Subject: Re: [eman] Comments to the requriment and energy-aware-mib draft

From: Benoit Claise <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 08:51:11 +0100

Petersen,

Thanks for your review
> Hi all,
> Here are some comments to the requriment and energy-aware-mib draft
> 1. requirement draft
> In section 1.1, it would be better if power saving policies can be further described.
Would you have specific requirements, in line with the charter, which 
needs to specified?
> In section 2, scenarios and target devices, should wireless devices also be included? 
>
> 2. energy-aware-mib draft
> In section 7, the definition of pmEntry is mainly ethernet based. Is it also applicable to non-eth ports?
No.
> In section 7, the pmImportance is Integer32 (1..100). But as in the descrption, maybe only 6 classes are needed. what about just define about 6-10 classes for this ranking? 
>
Shouldn't we prepare for the future?
The description is just an example.

Regards, Benoit.
> Best Regards,
> Petersen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eman mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman