Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC bis: ticket 63: make p=none with no reporting URI invalid?

From: Seth Blank <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 7 Jun 2020 13:41:49 -0700

As Chair, I'm closing ticket #63 and recording consensus of the group as
leaving this as-is, any guidance around this matter should be left to a BCP
or guidance document.

On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 6:10 PM Dotzero <[email-masked]> wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 5:57 PM Tim Wicinski <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
>> (with no hats)
>>
>> p=none with no reporting is fine, and we should keep it.
>>
>> One thing the WG could do is a BCP document on operational recommendations
>> where there are certain suggestions like this.
>>
>> tim
>>
>> +1
>>
>
> Michael Hammer
> _______________________________________________
> dmarc mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
>

-- 

*Seth Blank* | VP, Standards and New Technologies
*e:* [email-masked]
*p:* 415.273.8818

This email and all data transmitted with it contains confidential and/or
proprietary information intended solely for the use of individual(s)
authorized to receive it. If you are not an intended and authorized
recipient you are hereby notified of any use, disclosure, copying or
distribution of the information included in this transmission is prohibited
and may be unlawful. Please immediately notify the sender by replying to
this email and then delete it from your system.