Subject: Re: The Lightness of SAMLv2, or not (Re: [dix] draft proposed charter-consensus?)

From: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:47:53 -0800

One oint to bear in mind here.

If the outcome of this exercise is we discover that saml does the job in a way that is acceptable to the identified user community we have done a good job.

If we discover that there is some delta that needs to be addressed likewise.

If we discover that we can reuse the language of the saml spec then that is useful.

The traditional model that groups follow in this environment is seek and destroy. The incumbents try to block emergence of rivals.

I do not see that as a usefull approach. We tried that with ssh and pkix.

Let's see where we can get with embrace and extend.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Pete Rowley [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent:	Tue Feb 14 15:19:34 2006
To:	Digital Identity Exchange
Subject:	Re: The Lightness of SAMLv2, or not (Re: [dix] draft proposed charter-consensus?)

Duane Nickull wrote:

>Adobe is using SAML.  Anyone at RSA can drop by our booth to see.
>
>  
>
How many external sites are you able to interoperate with?

-- 
Pete

_______________________________________________
dix mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dix