 07:17:22 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B1D112762F for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 07:17:21 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.909 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D_EalA_GJaK7 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 07:17:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C09F1201F2 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 07:17:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1emLHf-0003cC-Cv for dispatch@ietf.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:17:15 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 16:17:15 +0100 (CET) From: Bernie Hoeneisen X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch To: IETF DISPATCH list Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Subject: [dispatch] Opportunistic encryption for email with pEp / Request for feedback X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2018 15:17:21 -0000 Dear dispatch list After an introduction in Prague , a successful BarBoF in Singapore and many hallway discussions we learned that there is considerable interest for secure interpersonal messaging, which is at the same time also usable and interoperable with systems already deployed out in the wild. The main concept of the pretty Easy privacy (pEp) work has already been published as I-D: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-birk-pep Basically it is about enhanced opportunistic encryption in email (and other messaging). We are seeking more feedback on our existing work as well to find the right venue (and scope) for this work to continue in the IETF. In addtion to the main draft, we are working on the following topics (to be published as I-Ds shortly), whose early drafts your may access already: - New privacy-enhancing formats for email based upon already existing standards, e.g. PGP/MIME (minimizing unnecessarily exposed meta data, including encrypting the subject): https://pep.foundation/dev/repos/internet-drafts/file/tip/pep-email/draft-birk-pep-email-NN.txt - Rating System and Privacy Status to label secure / private types of communications: https://pep.foundation/dev/repos/internet-drafts/file/tip/pep-rating/draft-birk-pep-rating-NN.txt - Trustwords (similar to the PGP wordlist or RFC 2289) to make authenticated communications easy for end-users: https://pep.foundation/dev/repos/internet-drafts/file/tip/pep-trustwords/draft-birk-pep-trustwords-NN.txt What do you think of this work? If this work is interestig to you, we kindly ask you to express your opinion on this list. Looking forward to your feedback! Best, Bernie et al. From nobody Fri Feb 23 02:40:50 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A92124235 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:40:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c8v8aEFmal9S for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:40:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10131127871 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:40:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1epAmQ-0006eY-2u for dispatch@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:40:42 +0100 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:40:42 +0100 (CET) From: Bernie Hoeneisen X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch To: IETF DISPATCH list Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="37663318-1195930349-1519382442=:24956" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Subject: [dispatch] I-D Action: draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00.txt (fwd) X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:40:49 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --37663318-1195930349-1519382442=:24956 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Please be informed that (as promised in my earlier email) the 2nd I-D of the pEp (Pretty Easy Privacy) series has just been published. You can find it on: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-birk-pep-trustwords/ Abstract:    In public-key cryptography comparing the public keys' fingerprints of    the communication partners involved is vital to ensure that there is    no man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack on the communication channel.    Fingerprints normally consist of a chain of hexadecimal chars.    However, comparing hexadecimal strings is often impractical for    regular users and prone to misunderstandings.    To mitigate these challenges, this memo proposes the comparision of    trustwords as opposed to hexadecimal strings.  Trustwords are common    words in a natural language (e.g., English) to which the hexidecimal    strings are mapped to.  This makes the verification process more    natural. If you consider this work useful, please express your option and view on this work on this list now. If you condider this not to be useful, please tell us why. Anyways, we are looking forward to your feedback! All the best Bernie ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Date: Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:17 AM Subject: I-D Action: draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00.txt To: i-d-announce@ietf.org A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.         Title           : pretty Easy privacy (pEp): Trustwords concept         Authors         : Volker Birk                           Hernani Marques                           Bernie Hoeneisen         Filename        : draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00.txt         Pages           : 6         Date            : 2018-02-22 Abstract:    In public-key cryptography comparing the public keys' fingerprints of    the communication partners involved is vital to ensure that there is    no man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack on the communication channel.    Fingerprints normally consist of a chain of hexadecimal chars.    However, comparing hexadecimal strings is often impractical for    regular users and prone to misunderstandings.    To mitigate these challenges, this memo proposes the comparision of    trustwords as opposed to hexadecimal strings.  Trustwords are common    words in a natural language (e.g., English) to which the hexidecimal    strings are mapped to.  This makes the verification process more    natural. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-birk-pep-trustwords/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ I-D-Announce mailing list I-D-Announce@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt --37663318-1195930349-1519382442=:24956-- From nobody Fri Feb 23 02:53:13 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44F9128C0A for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:53:12 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.91 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cf6VnwV5a01L for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:53:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C52E1242EA for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 02:53:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1epAyS-0006iY-Q9 for dispatch@ietf.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:53:08 +0100 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 11:53:08 +0100 (CET) From: Bernie Hoeneisen X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch To: IETF DISPATCH list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Subject: Re: [dispatch] Opportunistic encryption for email with pEp / Request for feedback X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:53:13 -0000 In my recent email I omitted the information that the Internet Society (ISOC) is diretly supporting the pEp work and it has been selected as an Innovative Projects for Beyond the Net Funding. Please find more information on: https://www.internetsociety.org/blog/2017/06/12-innovative-projects-selected-for-beyond-the-net-funding/ cheers Bernie -- http://ucom.ch/ Modern Telephony Solutions and Tech Consulting for Internet Technology On Thu, 15 Feb 2018, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote: > Dear dispatch list > > After an introduction in Prague > , a successful BarBoF > in Singapore and many hallway discussions we learned that there is > considerable interest for secure interpersonal messaging, which is at the > same time also usable and interoperable with systems already deployed out in > the wild. The main concept of the pretty Easy privacy (pEp) work has already > been published as I-D: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-birk-pep > > > Basically it is about enhanced opportunistic encryption in email (and other > messaging). We are seeking more feedback on our existing work as well to find > the right venue (and scope) for this work to continue in the IETF. > > In addtion to the main draft, we are working on the following topics (to be > published as I-Ds shortly), whose early drafts your may access already: > > - New privacy-enhancing formats for email based upon already existing > standards, e.g. PGP/MIME (minimizing unnecessarily exposed meta data, > including encrypting the subject): > https://pep.foundation/dev/repos/internet-drafts/file/tip/pep-email/draft-birk-pep-email-NN.txt > > - Rating System and Privacy Status to label secure / private types of > communications: > https://pep.foundation/dev/repos/internet-drafts/file/tip/pep-rating/draft-birk-pep-rating-NN.txt > > - Trustwords (similar to the PGP wordlist or RFC 2289) to make > authenticated communications easy for end-users: > https://pep.foundation/dev/repos/internet-drafts/file/tip/pep-trustwords/draft-birk-pep-trustwords-NN.txt > > > What do you think of this work? If this work is interestig to you, we kindly > ask you to express your opinion on this list. > > Looking forward to your feedback! > > Best, > Bernie et al. > > _______________________________________________ > dispatch mailing list > dispatch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch > From nobody Tue Feb 27 14:21:22 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9B912E87D for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:21:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.438 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_OBFUSCATE_05_10=0.26, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cPSIMwykIrSz for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:21:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com (mail-lf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A12E12E878 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:21:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id f75so587662lfg.6 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:21:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LwZvqQCg0fAPQh9PwZ+MbbSv0x4NpRrVZOLAW5nF1rw=; b=GyAa3cXfTu1TFBD+ONXEqDew6UjgZCSTnqEmXmhq3vsNHRvkrnuGlKPe8OvB+wqKZp hTpCdGgydTQeZJfnXWVMy58QBBcRgTBnzGgW0eufHBVu+t6Z8rCJO0b1347KqP0EX46Z 4EuAncAeHmsyJPW5o/HTyfSqiR/pyxTvEzBiPvXFP5tb8adbdP7lpviviOQKFnxCGWTl 9CHc0951CCldIeZumcTDwglsHGlQ9GKFY6Bi8PWIdpdHMmysLqoZkPd4J+r6+wzbmKo8 IoV/5iUdl9+OH5RZB0I42R9aYofJRhZ+UTd0moHq+tvac79uMlkfmNWMpiFtmE0IUbgZ tYNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LwZvqQCg0fAPQh9PwZ+MbbSv0x4NpRrVZOLAW5nF1rw=; b=jkKj+osKaooS0F46x9KdJnwbP2EMPuutAQ3AEyGKVYEl4KqaCUNHWbnW+pOldRiXHB C3K1VcdXYgfjLBH85+aXcuiIxGyh2kHI5HEAzFOzgLy3MZRz8FWXA9NOP5BqtDJS+5i6 8tD9FLakOWbz1IgICGTtaX1w/yCXZzdYwuteOEvFsrGN+GELJrGP8mTPNfJpZv0ofBAX Pmhj3Xr+Jghyacprp8yCxTB8u2OJL0clTe4QJ9J+1XDQQ7WZ6TabuMgT+aadl8ALugV8 cAvOqqTAAcQq0dwEbZ+T2r7v4YAf0KMPqNdyqOyVXpKOB1NIUjplN2pAmX4aPrnAE/he M3hw== X-Gm-Message-State: APf1xPCHikqUUSBSbnxP4ekZIVUTDm9IKkHXvkNl+Yhul/iQ7T4sNE3S 4qBKGlevjM5y7TZ6HGyb8W7F5er3qkW4X6+0eYg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELsC72HK/l8L8SYvx6bbg8pV7oSLZ4va4lcwenPCM3uDjzOWz8EEVJbC7b3wbRUJG/odJQsBSHXF6wSgBI12gqM= X-Received: by 10.46.125.10 with SMTP id y10mr12026157ljc.23.1519770075422; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:21:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.46.95.204 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:21:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Mary Barnes Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 16:21:14 -0600 Message-ID: To: Bernie Hoeneisen Cc: IETF DISPATCH list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f4f5e80953947c64b80566390b08" Archived-At: Subject: Re: [dispatch] Opportunistic encryption for email with pEp / Request for feedback X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 22:21:20 -0000 --f4f5e80953947c64b80566390b08 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hi folks, So, I've not seen anyone respond to this email. Is there anyone interested in this work? We need to be putting together the agenda for London and input as to whether folks think this is a topic of interest and worth discussing f2f would be very helpful. Regards, Mary. DISPATCH WG tri-chair On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote: > Dear dispatch list > > After an introduction in Prague doc/minutes-99-dispatch/>, a successful BarBoF in Singapore and many > hallway discussions we learned that there is considerable interest for > secure interpersonal messaging, which is at the same time also usable and > interoperable with systems already deployed out in the wild. The main > concept of the pretty Easy privacy (pEp) work has already been published as > I-D: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-birk-pep > > > Basically it is about enhanced opportunistic encryption in email (and > other messaging). We are seeking more feedback on our existing work as well > to find the right venue (and scope) for this work to continue in the IETF. > > In addtion to the main draft, we are working on the following topics (to > be published as I-Ds shortly), whose early drafts your may access already: > > - New privacy-enhancing formats for email based upon already existing > standards, e.g. PGP/MIME (minimizing unnecessarily exposed meta data, > including encrypting the subject): > https://pep.foundation/dev/repos/internet-drafts/file/tip/ > pep-email/draft-birk-pep-email-NN.txt > > - Rating System and Privacy Status to label secure / private types of > communications: > https://pep.foundation/dev/repos/internet-drafts/file/tip/ > pep-rating/draft-birk-pep-rating-NN.txt > > - Trustwords (similar to the PGP wordlist or RFC 2289) to make > authenticated communications easy for end-users: > https://pep.foundation/dev/repos/internet-drafts/file/tip/ > pep-trustwords/draft-birk-pep-trustwords-NN.txt > > > What do you think of this work? If this work is interestig to you, we > kindly ask you to express your opinion on this list. > > Looking forward to your feedback! > > Best, > Bernie et al. > > _______________________________________________ > dispatch mailing list > dispatch@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch > --f4f5e80953947c64b80566390b08 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi folks,

So, I've not seen anyone = respond to this email.=C2=A0 Is there anyone interested in this work?=C2=A0= We need to be putting together the agenda for London and input as to wheth= er folks think this is a topic of interest and worth discussing f2f would b= e very helpful.

Regards,
Mary.=C2=A0
DISPATCH WG tri-chair

On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 9:17 AM, Bernie Hoeneisen <bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch> wrote:
Dear dispatch list

After an introduction in Prague <https://dat= atracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-99-dispatch/>, a successful BarBo= F in Singapore and many hallway discussions we learned that there is consid= erable interest for secure interpersonal messaging, which is at the same ti= me also usable and interoperable with systems already deployed out in the w= ild. The main concept of the pretty Easy privacy (pEp) work has already bee= n published as I-D:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-birk-= pep


Basically it is about enhanced opportunistic encryption in email (and other= messaging). We are seeking more feedback on our existing work as well to f= ind the right venue (and scope) for this work to continue in the IETF.

In addtion to the main draft, we are working on the following topics (to be= published as I-Ds shortly), whose early drafts your may access already:
- New privacy-enhancing formats for email based upon already existing
=C2=A0 standards, e.g. PGP/MIME (minimizing unnecessarily exposed meta data= ,
=C2=A0 including encrypting the subject):
=C2=A0 https://pep.foundation/dev/repos/internet-drafts/file/tip/pep-e= mail/draft-birk-pep-email-NN.txt

- Rating System and Privacy Status to label secure / private types of
=C2=A0 communications:
=C2=A0 https://pep.foundation/dev/repos/internet-drafts/file/tip/pep= -rating/draft-birk-pep-rating-NN.txt

- Trustwords (similar to the PGP wordlist or RFC 2289) to make
=C2=A0 authenticated communications easy for end-users:
=C2=A0 https://pep.foundation/dev/repos/internet-drafts/file/tip/= pep-trustwords/draft-birk-pep-trustwords-NN.txt


What do you think of this work? If this work is interestig to you, we kindl= y ask you to express your opinion on this list.

Looking forward to your feedback!

Best,
=C2=A0Bernie et al.

_______________________________________________
dispatch mailing list
dispatch@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dispatch

--f4f5e80953947c64b80566390b08-- From nobody Tue Feb 27 15:16:58 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dispatch@ietf.org Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534AD12EAF1; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:11:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "\"IETF Secretariat\"" To: , Cc: ben@nostrum.com, dispatch@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.73.0 Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Precedence: bulk Message-ID: <151977307733.5200.14957647921274782552.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:11:17 -0800 Archived-At: Subject: [dispatch] dispatch - Requested session has been scheduled for IETF 101 X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 23:11:21 -0000 Dear Alexey Melnikov, The session(s) that you have requested have been scheduled. Below is the scheduled session information followed by the original request. dispatch Session 1 (1:30:00) Monday, Morning Session I 0930-1200 Room Name: Blenheim size: 200 --------------------------------------------- Special Note: 0930-1100 Joint with ARTAREA Request Information: --------------------------------------------------------- Working Group Name: Dispatch Area Name: Applications and Real-Time Area Session Requester: Alexey Melnikov Number of Sessions: 1 Length of Session(s): 1.5 Hours Number of Attendees: 100 Conflicts to Avoid: First Priority: jmap uta dmarc xrblock stir sipcore rtcweb rmcat payload netvc mmusic insipid ecrit avtcore bfcpbis clue core dcrup doh extra cfrg Second Priority: tram tsvwg tsvarea opsarea lmap People who must be present: Alexey Melnikov Mary Barnes Adam Roach Ben Campbell Cullen Jennings Murray Kucherawy Resources Requested: Special Requests: Please schedule in the 1st slot on Monday morning, list the meeting as coupled with ARTAREA, and avoid the same kind of conflicts with other area meetings and any Bofs and potential new ART WGs. --------------------------------------------------------- From nobody Tue Feb 27 15:22:56 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dispatch@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C2212EB56 for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:14:19 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.909 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 17URkCwo3MvU for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:14:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from softronics.hoeneisen.ch (softronics.hoeneisen.ch [62.2.86.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 103BF12EA8D for ; Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:12:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by softronics.hoeneisen.ch with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eqoQ4-0004w4-8q for dispatch@ietf.org; Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:12:24 +0100 Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:12:24 +0100 (CET) From: Bernie Hoeneisen X-X-Sender: bhoeneis@softronics.hoeneisen.ch To: IETF DISPATCH list In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="37663318-1187070440-1519773059=:17009" Content-ID: X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: bernie@ietf.hoeneisen.ch X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on softronics.hoeneisen.ch); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Archived-At: Subject: Re: [dispatch] I-D Action: draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00.txt (fwd) X-BeenThere: dispatch@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: DISPATCH Working Group Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 23:14:20 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --37663318-1187070440-1519773059=:17009 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=UTF-8; FORMAT=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-ID: Just to let you know that draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00), has triggered quite some discussion on the SAAG list. Here the link to the archives: https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/saag/current/maillist.html Best, Bernie -- http://ucom.ch/ Modern Telephony Solutions and Tech Consulting for Internet Technology On Fri, 23 Feb 2018, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote: > > Please be informed that (as promised in my earlier email) the 2nd I-D of the > pEp (Pretty Easy Privacy) series has just been published. You can find it on: > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-birk-pep-trustwords/ > > Abstract: > >    In public-key cryptography comparing the public keys' fingerprints of >    the communication partners involved is vital to ensure that there is >    no man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack on the communication channel. >    Fingerprints normally consist of a chain of hexadecimal chars. >    However, comparing hexadecimal strings is often impractical for >    regular users and prone to misunderstandings. > >    To mitigate these challenges, this memo proposes the comparision of >    trustwords as opposed to hexadecimal strings.  Trustwords are common >    words in a natural language (e.g., English) to which the hexidecimal >    strings are mapped to.  This makes the verification process more >    natural. > > If you consider this work useful, please express your option and view on this > work on this list now. If you condider this not to be useful, please tell us > why. > > Anyways, we are looking forward to your feedback! > > All the best > Bernie > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: > Date: Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 9:17 AM > Subject: I-D Action: draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00.txt > To: i-d-announce@ietf.org > > > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > >         Title           : pretty Easy privacy (pEp): Trustwords concept >         Authors         : Volker Birk >                           Hernani Marques >                           Bernie Hoeneisen >         Filename        : draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00.txt >         Pages           : 6 >         Date            : 2018-02-22 > > Abstract: >    In public-key cryptography comparing the public keys' fingerprints of >    the communication partners involved is vital to ensure that there is >    no man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack on the communication channel. >    Fingerprints normally consist of a chain of hexadecimal chars. >    However, comparing hexadecimal strings is often impractical for >    regular users and prone to misunderstandings. > >    To mitigate these challenges, this memo proposes the comparision of >    trustwords as opposed to hexadecimal strings.  Trustwords are common >    words in a natural language (e.g., English) to which the hexidecimal >    strings are mapped to.  This makes the verification process more >    natural. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-birk-pep-trustwords/ > > There are also htmlized versions available at: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00 > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-birk-pep-trustwords-00 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > I-D-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > > --37663318-1187070440-1519773059=:17009--