Subject: [dns-dir] FW: PRELIMINARY Agenda and Package for November 6, 2008 Telechat

From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2008 06:28:40 +0100

Please find below the preliminary agenda of the IESG 11/6 telechat.
Please send your comments and concerns related to the documents
submitted for approval until 11/5 COB the latest. 

Thanks and Regards,

Dan

2. Protocol Actions
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
	reasonable basis on which to build the salient part of the
Internet
	infrastructure? If not, what changes would make it so?"

2.1 WG Submissions
2.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-emu-eap-gpsk-16.txt
    EAP Generalized Pre-Shared Key (EAP-GPSK) Method (Proposed Standard)
-
1 of 
    7 
    Note: document shepherd: Joe Salowey <[email-masked]> 
    Token: Pasi Eronen
  o draft-ietf-sip-sips-08.txt
    The use of the SIPS URI Scheme in the Session Initiation Protocol
(SIP) 
    (Proposed Standard) - 2 of 7 
    Note: The proto Shepherd for this document is Dean Willis. 
    Token: Cullen Jennings
  o draft-ietf-psamp-info-11.txt
    Information Model for Packet Sampling Exports (Proposed Standard) -
3
of 7 
    Note: Juergen Quittek is the PROTO shepherd 
    Token: Dan Romascanu
  o draft-ietf-avt-dtls-srtp-06.txt
    Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Extension to Establish Keys
for 
    Secure Real-time Transport Protocol (SRTP) (Proposed Standard) - 4
of
7 
    Note: The document shepherd is Roni Even. 
    Token: Cullen Jennings
  o draft-ietf-behave-dccp-04.txt
    Network Address Translation (NAT) Behavioral Requirements for the
Datagram 
    Congestion Control Protocol (BCP) - 5 of 7 
    Token: Magnus Westerlund
  o draft-ietf-sip-dtls-srtp-framework-05.txt
    Framework for Establishing an SRTP Security Context using DTLS
(Proposed 
    Standard) - 6 of 7 
    Note: Last Call ends Oct 31. Dean Willis will act as the proto
shepherd. 
    Token: Cullen Jennings
  o draft-ietf-vrrp-unified-spec-02.txt
    Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol Version 3 for IPv4 and IPv6
(Proposed 
    Standard) - 7 of 7 
    Token: David Ward

2.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

2.2 Individual Submissions
2.2.1 New Item
NONE
2.2.2 Returning Item
NONE

3. Document Actions

3.1 WG Submissions
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.1.1 New Item
  o draft-ietf-behave-stun-test-vectors-03.txt
    Test vectors for STUN (Informational) - 1 of 2 
    Token: Magnus Westerlund
  o draft-ietf-idr-as-documentation-reservation-00.txt
    AS Number Reservation for Documentation Use (Informational) - 2 of 2

    Token: David Ward

3.1.2 Returning Item
NONE

3.2 Individual Submissions Via AD
	Reviews should focus on these questions: "Is this document a
reasonable
	contribution to the area of Internet engineering which it
covers? If
	not, what changes would make it so?"

3.2.1 New Item
  o draft-narten-successful-bof-03.txt
    Considerations for Having a Successful BOF (Informational) - 1 of 2 
    Token: Russ Housley
  o draft-rescorla-tls-suiteb-09.txt
    Suite B Profile for Transport Layer Security (TLS) (Informational) -
2
of 2 
    Token: Tim Polk

3.2.2 Returning Item
NONE
3.3 Independent Submissions Via RFC Editor
	The IESG will use RFC 3932 responses: 1) The IESG has not
	found any conflict between this document and IETF work; 2) The
	IESG thinks that this work is related to IETF work done in WG
	<X>, but this does not prevent publishing; 3) The IESG thinks
	that publication is harmful to work in WG <X> and recommends
	not publishing at this time; 4) The IESG thinks that this
	document violates the IETF procedures for <X> and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
	approval; 5) The IESG thinks that this document extends an
	IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should
	therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG
approval.

	The document shepherd must propose one of these responses in
	the Data Tracker note and supply complete text in the IESG
	Note portion of the write-up. The Area Director ballot positions
	indicate consensus with the response proposed by the
	document shepherd.

	Other matters may be recorded in comments, and the comments will
	be passed on to the RFC Editor as community review of the
document.

3.3.1 New Item
NONE
3.3.2 Returning Item
NONE

4. Working Group Actions
4.1 WG Creation
4.1.1 Proposed for IETF Review
    NONE
4.1.2 Proposed for Approval
  o Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto) - 1 of 2
    Token: Lisa Dusseault
  o Low Extra Delay Background Transport (ledbat) - 2 of 2
    Token: Lars Eggert
4.2 WG Rechartering
4.2.1 Under evaluation for IETF Review
    NONE
4.2.2 Proposed for Approval
  o Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) - 1 of 2
    Token: Magnus Westerlund
  o Mobility for IP: Performance, Signaling and Handoff Optimization
(mipshop) - 2 of 2
    Token: Jari Arkko

_______________________________________________
dns-dir mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-dir