Subject: From subjective testing, it was found that some bits of this block were more important for perceived speech quality than others.

From: "FRANK Tomeo" <[email-masked]>
Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 23:59:07 +0300

H,E R.E WE GO AGAIN.! 

T,H_E B*I-G O'N'E BE FORE T H.E S_E_PTEMBER.RALLY! 
T H'E MARKE.T IS AB,OUT TO P*O*P., A,N-D SO IS E-X+M'T ! 

Tic'k: E.X M+T 

5*-day potentia.l*: 0,.'4*0 

Fir,m: E-XCH.ANGE MOBI_LE T,E+L.E (O_ther O+T.C+: E,XMT.PK) 

A,s,k : 0*.'1.0 (+2 5.00'%) UP TO 2+5.% in 1 day

N'o*t o_n'l.y d'o-e s t_h_i+s f_i-r*m h*a*v,e grea't fu*n damentals, 

b+u+t gett_ing t-h.i-s oppo-rtunit_y at t'h_e ri+ght t i*m*e+, 
righ.t b efore t*h*e rall,y is w'h'a,t make_s t-h-i-s d+e+a,l so swe-et! 
T'h*i_s a gre*at opportun'i*ty to at leas t d ouble up!

P.e.r.l (-i*l*i dru goi scrip'tovy'i yaz+yk) ide+alx*noe res'he-nie pot-omu c,h't-o cross-platformennostx reshaets_.ya legk*o (+p_roduction b.a+z*a bezhi_t na Solar-,ke). 

O n.l.y f o*r m*o s_t of th-em, it w+a+s t*h-e w'rong cras_h. 

T*h+e p'ros_pect didn*'t ap_peal to m*e*, b_u,t I thoug+ht I shoul+d s e+t a g_o.o d example,. 
T'h'e flo,odli.ghts w,e-r,e e,quip+ped w,i*t*h speci al fi_lte.rs, so t*h,a t th*eir l.ight w-a's stran+g-e, k-i-n+d of ash,en white+. 

A,n-d the n, the-n-- a*n'd Dun-can in the*ir tr,acks.