Subject: Re: [eman] Applicability Draft

From: Emmanuel Tychon <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 09:58:02 +0200

This is a good point Randy, thanks for the feedback.

We'll make sure this is clarified in the next release.

Regards,
Emmanuel

On 16 Aug 2011, at 05:02, Randy Turner wrote:

> 
> In section 2.1 of the recently published "EMAN Applicability Statement" (August 2011),  there appears to be a definition of "network devices" as "routers & switches". In subsequent drafts of EMAN documents, it seems to me that we would want to broaden the category from it's current definition.
> 
> For instance, in an enterprise or large campus network, networked imaging devices such as multi-function peripherals (high duty-cycle printer, copier, fax, scanner products) consume an order of magnitude more power than any switch or router (except maybe a "core" router in a Tier-1 POP), especially when fully engaged in a full-range of their functionality.
> 
> I also noticed that generic computing devices (servers, desktops, laptops, storage appliances, etc.) were not included as well. Are these devices considered out of scope?  
> 
> Apologies if I'm re-visiting previously agreed upon info.
> 
> Thanks!
> Randy
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eman mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/eman
>