Subject: [dmarc-ietf] spec RUA filename examples contradiction

From: Tomki Camp <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2015 16:12:58 -0800

The specification specifies that RUA filename attachments should follow this
pattern for the extension:
     extension = "xml" / “xml.gz"
   The extension MUST be "xml" for a plain XML file, or "xml.gz" for an
   XML file compressed using GZIP.

However there are examples in the document which do not follow that pattern:
     Content-Disposition: attachment;
         filename="mail.receiver.example!example.com!
                   1013662812!1013749130.gz”

—Tomki