From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Thu Aug 15 07:41:54 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123B321E80AD; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:41:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.339 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.339 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.261, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id thAuUhGUHAD1; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:41:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9623511E8152; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:41:47 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.70.p1 Sender: Message-ID: <20130815144121.15477.78141.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:41:21 -0700 Cc: domainrep@ietf.org Subject: [domainrep] Last Call: (A Reputation Query Protocol) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:41:54 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Reputation Services WG (repute) to consider the following document: - 'A Reputation Query Protocol' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-08-29. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document defines a mechanism to conduct queries for reputation information over the Hypertext Transfer Protocol using JSON as the payload meta-format. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-query-http/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-query-http/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Thu Aug 15 07:45:01 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B93021F9D2E; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:45:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.366 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.366 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.234, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UV61cUhuWaLO; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:44:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2ED021E80AF; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:43:48 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.70.p1 Sender: Message-ID: <20130815144348.25999.91573.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:43:48 -0700 Cc: domainrep@ietf.org Subject: [domainrep] Last Call: (A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:45:01 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Reputation Services WG (repute) to consider the following document: - 'A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-08-29. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document defines a response set for describing assertions a reputation service provider can make about email identifers, for use in generating reputons. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Thu Aug 15 07:45:24 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065DA11E8141; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:45:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.389 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.389 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.211, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UHh5hgPJMSyt; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:45:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172DB11E8163; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:44:25 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.70.p1 Sender: Message-ID: <20130815144419.712.35650.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:44:19 -0700 Cc: domainrep@ietf.org Subject: [domainrep] Last Call: (A Media Type for Reputation Interchange) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:45:24 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Reputation Services WG (repute) to consider the following document: - 'A Media Type for Reputation Interchange' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-08-29. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document defines the format of reputation response data ("reputons"), the media-type for packaging it, and definition of a registry for the names of reputation applications and response sets. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-media-type/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-media-type/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Thu Aug 15 07:46:09 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D8F21E8172; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:46:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.407 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.193, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lTy6C2bwgihX; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:46:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB2A21F9AA2; Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:45:07 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.70.p1 Sender: Message-ID: <20130815144507.22504.36661.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 07:45:07 -0700 Cc: domainrep@ietf.org Subject: [domainrep] Last Call: (A Model for Reputation Reporting) to Informational RFC X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 14:46:09 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Reputation Services WG (repute) to consider the following document: - 'A Model for Reputation Reporting' as Informational RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-08-29. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. Abstract This document describes a general architecture for a reputation-based service and a model for requesting reputation-related data over the Internet, where "reputation" refers to predictions or expectations about an entity or an identifier such as a domain name. The document roughly follows the recommendations of RFC4101 for describing a protocol model. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-model/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-model/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From sm@resistor.net Wed Aug 21 00:55:48 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81C9D11E81E6 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.504 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.504 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.095, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o9I53taly235 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5E0611E81DC for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7L7tWfE027358; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377071744; bh=Td65R9MWqsqIAAZ/IOAt3V8UaaQtMuRXQXQ+T3MxBTs=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=rFIRAQ7jkfb0cjYTG2j1bgw1i40WM8DVbtIOus8Qe/8dEXn0qiYcBYcWGjAaFeGDM 30XGAfS9HWt1JoQZ7KqbavT7bXB9tSUGgsNPQ3j5G9KpVnltGj+kvMb3LbKgClEd1L 5VP32ZBKG5KM2mW0luewD3Jtwppxp69Xeyl/S9qA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1377071744; i=@resistor.net; bh=Td65R9MWqsqIAAZ/IOAt3V8UaaQtMuRXQXQ+T3MxBTs=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=VmWBvJwgArAiYA94oP7ZsDIZwLVOM7T+Z4lyMv7/VTFfQiqsUvpaWM6ua6oqDQ/6E dzIkOX3f1YJ0YO/lduRHJLKh5ZAAcfVJatPw5Ud3fv/lr7jQqU5vXhEUPP6Wc6iqFP tU1ZVC43UXzgCL2Y+HMCZkGnJSJoVi4TGCIR7Pks= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130821004354.0ba0e050@resistor.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:45:56 -0700 To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" From: SM In-Reply-To: References: <20130815144348.25999.91573.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130815101412.0b86a108@resistor.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: domainrep@ietf.org Subject: Re: [domainrep] Last Call: (A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:55:48 -0000 Hi Murray, At 23:58 20-08-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >I left the reference to RFC4408 as is because I was unclear on the >timing of the processing of this document versus RFC4408bis. I'm >fine with making that change if Pete thinks it's the right choice at >this point. Ok. >It may not need that status given some of the material that was >originally here has been moved to the other WG documents. I'll >defer to the chairs or the AD on that one. Ok. Regards, -sm From sm@resistor.net Wed Aug 21 00:56:05 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E938211E81DC for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:56:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.507 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.092, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PWSpcE8LjSk6 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC4E11E81BD for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7L7tWfG027358; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:55:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377071747; bh=yHUhqBdGHwlzI1jfdvyCnUQAEOMAYJheScZuK3vQQ3I=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=Q1yQfdsfhkTyQR3w/VeWwwppWZsKmOqiYSJLQX9PbDzFlxdYvyICKpLv3LoEZZXog VVx9PE0JUXsP9Xw4NOYkzB09Af5d68CvCDDEAEDOywJVv9WdJ4y6s+LTDh48Sm2Xn4 hG70zdcKfhCtCY3cKbBQ7i1MtxZakW0qdH5UNBqg= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1377071747; i=@resistor.net; bh=yHUhqBdGHwlzI1jfdvyCnUQAEOMAYJheScZuK3vQQ3I=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=TwcoW41eTBzfCHIdpQs4OyoFGRfBHrKTbWXhYKFuqpOUQ1GwwIXui56UMmCpnyo3w bdGsobsVh3bSG1rIWDbv/+GOfYIUYrBoTUMf6Fd4O+10I6E12/1JjgY44FCO9FVWt+ RhV2ky6cHRkMdJ2cVosmGPN1bRWuMRSrUwfCeEaQ= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130821005143.0b98d050@resistor.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:52:32 -0700 To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" From: SM In-Reply-To: References: <20130815144507.22504.36661.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130815104802.0b87f9b0@resistor.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: domainrep@ietf.org Subject: Re: [domainrep] Last Call: (A Model for Reputation Reporting) to Informational RFC X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:56:05 -0000 Hi Murray, At 00:17 21-08-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >Sure, mentioning something about the stored aggregated data also >makes sense in Section 8. I'll add something. [snip] >Reputations can certainly be private things, both as an aggregate >"result" and as the pieces of data that allowed that result to be >reached. But I don't think that's a new point given the above. The >new text will cover it. Ok. Regards, -sm From internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue Aug 27 07:32:30 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C31711E8361; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:32:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.567 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.567 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id k0ixySTtbctN; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:32:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4A611E8161; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:32:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.70.p1 Message-ID: <20130827143229.8650.90859.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:32:29 -0700 Cc: domainrep@ietf.org Subject: [domainrep] I-D Action: draft-ietf-repute-model-08.txt X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:32:30 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Reputation Services Working Group of the = IETF. Title : A Model for Reputation Reporting Author(s) : Nathaniel Borenstein Murray S. Kucherawy Andrew Sullivan Filename : draft-ietf-repute-model-08.txt Pages : 13 Date : 2013-08-27 Abstract: This document describes a general architecture for a reputation-based service and a model for requesting reputation-related data over the Internet, where "reputation" refers to predictions or expectations about an entity or an identifier such as a domain name. The document roughly follows the recommendations of RFC4101 for describing a protocol model. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-model There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-repute-model-08 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-repute-model-08 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From superuser@gmail.com Tue Aug 27 07:35:37 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B009511E8345 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:35:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.443 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.443 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.156, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hmrAEFi3TToA for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:35:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32AA11E8353 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:35:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id ey11so2164163wid.12 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:35:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=bFFFCwltoh0OgzNCqzkHTFdvp/MDI3oMQ2K7axCQT4s=; b=pVLg1Y7DX8hRkRlVEqd0/WfWTgfEwfHfSvrd+oKotCdWQXU0aRXsPEYbC48PnPWHPa 1Kya8IEKj/6g9PISGNEc/tXtGDDzViK9mQP9Dki3BrOwYsJnjzDP7t1gtvZXTZ/3F3My STugK6iiiFhrtEMnxr+jOC2Q2cBPOOkugvjxVNuqkTcviy3zGb8zdzi0GvkVCyJ0MsRm osnzJKAbRq6dIhjJCNdUQ5+nP4Jr9JrEToWZRL+rGIf+e8kOGk6AR1kp9mpOREADE7WP xje8L6+KrBcpmGM9zgUBdANXcB5JG1l4+kvul7f2UgPa9xSTQ0y4MTH560+ekw0RQSlA jXGA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.183.51 with SMTP id ej19mr11844321wic.60.1377614132585; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:35:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.75.144 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:35:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130827143229.8650.90859.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> References: <20130827143229.8650.90859.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 07:35:32 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" To: "domainrep@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2409e02ab5a04e4eec916 Subject: Re: [domainrep] I-D Action: draft-ietf-repute-model-08.txt X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:35:37 -0000 --001a11c2409e02ab5a04e4eec916 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Some minor LC feedback, and more importantly changes state to Proposed Standard as suggested during LC. A revised IETF LC will be issued today. -MSK On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:32 AM, wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Reputation Services Working Group of the > IETF. > > Title : A Model for Reputation Reporting > Author(s) : Nathaniel Borenstein > Murray S. Kucherawy > Andrew Sullivan > Filename : draft-ietf-repute-model-08.txt > Pages : 13 > Date : 2013-08-27 > > Abstract: > This document describes a general architecture for a reputation-based > service and a model for requesting reputation-related data over the > Internet, where "reputation" refers to predictions or expectations > about an entity or an identifier such as a domain name. The document > roughly follows the recommendations of RFC4101 for describing a > protocol model. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-model > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-repute-model-08 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-repute-model-08 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > domainrep mailing list > domainrep@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep > --001a11c2409e02ab5a04e4eec916 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Some minor LC feedback, and more importantly changes = state to Proposed Standard as suggested during LC.=A0 A revised IETF LC wil= l be issued today.

-MSK

On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 7:32 AM, <inter= net-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies.
=A0This draft is a work item of the Reputation Services Working Group of th= e IETF.

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Title =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 : A Model for Reputation Reportin= g
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Author(s) =A0 =A0 =A0 : Nathaniel Borenstein
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Murray S. Kucherawy
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Andrew Sullivan
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Filename =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: draft-ietf-repute-model-08.txt =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Pages =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 : 13
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Date =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: 2013-08-27

Abstract:
=A0 =A0This document describes a general architecture for a reputation-base= d
=A0 =A0service and a model for requesting reputation-related data over the<= br> =A0 =A0Internet, where "reputation" refers to predictions or expe= ctations
=A0 =A0about an entity or an identifier such as a domain name. =A0The docum= ent
=A0 =A0roughly follows the recommendations of RFC4101 for describing a
=A0 =A0protocol model.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-model
There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-repute-model-08

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-repute-model= -08


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp= .ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
domainrep mailing list
domainrep@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/domainrep

--001a11c2409e02ab5a04e4eec916-- From iesg-secretary@ietf.org Tue Aug 27 08:33:02 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79BD011E8379; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:33:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.481 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.119, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZoAYKlmcHNTs; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:33:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709C211E836A; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:32:44 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: The IESG To: IETF-Announce X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.70.p1 Sender: Message-ID: <20130827153244.1329.64539.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:32:44 -0700 Cc: domainrep@ietf.org Subject: [domainrep] Last Call: (A Model for Reputation Reporting) to Proposed Standard X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list Reply-To: ietf@ietf.org List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:33:02 -0000 The IESG has received a request from the Reputation Services WG (repute) to consider the following document: - 'A Model for Reputation Reporting' as Proposed Standard The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the ietf@ietf.org mailing lists by 2013-09-10. Exceptionally, comments may be sent to iesg@ietf.org instead. In either case, please retain the beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. This is a new Last Call on this document. It was previously in Last Call for Informational, but after some Last Call comments, the WG decided that it would be more appropriate on the standards track. The due date has been extended accordingly. Abstract This document describes a general architecture for a reputation-based service and a model for requesting reputation-related data over the Internet, where "reputation" refers to predictions or expectations about an entity or an identifier such as a domain name. The document roughly follows the recommendations of RFC4101 for describing a protocol model. The file can be obtained via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-model/ IESG discussion can be tracked via http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-model/ballot/ No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D. From sm@resistor.net Tue Aug 27 12:38:25 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9956E11E8175 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:38:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.513 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.513 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.086, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QX1yQz66gZ8V for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:38:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E1D21F9A90 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:38:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7RJc9EE006096; Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:38:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377632293; bh=L0pTAh7uS/SaKus5kY2igJ9AQXy51D4Q2PH6S2LotII=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=N23afPPoojotHm2nyWlZb8ZyN8kYJcOfMxhOpceGcz7nK8Qsv2H04JVWnZ3gYzTf9 A6ki+Xir0zI7j8jcWlbbWbAfOMCStFez8HfDmUwf7hMsCTH9EzFrLlgc2ioZ80IM7y UirAUGMZRQJWjMcsS40jI/C0ee6HgYPf/kVuftHc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1377632293; i=@resistor.net; bh=L0pTAh7uS/SaKus5kY2igJ9AQXy51D4Q2PH6S2LotII=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=tXg9iQwXkrfwNacywozLHqNSDct3dso3VIdJLTEcOdpSNaug/dlVBMYGAIwEzfYUX y8i7WhAZGj5fl/sYOCM3c9LryF+tKZ3KxvGOWsXkezEL4OvjSl1zPfaU75DgENd7w/ w/xj716RO0sbXC9kuggRPkYko5aETmYMcC5m4jDI= Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130827123553.0d270df0@resistor.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 12:37:38 -0700 To: "Murray S. Kucherawy" From: SM In-Reply-To: References: <20130827143229.8650.90859.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Cc: domainrep@ietf.org Subject: Re: [domainrep] I-D Action: draft-ietf-repute-model-08.txt X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:38:26 -0000 Hi Murray, At 07:35 27-08-2013, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >Some minor LC feedback, and more importantly changes state to >Proposed Standard as suggested during LC. A revised IETF LC will be >issued today. Please note that I was not suggesting the change to Proposed Standard. I clarified my comment in the off-list message. Regards, -sm From internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu Aug 29 11:49:35 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5524921E80CE; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:49:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.55 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2+Y6EN1nRvx5; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:49:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8285221E80CA; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:49:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.70.p1 Message-ID: <20130829184929.12269.691.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:49:29 -0700 Cc: domainrep@ietf.org Subject: [domainrep] I-D Action: draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-09.txt X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:49:35 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Reputation Services Working Group of the = IETF. Title : A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers Author(s) : Nathaniel Borenstein Murray S. Kucherawy Filename : draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-09.txt Pages : 8 Date : 2013-08-29 Abstract: This document defines a response set for describing assertions a reputation service provider can make about email identifers, for use in generating reputons. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-09 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-09 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu Aug 29 11:52:00 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9541611E814C; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:52:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.551 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.049, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kBuKN6US2ml5; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:51:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CEF21F9CBF; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:51:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.70.p1 Message-ID: <20130829185159.25935.20339.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:51:59 -0700 Cc: domainrep@ietf.org Subject: [domainrep] I-D Action: draft-ietf-repute-media-type-11.txt X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:52:01 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Reputation Services Working Group of the = IETF. Title : A Media Type for Reputation Interchange Author(s) : Nathaniel Borenstein Murray S. Kucherawy Filename : draft-ietf-repute-media-type-11.txt Pages : 15 Date : 2013-08-29 Abstract: This document defines the format of reputation response data ("reputons"), the media-type for packaging it, and definition of a registry for the names of reputation applications and response sets. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-media-type There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-repute-media-type-11 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-repute-media-type-11 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From internet-drafts@ietf.org Thu Aug 29 11:54:25 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BCD11E8153; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:54:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -102.551 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.049, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NHHhxj5rd1nU; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:54:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0FC411E8139; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:54:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: internet-drafts@ietf.org To: i-d-announce@ietf.org X-Test-IDTracker: no X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.70.p1 Message-ID: <20130829185423.3316.46699.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 11:54:23 -0700 Cc: domainrep@ietf.org Subject: [domainrep] I-D Action: draft-ietf-repute-query-http-10.txt X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:54:25 -0000 A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies. This draft is a work item of the Reputation Services Working Group of the = IETF. Title : A Reputation Query Protocol Author(s) : Nathaniel Borenstein Murray S. Kucherawy Filename : draft-ietf-repute-query-http-10.txt Pages : 8 Date : 2013-08-29 Abstract: This document defines a mechanism to conduct queries for reputation information over the Hypertext Transfer Protocol using JSON as the payload meta-format. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-query-http There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-repute-query-http-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-repute-query-http-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ From superuser@gmail.com Thu Aug 29 12:04:48 2013 Return-Path: X-Original-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: domainrep@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C51821E8091 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:04:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.463 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.463 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.136, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hqiDr+MaXlEK for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-x231.google.com (mail-wi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5DA21E8053 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:04:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hi5so926550wib.4 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:04:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=UK1X6iCcKDFjgLv0/DLnR5ZWTUjHff53mv5LBZfVYvg=; b=d4h4OZlZeTOjnM4Tml/GBlWYwgPKOSRQh/9DtCbLxmPq7PQgvLjrbgOdrNWCssHtWe U2UJDzGdAAqCFDevfcv2Wl/CDnuP+Techfy9tYZ65QupOJkrSn0ulOct8jtJ+NuWrTPs EBZ4CG/GltI54Qxgv3MO9vzCfrZxQgnZ/Zu1igR0MeeJJDNRHO5G3vn0gcwL/45Fp1AB mU9UDQQXdY2ilunm9OegynNNkivli3Z9ahZ+342ASGiKzqhDU+FZM49jRcH/ocGdk6QH KQ7lmgVgdSsgpcWW8TL4/zOC625NCu0Kho4MLXcdlDX2ArWifysZqGjKPw/UxYebGHFi nElg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.184.107 with SMTP id et11mr16240715wic.60.1377803084715; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:04:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.75.144 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:04:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130829184929.12269.691.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> References: <20130829184929.12269.691.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:04:44 -0700 Message-ID: From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" To: "domainrep@ietf.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c227ee6f5d8404e51ac7f6 Subject: Re: [domainrep] I-D Action: draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-09.txt X-BeenThere: domainrep@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Domain Reputation discussion list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:04:48 -0000 --001a11c227ee6f5d8404e51ac7f6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 This and the other two just take into account minor corrections raised during IETF Last Call, which has now closed. The next step for all four is the IESG telechat on 9/12. -MSK On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:49 AM, wrote: > > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > This draft is a work item of the Reputation Services Working Group of the > IETF. > > Title : A Reputation Response Set for Email Identifiers > Author(s) : Nathaniel Borenstein > Murray S. Kucherawy > Filename : draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-09.txt > Pages : 8 > Date : 2013-08-29 > > Abstract: > This document defines a response set for describing assertions a > reputation service provider can make about email identifers, for use > in generating reputons. > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers > > There's also a htmlized version available at: > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-09 > > A diff from the previous version is available at: > http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-repute-email-identifiers-09 > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ > > _______________________________________________ > I-D-Announce mailing list > I-D-Announce@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > --001a11c227ee6f5d8404e51ac7f6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

This and the other two just take into = account minor corrections raised during IETF Last Call, which has now close= d.=A0 The next step for all four is the IESG telechat on 9/12.

-MSK


On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 11:49 AM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org&g= t; wrote:

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts director= ies.
=A0This draft is a work item of the Reputation Services Working Group of th= e IETF.

=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Title =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 : A Reputation Response Set for E= mail Identifiers
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Author(s) =A0 =A0 =A0 : Nathaniel Borenstein
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Murray S. Kucherawy
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Filename =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: draft-ietf-repute-email-identifie= rs-09.txt
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Pages =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 : 8
=A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Date =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0: 2013-08-29

Abstract:
=A0 =A0This document defines a response set for describing assertions a
=A0 =A0reputation service provider can make about email identifers, for use=
=A0 =A0in generating reputons.


The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-repute-= email-identifiers

There's also a htmlized version available at:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-repute-email-ide= ntifiers-09

A diff from the previous version is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-= repute-email-identifiers-09


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submissio= n
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
ftp://ftp= .ietf.org/internet-drafts/

_______________________________________________
I-D-Announce mailing list
I-D-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d= -announce
Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html
or = ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt

--001a11c227ee6f5d8404e51ac7f6--