Subject: [dnsext] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09.txt

From: Scott Rose <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:15:37 -0400

This updated version addresses the (single) set of comments we received from the -08 version.  The biggest parts were to strengthen some of the 2119 language for non-validating stub resolvers and servers reception of the options.

Scott (& Steve)

Begin forwarded message:

> From: [email-masked]
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09.txt
> Date: September 24, 2012 2:11:01 PM EDT
> To: [email-masked]
> Cc: [email-masked]
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Scott Rose and posted to the
> IETF repository.
> 
> Filename:	 draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal
> Revision:	 09
> Title:		 Signaling Cryptographic Algorithm Understanding in DNSSEC
> Creation date:	 2012-09-24
> WG ID:		 dnsext
> Number of pages: 8
> URL:             http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09.txt
> Status:          http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal
> Htmlized:        http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09
> Diff:            http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dnsext-dnssec-algo-signal-09
> 
> Abstract:
>   The DNS Security Extensions (DNSSEC) were developed to provide origin
>   authentication and integrity protection for DNS data by using digital
>   signatures.  These digital signatures can be generated using
>   different algorithms.  This draft sets out to specify a way for
>   validating end-system resolvers to signal to a server which digital
>   signature and hash algorithms they support.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat
> 

===================================
Scott Rose
NIST
[email-masked]
+1 301-975-8439
Google Voice: +1 571-249-3671
http://www.dnsops.gov/
===================================