Subject: [eap] issue 141

From: [email-masked] (Jari Arkko)
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 16:19:26 +0300

In general I agree with what has been
stated in http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/EAP/eapissues.html#Issue%20141
and support the proposed changes. However, I think the term "cryptographic
separation" should stay in the document, because the definition
is more precise than the suggested replacement.

Also, regardin the MSK and EMSK, should we instead
move the normative language to the main body, not
delete it completely?

--Jari