Subject: Re: [eman] DRAFT EMAN minutes from IETF 80

From: "Mouli Chandramouli (moulchan)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 03:18:46 -0500

- Chris Verges (jabber):
	- On pmPowerIndex, this seems like a complex if/else-if/else
schema 
          that isn't structurally enforced in the MIB. What NMS or end
user 
          confusion might occur as a result of this?

Regarding this comment from WG meeting @ Prague - 

This point is explained in the DESCRIPTION clause of the pmPowerIndex
MIB object in the pmPowerTable
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-claise-energy-monitoring-mib-08  on how
this Index value is set/determined depending on which MIB is
implemented.  You can also look at Section 6. Discovery - which explains
in detail the discovery of the number of Power States on a device. 

Thanks
Mouli

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of
Benoit Claise (bclaise)
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 8:10 PM
To: eman mailing list
Subject: Re: [eman] DRAFT EMAN minutes from IETF 80

Dear all,

Editorial changes from Bill Mielke and Georgios Karagiannis inserted and

uploaded

Thanks and Regards, Bruce and Benoit
> Dear all
>
> Here are the draft minutes of our EMAN meeting.
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/80/minutes/eman.txt
>
> Please send me any corrections, changes, etc as soon as possible.
>
> Regards, Bruce and Benoit.
> _______________________________________________
> eman mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman

_______________________________________________
eman mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman