Subject: [dnssd] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-05: (with COMMENT)

From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 02 Mar 2020 02:06:07 -0800

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnssd-prireq/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

nit sec 2:
"on-link  An on-link attacker is [...]; thus, the external attacker
      is in the same multicast domain."
s/external attacker/on-link attacker/

I agree with Barry that at least RFC6763 and RFC7558 should be normative references.

Also thanks for the quick reply to the TSV-ART review (and thanks Tommy for the review!)!