Subject: [Ecrit] Fwd: AD review of draft-ietf-ecrit-dhc-lost-discovery

From: "Hannes Tschofenig" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:50:19 +0100

FYI

-------- Original-Nachricht --------
Datum: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:15:39 -0500
Von: "Peterson, Jon" <[email-masked]>
An: [email-masked]
CC: [email-masked]
Betreff: AD review of draft-ietf-ecrit-dhc-lost-discovery

This document is basically fine. Two non-blocking comments:

Section 1, Nit

   In order to interact with a LoST server, the LoST client finally
   needs to know its IP address.

I presume here that "finally" means... firstly? Also, because this document deals with DHCP, the "its" is ambiguous  - one could read it to signify the LoST client, not the LoST server (as I assume you intend).

The text currently in Section 5:

   A DHCPv4 client MAY request a LoST server domain name in an Parameter
   Request List option, as described in [RFC2131].

Probably belongs in Section 4.

- J

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit