Subject: Re: ISSUE 1: IPR was Re: Section 5.2 (IPR encumberance) in TAK rollover requirement draft

From: Alex Bligh <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:04:29 +0000

--On 07 March 2006 18:49 +0000 Paul Vixie <[email-masked]> wrote:

> and here's my answer.  count me as (b).  argumentation as above.  patch
> is:

I think Paul has it right. So count me as (b) with his patch too.

Alex

--
to unsubscribe send a message to [email-masked] with
the word 'unsubscribe' in a single line as the message text body.
archive: <http://ops.ietf.org/lists/namedroppers/>