Subject: Re: [DMM] [dmm] #25: Security clarifications

From: Jouni Korhonen <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 14:26:11 +0300

Any comment on this? I did not see anything about on-link/first-hop security
mentioned/addressed in -04.

- Jouni

On Apr 15, 2013, at 11:41 PM, dmm issue tracker <[email-masked]> wrote:

> #25: Security clarifications
> 
> 23) Section 5
> 
>   It is necessary to provide sufficient defense against possible
>   security attacks, or to adopt existing security mechanisms and
>   protocols to provide sufficient security protections.  For instance,
>   EAP-based authentication can be used for access network security,
>   while IPsec can be used for end-to-end security.
> 
> o EAP-based security does not necessarily address on-link / first
>  hop threats. You gain access, and then can fool around.. does not
>  sound too promising, unless the security considerations can scope
>  the used link type better i.e. in p2p links this might be sufficient
>  but not in all.
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------+------------------------------------
> Reporter:  [email-masked]  |      Owner:  [email-masked]
>     Type:  defect                  |     Status:  new
> Priority:  minor                   |  Milestone:
> Component:  requirements            |    Version:
> Severity:  In WG Last Call         |   Keywords:
> ------------------------------------+------------------------------------
> 
> Ticket URL: <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/wg/dmm/trac/ticket/25>
> dmm <http://tools.ietf.org/dmm/>
>