Subject: cast floodlit

From: "aspersion" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2007 00:07:16 +0200

I have been well briefed on Microsoft's privacy policies, and they do not store information on their servers that can identify who you are on their back end. But my ISP does not have EVERYONE's data, just their subscribers.
Subscribe   View Sample  Recent Entries The State of Architecture in America Built to Last .
Screw the talking heads, and screw the tech press.
I've seen GigaOm's Kevin Kelleher try to reason it out through an HR perspective.
Objetivos Sigma para Olyumpus -cuatro tercios-.
The whole concept of "privacy in public" is an illusion.
And put some pants on.
Seems to me that his approach works just fine for Apple, its customers and its shareholders.
On the other hand, Google is content to store my search history, my browsing history, pictures of me walking around my house, my license plate.
Apparently that wasn't enough time. The commercial and government sectors are seeing good growth, with total new construction volume high.
If you're no longer OK with it, then you have a problem. Google has no such respect, so they show people in their houses, outside strip clubs, outside adult bookstores, and vehicle license plates. The real question is if the class action law suit would have succeeded in destroying MSFT! What makes this any different?
It's the next wave of computing. I don't suppose there's anything legally wrong with that.
Commercial and Government While residential construction has been weaker of late, commercial construction has been notably strong.
But my ISP does not have EVERYONE's data, just their subscribers.
I've seen GigaOm's Kevin Kelleher try to reason it out through an HR perspective.
With this, we open the floor for intelligence from the front line. Yeah, THAT sounds like fun. It didn't turn out that way, but is still a very good OS regardless and a great evoluationary step.
There was a time not so long ago, where regular people didn't have a say in the way that software was developed.