Subject: RE: [eap] Issue 180: SA Descriptions

From: "McCann, Stephen" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 09:21:41 +0100

Dorothy, Bernard,
	Indeed, perhaps the use of WPA within the description should
be avoided, as I understand it to be a WiFi Alliance TM.

I also agree with Dorothy, in that this is a very informative description
and very welcome to people (like myself) who are sometimes 'on the
edge' of these detailed discussions. Thanks.

Kind regards

Stephen

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dorothy Stanley [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2003 8:54 PM
> To: Bernard Aboba
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: Re: [eap] Issue 180: SA Descriptions
> 
> 
> Hi Bernard,
> 
> A very useful description.
> Comments below.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Dorothy
> 
> >1.4 A concrete example: WPA
> >
> >  
> >
> 1. The WPA/.11i naming in the example should probably be consistent, 
> pick one or the other. Or mention that both
> use the approach described.
> 
> >
> >   After phase 2, the parties protect the .11i frames with
> >   e.g. TKIP or CCMP (basically, encryption and MAC using the
> >   keys negotiated in phase 2, and sequence numbers for replay
> >   protection)
> >  
> >
> 2. " .11i frames"
> Change ".11i frames" to "IEEE 802.11 data frames". Today  
> management frames are not protected, though some might be in 
> the future. Or, 
> generalize with
> "IEEE 802.11 frames" .
> 
> >
> >To take a second example, 802.11i does not
> >      protect the SSID, so the peer (STA) and authenticator (AP)
> >      can have a different idea about what service is being
> >      provided.
> >
> 3.Pre-ceed "802.11" with IEEE.
> 
>
> ----------------
> Dorothy Stanley
> Agere Systems
> 2000 North Naperville Rd. 
> Naperville, IL 60566
> 630-979-1572 (Phone, Fax)
> 630-222-6753 (Cell)
_______________________________________________
eap mailing list
[email-masked]
http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap