Subject: Re: DNSEXT WGLC: DNSSEC Roadmap

From: Erik Nordmark <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:19:05 -0800 (PST)

> As no RFC can refer to Internet Drafts, it would be hard to progress this
> document to an RFC.  IMHO, this is a worthy document whose time has not
> come - in its present scope.

To be exact there are two issues here:
1. A standards track document can't have normative references (i.e. things
   an implementor would need to read) to internet drafts.
2. Any remaining references to I-Ds will have the internet draft name
   replaced by "works in progress".

Thus for a roadmap it might make sense to
have references to works in progress; it is up to the WG to
decide.

  Erik

to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.