Subject: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis / Re: Collecting DMARC issues and nits for DMARC WG phase III - DMARC standardization

From: Дилян Палаузов <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 15:49:41 +0000

Hello,

who is going to work on DMARCbis document and is it realistic to finish it with a year?

Regards
  Дилян

On Thu, 2019-05-09 at 14:23 -0700, Seth Blank wrote:
> With the group officially in Phase III of the DMARC WG charter, our work is now to explicitly review and refine the DMARC specification, with the goal of generating a standards track document.
> 
> The draft-ietf-dmarc-psd experiment is part of this process, as is the conversation about defining proper ARC reporting XML for DMARC reports.
> 
> This email is an explicit CALL FOR ISSUES AND NITS about the DMARC spec which you believe should be officially discussed as part of the DMARCbis process. Please start a separate thread for each item you have. I'll make sure all are properly in the issue tracker and get addressed.
> 
> Please send in your items no later than *Friday, May 24th*. After this point, we'll be focusing on progressing the DMARCbis process, not gathering new issues.
> 
> Below are a list of nits already in the datatracker. I'll be kicking off threads for several other issues I'm aware of shortly.
> 
> Thanks everyone!
> 
> Seth, as Secretary
> 
> Active issues for DMARCbis in the data tracker:
> - SPF 4408 vs 7208: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/1
> - Flow of operations text: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/2
> - Two tiny nits in 6.6.2 and 6.6.3: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/2
> - Definition of "fo" parameter: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/4
> - Definition of "pct" parameter: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/5
> - Fuzzy normative language around filenames: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/6
> - ABNF for dmarc-record is slightly wrong: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/7
> - Perverse incentives to use p!=none & pct=0: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/22
> - objection to maintaining registry for all participating public suffixes: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/24
> - Link to "URI" reference broken in several sections: https://trac.ietf.org/trac/dmarc/ticket/25
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc