From maxpassion@gmail.com  Thu Feb 17 02:21:46 2011
Return-Path: <maxpassion@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9476B3A6C77; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:21:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AZV8I2p9EV-I; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:21:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CEFB3A6B75; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:21:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iwc10 with SMTP id 10so2469752iwc.31 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:22:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TroPgW5XeZKS+mOLikMQY6pA8RBCjIYiGGbQ+jjEL3s=; b=i+MUkXuK0PzvgjnFyGAWZLCXnUoD4XLxTdfnu30hoWbvMn0MF323gbRE/Rt2j34gIY RA9uBVzpu/KYPxMTkDIZnOZtsC1B5v0qmbsv1bvOe6PhmUsyJTGinMT7d4U5aOgTYAgF irg3GI0ZGR30aKpFbNGdN6ilv3Ace2/p96/AA=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=HMMinwnGRmKanvfCWWTffpn1IHqQwNPEOOEHYuauC1NiTRGkSlMAzAZh2q4H5pcfBQ ZV2MdClOMtRm+CKoNinARMVVWLr0+K5/ceHcoD/rtv8VPDTQR0nxGdimJX1kvKXJSrcb UnEYocd1fyI9o8iMOqw/oL2XJXvnI8HifKKIA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.241.70 with SMTP id ld6mr2494351icb.124.1297938135883; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:22:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.219.6 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:22:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D388641.7060405@piuha.net>
References: <C95CE87E.D35B%sgundave@cisco.com> <4D388641.7060405@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:22:15 +0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTimu4+VHtRmEHfFP--xQiW2KkoQ1JmHOonCUrSSi@mail.gmail.com>
From: liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: dmm@ietf.org, "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dmm] [MEXT] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:21:46 -0000

Hi Jari,

May I ask whether the charter allowing to do problem/scenarios/gap
analysis of DMM? Thanks.

Best regards,
Dapeng Liu

2011/1/21, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>:
> The IESG has approved the change to the charter in our telechat today.
>
> Jari
>
> _______________________________________________
> MEXT mailing list
> MEXT@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>

From julien.ietf@gmail.com  Thu Feb 17 10:47:57 2011
Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF083A6E4E; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:47:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.194
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.194 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.405,  BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5qV2SNWUxMTL; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:47:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ey0-f172.google.com (mail-ey0-f172.google.com [209.85.215.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD243A6E52; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:47:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by eyd10 with SMTP id 10so1705005eyd.31 for <multiple recipients>; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:48:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=M1i4Y1GhrEdLBN0PQbBdBlXKyYyvwFaPwAc8E6l0rtk=; b=t/TsZ+s7GJiBxG/xv1mpR9sJaxMHsUN08PnvPVG3r1cUZw+S/rBuGRgSevDqPmXiB1 yUOC2MRdAdkdcR1DDB4AxIB7zG45kR+f+BJFwoKDl5l3Wrv63K0UbpdgNmLVvxuWZpRf 1Fco7dOHpvwD9cyY6IizZ171Mw25H5CdmCLBc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=KTs8X4P22kwZYv2PlXCBSPW7ISKVZB7TjA7O5pGJcK0NBSCDp3bEpicTv/FrNA5jeQ cmU/x5ul8Q/cbyWGvsHTIpwgYxvC4y25Uj/CESDvcgIfXahwx1IqOCqEOJ4Ly1XkdZP8 k3lPDBpioV81/FCUvPORYRT/MFGJYjAjNh0IM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.74.15 with SMTP id s15mr2812640faj.28.1297968506950; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:48:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.74.142 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:48:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimu4+VHtRmEHfFP--xQiW2KkoQ1JmHOonCUrSSi@mail.gmail.com>
References: <C95CE87E.D35B%sgundave@cisco.com> <4D388641.7060405@piuha.net> <AANLkTimu4+VHtRmEHfFP--xQiW2KkoQ1JmHOonCUrSSi@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 10:48:26 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTinT1EEco1o+nyzad7k11dkzir8HtwMgVoNZxhQx@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
To: liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: dmm@ietf.org, "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dmm] [MEXT] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 18:47:57 -0000

Hi Dapeng,

It's at the usual location:

http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/mext-charter

--julien

On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:22 AM, liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jari,
>
> May I ask whether the charter allowing to do problem/scenarios/gap
> analysis of DMM? Thanks.
>
> Best regards,
> Dapeng Liu
>
> 2011/1/21, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>:
>> The IESG has approved the change to the charter in our telechat today.
>>
>> Jari
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MEXT mailing list
>> MEXT@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>

From maxpassion@gmail.com  Fri Feb 18 02:48:56 2011
Return-Path: <maxpassion@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52993A6C77; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:48:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id skfKvaR8rNLB; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:48:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-iy0-f172.google.com (mail-iy0-f172.google.com [209.85.210.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DEF3A6C41; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:48:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by iym1 with SMTP id 1so3610043iym.31 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:49:28 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=21t1uMfjczXEr0nQ+O8izE4yMfBvVTw6KDrhG11mV/Q=; b=bO6WUALwgDd3944grsKuZyAj0N3CpD7yQWf0V+cUqQcx5O9PU6WjXSSJW7vd0+mJea T5zxm7qWn4fLppp/TgZP5k670aHqnOwtvL47o+0sfJ3YZsKQ7qx1fcIthomL26nP7q0I +CQjDSgJEKs/Cd2/KAR94FhKBVJ85pNT46O1Y=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Y2CLOIHCSvnxC0MMztK7SefwyIZhD9zpkTecq3ZUNCBd0xs4bDwxLms638nwbGkZcA TUsXRFE33eJoEV/GPEmBDAFdMe14Ty0JBxmNmkQi3pIFjazCuKNZonMa1/xrJ62LciZw mG4T2yFi6SoM25HKVr2ddoOoHQ2gZFbyuTHQA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.42.230.2 with SMTP id jk2mr677223icb.392.1298026167148; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:49:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.42.219.6 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:49:26 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinT1EEco1o+nyzad7k11dkzir8HtwMgVoNZxhQx@mail.gmail.com>
References: <C95CE87E.D35B%sgundave@cisco.com> <4D388641.7060405@piuha.net> <AANLkTimu4+VHtRmEHfFP--xQiW2KkoQ1JmHOonCUrSSi@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinT1EEco1o+nyzad7k11dkzir8HtwMgVoNZxhQx@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 18:49:26 +0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikjJ5Pkte2MbV4GOo3tutfr8ehKx7NDUi2keh4z@mail.gmail.com>
From: liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
To: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: dmm@ietf.org, "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dmm] [MEXT] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:48:56 -0000

Hello Julien,

Thanks for the information. But my question is: since the charter is
extended to "work on operational considerations on setting up Mobile
IPv6 networks so that traffic is distributed in an optimal way". Does
it mean that the extended charter include problem/gap/scenario
analysis of distributing the mobility anchor (DMM)?

I remember it seem that people agreed to do the analysis work of DMM
as the first step in Beijing meeting?

Regards,

Dapeng Liu
2011/2/18, Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>:
> Hi Dapeng,
>
> It's at the usual location:
>
> http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/mext-charter
>
> --julien
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:22 AM, liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jari,
>>
>> May I ask whether the charter allowing to do problem/scenarios/gap
>> analysis of DMM? Thanks.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Dapeng Liu
>>
>> 2011/1/21, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>:
>>> The IESG has approved the change to the charter in our telechat today.
>>>
>>> Jari
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MEXT mailing list
>>> MEXT@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> dmm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>
>

From behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com  Fri Feb 18 08:30:26 2011
Return-Path: <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5A23A6CA1 for <dmm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:30:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.444
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.444 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.155,  BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sfNOU-qdMuSa for <dmm@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:30:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nm9-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm9-vm0.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.196]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 73D4A3A6E83 for <dmm@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:30:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [98.139.91.68] by nm9.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Feb 2011 16:30:58 -0000
Received: from [98.139.91.4] by tm8.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Feb 2011 16:30:58 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1004.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Feb 2011 16:30:58 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 643655.45710.bm@omp1004.mail.sp2.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 23343 invoked by uid 60001); 18 Feb 2011 16:30:58 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1298046658; bh=LKcFA4kYRpjX2mnKwu8gWX4DcBCcDb0FnXnjobjnMpw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3j476ZMMOyeproWfBsC5qumL7CFRN6EqUPBw1/8lrCeN+GeRV+oZDsM33N+tRg+HK0uJC60uGPnGHLuLeevE7e80/R0XlPLT2UwzI4sBtV+oLTng/fXEqPCy/+Dhmf043mP5IQInqY8aO15ZUrzvhFV0NYYeNgohcxJQuYs4Qds=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=m4HK4ntGCUs6D0hWfV52Hy3GGxM0iXMnqFFhkYo/LyV9oHSWALu2EfUa/9OR9rvGd4zC4LXj09AD0Duqw2oN0YYuBQgqDfBxherg1ZP5GQUXuYtiA8yaP31HsKYjAAuhEG/xCYV+9lvfagDfBqX93XHoVjgzDatAylyj1ZS0ulk=;
Message-ID: <339086.13026.qm@web111412.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: K1Qe5EwVM1nEoBXMKKopz1u0Kr1yls4H7wF2CkKlNEdvAV_ iNq8kFa1BkdhutEUl2vn2ZldBSeftlNluFtPG1ctJlWEwRs_6YoR0QzRNTWM qSDSFwJsxMUtMm7JxkMrJiM8ibqfD.79c9xbr7UDw.SxVnE9oLGVtRp_1w1l NKXD06C4.y05zTAYOkOuorj4zvzUaKSSBkaVS.diNRsBzYT_nmvCBqUXGaXf mrWqvmu.123Jr_7h91QSlF2Stohyt_7WLy1IgjFJzgy04ne_KV6mJG1_KpKr 4xykK6yQvwVrCktKUjNRbn.GB0ORWQvD5N.OxyHoBYEauJEk6e1DJWn3.CZT VzJA_LPocQBnE0S0Cusp2mRNShXC88Jt_tXFR9tWb.ESOIjgWtlGmt.SZYb1 bo8LH6KaBGC6P
Received: from [206.16.17.212] by web111412.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:30:58 PST
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/555 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.292656
References: <C95CE87E.D35B%sgundave@cisco.com> <4D388641.7060405@piuha.net> <AANLkTimu4+VHtRmEHfFP--xQiW2KkoQ1JmHOonCUrSSi@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinT1EEco1o+nyzad7k11dkzir8HtwMgVoNZxhQx@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikjJ5Pkte2MbV4GOo3tutfr8ehKx7NDUi2keh4z@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:30:58 -0800 (PST)
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
To: liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikjJ5Pkte2MbV4GOo3tutfr8ehKx7NDUi2keh4z@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: dmm@ietf.org, "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dmm] [MEXT] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:30:26 -0000

Hi Dapeng,



> 
> Hello Julien,
> 
> Thanks for the information. But my question is: since the  charter is
> extended to "work on operational considerations on setting up  Mobile
> IPv6 networks so that traffic is distributed in an optimal way".  Does
> it mean that the extended charter include  problem/gap/scenario
> analysis of distributing the mobility anchor  (DMM)?
> 
> I remember it seem that people agreed to do the analysis work of  DMM
> as the first step in Beijing meeting?

My understanding is that the new informational document will be inline with 
Julien's presentation he had in Beijing mext additional session we had on dmm 
and explain how MIPv6 as defined currently can be used to distribute the traffic 
in an optimal way.

I suggest that you take the lead in this effort.

Regards,

Behcet



      

From julien.ietf@gmail.com  Fri Feb 18 11:28:43 2011
Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B6C3A6FA4; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:28:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.199
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.400,  BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hca2KSWHg3tL; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:28:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726E83A6A0F; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:28:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so477059fxm.31 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:29:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CA9hyjBiaDs+J5KjHZUEKZvLN0wiz4SMHduWhRxd7LI=; b=ovRl2jIbFtZANsCq7FU5iDZb23ZuzsTNOpLg3K03NYxPIYgpaXeLgT2XNtn+/8i2Zg xY57GwzELB6Qg9kM7VHySBs7pyPEorx2r+s53doKQksu10pyab2l1HxxXfQAwZWcDsD+ myL+P8BbZ1Es6U0Mk3I/VPhpZayThPtWsk8ec=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=QEWMPSv3ahjCYNN636QbCBsvL1UzvL17gHuAs/SvbUaop3lFB8wP2PI6yejLAnIkjB 1BlgnUnq0mgA4KmzgilnQPmEN+s35Xev0tMmdO4VdCHRIwh8EdvoiETeyy/XhN8nqlHa QPXlt4BBuwyVJrHkFc3BAe1c63e/odee2/5ds=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.103.8 with SMTP id i8mr1453335fao.47.1298057305465; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:28:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.74.142 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:28:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikjJ5Pkte2MbV4GOo3tutfr8ehKx7NDUi2keh4z@mail.gmail.com>
References: <C95CE87E.D35B%sgundave@cisco.com> <4D388641.7060405@piuha.net> <AANLkTimu4+VHtRmEHfFP--xQiW2KkoQ1JmHOonCUrSSi@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinT1EEco1o+nyzad7k11dkzir8HtwMgVoNZxhQx@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikjJ5Pkte2MbV4GOo3tutfr8ehKx7NDUi2keh4z@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:28:25 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTikjTq+_AgF-JTT+agyxNyRt0kVsoFG2yxZ3wvRu@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
To: liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: dmm@ietf.org, "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dmm] [MEXT] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 19:28:43 -0000

Hello Dapeng,

The problem/gap/scenario analysis would serve as a basis to decide on
what are the "operational considerations on setting up Mobile IPv6
networks so that traffic is distributed in an optimal way."

--julien


On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:49 AM, liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Julien,
>
> Thanks for the information. But my question is: since the charter is
> extended to "work on operational considerations on setting up Mobile
> IPv6 networks so that traffic is distributed in an optimal way". Does
> it mean that the extended charter include problem/gap/scenario
> analysis of distributing the mobility anchor (DMM)?
>
> I remember it seem that people agreed to do the analysis work of DMM
> as the first step in Beijing meeting?
>
> Regards,
>
> Dapeng Liu
> 2011/2/18, Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>:
>> Hi Dapeng,
>>
>> It's at the usual location:
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/dyn/wg/charter/mext-charter
>>
>> --julien
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:22 AM, liu dapeng <maxpassion@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Jari,
>>>
>>> May I ask whether the charter allowing to do problem/scenarios/gap
>>> analysis of DMM? Thanks.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Dapeng Liu
>>>
>>> 2011/1/21, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>:
>>>> The IESG has approved the change to the charter in our telechat today.
>>>>
>>>> Jari
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MEXT mailing list
>>>> MEXT@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mext
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> dmm mailing list
>>> dmm@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>>>
>>
>

From jari.arkko@piuha.net  Fri Feb 18 12:25:41 2011
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8753A6F18; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:25:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.58
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.019, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22A05yGZ3fGK; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:25:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA2F3A6DF1; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:25:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163CA2CC32; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:26:14 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k+ai8yJskidM; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:26:13 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9229B2CC28; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:26:13 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4D5ED5E5.3080905@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:26:13 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20101027)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <C95CE87E.D35B%sgundave@cisco.com>	<4D388641.7060405@piuha.net>	<AANLkTimu4+VHtRmEHfFP--xQiW2KkoQ1JmHOonCUrSSi@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTinT1EEco1o+nyzad7k11dkzir8HtwMgVoNZxhQx@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTikjJ5Pkte2MbV4GOo3tutfr8ehKx7NDUi2keh4z@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikjTq+_AgF-JTT+agyxNyRt0kVsoFG2yxZ3wvRu@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikjTq+_AgF-JTT+agyxNyRt0kVsoFG2yxZ3wvRu@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dmm@ietf.org, "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dmm] [MEXT] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:25:41 -0000

I think the focus should be on determining how to use the existing 
protocols for optimal distribution. If you start from a gap analysis it 
would set the focus on finding some case where this isn't possible.

Jari


From julien.ietf@gmail.com  Fri Feb 18 12:35:56 2011
Return-Path: <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7283A6F9B; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:35:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.205
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.205 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.394,  BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AwAwiOBqQPTh; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:35:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A48EF3A6E4D; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:35:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fxm15 with SMTP id 15so536456fxm.31 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:36:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=kUyZvaeaw39fVry6qBfnBqIpdf08nXY2tRHKyOArMos=; b=AsqJn2ypHo4yk3Z5TfralvmO8kUfSq40YsxrFNOaijA8RzWctEXzN0qDbN7VhM8I+v erwAySTpCYvaFLVrL6r/9Q1IwzXeaQI0AbhM6IgLmLzL23P/I4pdLFXY/z5f5WCL3d8W fQ8wMdQJNvd2XwUyTT10zUYBjy8Vx3buM0LnE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Xnt8tQPAK2L58/gZmIJOBvCzVDpHYxVGwofBZX374TWxOTZwO336kM0szJk1sg0GpB kfEwmCrE0nwoWRCOGY+AGgDc+fgrHAAWeqSLiU5XNhnDUVli7HOCZIs6KvDmc6jShLsv qEN79MyrbYAMElhSY4h+5fe6nOIot5txwqYxs=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.103.8 with SMTP id i8mr1543421fao.47.1298061324279; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:35:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.74.142 with HTTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:35:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D5ED5E5.3080905@piuha.net>
References: <C95CE87E.D35B%sgundave@cisco.com> <4D388641.7060405@piuha.net> <AANLkTimu4+VHtRmEHfFP--xQiW2KkoQ1JmHOonCUrSSi@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTinT1EEco1o+nyzad7k11dkzir8HtwMgVoNZxhQx@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikjJ5Pkte2MbV4GOo3tutfr8ehKx7NDUi2keh4z@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikjTq+_AgF-JTT+agyxNyRt0kVsoFG2yxZ3wvRu@mail.gmail.com> <4D5ED5E5.3080905@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 12:35:24 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTik6XywaJ5ScydzCP4N8piqroVX9CDegv6+JVfar@mail.gmail.com>
From: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: dmm@ietf.org, "mext@ietf.org" <mext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dmm] [MEXT] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 20:35:56 -0000

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:26 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> wrote:
> I think the focus should be on determining how to use the existing protocols
> for optimal distribution. If you start from a gap analysis it would set the
> focus on finding some case where this isn't possible.

That makes sense.

--julien

From anthonychan@huawei.com  Fri Feb 18 14:43:22 2011
Return-Path: <anthonychan@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dmm@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03873A6E7D; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:43:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zNm5eIJUINY4; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:43:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usaga04-in.huawei.com (usaga04-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.180]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354223A6DFD; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 14:43:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga04-in [172.18.4.101]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LGU008JK4H7UQ@usaga04-in.huawei.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:43:56 -0600 (CST)
Received: from C73782 ([10.124.9.58]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0LGU00HR84H6BZ@usaga04-in.huawei.com>; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:43:55 -0600 (CST)
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 16:43:55 -0600
From: Anthony Chan <anthonychan@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <4D5ED5E5.3080905@piuha.net>
To: 'Jari Arkko' <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, 'Julien Laganier' <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-id: <001201cbcfbd$53ceee30$3a097c0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3664
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Thread-index: AcvPqlSL5/5oz5PPRlixJnk96frJ8AAEXcQg
Cc: dmm@ietf.org, mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dmm] [MEXT] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work
X-BeenThere: dmm@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Distributed Mobility Management <dmm.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dmm>
List-Post: <mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm>, <mailto:dmm-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 22:43:23 -0000

Jari,

How about the problem statement that were presented at the last meeting. 

The two questions which we reached consensus in the last meeting were (1)
whether we need to better understand / clarify the problems and (2) whether
we need to understand what the existing protocol can do to address these
problems. 

H Anthony Chan

-----Original Message-----
From: dmm-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dmm-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jari
Arkko
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 2:26 PM
To: Julien Laganier
Cc: dmm@ietf.org; mext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dmm] [MEXT] suggest charter item for distributed mobility work

I think the focus should be on determining how to use the existing 
protocols for optimal distribution. If you start from a gap analysis it 
would set the focus on finding some case where this isn't possible.

Jari

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm